BibTex RIS Cite

Bazı Ekmeklik Buğday Genotiplerinin Verim Stabilitelerinin Parametrik ve Parametrik Olmayan Metotlarla Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2015, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 22 - 31, 10.04.2016

Mehmet Şahin Aysun Göçmen Akçacık Seydi Aydoğan Sümerya Hamzaoğlu Enes Yakışır

Abstract

Bu çalışma 16 ekmeklik buğday çeşidi ve 2 adet ileri çıkmış hattın verim performanslarını ve stabilitelerini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bahri Dağdaş Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü merkez arazisinde 2009-2014 yetiştirme döneminde 6 çevrede, tesadüf blokları deneme deseninde, üç tekerrürlü olarak yetiştirilmiş 18 ekmeklik buğday genotipinin tane verimleri, 11 adet parametrik (bi, R2, S2di, Wi2, S2i, CVi, σi 2, P59, α, λi, Pi)stabilite parametresi, 5 adet parametrik olmayan stabilite parametresi (Si(1), Si(2),Si(6), TOP, RS) ile değerlendirilmiştir. Genotip x çevre interaksiyonu, stabilite metotları arasındaki korelasyon ve stabil çeşitler belirlenmiştir. İncelenen stabilite parametrelerine göre tane verimi yönünden G7, G8, G6, G17, G5 stabil genotiplerdir. G5 genotipi stabil fakat düşük verime sahip olmuştur. G13, G4, G12, G2 ve G11 ise yüksek verimli stabil olmayan genotipler olarak belirlenmiştir. Tane verimi ve bi, S2i, αi, Pi, Si(6), TOP, RS stabilite parameters arasında yüksek ve önemli korelasyon bulunmuştur

Keywords

Ekmeklik buğday verim parametrik parametrik olmayan stabilite ölçüleri

References

  • Akçura, M., Kaya, Y., Taner, S., Ayrancı, R. (2006). Parametric stability analyses for grain yield of durum wheat. Plant Soil Enviroment, 52 (6):254-261.
  • Akçura, M., Kara, R., Akaya, A., Dokuyucu, T., Kıllı, F. (2007). Parametric and Non-parametic Stability Analyses for Grain Yield of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes in Kahramanmaraş Conditions of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 12(1):8-20.
  • Becker, H. C. (1981). Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica, 30:835–840.
  • Eberhart, S. A., Russell, W. A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.
  • Finlay, K. W., Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:742-754.
  • Flores F., Moreno, M. T., Cubero, J. I. (1998). A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G ×E interaction. Fiel d Crops Res . , 56: 271–286.
  • Fox, P. N., Skovmand, B., Thompson, B. K., Braun, H. J., Cormier, R. (1990). Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica 47:57-64.
  • Francis, T. R., Kannenberg L. W. (1978). Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can J. Plant Sci 58:1029-1034.
  • Huehn, M. (1979). Beitrage zur erfassung der phanotypischen stabilitat. EDV Med. Biol 10:112-117.
  • Kahrıman, F., Egesel, C. Ö., Baytekin, H., Gül, M. K. (2010). Ekmeklik buğday çeşit seçiminde parametrik ve parametrik olmayan stabilite istatistiklerinin kullanımı. YYÜ Tar Bil Derg.(YYU J AGR SCI) 2010, 20(1):32-40.
  • Kang, M. S. (1988) A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding,stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res Comm 16:113-115.
  • Kang, M. S., Pham, H. N. (1991). Simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Agron.J: 83:161-165
  • Kaya, Y., Taner, S. (2003). Estimating Genotyping Ranks by Non-Parametric Stability analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Central Europian Agriculture, 47-54.
  • Ketata, H. Y., Yau, S. K., Nachit, M. (1989). Relative consistency performance across environments. International Symposium on Physiology and Breeding of Winter Cereals for stressed Mediterranean Environments, Montpellier.
  • Kılıç, H., Akçura, M., Aktaş H. (2010). Assessment of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in multi-environments. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj 38 (3) 2010, 271-279.
  • Lin, C. S., Binns, M. R. (1988). A method of analysing cultivar × location × year experiments: A new stability parameter. Theor Appl Genet 76:425-430.
  • Nassar, R., Huehn, M. (1987). Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: tests of significance for non- parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 43:45-53.
  • Plaisted, R. L., Peterson, L. C. A (1959). Technique for evaluating the ability of selections and yield consistency in different locations or seasons. Am Potato J 36:381-385.
  • Sabancı, C. O. (1997). Stabilite analizinde kullanılan yöntemler ve stabilite parametreleri. Anadolu, J. of AARI 7 (1), 75 – 90 Mara.
  • SAS Institute (1999). SAS/STAT user’s guide. 8. Version. SAInstitute Inc. Cary. NC.
  • Shukla, G. K. (1972). Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237-245.
  • Şahin, M., Aydoğan, S., Göçmen Akçacık, A. (2006). Bazı ekmeklik buğday çeşitlerinin Konya kuru koşullarında verim ve kalite yönüyle stabilite yeteneklerinin belirlenmesi Bahri Dağdaş Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü. Bitkisel Araştırma Dergisi 1 (3) S:17-23.
  • Şahin, M., Akçacık, A., Aydoğan, S. (2011). Bazı ekmeklik buğday genotiplerinin tane verimi ile kalite özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler ve stabilite yetenekleri. Anadolu J. of AARI 21(2),39-48
  • Teich, A. H. (1983). Genotype-Environment interaction variances in yield of winter wheat. Cereal Research Communication. 11: 15-20.
  • Tai, G. C. C. (1971). Genotypic stability analysis and its application to potato regional trials. Crop cience, 11:184–190.
  • Wricke, G. (1962). On a method of understanding the biological diversity in field research. Z. Pflanzenzucht 47:92-46.

