Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Analitik Hiyerarşi Metodu (AHP) kullanılarak Türkiye'de ki Alternatif Enerji Kaynakları Teknolojisi Programlarının Tercih Edilebilirlik Sıralaması

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 183 - 192, 31.12.2019

Abstract

Türkiye'deki Alternatif Enerji Kaynakları Teknolojisi Programları (AERTP'ler), enerji sektöründeki istihdam açığını kapatmaya yönelik önemli bir potansiyele sahip olan meslek okullarındaki çekici programlar arasındadır. Bu programların katılımcıları için, yabancı dil eğitimi, kampüs hayatı ve bir üniversitenin yaşam olanakları, teknolojik yatırımlar ve bir üniversitedeki öğrenci sayısı gibi katılımcıların tercihleri ​​ile ilgili programların bir listesini yapmak zorlu bir karardır. Alternatif Enerji Kaynakları Teknoloji Programlarının sayısının 2018-2019 ve 2019-2020 yılları arasında artmasına göre, bu çalışma aktif olarak faaliyet gösteren Alternatif Enerji Kaynakları Teknoloji Programlarının güncellenmiş  tercih edilebilme sıralamasını, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Analizlerinden  Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) yöntemini kullanarak gerçekleştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, yüz öğrenci ile yapılan uygulamalı bir anket, katılımcıların seçtikleri bir enerji programı seçiminde hangi tercihlerin olduğunu anlamak için sorular değerlendirildi. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki enerji programlarının tercih edilebilirlik sıralaması ile katılımcılara tutarlı seçimler yapma fırsatı sunmaktadır.


References

  • EPDK, “Elektrik Piyasası Sektör Raporu,” 2019. [Online] Availablehttps://www.epdk.org.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-23/elektrikaylik-sektor-raporlar. [Accessed: 10-Dec-2019]
  • OSYM, "Student Selection and Placement Center," 2019. [Online] Available https://www.osym.gov.tr. [Accessed: 12-Nov-2019]
  • M. Jesensek. "Why the rankings are important". Katedra (Maribor), 1(4), 6-7, 2006
  • B. Alma, E. Coşkun, and E. Övendireli, "University Ranking Systems and Proposal of a Theoretical Framework for Ranking of Turkish Universities: A Case of Management Departments". Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 128-138, 2016.
  • P. Leung. "Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) applications in fishery management". International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6(1-2), 96-110, 2005.
  • Ö. F. Ünal, “Performans Değerlemede Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) Uygulamaları”. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 37-55, 2012.
  • K. M. A. S. Al-Harbi, “Application of the AHP in project management”. International journal of project management, 19(1), 19-27, 2001.
  • T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, "How to make a decision. In Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process", Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 1-25, 2001.
  • M. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, “An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods”. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66, 2013.
  • YOK, “Yuksekogretim Program Atlası” 2019. [Online] Available https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/index.php. [Accessed: 12-July-2019]. OSYM, “2018 KPSS On Lisans Degerlendirme Raporu” 2019. [Online] Available https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2018/GENEL/onlisansdegrpweb21022019.pdf. [Accessed: 12-Oct-2019].
  • YOK, “Yuksekogretim Program Atlası” 2019. [Online] Available https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/index.php. [Accessed: 1-Nov-2019].
  • Python Software Foundation, Current Release Python 3.7.4 2019. Retrieved July 31, 2019, from https://www.python.org/
  • R. L. Keeney and A. Sicherman, “Assessing and analyzing preferences concerning multiple objectives: An interactive computer program”. Behavioral Science, 21(3), 173-182, 1976.
  • T. L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98, 2008
  • T. L. Saaty, and L. G. Vargas, Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process . Springer Science & Business Media. Vol. 175, 2012.
  • Sakarya University, SABIS, “Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” 2019. [Online] Available http://content.lms.sabis.sakarya.edu.tr/Uploads/49858/27314/week-10-ahp-analytical_hierarchy_process.pdf. [Accessed: 12-Dec-2019]

Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 183 - 192, 31.12.2019

Abstract

Alternative Energy
Resources Technology Programs (AERTPs) in Turkey are among the attractive
programs on vocational schools that has a significant potential to cover
employment gap in energy sector. For the participants of these programs, it is
a tough decision by making a consistent list of programs associated with participants’
preferences including foreign language education, campus life and living
facilities of a university, technological investments, and the number of
students in a university. According to increasing the number of Alternative
Energy Resources Technology Programs in between the terms of 2018-2019 and
2019-2020, this study intends to carry out an updated preferability ranking
actively operating in these energy programs using Analytic Hierarchy Process
(AHP) method of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Analysis. For that purpose, an
applied survey on a hundred students evaluated questions to understand what
preferences for selection an energy program the participants pick. As a
consequence, this study provides an opportunity for the participants to make
consistent choices with the help of preferability ranking of the energy
programs in Turkey. 

References

  • EPDK, “Elektrik Piyasası Sektör Raporu,” 2019. [Online] Availablehttps://www.epdk.org.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-23/elektrikaylik-sektor-raporlar. [Accessed: 10-Dec-2019]
  • OSYM, "Student Selection and Placement Center," 2019. [Online] Available https://www.osym.gov.tr. [Accessed: 12-Nov-2019]
  • M. Jesensek. "Why the rankings are important". Katedra (Maribor), 1(4), 6-7, 2006
  • B. Alma, E. Coşkun, and E. Övendireli, "University Ranking Systems and Proposal of a Theoretical Framework for Ranking of Turkish Universities: A Case of Management Departments". Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 128-138, 2016.
  • P. Leung. "Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) applications in fishery management". International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6(1-2), 96-110, 2005.
  • Ö. F. Ünal, “Performans Değerlemede Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) Uygulamaları”. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 37-55, 2012.
  • K. M. A. S. Al-Harbi, “Application of the AHP in project management”. International journal of project management, 19(1), 19-27, 2001.
  • T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, "How to make a decision. In Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process", Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 1-25, 2001.
  • M. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, “An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods”. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66, 2013.
  • YOK, “Yuksekogretim Program Atlası” 2019. [Online] Available https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/index.php. [Accessed: 12-July-2019]. OSYM, “2018 KPSS On Lisans Degerlendirme Raporu” 2019. [Online] Available https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2018/GENEL/onlisansdegrpweb21022019.pdf. [Accessed: 12-Oct-2019].
  • YOK, “Yuksekogretim Program Atlası” 2019. [Online] Available https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/index.php. [Accessed: 1-Nov-2019].
  • Python Software Foundation, Current Release Python 3.7.4 2019. Retrieved July 31, 2019, from https://www.python.org/
  • R. L. Keeney and A. Sicherman, “Assessing and analyzing preferences concerning multiple objectives: An interactive computer program”. Behavioral Science, 21(3), 173-182, 1976.
  • T. L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98, 2008
  • T. L. Saaty, and L. G. Vargas, Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process . Springer Science & Business Media. Vol. 175, 2012.
  • Sakarya University, SABIS, “Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” 2019. [Online] Available http://content.lms.sabis.sakarya.edu.tr/Uploads/49858/27314/week-10-ahp-analytical_hierarchy_process.pdf. [Accessed: 12-Dec-2019]
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Electrical Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Ahmet Teber 0000-0002-7361-2302

Ahmet Karakaş This is me 0000-0003-0993-5307

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Teber, A., & Karakaş, A. (2019). Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 183-192.
AMA Teber A, Karakaş A. Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. December 2019;2(2):183-192.
Chicago Teber, Ahmet, and Ahmet Karakaş. “Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method”. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 2, no. 2 (December 2019): 183-92.
EndNote Teber A, Karakaş A (December 1, 2019) Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 2 2 183–192.
IEEE A. Teber and A. Karakaş, “Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method”, Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 183–192, 2019.
ISNAD Teber, Ahmet - Karakaş, Ahmet. “Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method”. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 2/2 (December 2019), 183-192.
JAMA Teber A, Karakaş A. Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;2:183–192.
MLA Teber, Ahmet and Ahmet Karakaş. “Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method”. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 2, 2019, pp. 183-92.
Vancouver Teber A, Karakaş A. Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;2(2):183-92.

Indexing