Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2016, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 29 - 35, 01.06.2016

Zeynep Sırel Zehra Aytac

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.50988
Cited By: 3

Abstract

References

  • Abel, G.H.1976. Relationship and use of yield components in safflower breeding. Agron. J. 68: 442-447.
  • Ahmadzadeh, A.R., B.Alizadeh, H.A.Shahryar and M. Narimani. 2012. Path analysis of the relationships between grain yield and some morphological characters in spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) under normal irrigation and drought stress condition. J. Medi. Plants Res. 6(7): 1268-1271.
  • Alinaghizadeh, M., M. Dehnavi, H. Faraji, A. Dehdari and M. Gandomani. 2008. Effects of sowing dates on yield components of different spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivars as a douple crop in Yasouj. Iran. 7th International Safflower Conference, Australia.
  • Alizadeh, K. 2005. Evaluation of safflower germplasm by some agronomic characteristics and their relationships on grain yield production in the cold dry land of Iran. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology. 7(3): 389-391.
  • Anonymous, 1984. MSTAT-C Microcomputer statistical program. Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Arnon, I. 1972. Crop production in dry regions .Vol. 2, pp. 11- 19. Leonard Hill, London.
  • Arslan, B. 2007a. The path analysis of yield and its components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Biological Sciences. 7(4): 668-672.
  • Arslan, B. 2007b. Assessing of herbitability and variance components of yield and some agronomic traits of different safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 6(3): 554-557.
  • Aytaç, Z. and G. Kınacı 2009. Variability, heritability and relationships between seed yield and some characters of safflower genotypes. 8. Field Crops Congress, 19-22 Ekim 2009, Hatay, Turkey.
  • Bahmankar, M., M.R. Raij, A.R.Seloki and K. Shirkool. 2014. Assessment of broad sense heritability and genetic advance in safflower. Int. J. of Biosciences. 4(8): 131-135.
  • Baydar, H. and O.Y. Gökmen. 2003. Hybrid seed production in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) following the induction of male sterility by gibberellic acid. Plant Breed. 122:459- 461.
  • Bhatt, G.M. 1973. Significance of path coefficient analysis in determining the nature of character association. Euphytica. 22: 338– 343.
  • Behnam, T., A.Said, , S. Mohamadreza, B. B Alireza and Gafari, G. 2011. Path analysis of seed and oil yield in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.).International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. P.3-4.
  • Bidgoli, A.M., G.A. Akbari, M.J.Mirhadi, E.Zand and S. Soufizadeh. 2006. Path analysis of the relationships between seed yield and some morphological and phenological traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Euphytica. 148(3): 261- 268.
  • Camas, N., A.K. Ayan and C. Cırak 2005. Relationships between seed yield and some characters of safflower (Carthamus tinctorıus L.) cultivars grown in the middle black sea conditions. VI th. International Safflower Conference. 06-10 June 2005, Istanbul.
  • Chaudhary, S.K. 1990. Path analysis for seed yield in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in acid soil under mid altitude conditions. International journal of tropical agriculture. 8(2):129-132.
  • Cosge, B. and D. Kaya. 2008. Performance of some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) varieties sown in late-autumn and late-spring. SDU The Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. 12(1): 13-18.
  • Dajue, L.and P. Griffee. 2001. International safflower trials in China, India and Thailand. Sesame and Safflower Newsletter No.16.
  • Elfadl, E., C. Reinbrecht and W. Claupein. 2010. Evaluation of phenotypic variation in a worldwide germplasm collection of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) grown under organic farming conditions in Germany. Genetic resources and crop evolution. 57(2): 155-170.
  • Eren, K., D.Başalma, S.Uranbey and C.Er. 2005. Effect of growing in winter and spring on yield, yield components and quality of some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars in Ankara. VI th. International Safflower Conference, 06-10 June 2005, İstanbul.
