Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Permakültür Alanında Bilimsel Üretim: Bibliyometrik ve Görsel Haritalama

Year 2025, Volume: 28 Issue: 6, 1557 - 1574

Cemile Bahtiyar Karadeniz , Yunus Ergün

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1691020

Abstract

Bu çalışma, permakültür alanındaki akademik üretimin gelişimini bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle inceleyerek, bilgi birikiminin evrimini, araştırma eğilimlerini ve mevcut boşlukları sistematik olarak ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Hızla şehirleşen toplumların sürdürülebilirlik arayışlarına yanıt veren permakültür yaklaşımının, güncel akademik yazındaki yeri nicel verilere dayanarak değerlendirilmiştir. Web of Science veri tabanında 1981–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan 441 bilimsel yayın analiz kapsamına alınmıştır. Zamana bağlı dağılım incelendiğinde, permakültür konulu çalışmaların özellikle 2017 (42 yayın) ve 2021 (53 yayın) yıllarında belirgin bir artış gösterdiği görülmektedir. En üretken araştırmacılar arasında Alexander Badman-King (9 yayın) ve Sarah T. Lovell (6 yayın) öne çıkarken, en yüksek atıf alan çalışma ise Brian Machovina, Kenneth J. Feeley ve William J. Ripple’ın 2015 tarihli ortak yayınıdır (281 atıf). Ayrıca, Laurrens Klerkx’in çalışmaları da toplam 304 atıf ile alandaki etkili katkılar arasında yer almaktadır. Yayın türleri bakımından incelemelerde çoğunlukla dergi makaleleri (321 eser) tercih edilmiştir. Disipliner dağılımda ise çevre bilimleri (125 yayın), tarım (91), bilim ve teknoloji çalışmaları (63), eğitim bilimleri (33) ve coğrafya (31) ön plana çıkmaktadır. Ülke bazlı dağılımda ABD (90 yayın), Birleşik Krallık (53) ve Avustralya (36) en fazla katkı sağlayan ülkeler olurken, yayınların büyük çoğunluğu İngilizce (399) dilindedir. Bu yayınların önemli bir kısmı ESCI (134), SCI-Expanded (131) ve SSCI (113) endekslerinde yer almakta ve bu durum alandaki çalışmaların akademik etkisini göstermektedir. Anahtar kelime analizinde, “permakültür” terimi 177 kez ile en sık kullanılan kavram olurken, onu “sürdürülebilirlik” (48) ve “agroekoloji” (32) izlemiştir. Bu çalışma, permakültür araştırmalarının sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve çevresel sistem tasarımı gibi temalar etrafında yoğunlaştığını ortaya koymakta; alanın akademik konumunu, literatürdeki yapısal örüntüleri ve araştırma boşluklarını nicel verilerle analiz ederek gelecekteki çalışmalara yön vermeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

