Abstract
Beslenme her canlı için bir zorunluluktur. Bal arıları normal koşullarda besin madde ihtiyaçlarını doğal floral kaynaklardan karşılamaktadır. Yetersiz floral kaynakların olduğu durumlarda ise koloniler için ek besleme yapılması gereklidir. Bu çalışmada sonbahar döneminde eşit güçte hazırlanan kolonilere farklı protein diyetlerinin ve erken bahara kadar ihtiyaç duyulan karbonhidratın (şeker-su karışımı) verilmesiyle oluşan ek besleme modellerinin ekonomik analizi yapılmıştır. Besleme denemesi her grupta 8 koloni olacak şekilde 6 grup ve toplam 48 koloni üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Deneme grupları haşhaş poleni, pamucak poleni, karışık polen, arı keki, şurup ve kontrol olmak üzere altı farklı gruptan oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada deneme grupları için kovan başına üretim masrafları ortaya konulduktan sonra kovan başına arılı çerçeve değerlerinin üretim masraflarını karşılayıp karşılamadığına bakılmıştır. Kış öncesi, kış ve erken ilkbahar dönemlerinin sonuçları birlikte değerlendirildiğinde, haşhaş poleni ile yapılan beslemenin diğer besleme gruplarına göre biraz daha avantajlı olduğu söylenebilir. Haşhaş poleni ile yapılan beslemede kovan başına arılı çerçeve değerinin üretim masrafını karşılama oranları kış öncesinde %40,65, kış döneminde %102,98 ve erken ilkbahar döneminde %98,66 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Nisbi karlılık açısından haşhaş polenine en yakın olan protein diyeti pamucak polenidir. Diğer besleme gruplarında ise nisbi karlılık haşhaş ve pamucak poleni ile yapılan deneme grubundan daha düşük bulunmuştur.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
TARIM VE ORMAN BAKANLIĞI Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü
Project Number
TAGEM/HAYSÜD/B/20/A4/P5/1890
Thanks
Bu makale TC Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü tarafından desteklenen “BAL ARILARININ POLEN TERCİHLERİ VE KIŞLATMADA POLEN KULLANIMININ KOLONİ DİNAMİĞİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ” isimli projeden üretilmiştir. TARIM VE ORMAN BAKANLIĞI Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğüne ve Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü'ne desteklerinden dolayı teşekkür ederiz.
References
- Adanacıoglu, H., M. Kosoglu, G. Saner, E. Topal, B. Yucel. 2019. Economic feasibility of package beekeeping application in Turkey: A case study of Edirne province. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 25(5): 651-658.
- Aksoy, A., M.M. Sarı, and M. Terin. 2017. Economic structure of beekeeping sector in Erzurum Province. Türk Tarım Doğa Bilim. Derg. 4(4): 434-440.
- Akyol, E., H. Yeninar, N. Sahinler, and A. Guler A. 2006. The effects of additive feeding and feed additives before wintering on honey bee colony performances, wintering abilities and survival rates at the East Mediterranean region. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 9(4): 589-592.
- Aleskerova, Y., and V. Todosiichuk. 2021. Analysis of economic aspects of organic beekeeping production. Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal. 2(1): 1-9.
- Bianca, P.C., I. Marioara, and P.A. Aurora. 2011. Economic diagnosis of beekeeping in the North West region of Romania: a case study of Cluj County. Analele Universităţii din Oradea, Fascicula Ecotoxicologie, Zootehnie şi Tehnologii de Industrie alimentară. 10: 279-287.
- Bixby, M., K. Baylis, S.E. Hoover, R.W. Currie, A.P. Melathopoulos, S.F. Pernal, L.J. Foster, and M.M. Guarna. 2017. A bio-economic case study of Canadian honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies: Marker-assisted selection (MAS) in queen breeding affects beekeeper profits. J Econ Entomol. 110: 816-825.
- Blanc, S., F. Brun, G. Di Vita, and A. Mosso. 2018. Traditional beekeeping in rural areas: Profitability analysis and feasibility of pollination service. Qual. Access Success. 19: 72-79.
- Bryś, M.S., P. Skowronek, and A. Strachecka. 2021. Pollen diet-properties and impact on a bee colony. Insects. 12(9), 798: 1-9.
- Cejvanovic, F., Z. Grgic, A., Maksimovic, and D. Bicanic. 2011. Assumptions of economic model for sustainable productions of beekeeping in the Bosnia and Hercegovina. J. Agricultural Sci. Technol. 5(4): 481-485.
