Research Article
Year 2016,
Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 224 - 232, 15.12.2016
Abstract
References
- Andersen, P.C. and D.W. Gorbet. 2002. Influence of Year and Planting Date on Fatty Acid Chemistry of High Oleic Acid and Normal Peanut Genotypes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:1298-1305
- Anonymous, 2014. The Meteorological Data for Adana. The Turkish State Meteorological Service Adana Regional Directorship, 2013 and 2014
- Anonymous, 2015. FAO Production Year Book (www.fao.org).
- AOCS. 1989. Official and Recommended Methods. American oil Chemists’ Society Press. Champaing, IL, USA
- A.O.A.C. (1990): Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis. 1st Ed. The Association, Washington DC.USA.
- Arioglu, H., C. Kurt, H. Bakal, L. Gulluoglu and N.S. Sinan. 2013. The Effect of Pix Applied at Different Growing Stages on Some Agronomical Characteristics of Peanut. Turk J Field Crops 18 (2): 260-267
- Arioglu, H.H. 2014. The Oil Seed Crops Growing and Breeding. The Publication of University of Cukurova, Faculty of Agriculture, No:A-70, 204 p. Adana-Turkey
- Bovi, M.L.A. 1982. Genotypic and Environmental Effect on Fatty Acid Composition, Iodine Value and Oil Content of Peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida, p. 119.
- Canavar, Ö and M.A. Kaynak. 2013. Determination of Yield and Yield Components and seed Quality of Peanuts (Arachis hypogea L.) at Different Harvest Times. Int. J. of Agronomy and Plant Production 4(S):3791-3803
- Chowdhury, F.N., D. Hossain, M. Hosen and S. Rahman. 2015. Comparative Study on Chemical Composition of Five Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis hypogeal L.). World J. of Agricultural Science 11(5)247-254
- Court W.A., R.C. Roy and J G. Hendel. 1984. Effect of Harvest Date on Agronomic and Chemical Characteristics of Ontario Peanuts. Canadian J. Plant Science 64:521-528
- Duncan, W.G., D.E. McCloud, R.L. McGraw and K.J. Boote. 1978. Physiological Aspects of Peanut Yield Improvement. Crop Science 18:1015-1020
- Dwivedi, S. L., S.N. Nigam, R. Jambunathan, K.L. Sahrawat, G.V.S. Nagabhushanam and K. Raghunath. 1996. Effect of Genotypes and Environments on Oil and Oil Quality Parameters and Their Correlation in Peanut (Arachis hypogeal L.). Peanut Science 20:84-89
- Gulluoglu, L. 2011. Effects of Regulator Applications on Pod Yield and Some Agronomic Characters of Peanut in Mediterranean Region. Turk J Field Crops 16(2):210-214
- Hashim, J.B., P.E. Koehler, R.R. Eitenmiller and C.K. Kvien. 1993. Fatty Acid Composition and Tocopherol Content of Drought Stressed Florunner Peanuts. Peanut Science 20:21- 24
- Hinds, M.J. 1995. Fatty Acid Composition of Caribbean-Grown Peanuts (Arachis hypogea L.) at Three Maturity Stages. Food Chemistry 53:7-14
- Holaday, C.E. and L. Pearson. 1974. Effects of Genotype and Production Area on the Fatty Acid Composition, Total Oil and Protein in Peanuts. Journal of Food Science 39(6):1206- 1209.
- Ingale, S. and S.K. Shrivastava. 2011. Nutritional Study of New Variety of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) JL-24 Seeds. African J. of Food Science 5(8):490-498
- Ishag, H.M. 2000. Phenotypic and Yield Response of Irrigated Groundnut Cultivars in a Hot Environment. Exp. Agric. 36: 303-312.