Permakültür Tarım ekolojisi Kentsel tarım Sürdürülebilir tarım

References

  • Akdağ, G. & Cicik, Ş. (2021). Çiftlik turizmi uygulamalarının permakültür gönüllülerinin motivasyonlarına etkisi, Gastroia: Journal of Gastronomy and Travel Research, 5(2), 359-387. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/ download/article-file/1692124.
  • Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença Jr, D., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 110(3), 392.
  • Arslan, B. & Akyol, E. M. (2023). Web of Science (WOS) veri tabaninda yer alan örgütsel sessizlik konulu makalelerin bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmesi. Journal of Business in The Digital Age, 6(Özel Sayı), 46-56. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3112664.
  • Kabacık, S. Ç. & Gül, E. D. (2021). Okul öncesi eğitim ve permakültür. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18 (Eğitim Bilimleri Özel Sayısı), 5140-5156, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1686843.
  • Canty, J. (Ed.). (2019). Globalism and localization: Emergent solutions to ecological and social crises. Routledge.
  • Dereli, A. B. (2024). Vosviewer ile bibliyometrik analiz. Communicata, (28),1-7, https://doi.org/10.32952/ communicata.1517725.
  • Dirik, D., Eryılmaz, İ., & Erhan, T. (2023). Post-truth kavramı üzerine yapılan çalışmaların VOSviewer ile bibliyometrik Analizi. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(2), 164-188. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1271369
  • Ferguson, R. S. & Lovell, S. T. (2013). Permaculture for agroecology: Design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 34(2), 251-274, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0181-6
  • Ferguson, R. S. & Lovell, S. T. (2017). Livelihoods and production diversity on U.S. permaculture farms, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems,41(6), 588-613, https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1320 349
  • Hathaway, M. D. (2016). Agroecology and permaculture: addressing key ecological problems by rethinking and redesigning agricultural systems. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6, 239-250. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13412-015-0254-8.
  • Holmgren, D. (1992). Uncommon sense: development of the permaculture concept. Permac Int 44, 26–30.
  • Holmgren, D. (2001). The Essence of permaculture, extracts of book permaculture: principles and pathways to sustainability. Holmgren Design Services. The Source of Permaculture Vision and Innovation.
  • Holmgren, D. (2002). Permaculture: Principles and pathways beyond sustainability. Hepburn: Chelsea Green Publishing Co.
  • Krebs, J. & Bach, S. (2018). Permaculture-scientific evidence of principles for the agroecological design of farming systems. Sustainability, 10(9), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093218
  • Machovina, B., Feeley, K. J., & Ripple, W. J. (2015). Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption, Scıence of the Total Envıronment, 536, 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07. 022.
  • Maye, D. (2018). Examining Innovation for Sustainability from the Bottom Up: An Analysis of the Permaculture Community in England. Journal of the European Society for Rural Sociologia, 58(2), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12141
  • Mollison, B. & Holmgren, D. (1978). Permaculture one: a perennial agricultural system for human settlements. Tagari, Tyalgum
  • Mollison B. C. & Slay, R. M. (1997). Introduction to permaculture, 2nd edn. Tagari, Tasmania
  • Mollison, B. (1988). Permaculture: a designer's manual. Tagari, Tasmania
  • Mollison, B. (2003). The foundation year-book of the permaculture academy. http://www.Patriciamicha eldesign.com/texts/YearBook.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2013
  • Mollison, B. (2017). Permakültüre giriş. (Çev. E. Özkan). Sinek Sekiz Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. Suny, Albany
  • Özçalık, M., Kavuncu, O., & Şahin, Ş. (2023). Kırıkkale Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin permakültüre yönelik tutumlarının belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, 7(1), 1-16.5140-5156. https://doi.org/10.32328/ turkjforsci.1226773
  • Rhodes, C .J. (2013). Feeding and healing the world: through regenerative agriculture and permaculture. Science Progress. 95(4), 345–446. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685012X13504990668392
  • Suh, J. (2014). Permaculture principles, practices, and environmentalism. In: Iqbal, A., et al. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 58. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16155-1_1
  • Yang, L., Chen, Z., Liu, T., Gong, Z., Yu, Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 96, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0911-6
  • Zupic, I. & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.

Scientific Production in Permaculture: Bibliometric and Visual Mapping

Year 2025, Volume: 28 Issue: 6, 1557 - 1574

Cemile Bahtiyar Karadeniz , Yunus Ergün

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1691020

Abstract

This study aims to systematically examine the development of academic production in the field of permaculture through bibliometric analysis, revealing the evolution of knowledge, research trends, and existing gaps. The approach of permaculture, which responds to the sustainability pursuits of rapidly urbanizing societies, has been evaluated based on quantitative data from current scholarly literature. A total of 441 scientific publications published between 1981 and 2025 in the Web of Science database were included in the analysis. Analysis of the temporal distribution indicates a significant increase in permaculture-related studies, particularly in 2017 (42 publications) and 2021 (53 publications). Among the most prolific researchers are Alexander Badman-King (9 publications) and Sarah T. Lovell (6 publications), while the most highly cited work is a 2015 co-authored publication by Brian Machovina, Kenneth J. Feeley, and William J. Ripple, which has garnered 281 citations. Additionally, Laurens Klerkx’s works also constitute influential contributions to the field, with a total of 304 citations. In terms of publication types, journal articles constitute the majority, totaling 321 works. Disciplinary distribution highlights environmental sciences (125 publications), agriculture (91), science and technology studies (63), educational sciences (33), and geography (31) as the primary fields contributing to permaculture research. Country-wise, the United States (90 publications), the United Kingdom (53), and Australia (36) are the leading contributors, while the majority of publications are in the English language (399). A significant portion of these works is indexed in ESCI (134), SCI-Expanded (131), and SSCI (113), reflecting the academic impact of the research within the field. Keyword analysis reveals that the term “permaculture” appears 177 times, making it the most frequently used concept, followed by “sustainability” (48 mentions) and “agroecology” (32). These findings suggest that permaculture research is generally associated with sustainable development, ecological agriculture, and holistic environmental approaches. This study reveals that permaculture research is predominantly concentrated around themes such as sustainable development and environmental systems design; it aims to guide future research by analyzing the field’s academic position, structural patterns in the literature, and existing research gaps through quantitative data.