Evaluation of Some of Bread Wheat Genotypes Yield Stability with Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods

Year 2015, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 22 - 31, 10.04.2016

Mehmet Şahin Aysun Göçmen Akçacık Seydi Aydoğan Sümerya Hamzaoğlu Enes Yakışır

Abstract

This study was made to evaluate to the yielding performance and stability of 16 bread wheat cultivars and 2 advanced lines. Grain yield of 18 bread wheat genotypes which were grown in a randomized complete block design with three replications in 6 environments from 2009 to 2014 growing seasons in Bahri Dagdas Agricultural Research Enstitute central location were evaluated with 11 parametric (bi, R2, S2di, Wi2, Si, CVi, σi 2, P, αi, λi, Pi ) stability parameter and 5 non-parametric (Si(1), Si(2),Si(6), TOP, RS )stability parameter. Genotype x environment interaction (GEI), correlation between the stability methods and stable varieties were determined. According to the examined stability parameters G7, G8, G6, G17, G5 were stable genotypes in terms of grain yield. G5 genotype were stable but low-yielding. G13, G4, G12, G2 and G11 were determined as high-yielding but unstable genotypes. High and significant correlation was found between grain yield and bi, S2i, αi, Pi, Si(6), TOP, RS stability statistics

Keywords

Bread wheat yield parametric nonparametric stability measures

References

  • Akçura, M., Kaya, Y., Taner, S., Ayrancı, R. (2006). Parametric stability analyses for grain yield of durum wheat. Plant Soil Enviroment, 52 (6):254-261.
  • Akçura, M., Kara, R., Akaya, A., Dokuyucu, T., Kıllı, F. (2007). Parametric and Non-parametic Stability Analyses for Grain Yield of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes in Kahramanmaraş Conditions of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 12(1):8-20.
  • Becker, H. C. (1981). Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica, 30:835–840.
  • Eberhart, S. A., Russell, W. A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.
  • Finlay, K. W., Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:742-754.
  • Flores F., Moreno, M. T., Cubero, J. I. (1998). A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G ×E interaction. Fiel d Crops Res . , 56: 271–286.
  • Fox, P. N., Skovmand, B., Thompson, B. K., Braun, H. J., Cormier, R. (1990). Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica 47:57-64.
  • Francis, T. R., Kannenberg L. W. (1978). Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can J. Plant Sci 58:1029-1034.
  • Huehn, M. (1979). Beitrage zur erfassung der phanotypischen stabilitat. EDV Med. Biol 10:112-117.
  • Kahrıman, F., Egesel, C. Ö., Baytekin, H., Gül, M. K. (2010). Ekmeklik buğday çeşit seçiminde parametrik ve parametrik olmayan stabilite istatistiklerinin kullanımı. YYÜ Tar Bil Derg.(YYU J AGR SCI) 2010, 20(1):32-40.
  • Kang, M. S. (1988) A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding,stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res Comm 16:113-115.