- Cengiz, M.M., and C. Dülger. 2018. Gezginci ve sabit arıcılık işletmelerinde kontrollü şartlarda yetiştirilen ana arılarla oluşturulan balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) kolonilerinin bazı fizyolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bil. Derg. 13(1): 19-27.
- Ceyhan, V., and S. Canan. 2017. Türkiye Arıcılarının koloni yönetim sistemleri itibariyle ekonomik performansı. Türk Tarım Doğa Bilim. Derg. 4(4): 516-522.
- Islam, N., R. Mahmood, G. Sarwar, S. Ahmad, and S. Abid. 2020. Development of pollen substitute diets for Apis mellifera ligustica colonies and their impact on brood development and honey production. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 33(2): 381-388.
- Jeločnik, M., B. Bekić, and J. Subić. 2013. Contribution margin in the mobile beekeeping on the territory of Pančevo city. Ekonomika. 59(2): 73-82.
- Koprivlenski, V., V. Dirimanova, and V. Agapieva. 2015. Economic analysis of state and development of beekeeping in Bulgaria. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 15(2): 167-170.
- Kumar, M., D.P. Abrol, D. Sharma, U.S. Vikram, and A.K.Singh. 2021. Impact of artificial diets on performance of Apis mellifera colonies during dearth periods. J Entomol Zool Stud. 9(3):404-409.
- Kumar, R., and O.P. Agrawal. 2014. Comparative performance of honeybee colonies fed with artificial diets in Gwalior & Panchkula region. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2(5):104-107.
- Leonhardt, S.D., N. Gallai, L.A. Garibaldi, M. Kuhlmann, and A.M. Klein. 2013. Economic gain, stability of pollination and bee diversity decrease from southern to northern Europe. Basic Appl. Ecol. 14: 461-471.
- Makri, P., P. Papanagiotou, and E. Papanagiotou. 2015. Efficiency and economic analysis of Greek beekeeping farms. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 21(3): 479-484.
- Paray, B.A., I. Kumari, Y.A. Hajam, B. Sharma, R. Kumar, M.F. Albeshr, M.A. Farah, and J.M. Khan. 2021. Honeybee nutrition and pollen substitutes: A review. Saudi J Biol Sci. 28(1):1167-1176.
- Pilati, L., and P. Fontana P. 2018. Sequencing the movements of honey bee colonies between the forage sites with the microeconomic model of the migratory beekeeper. pp. 1-20. In: R.E. Rebolledo Ranz (Ed). Apiculture, IntechOpen, London.
- Saner, G., S. Engindeniz, B. Tolon, and F. Cukur. 2004. The economic analysis of beekeeping enterprise in sustainable development: The case study of Turkey. Apiacta. 38: 342-351.
- Sihang, R.C., and M. Gupta. 2013. Testing the Effects of Some Pollen Substitute Diets on Colony Build up and Economics of Beekeeping with Apis mellifera L. J Entomol. 10(3): 120-135.
- Somerville, D. 2000. Honey bee nutrition and supplementary feeding. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/117494/honey-bee-nutrition-supplementary-feeding.pdf. (Accessed: 07.08.2022).
- Somerville, D. 2010. Wintering bees. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/331697/ Wintering-bees.pdf. (Accessed: 07.08.2022.
- Thrasyvoulou, A. 1998. Practical apiculture. Melissokomiki epitheorisi. Apicultural Review. Thessaloniki, Greece.
- Topal, E., B. Yücel, R. İvgin Tunca, and M. Kösoğlu. 2019. Bal arılarında beslemenin koloni dinamiği üzerine etkileri. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 9(4): 2398-2408.
- Ullah, A., M.F. Shahzad, I. Jamshaid, and M.S. Baloch. 2021. Nutritional effects of supplementary diets on brood development, biological activities and honey production of Apis mellifera L. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28(12): 6861-6868.
- Vaziritabar, S., and S.M. Esmaeilzade. 2016. Profitability and socio-economic analysis of beekeeping and honey production in Karaj state, Iran. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 4(4): 1341-1350.
- Vercelli, M., L. Croce, and T. Mancuso. 2020. An economic approach to assess the annual stock in beekeeping farms: The honey bee colony inventory tool. Sustainability. 12(21), 9258: 1-14.
- Vrabcová, P., and M. Hájek. 2020. The economic value of the ecosystem services of beekeeping in the Czech Republic. Sustainability. 12(23), 10179: 1-11.