- Isleib, T.G., B.L. Tilman, H.E. Patte, T.H. Sanders, K.W. Hendrix and L.O. Dean. 2008. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction for Seed Composition Traits of Breeding Lines in the Uniform Peanut Performance Test. Peanut Science 35:130-138
- Jordan, D.L., S. Danesha, L.Carley, C. Dharmasri, B.S. Turner, R.L.Brandenburg and G.B. Michael. 2008. Peanut response to Planting Date and Potential of Canopy Reflectance as an Indicator of Pod Maturation. Agronomy Journal 100:376- 380
- Kaba, J.S., K.Ofori and F.K. Kumaga. 2014. Inter-Relationships of Yield and Components of Yield at Different Stages of Maturity in Three Groundnuts (Arachis hypogea L.) Varieties. International J. of Life Science Research 2(1):43- 48
- Knauft, A., A.J. Norden and D.W. Gorbet. 1986. The Effect of Three Digging Dates on Oil Quality, Yield, and Grade of Five Peanut Genotypes Grown without Leaf spot Control. Peanut Science 13: 86-89
- Lim, E.S and O. Hamdan.1984. The Reproductive Character of Four Varieties of Groundnuts (Arachis hypogea L.) Pertanica 7:25-31
- Lu, K.C., M.S. Yeh, K.H. Yang and H.S. Lu. 1997. Effects of Genotype, Population Density and Harvest Date on Yield and Quality of Peanut. J. of Agric. Res. China 46(2):116-131
- Mixon, A.C and W.D. Branch. 1985. Agronomic Performance of a Spanish and Runner Cultivar Harvested at Six Different Digging Intervals. Peanut Science 12:50-54
- Önemli, F. 2012. Impact of Climate Change on Oil Fatty Acid Composition of Peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) in Three Market Classes. Chilean J. Agri. Res. 72(4):383-488
- Park, C.K and J.H. Oh. 1992. Effect of Cultural Practice and Harvest Time on Yield Components of Peanut. Korean J. Crop Science 37(4):347-354
- Pattee, H.E., J.C. Wynne, T.H. Sanders and A. Mschubert. 1980. Relation of the Seed/Hull Ratio to Yield and Dollar Value in Peanut Production. Peanut Science 7:74-77
- Raheja, R.K., S.K. Battai, K.L. Ahuja, K.S. Labana and M. Singh. 1987. Comparison of Oil Content and Fatty Acid Composition of Peanut Genotypes Differing in Growth Habit. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 37:103-108
- Rahmianna, A.A., A. Taufiq and E. Yusnawan. 2009. Pod Yield and Kernel Quality of Peanut Grown Under Two Different Irrigations and Two Harvest Times. Indonesian J. of Agriculture 2(2)103-109
- Rowland, D.L., R.B. Sorensen, C.L. Butts and H.W. Faircloth. 2006. Determination of Maturity and Degree Day Indices and Their Success in Predicting Peanut Maturity. Peanut Science 33:125-136
- Sanders,T.H., E.J. Williams, A.M. Schubert and H.E. Pattee. 1980. Peanut Maturity Method Evaluations. I.Southeast Peanut Science 7:78-82
- Sattayarak, S. 1997. Effects of Harvesting Dates on Different Characters and Seed Quality of Peanut Grown in Southern Thailand. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/.do?recordID= TH2000000950
- Singh, F. and D.L. Oswalt. 1995. Groundnut Production Practices. ICRISAT. SAT, e-journal 9:29
- Young, C. T., M. E. Manson, R. S. Matlock and G. R. Waller. 1972. Effect of Maturity on the Fatty Acid Composition of Eight Varieties of Peanut Grown at Parkins, Oklahoma in 1968. JAOCS 49:314-317
- Young, C.Y. and R.E. Worthington. 1974. Fatty Acid Composition of Spanish Peanut Oil as Influenced by Planting Location, Soil Moisture Conditions, Variety, and Season. AOCS 51:312-315
- Young, J. H., N.K. Person, J.O. Donald, and W.D. Mayfield.1982. Harvesting, Curing and Energy Utilization, pp.458-485. In H.E. Pattee and C. T. Young (eds). Peanut Science and Technology. Amer. Peanut Res. Educ. Society Inc., Yoakum. TX, USA.