  • Kang, M. S., Pham, H. N. (1991). Simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Agron.J: 83:161-165
  • Kaya, Y., Taner, S. (2003). Estimating Genotyping Ranks by Non-Parametric Stability analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Central Europian Agriculture, 47-54.
  • Ketata, H. Y., Yau, S. K., Nachit, M. (1989). Relative consistency performance across environments. International Symposium on Physiology and Breeding of Winter Cereals for stressed Mediterranean Environments, Montpellier.
  • Kılıç, H., Akçura, M., Aktaş H. (2010). Assessment of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in multi-environments. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj 38 (3) 2010, 271-279.
  • Lin, C. S., Binns, M. R. (1988). A method of analysing cultivar × location × year experiments: A new stability parameter. Theor Appl Genet 76:425-430.
  • Nassar, R., Huehn, M. (1987). Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: tests of significance for non- parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 43:45-53.
  • Plaisted, R. L., Peterson, L. C. A (1959). Technique for evaluating the ability of selections and yield consistency in different locations or seasons. Am Potato J 36:381-385.
  • Sabancı, C. O. (1997). Stabilite analizinde kullanılan yöntemler ve stabilite parametreleri. Anadolu, J. of AARI 7 (1), 75 – 90 Mara.
  • SAS Institute (1999). SAS/STAT user’s guide. 8. Version. SAInstitute Inc. Cary. NC.
  • Shukla, G. K. (1972). Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237-245.
  • Şahin, M., Aydoğan, S., Göçmen Akçacık, A. (2006). Bazı ekmeklik buğday çeşitlerinin Konya kuru koşullarında verim ve kalite yönüyle stabilite yeteneklerinin belirlenmesi Bahri Dağdaş Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü. Bitkisel Araştırma Dergisi 1 (3) S:17-23.
  • Şahin, M., Akçacık, A., Aydoğan, S. (2011). Bazı ekmeklik buğday genotiplerinin tane verimi ile kalite özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler ve stabilite yetenekleri. Anadolu J. of AARI 21(2),39-48
  • Teich, A. H. (1983). Genotype-Environment interaction variances in yield of winter wheat. Cereal Research Communication. 11: 15-20.
  • Tai, G. C. C. (1971). Genotypic stability analysis and its application to potato regional trials. Crop cience, 11:184–190.
  • Wricke, G. (1962). On a method of understanding the biological diversity in field research. Z. Pflanzenzucht 47:92-46.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA72JH49NB
Journal Section Research
Authors

Mehmet Şahin This is me

Aysun Göçmen Akçacık This is me

Seydi Aydoğan

Sümerya Hamzaoğlu This is me

Enes Yakışır This is me

Publication Date April 10, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Şahin, M., Göçmen Akçacık, A., Aydoğan, S., Hamzaoğlu, S., et al. (2016). Bazı Ekmeklik Buğday Genotiplerinin Verim Stabilitelerinin Parametrik ve Parametrik Olmayan Metotlarla Değerlendirilmesi. Bahri Dağdaş Bitkisel Araştırma Dergisi, 4(2), 22-31.
 Download Cover Image