- Zalilova, Z.A., A.G. Mannapov, M.T. Lukyanova, and V.A. Kovshov. 2021. Strategies of regional economic and sustainable development: The case of the beekeeping industry. pp. 855-862. In: A.V. Bogoviz (Ed.). The Challenge of Sustainability in Agricultural Systems, Springer, Cham.
Abstract
Nutrition is a requirement for the survival of every living organism. Under normal conditions, honeybees meet their nutritional needs from natural floral sources. In cases where there are insufficient floral resources, additional feeding is required for the colonies. In this study, economic analysis of supplementary feeding models formed by giving different protein diets and carbohydrate (sugar-water mixture) needed until early spring to colonies prepared with equal strength in the autumn period was performed. The feeding experiment was carried out on 6 groups with 8 colonies in each group and a total of 48 colonies. Experimental groups were as follows: Papaver somniforum pollen, Cistus creticus pollen, mixed pollen, bee cake, syrup, and control. In this study, after determining the production costs per hive for the experimental groups, it was analyzed whether the bee frame values per hive cover the production costs. It could be concluded that feeding with P. somniforum pollen is slightly more advantageous than other feeding groups when the results of the pre-winter, winter and early spring periods are evaluated together. The ratio of bee frame value per hive to cover the production cost was calculated as 40.65% before winter, 102.98% in winter and 98.66% in early spring for the feeding with P. somniforum pollen. In terms of relative profitability, the protein diet with the closest performance to P. somniforum pollen is C. creticus pollen. In other feeding groups, the relative profitability was found to be lower.
Project Number
TAGEM/HAYSÜD/B/20/A4/P5/1890
References
- Adanacıoglu, H., M. Kosoglu, G. Saner, E. Topal, B. Yucel. 2019. Economic feasibility of package beekeeping application in Turkey: A case study of Edirne province. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 25(5): 651-658.
- Aksoy, A., M.M. Sarı, and M. Terin. 2017. Economic structure of beekeeping sector in Erzurum Province. Türk Tarım Doğa Bilim. Derg. 4(4): 434-440.
- Akyol, E., H. Yeninar, N. Sahinler, and A. Guler A. 2006. The effects of additive feeding and feed additives before wintering on honey bee colony performances, wintering abilities and survival rates at the East Mediterranean region. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 9(4): 589-592.
- Aleskerova, Y., and V. Todosiichuk. 2021. Analysis of economic aspects of organic beekeeping production. Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal. 2(1): 1-9.
- Bianca, P.C., I. Marioara, and P.A. Aurora. 2011. Economic diagnosis of beekeeping in the North West region of Romania: a case study of Cluj County. Analele Universităţii din Oradea, Fascicula Ecotoxicologie, Zootehnie şi Tehnologii de Industrie alimentară. 10: 279-287.
- Bixby, M., K. Baylis, S.E. Hoover, R.W. Currie, A.P. Melathopoulos, S.F. Pernal, L.J. Foster, and M.M. Guarna. 2017. A bio-economic case study of Canadian honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies: Marker-assisted selection (MAS) in queen breeding affects beekeeper profits. J Econ Entomol. 110: 816-825.
- Blanc, S., F. Brun, G. Di Vita, and A. Mosso. 2018. Traditional beekeeping in rural areas: Profitability analysis and feasibility of pollination service. Qual. Access Success. 19: 72-79.
- Bryś, M.S., P. Skowronek, and A. Strachecka. 2021. Pollen diet-properties and impact on a bee colony. Insects. 12(9), 798: 1-9.
- Cejvanovic, F., Z. Grgic, A., Maksimovic, and D. Bicanic. 2011. Assumptions of economic model for sustainable productions of beekeeping in the Bosnia and Hercegovina. J. Agricultural Sci. Technol. 5(4): 481-485.
- Cengiz, M.M., and C. Dülger. 2018. Gezginci ve sabit arıcılık işletmelerinde kontrollü şartlarda yetiştirilen ana arılarla oluşturulan balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) kolonilerinin bazı fizyolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bil. Derg. 13(1): 19-27.
- Ceyhan, V., and S. Canan. 2017. Türkiye Arıcılarının koloni yönetim sistemleri itibariyle ekonomik performansı. Türk Tarım Doğa Bilim. Derg. 4(4): 516-522.
