Abstract
References
- Aslan, E., 2009. Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi Yöntemi Yardımıyla Tedarikçi Seçimi ve Üretim Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
- ATLAS, 2022. La Production Mondiale de pomme de ten-e. https://www.atlasbig.com/fr-lu/pays-par production-de-pommes-de-ten-e 31.03.2022.
- Bararyenya A, Inamahoro M, Niko N, Ntahimpera A and Nayihanzamaso P, 2012. https://isabu.bi/wp- content/uploads/2021/09/Livret-Acquits-de-la-composante-pomme-de-ten-e.pdf 05/3/2022
- FAOSTAT, 2022: Statistiques de la FAO. https://agronomie.info/fr/economie-de-la-pomme-de-ten-e/
- FAOSTAT,2015: Statistiques de la FAO. https://agronomie.info/fr/economie-de-la-pomme-de-ten-e/
- Harahagazwe, D., Ledent, J. F., & Rusuku, G. (2012). Growth analysis and modelling of CIP potato geno- types for their characterization in two contrasting environı11ents of Burundi. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(46), 6173-6185. https://ifdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Article-basse altitude-PDT-1.pdf
- Heizer, J. ve Render, B., 2003. Operations Management, 8th Edition. Pearson Education Inc. New Jersey.
- MINEAGRIE, 2011: Evaluation des recoltes, des approvisionnements alimentaıres de la situation nutrition nelle saıson a 2011
- Okonkwo, J.C., 1992: Irish potato production in Nigeria. Training Workshop Paper, NRCRI, Vom, Nige rıa.
- Saat, M., 2000. Çok Amaçlı Karar Vermede Bir Yaklaşım: Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 2: 149-162.
- Saaty, T. L., 1990. Multicriteıia Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, 2nd Edition, Pittsburgh, s.54.
- Saaty, T. L., 2001. Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback: Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications.
- Topel, A., 2006. Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesinin Bulanık Mantık Ortamındaki Uygulamaları-Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Gstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul
Abstract
Potatoes croping are paramount in Burundi and almost all the provinces of the country grow potatoes. However, there are several varieties of potatoes grown in Burundi. Farmers are facing with the difficulties of deciding which right variety of potatoes to grow. This work was carried out for helping farmers to make the right choice of the variety to grow. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method has been used. The Ndinamagara, Ingabire and Victoria potatoes varieties were the different decisions alternatives. The Prices of seeds, Yield, Marketing, Cost of producing and Sustainability were the mains criteria that were taken as the accountment for taking the decision process. In this work, it was a question of developing a multi-criteria decision-making process and determining the appropriate potatoes production system with the AHP method. The results shown that each criteria had it own highly preferred variety. According to the seed price criterion, the Victoria variety was found to be more important than the others. The Victoria potatoes had a priority weight of 66.4%. Since the coherence ratio was less than 0.10, the matrix was seen as coherent. For the yield criterion, the Ndinamagara variety has a weight of 50.1% and the consistency ratio was less than 0.10. According to the marketing criteria, the Ndinamagara variety still had a weight of 60.7% of points and the consistency ratio was also less than 0.10 and the matrix was also consistent. For the production cost criterion, the Victoria variety has a weight of 70.2%. For the sustainability criterion, the Ndinamagara variety has been found to be more important and had a weight of 0.776 points and the consistency ratio was 0.10. In concluding, for the final decision, the Victoria variety was determined to have a greater weight (48.6%) than the Ndinamagara variety (31.8%) and the Ingabire variety represented as the last with a rate of 19.6%. Considering the results of this work, the suitable potatoes variety was decided as Victoria variety.
Keywords
Multi-Criteria Decision Making Analytic Hierarchical Process Potatoes Growing Decisions Burundi
References
- Aslan, E., 2009. Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi Yöntemi Yardımıyla Tedarikçi Seçimi ve Üretim Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
- ATLAS, 2022. La Production Mondiale de pomme de ten-e. https://www.atlasbig.com/fr-lu/pays-par production-de-pommes-de-ten-e 31.03.2022.
- Bararyenya A, Inamahoro M, Niko N, Ntahimpera A and Nayihanzamaso P, 2012. https://isabu.bi/wp- content/uploads/2021/09/Livret-Acquits-de-la-composante-pomme-de-ten-e.pdf 05/3/2022
- FAOSTAT, 2022: Statistiques de la FAO. https://agronomie.info/fr/economie-de-la-pomme-de-ten-e/
- FAOSTAT,2015: Statistiques de la FAO. https://agronomie.info/fr/economie-de-la-pomme-de-ten-e/
- Harahagazwe, D., Ledent, J. F., & Rusuku, G. (2012). Growth analysis and modelling of CIP potato geno- types for their characterization in two contrasting environı11ents of Burundi. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(46), 6173-6185. https://ifdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Article-basse altitude-PDT-1.pdf
- Heizer, J. ve Render, B., 2003. Operations Management, 8th Edition. Pearson Education Inc. New Jersey.
- MINEAGRIE, 2011: Evaluation des recoltes, des approvisionnements alimentaıres de la situation nutrition nelle saıson a 2011
- Okonkwo, J.C., 1992: Irish potato production in Nigeria. Training Workshop Paper, NRCRI, Vom, Nige rıa.
- Saat, M., 2000. Çok Amaçlı Karar Vermede Bir Yaklaşım: Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 2: 149-162.
- Saaty, T. L., 1990. Multicriteıia Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, 2nd Edition, Pittsburgh, s.54.
- Saaty, T. L., 2001. Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback: Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications.
- Topel, A., 2006. Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesinin Bulanık Mantık Ortamındaki Uygulamaları-Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Gstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Agribusiness |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | May 2, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 2 Issue: 1 |