Keywords

Permaculture Agroecology Urban agriculture Sustainable farming

References

  • Akdağ, G. & Cicik, Ş. (2021). Çiftlik turizmi uygulamalarının permakültür gönüllülerinin motivasyonlarına etkisi, Gastroia: Journal of Gastronomy and Travel Research, 5(2), 359-387. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/ download/article-file/1692124.
  • Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença Jr, D., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 110(3), 392.
  • Arslan, B. & Akyol, E. M. (2023). Web of Science (WOS) veri tabaninda yer alan örgütsel sessizlik konulu makalelerin bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmesi. Journal of Business in The Digital Age, 6(Özel Sayı), 46-56. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3112664.
  • Kabacık, S. Ç. & Gül, E. D. (2021). Okul öncesi eğitim ve permakültür. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18 (Eğitim Bilimleri Özel Sayısı), 5140-5156, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1686843.
  • Canty, J. (Ed.). (2019). Globalism and localization: Emergent solutions to ecological and social crises. Routledge.
  • Dereli, A. B. (2024). Vosviewer ile bibliyometrik analiz. Communicata, (28),1-7, https://doi.org/10.32952/ communicata.1517725.
  • Dirik, D., Eryılmaz, İ., & Erhan, T. (2023). Post-truth kavramı üzerine yapılan çalışmaların VOSviewer ile bibliyometrik Analizi. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(2), 164-188. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1271369
  • Ferguson, R. S. & Lovell, S. T. (2013). Permaculture for agroecology: Design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 34(2), 251-274, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0181-6
  • Ferguson, R. S. & Lovell, S. T. (2017). Livelihoods and production diversity on U.S. permaculture farms, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems,41(6), 588-613, https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1320 349
  • Hathaway, M. D. (2016). Agroecology and permaculture: addressing key ecological problems by rethinking and redesigning agricultural systems. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6, 239-250. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13412-015-0254-8.
  • Holmgren, D. (1992). Uncommon sense: development of the permaculture concept. Permac Int 44, 26–30.
  • Holmgren, D. (2001). The Essence of permaculture, extracts of book permaculture: principles and pathways to sustainability. Holmgren Design Services. The Source of Permaculture Vision and Innovation.
  • Holmgren, D. (2002). Permaculture: Principles and pathways beyond sustainability. Hepburn: Chelsea Green Publishing Co.
  • Krebs, J. & Bach, S. (2018). Permaculture-scientific evidence of principles for the agroecological design of farming systems. Sustainability, 10(9), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093218
  • Machovina, B., Feeley, K. J., & Ripple, W. J. (2015). Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption, Scıence of the Total Envıronment, 536, 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07. 022.
  • Maye, D. (2018). Examining Innovation for Sustainability from the Bottom Up: An Analysis of the Permaculture Community in England. Journal of the European Society for Rural Sociologia, 58(2), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12141
  • Mollison, B. & Holmgren, D. (1978). Permaculture one: a perennial agricultural system for human settlements. Tagari, Tyalgum
  • Mollison B. C. & Slay, R. M. (1997). Introduction to permaculture, 2nd edn. Tagari, Tasmania
  • Mollison, B. (1988). Permaculture: a designer's manual. Tagari, Tasmania
  • Mollison, B. (2003). The foundation year-book of the permaculture academy. http://www.Patriciamicha eldesign.com/texts/YearBook.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2013
  • Mollison, B. (2017). Permakültüre giriş. (Çev. E. Özkan). Sinek Sekiz Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. Suny, Albany
  • Özçalık, M., Kavuncu, O., & Şahin, Ş. (2023). Kırıkkale Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin permakültüre yönelik tutumlarının belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, 7(1), 1-16.5140-5156. https://doi.org/10.32328/ turkjforsci.1226773
  • Rhodes, C .J. (2013). Feeding and healing the world: through regenerative agriculture and permaculture. Science Progress. 95(4), 345–446. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685012X13504990668392
  • Suh, J. (2014). Permaculture principles, practices, and environmentalism. In: Iqbal, A., et al. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 58. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16155-1_1
  • Yang, L., Chen, Z., Liu, T., Gong, Z., Yu, Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 96, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0911-6
  • Zupic, I. & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Sustainable Agricultural Development, Agricultural Policy
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLE
Authors

Cemile Bahtiyar Karadeniz 0000-0002-3902-5251

Yunus Ergün 0000-0002-2986-6073

Early Pub Date August 14, 2025
Publication Date
Submission Date May 4, 2025
Acceptance Date July 30, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025Volume: 28 Issue: 6

Cite

APA Bahtiyar Karadeniz, C., & Ergün, Y. (2025). Permakültür Alanında Bilimsel Üretim: Bibliyometrik ve Görsel Haritalama. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 28(6), 1557-1574. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1691020
 Download Cover Image


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149