- Islam, N., R. Mahmood, G. Sarwar, S. Ahmad, and S. Abid. 2020. Development of pollen substitute diets for Apis mellifera ligustica colonies and their impact on brood development and honey production. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 33(2): 381-388.
- Jeločnik, M., B. Bekić, and J. Subić. 2013. Contribution margin in the mobile beekeeping on the territory of Pančevo city. Ekonomika. 59(2): 73-82.
- Koprivlenski, V., V. Dirimanova, and V. Agapieva. 2015. Economic analysis of state and development of beekeeping in Bulgaria. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 15(2): 167-170.
- Kumar, M., D.P. Abrol, D. Sharma, U.S. Vikram, and A.K.Singh. 2021. Impact of artificial diets on performance of Apis mellifera colonies during dearth periods. J Entomol Zool Stud. 9(3):404-409.
- Kumar, R., and O.P. Agrawal. 2014. Comparative performance of honeybee colonies fed with artificial diets in Gwalior & Panchkula region. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2(5):104-107.
- Leonhardt, S.D., N. Gallai, L.A. Garibaldi, M. Kuhlmann, and A.M. Klein. 2013. Economic gain, stability of pollination and bee diversity decrease from southern to northern Europe. Basic Appl. Ecol. 14: 461-471.
- Makri, P., P. Papanagiotou, and E. Papanagiotou. 2015. Efficiency and economic analysis of Greek beekeeping farms. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 21(3): 479-484.
- Paray, B.A., I. Kumari, Y.A. Hajam, B. Sharma, R. Kumar, M.F. Albeshr, M.A. Farah, and J.M. Khan. 2021. Honeybee nutrition and pollen substitutes: A review. Saudi J Biol Sci. 28(1):1167-1176.
- Pilati, L., and P. Fontana P. 2018. Sequencing the movements of honey bee colonies between the forage sites with the microeconomic model of the migratory beekeeper. pp. 1-20. In: R.E. Rebolledo Ranz (Ed). Apiculture, IntechOpen, London.
- Saner, G., S. Engindeniz, B. Tolon, and F. Cukur. 2004. The economic analysis of beekeeping enterprise in sustainable development: The case study of Turkey. Apiacta. 38: 342-351.
- Sihang, R.C., and M. Gupta. 2013. Testing the Effects of Some Pollen Substitute Diets on Colony Build up and Economics of Beekeeping with Apis mellifera L. J Entomol. 10(3): 120-135.
- Somerville, D. 2000. Honey bee nutrition and supplementary feeding. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/117494/honey-bee-nutrition-supplementary-feeding.pdf. (Accessed: 07.08.2022).
- Somerville, D. 2010. Wintering bees. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/331697/ Wintering-bees.pdf. (Accessed: 07.08.2022.
- Thrasyvoulou, A. 1998. Practical apiculture. Melissokomiki epitheorisi. Apicultural Review. Thessaloniki, Greece.
- Topal, E., B. Yücel, R. İvgin Tunca, and M. Kösoğlu. 2019. Bal arılarında beslemenin koloni dinamiği üzerine etkileri. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 9(4): 2398-2408.
- Ullah, A., M.F. Shahzad, I. Jamshaid, and M.S. Baloch. 2021. Nutritional effects of supplementary diets on brood development, biological activities and honey production of Apis mellifera L. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28(12): 6861-6868.
- Vaziritabar, S., and S.M. Esmaeilzade. 2016. Profitability and socio-economic analysis of beekeeping and honey production in Karaj state, Iran. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 4(4): 1341-1350.
- Vercelli, M., L. Croce, and T. Mancuso. 2020. An economic approach to assess the annual stock in beekeeping farms: The honey bee colony inventory tool. Sustainability. 12(21), 9258: 1-14.
- Vrabcová, P., and M. Hájek. 2020. The economic value of the ecosystem services of beekeeping in the Czech Republic. Sustainability. 12(23), 10179: 1-11.
- Zalilova, Z.A., A.G. Mannapov, M.T. Lukyanova, and V.A. Kovshov. 2021. Strategies of regional economic and sustainable development: The case of the beekeeping industry. pp. 855-862. In: A.V. Bogoviz (Ed.). The Challenge of Sustainability in Agricultural Systems, Springer, Cham.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Agricultural Engineering (Other) |
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Project Number | TAGEM/HAYSÜD/B/20/A4/P5/1890 |
| Publication Date | December 29, 2022 |
| Submission Date | September 13, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 32 Issue: 2 |