  • Eslam, B., H. Monirifar and M. Ghassemi. 2010. Evaluation of late season drought effect on seed and oil yields in spring safflower genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 34 (5), 373-380.
  • Golkar, P., A. Arzani and A.M. Rezaei. 2011. Determining relationships among seed yield, yield components and morpho-phenological traits using multivariate analyses in safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.). Annals of Biological Research, 2(3): 162-69.
  • Golparvar, A. R. 2011. Assessment of relationship between seed and oil yield with agronomic traits in spring safflower cultivars under drought stress condition. J. Res. Agric. Sci. 7(2): 109-113.
  • Hussain,T., M.A.Tariq, I.Ahmad, M.Saghir, M.Batool, M.Safdar and M.Tariq. 2014. Characters association analysis in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 4(6): 63-65.
  • Karimi, M., A.R. Golparvar and M.Shams. 2013. Multivariate regression and path coefficient analysis of seed and oil yield in spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. App. Sci. Report. 4 (1): 184-186
  • Kizil, S., Ö.Çakmak, S. Kirici and M. Inan.2008. A comprehensive study on safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in semi-arid conditions. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 22(4): 947-953.
  • Koutroubas, S. D., K. Papakosta and A. Doitsinis. 2004. Cultivar and a seasonal effect on the contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to safflower yield, Field Crops Research. 90: 263-274.
  • Kolsarıcı, Ö., Ş. Aytekin, N.Vurdu, B. Gönenç. 1993. Distribution of yield components of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) cultivars of foreign origin. BS. Thesis. Ankara University. Dep.of Field Crops, Ankara, 19 p.
  • La Fuenta, R.A.B. 1969. Preliminary Result on the Behavior of Safflower at the Estaction Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Field Crop Abstracts. 22(3): 2167
  • Maas, E.V. 1986. Salt tolerance of plants. Applied Agricultural Research. 1: 12–26
  • Mündel, H.H., R.J.Morrison, R.E. Blackshaw and B.Roth (eds). 1992. Safflower Production on the Canadian Prairies. Agric. Can. Res. Station, Lethbridge/Alberta Saffl.Growers Assoc., with funding by Farming for the Future Project No. 87-0016, Alberta.35 p.
  • Nabloussi, A. E., M. Fechtali, S. Lyagoubi, S.E. Knights and T.D. Potter. 2008. Agronomic and technological evaluation of a world safflower collection in Moroccan conditions. In Safflower: unexploited potential and world adaptability. 7th International Safflower Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, 3-6 November, 2008: Agri-MC Marketing and Communication. 1-6.
  • Omidi, A. H., H. Khazaei, P.Monneveux and F. Stoddard (2012). Effect of cultivar and water regime on yield and yield components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 17(1): 10-15.
  • Öztürk, Ö. 1994. Investigation on yield and yield components of some safflower cultivars under Konya ecological conditions, MS Thesis, Selcuk University, Grad. School of Nat. Sc. Dep. of Agronomy. 69 p.
  • Pascual-Villalobos, M.J. and N. Alburquerque.1995. Genetic variation of a safflower germplasm collection grown as a winter crop in southern Spain. Euphytica. 92(3): 327-332.
  • Patil, B.R., S.G. Deshmukh and M.P. Deshmukh. 1990. Studies on correlation and path analysis in safflower. Annals of plant physiology, 4(1): 86-91.
  • Polat, T. 2007. Effect of different row spacings and nitrogen rates on the yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). PhD Thesis, Atatürk University, Grad. School of Nat. Sc. Dep. of Agronomy, Erzurum.
  • Sergek, Y. 2001. Determination of Suitable Sowing Time, Variety and Row Distance in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). MS Thesis, Ankara University, Grad. School of Nat. Sc. Dep. of Agronomy. 73p.
  • Singh, V. and N. Nimbkar. 2007. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), in: R.J. Singh (Ed.), Genetic Resources, Chromosome Engineering, Crop Improvement, Oil Seed Crops. vol. 4, New York, CRC press.
  • Topal, M., E. Ozturk and T. Polat. 2010. Path analysis of seed yield components using different correlation coefficients in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J. Anim. Plant Sci. 20(4): 220-224.
  • Tabrizi, A.H.O. 2000. Correlation between traits and path analysis for grain and oil yield in spring safflower. Sesame and Safflower Newsletter (15):78-82.