- Wright, F.S. and D.M. Porter. 1991. Early Leaf Spot of Peanuts: Effect of Conservation Tillage Practices on Disease Development. Peanut Science 8:72-75
THE EFFECT OF HARVESTING DATE ON SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF PEANUT GROWN IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION OF TURKEY
Abstract
This study was conducted at the experimental area of the Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture,
Cukurova University as a main crop in 2013 and 2014. The objective of this study was to determinate the effect
of harvesting dates on yield and some agronomic traits, seed and oil quality of peanut (Arachis hypogea L.)
grown in the Mediterranean region. The experimental design was a Randomized Complete Block Design with
three replications. The Halisbey peanut variety (Virginia market type) was used as a plant material in this
research. Pod yield per hectare, shelling percentage, 100-seed weight, protein and oil percentage, fatty acids
(palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acids) composition and oil quality (oleic acid to linoleic acid ratio, iodine
value) traits were investigated. According to a two-year average, the highest pod weight (84.24 g plant-1
) and
pod number (36.83 no. plant-1
) per plant was obtained when the plants were harvested at 180 days after
planting (DAP). The shelling percentage and 100-seed weight increased when the harvesting was delayed. The
highest pod (8002.6 kg ha-1
) was obtained when the plants were harvested at 180 DAP. The oil and protein
percentage ranged from 48.66-49.66% and 24.65-25.89% respectively. The oleic and linoleic acid content
varied between 51.54-54.94% and 24.65-26.78%, respectively. Oleic acid to linoleic acid ratio (O/L) increased
when the harvesting time was delayed.
References
- Andersen, P.C. and D.W. Gorbet. 2002. Influence of Year and Planting Date on Fatty Acid Chemistry of High Oleic Acid and Normal Peanut Genotypes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:1298-1305
- Anonymous, 2014. The Meteorological Data for Adana. The Turkish State Meteorological Service Adana Regional Directorship, 2013 and 2014
- Anonymous, 2015. FAO Production Year Book (www.fao.org).
- AOCS. 1989. Official and Recommended Methods. American oil Chemists’ Society Press. Champaing, IL, USA
- A.O.A.C. (1990): Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis. 1st Ed. The Association, Washington DC.USA.
- Arioglu, H., C. Kurt, H. Bakal, L. Gulluoglu and N.S. Sinan. 2013. The Effect of Pix Applied at Different Growing Stages on Some Agronomical Characteristics of Peanut. Turk J Field Crops 18 (2): 260-267
- Arioglu, H.H. 2014. The Oil Seed Crops Growing and Breeding. The Publication of University of Cukurova, Faculty of Agriculture, No:A-70, 204 p. Adana-Turkey
- Bovi, M.L.A. 1982. Genotypic and Environmental Effect on Fatty Acid Composition, Iodine Value and Oil Content of Peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida, p. 119.
- Canavar, Ö and M.A. Kaynak. 2013. Determination of Yield and Yield Components and seed Quality of Peanuts (Arachis hypogea L.) at Different Harvest Times. Int. J. of Agronomy and Plant Production 4(S):3791-3803
- Chowdhury, F.N., D. Hossain, M. Hosen and S. Rahman. 2015. Comparative Study on Chemical Composition of Five Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis hypogeal L.). World J. of Agricultural Science 11(5)247-254
- Court W.A., R.C. Roy and J G. Hendel. 1984. Effect of Harvest Date on Agronomic and Chemical Characteristics of Ontario Peanuts. Canadian J. Plant Science 64:521-528
- Duncan, W.G., D.E. McCloud, R.L. McGraw and K.J. Boote. 1978. Physiological Aspects of Peanut Yield Improvement. Crop Science 18:1015-1020
- Dwivedi, S. L., S.N. Nigam, R. Jambunathan, K.L. Sahrawat, G.V.S. Nagabhushanam and K. Raghunath. 1996. Effect of Genotypes and Environments on Oil and Oil Quality Parameters and Their Correlation in Peanut (Arachis hypogeal L.). Peanut Science 20:84-89
- Gulluoglu, L. 2011. Effects of Regulator Applications on Pod Yield and Some Agronomic Characters of Peanut in Mediterranean Region. Turk J Field Crops 16(2):210-214
- Hashim, J.B., P.E. Koehler, R.R. Eitenmiller and C.K. Kvien. 1993. Fatty Acid Composition and Tocopherol Content of Drought Stressed Florunner Peanuts. Peanut Science 20:21- 24
- Hinds, M.J. 1995. Fatty Acid Composition of Caribbean-Grown Peanuts (Arachis hypogea L.) at Three Maturity Stages. Food Chemistry 53:7-14
- Holaday, C.E. and L. Pearson. 1974. Effects of Genotype and Production Area on the Fatty Acid Composition, Total Oil and Protein in Peanuts. Journal of Food Science 39(6):1206- 1209.
