Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 61 - 72, 30.06.2023

Uğur Özkan Nesim Yıldız Celal Peker

https://doi.org/10.46592/turkager.1252187
Cited By: 1

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fertilizing Sorghum Yield Quality

Kaynakça

  • Afzal M, Ahmad A and Ahmad AH (2012). Effect of nitrogen on growth and yield of sorghum forage (Sorghum bicolor (l.) Moench cv.) Under three cuttings system. Cercetări Agronomice, 45: 57-64.
  • Ahmeda IAM, Eltiliba AMA, Ganawab FHS and Islamd KR (2016). Utilization of industrial waste aqueous ammonia for irrigated forage sorghum production. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 62: 93-07.
  • Almodares A, Jafarinia M and Hadi MR (2009). The effects of nitrogen fertilizer on chemical compositions in corn and sweet sorghum. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 6(4): 441-446.
  • Amelework B, Shimelis H, Tongoona P, Mark Laing M and Mengistu F (2015). Genetic variation in lowland sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) landraces assessed by simple sequence repeats. Plant Genetic Resources, 13: 131-141.
  • AOAC (2005). Official methods of analysis (930.15 and 2001.12). 18th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Atis I, Konuskan O, Duru M, Gozubenli H and Yilmaz S (2012). Effect of harvesting time on yield, composition and forage quality of some forage sorghum cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 14(6): 879-886.
  • Avci M (2000). Determination of winter perennial wheatgrass- leguminous forage crops mixtures that can be cultivated to establish temporary artificial pasture in Çukurova. Çukurova University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 113 p., Adana.
  • Bilen Y and Turk M (2021). A research on possibilities of second crop sorghum-sudangrass hybrids growing on banaz condition. SDU Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 16(1): 46-51.
  • Brocke KV, Trouche G, Weltzien E, Barro CPK, Sidibe A, Zougmore R (2014) Helping farmers adapt to climate and cropping system change through increased access to sorghum genetic resources adapted to prevalent sorghum cropping systems in Burkina Faso. Experimental Agriculture, 50: 284-305.
  • Carmi A, Aharoni Y, Edelstein M, Umiel N, Hagiladi A, Yosef E, Nikbachat M, Zenou A, Miron J (2006). Effects of irrigation and plant density on yield, composition and in vitro digestibility of a new forage sorghum variety, Tal, at two maturity stages. Animal Feed Science Technology, 131: 121-133.
  • Celik B and Turk M (2021). The determination of forage yield and quality of some silage sorghum cultivars in ecological conditions of uşak province. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 2(1): 1-7.
  • Chaudhary JD, Pavaya RP, Malav JK, Dipika G, Chaudhary N, Kuniya NK and Jat JR (2018). Effect of nitrogen and potassium on yield, nutrient content and uptake by forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) on loamy sand. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(2): 761-765.
  • Cheema MA, Farhad W, Saleem MF, Khan HZ, Munir A, Wahid MA, Rasul F and Hammad HM (2010). Nitrogen management strategies for sustainable maize production. Crop Environment, 1: 49-52.
  • Costa RF, Pires DADA, Moura MMA, Sales ECJD, Rodrigues JAS and Rigueira JPS (2016). Agronomic characteristics of sorghum genotypes and nutritional values of silage. Acta Scientiarum- Animal Sciences, 38: 127-133.
  • Damian JM, Ros COD, Silva RFD, Coldebella, IJ and Simon DH (2017). N, P or K doses on the dry matter and crude protein yield in maize and sorghum for silage. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 47: 53-61.
  • Fonseca, L, Mezzalira JC, Bremm C, Filho RSA, Gonda HL and Carvalho PCF (2012). Management targets for maximising the short-term herbage intake rate of cattle grazing in Sorghum bicolor. Livestock Science, 145: 205–211.
  • Govea FE, Marsalis MA, Lauriault LM and Bean BW (2010). Forage sorghum nutritive value: A review. Online. Forage and Grazinglands, 8(1): 1-6.
  • Horrocks RD and Vallentine JF (1999). Harvested Forages. Academic Press, London, UK.
  • Holman JD, Obour AK and Mengel DB (2019). Nitrogen application effects on forage sorghum production and nitrate concentration. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 42(20): 2794-2804.
  • Ikanović J, Janković S, Popović V, Rakić S, Dražić G, Živanović L and Kolarić L (2014). The effect of nitrogen fertilizer rates on green biomass and dry matter yield of Sorghum ssp. at different growth stages. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 30(4): 743-749.
  • Iqbal MA (2015). Agronomic management strategies elevate forage sorghum yield: A review. Journal of Advanced Botany and Zoology, 3: 1-6.
  • Iqbal MA, Ahamd B, Shah MH and Ali K (2015). A study on forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) production in perspectives of white revolution in Punjab, Pakistan: Issues and future options. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 15(4): 640-647.
  • Kaplan M, Baran O, Unlukara A, Kale H, Arslan M, Kara K and Ulas A (2016). The effects of different nitrogen doses and irrigation levels on yield, nutritive value, fermentation and gas production of corn silage. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 21(1): 101-109.
  • Kaplan M, Kara K, Unlukara A, Kale H, Beyzi SB, Varol IS and Kamalak A (2019). Water deficit and nitrogen affects yield and feed value of sorghum sudangrass silage. Agricultural Water Management, 218: 30-36.
  • Keskin B, Akdeniz H, Temel S and Baris, E (2018). Determination of agricultural characteristics of some silage sorghum and Sudan grass varieties grown as second product. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(4): 412-418.