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS

Year 2016, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 29 - 35, 01.06.2016

Zeynep Sırel Zehra Aytac

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.50988
Cited By: 3

Abstract

This study was carried out in the experimental field of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Eskişehir
Osmangazi, in 2009 and 2010 under semi-arid conditions. Thirteen different safflower cultivars and lines (V49/848,
V-50/166, V-50/426, V-51/263, KN 144, Finch, Sahuaripa 88, Ole, AC Stirling, Oleic Leed, US 10, N 5,
UC-1) were used as materials. The cultivars and lines were planted in a Randomized Complete Block Design
with three replications. Significant differences (P<0.01) were found for all studied yield components. The seed
yield differed significantly between 976.7 and 1666.0 kg/ha. The seed yield showed a positive and significant
correlation with plant height, seed yield per plant, seed weight per head and biological yield per plant. The
greatest direct effect corresponded to plant height, seed weight/head and 1000-seed weight on seed yield.

Keywords

Carthamus tinctorius L. correlation coefficient path analysis Safflower seed yield

References

  • Abel, G.H.1976. Relationship and use of yield components in safflower breeding. Agron. J. 68: 442-447.
  • Ahmadzadeh, A.R., B.Alizadeh, H.A.Shahryar and M. Narimani. 2012. Path analysis of the relationships between grain yield and some morphological characters in spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) under normal irrigation and drought stress condition. J. Medi. Plants Res. 6(7): 1268-1271.
  • Alinaghizadeh, M., M. Dehnavi, H. Faraji, A. Dehdari and M. Gandomani. 2008. Effects of sowing dates on yield components of different spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivars as a douple crop in Yasouj. Iran. 7th International Safflower Conference, Australia.
  • Alizadeh, K. 2005. Evaluation of safflower germplasm by some agronomic characteristics and their relationships on grain yield production in the cold dry land of Iran. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology. 7(3): 389-391.
  • Anonymous, 1984. MSTAT-C Microcomputer statistical program. Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Arnon, I. 1972. Crop production in dry regions .Vol. 2, pp. 11- 19. Leonard Hill, London.
  • Arslan, B. 2007a. The path analysis of yield and its components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Biological Sciences. 7(4): 668-672.
  • Arslan, B. 2007b. Assessing of herbitability and variance components of yield and some agronomic traits of different safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 6(3): 554-557.
  • Aytaç, Z. and G. Kınacı 2009. Variability, heritability and relationships between seed yield and some characters of safflower genotypes. 8. Field Crops Congress, 19-22 Ekim 2009, Hatay, Turkey.
  • Bahmankar, M., M.R. Raij, A.R.Seloki and K. Shirkool. 2014. Assessment of broad sense heritability and genetic advance in safflower. Int. J. of Biosciences. 4(8): 131-135.
  • Baydar, H. and O.Y. Gökmen. 2003. Hybrid seed production in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) following the induction of male sterility by gibberellic acid. Plant Breed. 122:459- 461.
  • Bhatt, G.M. 1973. Significance of path coefficient analysis in determining the nature of character association. Euphytica. 22: 338– 343.
  • Behnam, T., A.Said, , S. Mohamadreza, B. B Alireza and Gafari, G. 2011. Path analysis of seed and oil yield in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.).International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. P.3-4.
  • Bidgoli, A.M., G.A. Akbari, M.J.Mirhadi, E.Zand and S. Soufizadeh. 2006. Path analysis of the relationships between seed yield and some morphological and phenological traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Euphytica. 148(3): 261- 268.
  • Camas, N., A.K. Ayan and C. Cırak 2005. Relationships between seed yield and some characters of safflower (Carthamus tinctorıus L.) cultivars grown in the middle black sea conditions. VI th. International Safflower Conference. 06-10 June 2005, Istanbul.
  • Chaudhary, S.K. 1990. Path analysis for seed yield in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in acid soil under mid altitude conditions. International journal of tropical agriculture. 8(2):129-132.
  • Cosge, B. and D. Kaya. 2008. Performance of some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) varieties sown in late-autumn and late-spring. SDU The Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. 12(1): 13-18.
  • Dajue, L.and P. Griffee. 2001. International safflower trials in China, India and Thailand. Sesame and Safflower Newsletter No.16.
  • Elfadl, E., C. Reinbrecht and W. Claupein. 2010. Evaluation of phenotypic variation in a worldwide germplasm collection of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) grown under organic farming conditions in Germany. Genetic resources and crop evolution. 57(2): 155-170.