- Ingale, S. and S.K. Shrivastava. 2011. Nutritional Study of New Variety of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) JL-24 Seeds. African J. of Food Science 5(8):490-498
- Ishag, H.M. 2000. Phenotypic and Yield Response of Irrigated Groundnut Cultivars in a Hot Environment. Exp. Agric. 36: 303-312.
- Isleib, T.G., B.L. Tilman, H.E. Patte, T.H. Sanders, K.W. Hendrix and L.O. Dean. 2008. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction for Seed Composition Traits of Breeding Lines in the Uniform Peanut Performance Test. Peanut Science 35:130-138
- Jordan, D.L., S. Danesha, L.Carley, C. Dharmasri, B.S. Turner, R.L.Brandenburg and G.B. Michael. 2008. Peanut response to Planting Date and Potential of Canopy Reflectance as an Indicator of Pod Maturation. Agronomy Journal 100:376- 380
- Kaba, J.S., K.Ofori and F.K. Kumaga. 2014. Inter-Relationships of Yield and Components of Yield at Different Stages of Maturity in Three Groundnuts (Arachis hypogea L.) Varieties. International J. of Life Science Research 2(1):43- 48
- Knauft, A., A.J. Norden and D.W. Gorbet. 1986. The Effect of Three Digging Dates on Oil Quality, Yield, and Grade of Five Peanut Genotypes Grown without Leaf spot Control. Peanut Science 13: 86-89
- Lim, E.S and O. Hamdan.1984. The Reproductive Character of Four Varieties of Groundnuts (Arachis hypogea L.) Pertanica 7:25-31
- Lu, K.C., M.S. Yeh, K.H. Yang and H.S. Lu. 1997. Effects of Genotype, Population Density and Harvest Date on Yield and Quality of Peanut. J. of Agric. Res. China 46(2):116-131
- Mixon, A.C and W.D. Branch. 1985. Agronomic Performance of a Spanish and Runner Cultivar Harvested at Six Different Digging Intervals. Peanut Science 12:50-54
- Önemli, F. 2012. Impact of Climate Change on Oil Fatty Acid Composition of Peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) in Three Market Classes. Chilean J. Agri. Res. 72(4):383-488
- Park, C.K and J.H. Oh. 1992. Effect of Cultural Practice and Harvest Time on Yield Components of Peanut. Korean J. Crop Science 37(4):347-354
- Pattee, H.E., J.C. Wynne, T.H. Sanders and A. Mschubert. 1980. Relation of the Seed/Hull Ratio to Yield and Dollar Value in Peanut Production. Peanut Science 7:74-77
- Raheja, R.K., S.K. Battai, K.L. Ahuja, K.S. Labana and M. Singh. 1987. Comparison of Oil Content and Fatty Acid Composition of Peanut Genotypes Differing in Growth Habit. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 37:103-108
- Rahmianna, A.A., A. Taufiq and E. Yusnawan. 2009. Pod Yield and Kernel Quality of Peanut Grown Under Two Different Irrigations and Two Harvest Times. Indonesian J. of Agriculture 2(2)103-109
- Rowland, D.L., R.B. Sorensen, C.L. Butts and H.W. Faircloth. 2006. Determination of Maturity and Degree Day Indices and Their Success in Predicting Peanut Maturity. Peanut Science 33:125-136
- Sanders,T.H., E.J. Williams, A.M. Schubert and H.E. Pattee. 1980. Peanut Maturity Method Evaluations. I.Southeast Peanut Science 7:78-82
- Sattayarak, S. 1997. Effects of Harvesting Dates on Different Characters and Seed Quality of Peanut Grown in Southern Thailand. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/.do?recordID= TH2000000950
- Singh, F. and D.L. Oswalt. 1995. Groundnut Production Practices. ICRISAT. SAT, e-journal 9:29
- Young, C. T., M. E. Manson, R. S. Matlock and G. R. Waller. 1972. Effect of Maturity on the Fatty Acid Composition of Eight Varieties of Peanut Grown at Parkins, Oklahoma in 1968. JAOCS 49:314-317
- Young, C.Y. and R.E. Worthington. 1974. Fatty Acid Composition of Spanish Peanut Oil as Influenced by Planting Location, Soil Moisture Conditions, Variety, and Season. AOCS 51:312-315
- Young, J. H., N.K. Person, J.O. Donald, and W.D. Mayfield.1982. Harvesting, Curing and Energy Utilization, pp.458-485. In H.E. Pattee and C. T. Young (eds). Peanut Science and Technology. Amer. Peanut Res. Educ. Society Inc., Yoakum. TX, USA.