  • Kir H and Sahan BD (2019). Yield and quality feature of some silage sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid cultivars in ecological conditions of Kırşehir province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 6(3): 388-395.
  • Księżak J, Matyka M, Bojarszczuk J and Kacprzak A (2012). Evaluation of productivity of maize and sorghum to be used for energy purposes as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. Žemdribystė-Agriculture, 99(4): 363-370.
  • Kumar TVA, Samuel DVK, Jha SK and Sinha JP (2015). Twin screw extrusion of sorghum and soya blends: a response surface analysis. Journal of Agricultural Science Technology, 17: 649-662.
  • Lema M, Felix A, Salako S and Bishnoi U (2000). Nutrient content and in vitro dry matter digestibility from various grain sorghum and sweet sorghum cultivars. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 17: 55-70.
  • Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, Dhima KV, Dordas CA, Yiakoulaki MD (2006). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crop Research, 99: 106-113.
  • Lyons SE, Ketterings QM, Godwin GS, Cherney JH, Cherney DJ, Meisinger JJ and Kilcer TF (2019). Double‐cropping with forage sorghum and forage triticale in New York. Agronomy Journal, 111(6): 3374-3382.
  • Mahama GY, Vara Prasad PV, Mengel DB and Tesso TT (2014). Influence of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of grain sorghum hybrids and ınbred lines. Agronomy Journal, 106(5): 1623-1630.
  • Marsalis MA, Angadi SV and Contreras-Govea FE (2010). Dry matter yield and nutritive value of corn, forage sorghum, and BMR forage sorghum at different plant populations and nitrogen rates. Field Crop Research, 116: 52-57.
  • McMaster GS and Wilhelm WW (1997). Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 87(4): 291-300.
  • Monteiro MCD, Anunciação Filho CJ, Tabosa JN, Oliveira FJ, Reis OV and Bastos GQ (2004). Avaliação do desempenho de sorgo forrageiro para o semiárido de Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, 3: 52-61. (In Spanish)
  • National Research Council (NRC) 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Noori MS (2020). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on growth and forage yield of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] under takhar agro-ecological conditions. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 1(2): 66-71.
  • Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF) (2002) Annual Report.
  • Pal MS, Reza A, Joshi YP and Panwar UBS (2014). Production potential of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under different intercropping systems. Agriculture for Sustainable Development, 2(2): 87-91.
  • Posada OS, Rosero NR, Rodríguez N and Costa CA (2012). Comparison of methods to determine the energy value of feeds for ruminants. Revista MVZ Cordoba, 17(3): 3184-3192.
  • Rahimi J, Laux P and Khalili A (2020). Assessment of climate change over Iran: CMIP5 results and their presentation in terms of Köppen–Geiger climate zones. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 141(1): 183-199.
  • Robertson JB and Van Soest PJ (1981). The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food; James, WPT, Theander O, Eds; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 123-158.
  • Sankarapandian R, Audilakshmi S, Sharma V, Ganesamurthy K, Talwar HS and Patil JV (2013). Effect of morpho-physiological traits on grain yield of sorghum grown under stress at different growth stages, and stability analysis. Journal of Agricultural Science, 151: 630-647.
  • SAS Institute, Inc (2017). JMP® Statistical Discovery Software (v.13.0). Cary, NC.
  • Sayar MS, Han Y, Yolcu H and Yucel H (2014). Yield and quality traits of some perennial forages as both sole crops and intercropping mixtures under irrigated conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(1): 59-65.
  • Sher A, Ansar M, Ijaz M and Sattar A (2016). Proximate analysis of forage sorghum cultivars with different doses of nitrogen and seed rate. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 21(2): 276-285.
  • Sher A, Hassan FU, Ali H, Hussain M and Sattar A (2017). Enhancing forage quality through appropriate nitrogen dose, seed rate and harvest stage, in sorghum cultivars grown in Pakistan. Grassland Science, 63(1): 15-22.
  • Shivprasad M and Singh R (2017). Effect of planting geometry and different levels of nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of multi-cut fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Monech). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6(4): 896-899.
  • Silva TC, Santos EM, Azevedo JAG, Edvan RL, Perazzo AF and Pinho RMA (2011). Agronomic divergence of sorghum hybrids for silage yield in the semiarid region of Paraiba. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40: 1886-1893.
  • Singh KP, Chaplot PC, Sumeriya HK and Choudhary GL (2016). Performance of single cut forage sorghum genotypes to fertility levels. Forage Research, 42(2): 140-142.
  • Tang C, Yang X, Chen X, Ameen A and Xie G. (2018). Sorghum biomass and quality and soil nitrogen balance response to nitrogen rate on semiarid marginal land. Field Crops Research, 215: 12-22.
  • Tolentino DC, Rodrigues JAS, Pires DADA, Veriato FT, Lima LOB and Moura MMA (2016). The quality of silage of different sorghum genotypes. Acta Scientiarum- Animal Sciences, 38: 143-149.
  • Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597.
  • Zhang YJ, Zhang XQ, Wang XY, Li N and Kan HM (2014). Establishing the carrying capacity of the grasslands of China: a review. The Rangeland Journal, 36(1): 1-9.