  • Eren, K., D.Başalma, S.Uranbey and C.Er. 2005. Effect of growing in winter and spring on yield, yield components and quality of some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars in Ankara. VI th. International Safflower Conference, 06-10 June 2005, İstanbul.
  • Eslam, B., H. Monirifar and M. Ghassemi. 2010. Evaluation of late season drought effect on seed and oil yields in spring safflower genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 34 (5), 373-380.
  • Golkar, P., A. Arzani and A.M. Rezaei. 2011. Determining relationships among seed yield, yield components and morpho-phenological traits using multivariate analyses in safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.). Annals of Biological Research, 2(3): 162-69.
  • Golparvar, A. R. 2011. Assessment of relationship between seed and oil yield with agronomic traits in spring safflower cultivars under drought stress condition. J. Res. Agric. Sci. 7(2): 109-113.
  • Hussain,T., M.A.Tariq, I.Ahmad, M.Saghir, M.Batool, M.Safdar and M.Tariq. 2014. Characters association analysis in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 4(6): 63-65.
  • Karimi, M., A.R. Golparvar and M.Shams. 2013. Multivariate regression and path coefficient analysis of seed and oil yield in spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. App. Sci. Report. 4 (1): 184-186
  • Kizil, S., Ö.Çakmak, S. Kirici and M. Inan.2008. A comprehensive study on safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in semi-arid conditions. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 22(4): 947-953.
  • Koutroubas, S. D., K. Papakosta and A. Doitsinis. 2004. Cultivar and a seasonal effect on the contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to safflower yield, Field Crops Research. 90: 263-274.
  • Kolsarıcı, Ö., Ş. Aytekin, N.Vurdu, B. Gönenç. 1993. Distribution of yield components of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) cultivars of foreign origin. BS. Thesis. Ankara University. Dep.of Field Crops, Ankara, 19 p.
  • La Fuenta, R.A.B. 1969. Preliminary Result on the Behavior of Safflower at the Estaction Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Field Crop Abstracts. 22(3): 2167
  • Maas, E.V. 1986. Salt tolerance of plants. Applied Agricultural Research. 1: 12–26
  • Mündel, H.H., R.J.Morrison, R.E. Blackshaw and B.Roth (eds). 1992. Safflower Production on the Canadian Prairies. Agric. Can. Res. Station, Lethbridge/Alberta Saffl.Growers Assoc., with funding by Farming for the Future Project No. 87-0016, Alberta.35 p.
  • Nabloussi, A. E., M. Fechtali, S. Lyagoubi, S.E. Knights and T.D. Potter. 2008. Agronomic and technological evaluation of a world safflower collection in Moroccan conditions. In Safflower: unexploited potential and world adaptability. 7th International Safflower Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, 3-6 November, 2008: Agri-MC Marketing and Communication. 1-6.
  • Omidi, A. H., H. Khazaei, P.Monneveux and F. Stoddard (2012). Effect of cultivar and water regime on yield and yield components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 17(1): 10-15.
  • Öztürk, Ö. 1994. Investigation on yield and yield components of some safflower cultivars under Konya ecological conditions, MS Thesis, Selcuk University, Grad. School of Nat. Sc. Dep. of Agronomy. 69 p.
  • Pascual-Villalobos, M.J. and N. Alburquerque.1995. Genetic variation of a safflower germplasm collection grown as a winter crop in southern Spain. Euphytica. 92(3): 327-332.
  • Patil, B.R., S.G. Deshmukh and M.P. Deshmukh. 1990. Studies on correlation and path analysis in safflower. Annals of plant physiology, 4(1): 86-91.
  • Polat, T. 2007. Effect of different row spacings and nitrogen rates on the yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). PhD Thesis, Atatürk University, Grad. School of Nat. Sc. Dep. of Agronomy, Erzurum.
  • Sergek, Y. 2001. Determination of Suitable Sowing Time, Variety and Row Distance in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). MS Thesis, Ankara University, Grad. School of Nat. Sc. Dep. of Agronomy. 73p.
  • Singh, V. and N. Nimbkar. 2007. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), in: R.J. Singh (Ed.), Genetic Resources, Chromosome Engineering, Crop Improvement, Oil Seed Crops. vol. 4, New York, CRC press.
  • Topal, M., E. Ozturk and T. Polat. 2010. Path analysis of seed yield components using different correlation coefficients in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J. Anim. Plant Sci. 20(4): 220-224.
  • Tabrizi, A.H.O. 2000. Correlation between traits and path analysis for grain and oil yield in spring safflower. Sesame and Safflower Newsletter (15):78-82.
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Zeynep Sırel This is me