- Wright, F.S. and D.M. Porter. 1991. Early Leaf Spot of Peanuts: Effect of Conservation Tillage Practices on Disease Development. Peanut Science 8:72-75
There are 39 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 15, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2016 Volume: 21 Issue: 2 |
Cite
Cited By
Pod Yield Stability of Best Groundnut Varieties from National Agricultural Research Stations Program in West Africa
American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20241202.15
EFFECT OF CROP GEOMETRY ON GROWTH, YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF RABI GROUNDNUT
Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences
https://doi.org/10.18006/2019.7(5).477.480
Yerfıstığı (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotiplerinin Bazı Besinsel ve Antioksidan Parametreler Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
Tuğçe KALEFETOĞLU MACAR
https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.471805
EFFECT OF HIGH AIR AND SOIL TEMPERATURE ON YIELD AND SOME YIELD COMPONENTS OF PEANUT (Arachis hypogaea L.)
Turkish Journal Of Field Crops
Leyla GULLUOGLU
https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.422651
COMPARISON OF AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME PEANUT (Arachis hypogaea L.) VARIETIES GROWN AS MAIN AND DOUBLE CROP IN MEDITERRANEAN REGION
Turkish Journal Of Field Crops
Leyla GULLUOGLU
https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.356208
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) improvement in sub-Saharan Africa: a review
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science
Seltene Abady
https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1601252
Diyarbakır Koşullarında Ana Ürün Yerfıstığı Yetiştiriciliğinde Tek Ve Çift Sıralı Ekim Yöntemlerinin Verim Ve Önemli Tarımsal Özelliklere Etkisi
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
Cenk Burak Şahin
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.552168
Growth and yield response of two groundnut cultivars to row pattern in the forest-Savannah Transition Zone of Ghana
Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds
M. E. Essilfie
https://doi.org/10.5897/JCO2019.0203
Diversity of pod weight of Indonesian local groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties at different harvesting time
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
T Zulchi
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/482/1/012044
Ana Ürün Koşullarında Çift Sıralı Ekim Yöntemlerine Göre Oluşturulan Farklı Bitki Sıklığının, Değişik Büyüme Özelliğine Sahip Yerfıstığı (Arachis hypogaea L.) Çeşitlerinin Bazı Önemli Tarımsal ve Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri
Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi
Halil BAKAL
https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.705501
Turkish Journal of Field Crops is published by the Society of Field Crops Science and issued twice a year.
Owner : Prof. Dr. Behçet KIR
Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture,Department of Field Crops
Editor in Chief : Prof. Dr. Emre ILKER
Address : 848 sok. 2. Beyler İşhanı No:72, Kat:3 D.313 35000 Konak-Izmir, TURKEY
Email : turkishjournaloffieldcrops@gmail.com contact@field-crops.org
Tel : +90 232 3112679
Tel/Fax : : +90 232 3432474