Influence of N fertilizing on Single-cut Sorgum × Sudangrass Hybrids’ Forage Yield and Nutritive Profile

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 61 - 72, 30.06.2023

Uğur Özkan Nesim Yıldız Celal Peker

https://doi.org/10.46592/turkager.1252187
Cited By: 1

Öz

The study aimed to observe the effects of two forage sorghum hybrids and different nitrogenous (N) fertilizer rates. The current study was set up in randomized complete block (RCB) as a split-plot design with triplicate at the Field Crops Department experimental area, University of Ankara in the 2022 summer season. This experiment included two treatments which had forage sorghum hybrids (Hay day and Super-graze) and nitrogen fertilization rates in the form of 18% ammonium sulfate [control group with no nitrogen (N0), 120 kg ha-1 N (N1), 180 kg ha-1 N (N2)]. N fertilizing rates positively influenced in agronomic profiles, yield components and nutritive profiles. The plant height (197.24-221.72 cm), green herbage yield (GHY) (60.42-70.89 ton ha-1), dry matter (DM) yield (17.77-23.98 ton ha-1), crude protein (CP) yield (0.97-1.90 ton ha-1), metabolic energy (ME) yield (33070.17-51840.85 Mcal ha-1), net energy production (NEp) yield (21164.91-33178.15 Mcal ha-1) increased with applied N rates. The maximum of DM (33.83%), CP (7.90%), TDN (58.63%), ME (2.16 Mcal kg-1 DM), NEp (1.80 Mcal kg-1 DM), and the minimum of ADF (33.09%), NDF (53.17%), ADL (5.14%) were obtained in N2 rates. In light of the results; “Hay-day” had more GHY. “Sugar-graze” had more DM yield and it was determined more digestible forage. It was inferred that the best yield components and nutritive profiles were obtained in N2 rate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fertilizing Sorghum Yield Quality