Zehra Aytac

Publication Date June 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 21 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Sırel, Z., & Aytac, Z. (2016). RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, 21(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.50988
AMA Sırel Z, Aytac Z. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS. TJFC. June 2016;21(1):29-35. doi:10.17557/tjfc.50988
Chicago Sırel, Zeynep, and Zehra Aytac. “RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus Tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 21, no. 1 (June 2016): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.50988.
EndNote Sırel Z, Aytac Z (June 1, 2016) RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 21 1 29–35.
IEEE Z. Sırel and Z. Aytac, “RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS”, TJFC, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2016, doi: 10.17557/tjfc.50988.
ISNAD Sırel, Zeynep - Aytac, Zehra. “RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus Tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 21/1 (June 2016), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.50988.
JAMA Sırel Z, Aytac Z. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS. TJFC. 2016;21:29–35.
MLA Sırel, Zeynep and Zehra Aytac. “RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus Tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, vol. 21, no. 1, 2016, pp. 29-35, doi:10.17557/tjfc.50988.
Vancouver Sırel Z, Aytac Z. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SEED YIELD AND SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS. TJFC. 2016;21(1):29-35.

Cited By

Identification of cold tolerance and some agronomic traits of advanced safflower genotypes developed by hybridization
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
https://doi.org/10.1002/aocs.12754
Effect of sowing date on some agronomic and technological traits of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in Northern Turkey
Turkish Journal Of Field Crops
https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.941575
Effect of Row Spacing, Sowing Density, and Harvest Time on Floret Yield and Yield Components of Two Safflower Cultivars Grown in Southwestern Germany
Agronomy
Kathrin Steberl
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050664

Turkish Journal of Field Crops is published by the Society of Field Crops Science and issued twice a year.
Owner : Prof. Dr. Behçet KIR
Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture,Department of Field Crops
Editor in Chief : Prof. Dr. Emre ILKER
Address : 848 sok. 2. Beyler İşhanı No:72, Kat:3 D.313 35000 Konak-Izmir, TURKEY
Email :  turkishjournaloffieldcrops@gmail.com contact@field-crops.org
Tel : +90 232 3112679
Tel/Fax : : +90 232 3432474