Kaynakça

  • Afzal M, Ahmad A and Ahmad AH (2012). Effect of nitrogen on growth and yield of sorghum forage (Sorghum bicolor (l.) Moench cv.) Under three cuttings system. Cercetări Agronomice, 45: 57-64.
  • Ahmeda IAM, Eltiliba AMA, Ganawab FHS and Islamd KR (2016). Utilization of industrial waste aqueous ammonia for irrigated forage sorghum production. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 62: 93-07.
  • Almodares A, Jafarinia M and Hadi MR (2009). The effects of nitrogen fertilizer on chemical compositions in corn and sweet sorghum. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 6(4): 441-446.
  • Amelework B, Shimelis H, Tongoona P, Mark Laing M and Mengistu F (2015). Genetic variation in lowland sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) landraces assessed by simple sequence repeats. Plant Genetic Resources, 13: 131-141.
  • AOAC (2005). Official methods of analysis (930.15 and 2001.12). 18th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Atis I, Konuskan O, Duru M, Gozubenli H and Yilmaz S (2012). Effect of harvesting time on yield, composition and forage quality of some forage sorghum cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 14(6): 879-886.
  • Avci M (2000). Determination of winter perennial wheatgrass- leguminous forage crops mixtures that can be cultivated to establish temporary artificial pasture in Çukurova. Çukurova University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 113 p., Adana.
  • Bilen Y and Turk M (2021). A research on possibilities of second crop sorghum-sudangrass hybrids growing on banaz condition. SDU Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 16(1): 46-51.
  • Brocke KV, Trouche G, Weltzien E, Barro CPK, Sidibe A, Zougmore R (2014) Helping farmers adapt to climate and cropping system change through increased access to sorghum genetic resources adapted to prevalent sorghum cropping systems in Burkina Faso. Experimental Agriculture, 50: 284-305.
  • Carmi A, Aharoni Y, Edelstein M, Umiel N, Hagiladi A, Yosef E, Nikbachat M, Zenou A, Miron J (2006). Effects of irrigation and plant density on yield, composition and in vitro digestibility of a new forage sorghum variety, Tal, at two maturity stages. Animal Feed Science Technology, 131: 121-133.
  • Celik B and Turk M (2021). The determination of forage yield and quality of some silage sorghum cultivars in ecological conditions of uşak province. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 2(1): 1-7.
  • Chaudhary JD, Pavaya RP, Malav JK, Dipika G, Chaudhary N, Kuniya NK and Jat JR (2018). Effect of nitrogen and potassium on yield, nutrient content and uptake by forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) on loamy sand. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(2): 761-765.
  • Cheema MA, Farhad W, Saleem MF, Khan HZ, Munir A, Wahid MA, Rasul F and Hammad HM (2010). Nitrogen management strategies for sustainable maize production. Crop Environment, 1: 49-52.
  • Costa RF, Pires DADA, Moura MMA, Sales ECJD, Rodrigues JAS and Rigueira JPS (2016). Agronomic characteristics of sorghum genotypes and nutritional values of silage. Acta Scientiarum- Animal Sciences, 38: 127-133.
  • Damian JM, Ros COD, Silva RFD, Coldebella, IJ and Simon DH (2017). N, P or K doses on the dry matter and crude protein yield in maize and sorghum for silage. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 47: 53-61.
  • Fonseca, L, Mezzalira JC, Bremm C, Filho RSA, Gonda HL and Carvalho PCF (2012). Management targets for maximising the short-term herbage intake rate of cattle grazing in Sorghum bicolor. Livestock Science, 145: 205–211.
  • Govea FE, Marsalis MA, Lauriault LM and Bean BW (2010). Forage sorghum nutritive value: A review. Online. Forage and Grazinglands, 8(1): 1-6.
  • Horrocks RD and Vallentine JF (1999). Harvested Forages. Academic Press, London, UK.
  • Holman JD, Obour AK and Mengel DB (2019). Nitrogen application effects on forage sorghum production and nitrate concentration. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 42(20): 2794-2804.
  • Ikanović J, Janković S, Popović V, Rakić S, Dražić G, Živanović L and Kolarić L (2014). The effect of nitrogen fertilizer rates on green biomass and dry matter yield of Sorghum ssp. at different growth stages. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 30(4): 743-749.
  • Iqbal MA (2015). Agronomic management strategies elevate forage sorghum yield: A review. Journal of Advanced Botany and Zoology, 3: 1-6.
  • Iqbal MA, Ahamd B, Shah MH and Ali K (2015). A study on forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) production in perspectives of white revolution in Punjab, Pakistan: Issues and future options. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 15(4): 640-647.
  • Kaplan M, Baran O, Unlukara A, Kale H, Arslan M, Kara K and Ulas A (2016). The effects of different nitrogen doses and irrigation levels on yield, nutritive value, fermentation and gas production of corn silage. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 21(1): 101-109.
  • Kaplan M, Kara K, Unlukara A, Kale H, Beyzi SB, Varol IS and Kamalak A (2019). Water deficit and nitrogen affects yield and feed value of sorghum sudangrass silage. Agricultural Water Management, 218: 30-36.
  • Keskin B, Akdeniz H, Temel S and Baris, E (2018). Determination of agricultural characteristics of some silage sorghum and Sudan grass varieties grown as second product. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(4): 412-418.
  • Kir H and Sahan BD (2019). Yield and quality feature of some silage sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid cultivars in ecological conditions of Kırşehir province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 6(3): 388-395.
  • Księżak J, Matyka M, Bojarszczuk J and Kacprzak A (2012). Evaluation of productivity of maize and sorghum to be used for energy purposes as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. Žemdribystė-Agriculture, 99(4): 363-370.
  • Kumar TVA, Samuel DVK, Jha SK and Sinha JP (2015). Twin screw extrusion of sorghum and soya blends: a response surface analysis. Journal of Agricultural Science Technology, 17: 649-662.
  • Lema M, Felix A, Salako S and Bishnoi U (2000). Nutrient content and in vitro dry matter digestibility from various grain sorghum and sweet sorghum cultivars. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 17: 55-70.
  • Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, Dhima KV, Dordas CA, Yiakoulaki MD (2006). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crop Research, 99: 106-113.
  • Lyons SE, Ketterings QM, Godwin GS, Cherney JH, Cherney DJ, Meisinger JJ and Kilcer TF (2019). Double‐cropping with forage sorghum and forage triticale in New York. Agronomy Journal, 111(6): 3374-3382.
  • Mahama GY, Vara Prasad PV, Mengel DB and Tesso TT (2014). Influence of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of grain sorghum hybrids and ınbred lines. Agronomy Journal, 106(5): 1623-1630.
  • Marsalis MA, Angadi SV and Contreras-Govea FE (2010). Dry matter yield and nutritive value of corn, forage sorghum, and BMR forage sorghum at different plant populations and nitrogen rates. Field Crop Research, 116: 52-57.
  • McMaster GS and Wilhelm WW (1997). Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 87(4): 291-300.
  • Monteiro MCD, Anunciação Filho CJ, Tabosa JN, Oliveira FJ, Reis OV and Bastos GQ (2004). Avaliação do desempenho de sorgo forrageiro para o semiárido de Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, 3: 52-61. (In Spanish)
  • National Research Council (NRC) 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Noori MS (2020). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on growth and forage yield of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] under takhar agro-ecological conditions. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 1(2): 66-71.
  • Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF) (2002) Annual Report.
  • Pal MS, Reza A, Joshi YP and Panwar UBS (2014). Production potential of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under different intercropping systems. Agriculture for Sustainable Development, 2(2): 87-91.
  • Posada OS, Rosero NR, Rodríguez N and Costa CA (2012). Comparison of methods to determine the energy value of feeds for ruminants. Revista MVZ Cordoba, 17(3): 3184-3192.
  • Rahimi J, Laux P and Khalili A (2020). Assessment of climate change over Iran: CMIP5 results and their presentation in terms of Köppen–Geiger climate zones. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 141(1): 183-199.
  • Robertson JB and Van Soest PJ (1981). The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food; James, WPT, Theander O, Eds; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 123-158.
  • Sankarapandian R, Audilakshmi S, Sharma V, Ganesamurthy K, Talwar HS and Patil JV (2013). Effect of morpho-physiological traits on grain yield of sorghum grown under stress at different growth stages, and stability analysis. Journal of Agricultural Science, 151: 630-647.
  • SAS Institute, Inc (2017). JMP® Statistical Discovery Software (v.13.0). Cary, NC.
  • Sayar MS, Han Y, Yolcu H and Yucel H (2014). Yield and quality traits of some perennial forages as both sole crops and intercropping mixtures under irrigated conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(1): 59-65.
  • Sher A, Ansar M, Ijaz M and Sattar A (2016). Proximate analysis of forage sorghum cultivars with different doses of nitrogen and seed rate. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 21(2): 276-285.
  • Sher A, Hassan FU, Ali H, Hussain M and Sattar A (2017). Enhancing forage quality through appropriate nitrogen dose, seed rate and harvest stage, in sorghum cultivars grown in Pakistan. Grassland Science, 63(1): 15-22.
  • Shivprasad M and Singh R (2017). Effect of planting geometry and different levels of nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of multi-cut fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Monech). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6(4): 896-899.
  • Silva TC, Santos EM, Azevedo JAG, Edvan RL, Perazzo AF and Pinho RMA (2011). Agronomic divergence of sorghum hybrids for silage yield in the semiarid region of Paraiba. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40: 1886-1893.
  • Singh KP, Chaplot PC, Sumeriya HK and Choudhary GL (2016). Performance of single cut forage sorghum genotypes to fertility levels. Forage Research, 42(2): 140-142.
  • Tang C, Yang X, Chen X, Ameen A and Xie G. (2018). Sorghum biomass and quality and soil nitrogen balance response to nitrogen rate on semiarid marginal land. Field Crops Research, 215: 12-22.
  • Tolentino DC, Rodrigues JAS, Pires DADA, Veriato FT, Lima LOB and Moura MMA (2016). The quality of silage of different sorghum genotypes. Acta Scientiarum- Animal Sciences, 38: 143-149.
  • Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597.
  • Zhang YJ, Zhang XQ, Wang XY, Li N and Kan HM (2014). Establishing the carrying capacity of the grasslands of China: a review. The Rangeland Journal, 36(1): 1-9.
Toplam 54 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ziraat Mühendisliği
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Uğur Özkan 0000-0002-6869-4526

Nesim Yıldız 0000-0002-6705-2038

Celal Peker 0000-0003-3990-3533

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 25 Haziran 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 20 Şubat 2023
Kabul Tarihi 12 Mayıs 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Özkan, U., Yıldız, N., & Peker, C. (2023). Influence of N fertilizing on Single-cut Sorgum × Sudangrass Hybrids’ Forage Yield and Nutritive Profile. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 4(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.46592/turkager.1252187

Cited By

Uptake of Fertilizer Nitrogen and Soil Nitrogen by Sorghum Sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor × Sorghum sudanense) in a Greenhouse Experiment with 15N-Labelled Ammonium Nitrate
Soil Systems
https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7030071
 Kapak Resmi İndir

26831

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi

Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research'deki makaleler OPEN ACCESS açık erişimli makalelerdir, yani tüm içeriğin kullanıcıya veya kurumuna ücretsiz olarak erişilebilir olduğu anlamına gelir. Yayınlanan makaleler Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC-BY-NC-4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en) ile lisanslanmıştır. Bu lisans, üçüncü tarafların orijinal çalışmaya uygun şekilde atıfta bulunarak içeriği ticari olmayan amaçlarla paylaşmasına ve uyarlamasına izin verir. Daha fazla bilgi için lütfen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ adresini ziyaret edin. 

Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research (TURKAGER); CABI, EBSCO, Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals (MIAR), CAS Source Index (CASSI), Food Science & Technology Abstracts (FSTA), BASE, Directory Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), ROAD (Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources), WorldCat, ResearchBible, Beluga-Catalogue of Hamburg Libraries, Advanced Science Index (ASI), Scientific Literature (Scilit), Scholar Article Journal Index (SAJI), IJIFACTOR Indexing, Electronic Journals Library (EZB), SJIF Master Journals List, International Institute of Organized Research (I2OR), International Services for Impact Factor and Indexing (ISIFI), ASOS INDEX, Cosmos, Technical Information Library (TIB), ROOTINDEXING, Scientific Indexing Services (SIS), Journal Tables of Contents, Quality Open Access Market tarafından indekslenmektedir.

Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research (TURKAGER) herhangi bir başvuru, yayın ücreti veya abonelik ücreti almamaktadır.

Yayıncı: Ebubekir ALTUNTAŞ

Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research (TURKAGER) makalelerine (TURKAGER) atıf yapan makaleler için lütfen tıklayınız: