Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Determination of Potential Forage Value of Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Tree Leaves

Yıl 2022, , 576 - 582, 30.12.2022

Özer Kurt

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1065337
Cited By: 1

Öz

In this study, was purposed to determine the chemical composition, condensed tannin (CT) content, in vitro total gas (TG) production, metabolic energy (ME) and organic matter digestibility (OMD) of honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) tree leaves collected in different months. The differences between the chemical composition, condensed tannin (CT), in vitro total gas production (TG), metabolic energy (ME) and organic matter digestibility (OMD) of honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) leaves by month were found to be significant (P<0.05). Honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) tree leaves crude protein (CP) 5.59%-19.48%, crude fat 3.64-9.71%, acid detergent fiber (ADF) 23.54-34.52%, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) 38.58%-49.00, CT 13.86-19.35% , in vitro TG productions varied between 27.41-41.43 ml-1200 mg DM, ME values 6.52-8.99 Mj kg-1 DM and OMD 49.43-64.50%, and differences between them were found to be statistically significant (P<0.05). As a result, considering the crude nutrient composition, it can be said that leaves of honey locust can be an alternative source of roughage, and attention should be paid to their use due to their high tannin content.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Alternative roughage Harvest stage Honey locust (Gleditsia tricanthos) Forage value Tree leaves

Kaynakça

  • Abdulrazak SA, Fujihara T, Ondilek JK, Ørskov ER 2000. Nutritive Evaluation of Some Acacia Tree Leaves from Kenya. Animal Feed Science and Technology 85 (1-2): 89–98.
  • Alatürk F, Alpars T, Gökkuş A, Coşkun E, Akbağ IA 2014. Bazı Çalı Türlerinin Mevsimsel Değişimi. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 2 (1): 133-141.
  • Alçiçek A, Kılıç A, Ayhan V, Özdoğan M 2010. Forage Production and Problems in Turkey. Proceedings of the Turkey Agricultural Engineering VII Technical Congress. 11-15, Ankara, Turkey.
  • AOAC 1990. Official Method of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA, 66-88.
  • Ataşoğlu C, Şahin S, Canbolat Ö, Baytekin H 2010. The Effect of Harvest Stage on The Potential Nutritive Value of Kermes Oak (Quercus coccifera) Leaves. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 22 (2): 182-185.
  • Başer A, Kamalak A 2020. Türkiye’nin Akdeniz Bölgesinde Yetişen Bazı Baklagil Ağaç Yapraklarının Yem Değerleri ve In Vitro Fermentasyon Özellikleri. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 7(4): 940-947.
  • Boğa M, Kocadayıoğulları F, Can ME 2021. Tanenlerin Ruminant Hayvan Beslemede Kullanımı. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 4 (4): 217-225.
  • Boğa M, Avci BC, Kiliç HN, Civaner HN, 2022. Farklı Baklagil Ağaçları Yapraklarının Alternatif Yem Kaynağı Olarak Besin Madde İçeriği ve Sindirilebilirliğinin Belirlenmesi Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi http://dogadergi.ksu.edu.tr/tr/pub/ksutarimdoga/article/993655.
  • Borens FM, Poppi DP 1990. The Nutritive Value for Ruminants of Tagasaste (Chamaecytisus palmensis), a Leguminous Tree. Animal Feed Science and Technology 28 (3-4): 275-292.
  • Bouazza L, Bodas R, Boufennara S, Bousseboua H, Lopez S 2012. Nutritive Evaluation of Foliage from Fodder Trees and Shrubs Characteristic of Algerian Arid and Semi Arid Areas. Journal Animal Feeding Sci 21(3): 521-536.
  • Brewbaker JL 1986. Leguminous Trees and Shrubs for Southeast Asia and The South Pacific. (Forages in Southeast Asian and South Pacific Agriculture, Proceedings Series. ACIAR Proceedings, Ed. In Blair GJ, Ivory DA, Evans TR) 43-50.
  • Budağ C 2009. Baklagil Tane Yemleri ve Ruminant Beslenmede Kullanımı. YYÜ Fen Bilim Enstitüsü Derg 14(2): 88-107.
  • Canbolat Ö 2012. Determination of Potential Nutritive Value of Exotic Tree Leaves in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veterinerlik Fakültesi Dergisi 18(3): 419-423.
  • Canbolat Ö, Karaman Ş 2009. Bazı Baklagil Kaba Yemlerinin in vitro Gaz Üretimi, Organik Madde Sindirimi, Nispi Yem Değeri ve Metabolik Enerji İçeriklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 15 (02): 188-196.
  • Degen AA, Blanke A, Becker K, Kam M, Benjamin RW, Makkar HPS 1997. The Nutritive Value of Acacia saligna and Acacia salicina for Goats and Sheep. Animal Science 64(2): 253.
  • Demirkol İ 2019. Akasya Yaprağının Besleme Değeri ve Metan Üretim Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi. Harran Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Zootekni Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 30 sy.
  • El-Shatnawi MK, Mohawesh YM 2000. Seasonal Chemical Composition of Saltbush in Semiarid Grassland of Jordan. Journal of Range Management 53: 211-214.
  • Foroughbakhch R, Carrillo-Parra A, Cardenas-Avila ML, Moreno-Limon S 2012. Seasonal Changes in Alimentary Value and Digestibility of Gleditsia triacanthos L. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 11(22): 4279-4282.
  • Frost RA, Wilson LM, Launchbaugh KL, Hovde EM 2008. Seasonal Change in Forage Value of Rangeland Weeds in Northern Idaho. Invasive Plant Science and Management 1(4): 343-351.
  • Hagerman AE 1988. Extraction of Tannin from Fresh and Preserved Leaves. Journal of chemical Ecology 14(2): 453-61.
  • Kaçar B, Katkat AV, Öztürk Ş 2006. Bitki Fizyolojisi. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 563 sy.
  • Kamalak A 2007. Kondense Tanenin Olumsuz Etkilerini Azaltmak İçin Kullanılan Katkı Maddeleri ve Yemlere Uygulanan İşlemler. KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 10(2).
  • Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Atalay AI, Kaplan M 2010. Determination of Potential Nutritive Value of Young, Old and Senescent Leaves of Arbutus andrachne Tree. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 37(2): 257-260.
  • Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Gurbuz Y, Ozay O, Ozkose E 2005. Chemical Composition and Its Relationship to in vitro Gas Production of Several Tannin Containing Trees and Shrub Leaves. Asian- Aust. Journal Animal Sciences 18(2): 203-208.
  • Kamalak A, Guven I, Kaplan M, Boga, M, Atalay AI, Ozkan CO 2012. Potential Nutritive Value of Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Pods from Different Growing Sites for Ruminants. Journal Agricultural Science Technology 14(1): 115-126.
  • Kaya E, Canbolat O, Atalay AI, Kurt O, Kamalak A 2016. Potential Nutritive Value and Methane Production of Pods, Seed and Senescent Leaves of Gleditsia triacanthos Trees. Livestock Research for Rural Development 28(7):123.
  • Khazaal K, Boza J, Ørskov ER 1994. Assesment of Phenolics-Related Anti-Nutritive Effects in Mediterranean Browse: A Comparison Between The Use of The In Vitro Gas Production Technique with or without Polyvinylpolypyrrolidone or Nylon Bag. Animal Feed Science Technology 49(1-2): 133–149.
  • Kökten K, Kaplan M, Hatipoğlu R, Saruhan V, Çınar S 2012. Nutritive Values of The Leaves of Mediterranean Shrubs. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 22(1): 188-194.
  • Luginbuhl JM, Mueller JP 2000. Evaluation of Fodder Trees for Goats. 7th International Conference on Goats 15-18 May 2000, France
  • Makkar HPS, Blümmel M, Becker K 1995. Formation of Complexes Between Polyvinyl Pyrrolidones or Polyethylene Glycols and Tannins, and Their Implication in Gas Production and True Digestibility in in vitro Techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 73(6): 897-913.
  • Medjekal S, Bodas R, Bousseboua H, López S 2018. Evaluation of Carob (Ceratonia siliqua) and Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Pods as a Feed for Sheep. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 8(2): 247-256.
  • Menke KH, Steingass H 1988. Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value Obtained from Chemical Analysis and in vitro Gas Production Using Rumen Fluid. Animal Research development 28: 7-55.
  • Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W 1979. The Estimation of the Digestibility and Metabolizable Energy Content of Ruminant Feedingstuffs from The Gas Production When They Are Incubated with Rumen Liquor in vitro. The Journal of Agricultural Science 93(1): 217-222.
  • Mountousis J, Papanikolaou K, Stanogias G, Chatzitheodoridis F, Roukos C 2008. Seasonal Variation of Chemical Composition and Dry Matter Digestibility of Rangelands in NW Greece. Journal of Central European Agriculture 9(3): 547- 556.
  • Oktay G, Temel S 2015. Ebu Cehil (Calligonum polygonoides L. ssp. commosum (L’Her.) Çalısının Yıllık Yem Değerinin Belirlenmesi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1): 30-36.
  • Özelçam H, Dereboylu AE, Canbolat Ö, Ipçak HH 2019. Kurutulmuş ve Silolanmış Pavlonya (Paulownia sp.) Ağacı Yapraklarının Yem Değerinin Ileri Düzeyde Tanımlanması ve in vitro Sindirilebilirliğinin Belirlenmesi. 118O461 nolu Tübitak Tovag Proje Sonuç Raporu.
  • Özyazici MA, Açıkbaş S 2020. Ihlamur Ağacı (Tilia rubra subsp. caucasica (Rupr.) V. Engl.) Yapraklarının Yem Değeri Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(3):581-596.
  • Papachristou TG, Nastis AS 1996. Influence of Deciduous Broad Leaved Woody Species in Goat Nutrition During The Dry Season in Northern Greece. Journal of Small Ruminant Research 20(1): 15-22.
  • Parlak AO, Gokkus A, Hakyemez BH, Baytekin H 2011. Forage Quality of Deciduos Woody and Herbaceous Species Throughout a Year in Mediterranean Shrublands of Western Turkey. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 21(3): 513-518.
  • Paterson RT, Karanja GM, Nyaata OZ, Kariuki, IW, Roothaert RL 1998. A Review of Tree Fodder Production and Utilization within Smallholder Agroforestry Systems in Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 41 (2): 181-199.
  • Pecetti L, Tava A, Pagnotta MA, Russi L 2007. Variations in Forage Quality and Chemical Composition Among Italian Accessions of Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) Strit. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 87(6): 985-991.
  • Salem BH, Atti N, Priolo A, Nefzaoui A 2002. Polyethylene Glycol in Concentrate or Feed Blocks to Deactivate Condensed Tannins in Acacia Cyanophylla Lindl. Foliage. 1. Effects on Intake, Digestion and Growth by Barbarine Lambs. Animal Science 75 (1):127-135.
  • Singh B, Todaria NP 2012. Nutrients Composition Changes in Leaves of Quercus semecarpifolia at Different Seasons and Altitudes. Annals of Forest Research 55(2): 189–196.
  • Şimşek N, Kamalak A 2019. Bazı Ağaç Yapraklarının Anti Metanojenik Özelliklerinin in vitro Gaz Üretim Tekniği ile Belirlenmesi. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture 2(1): 1-5.
  • Tatlıyer A, Kamalak A, Öztürk D 2019. Sandal Ağacı (Arbutus andrachne) Yapraklarının Potansiyel Besleme Değerinin Belirlenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 22(2): 315-321.
  • Temel S, Kır AE 2015. Bazı Çalı ve Ağaç Türlerinin Mevsimsel Dönem ve Hayvan Gruplarınagöre Otlanmada Tercih Durumlarının Belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi 1(1): 31 – 39.
  • Tolera A, Said AN 1997. in sacco, in vitro andin vivo digestibility and Supplementary Value of Some Tropical Forage Legume Hays to Sheep Feeding on a Basal Diet of Maize Stover. Journal of Physiology Animal Nutrition 77(1): 35-43.
  • Tolunay A, Adıyaman E, Akyol A, Ince D 2009. Herbage Growth and Fodder Yield Characteristics of Kermes Oak (Quecus coccifera L.) in a Vegetation Period. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8(2): 290-294.
  • Van Soest PJ 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. (Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell University Press) 44 sy.
  • Van Soest PV, Robertson JB Lewis BA 1991. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74(10): 3583-3597.
  • Ventura MR, Castanon JIR, Pieltain MC, Flores MP 2004. Nutritive Value of Forage Shrubs: Bituminaria bituminosa, Rumex lunaria, Acacia salicina, Cassia sturtii and Adenocorpus foliosus. Small Ruminant Research. 52: 13-18.

Gladiçya (Gleditsia triacanthos) Ağaç Yapraklarının Potansiyel Yem Değerinin Saptanması

Yıl 2022, , 576 - 582, 30.12.2022

Özer Kurt

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1065337
Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışma da farklı aylarda toplanan gladiçya (Gleditsia triacanthos) ağaç yapraklarının kimyasal bileşimi, kondanse tanen (KT) içeriği, in vitro toplam gaz (TG) üretimi, metabolik enerji (ME) ve organik madde sindirim derecesi (OMSD)’nin saptanması amaçlanmıştır. Aylara göre gladiçya ağaç yapraklarının kimyasal bileşimi, kondanse tanen (KT), in vitro toplam gaz (TG) üretimi, metabolik enerji (ME) ve organik madde sindirim derecesi (OMSD) arasındaki farklılıklar önemli bulunmuştur (P<0.05). Gladiçya ağaç yaprakları ham protein (HP) %5.59-19.48, ham yağ (HY) %3.64-9.71, asit deterjan lif (ADF) %23.54-34.52, nötr deterjan lif (NDF) %38.58-49.00, KT %13.86-19.35, in vitro TG üretimleri 27.41-41.43 ml-1200 mg KM, ME değerleri 6.52-8.99 Mj kg-1 KM ve OMSD %49.43-64.50, aralığında değişmiş ve aralarındaki farklılıklar istatistiki olarak önemli bulunmuştur (P<0.05). Sonuç olarak ham besin madde bilşimine bakıldığında gladiçya yapraklarının alternatif kaba yem kaynağı olabileceği, yüksek tanen içeriği nedeniyle kullanımına dikkat edilmesi gerektiği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ağaç yaprağı Alternatif kaba yem Gladiçya(Gleditsia tricanthos) Yem değeri Hasat zamanı Forage value Tree leaves

Kaynakça

  • Abdulrazak SA, Fujihara T, Ondilek JK, Ørskov ER 2000. Nutritive Evaluation of Some Acacia Tree Leaves from Kenya. Animal Feed Science and Technology 85 (1-2): 89–98.
  • Alatürk F, Alpars T, Gökkuş A, Coşkun E, Akbağ IA 2014. Bazı Çalı Türlerinin Mevsimsel Değişimi. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 2 (1): 133-141.
  • Alçiçek A, Kılıç A, Ayhan V, Özdoğan M 2010. Forage Production and Problems in Turkey. Proceedings of the Turkey Agricultural Engineering VII Technical Congress. 11-15, Ankara, Turkey.
  • AOAC 1990. Official Method of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA, 66-88.
  • Ataşoğlu C, Şahin S, Canbolat Ö, Baytekin H 2010. The Effect of Harvest Stage on The Potential Nutritive Value of Kermes Oak (Quercus coccifera) Leaves. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 22 (2): 182-185.
  • Başer A, Kamalak A 2020. Türkiye’nin Akdeniz Bölgesinde Yetişen Bazı Baklagil Ağaç Yapraklarının Yem Değerleri ve In Vitro Fermentasyon Özellikleri. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 7(4): 940-947.
  • Boğa M, Kocadayıoğulları F, Can ME 2021. Tanenlerin Ruminant Hayvan Beslemede Kullanımı. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 4 (4): 217-225.
  • Boğa M, Avci BC, Kiliç HN, Civaner HN, 2022. Farklı Baklagil Ağaçları Yapraklarının Alternatif Yem Kaynağı Olarak Besin Madde İçeriği ve Sindirilebilirliğinin Belirlenmesi Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi http://dogadergi.ksu.edu.tr/tr/pub/ksutarimdoga/article/993655.
  • Borens FM, Poppi DP 1990. The Nutritive Value for Ruminants of Tagasaste (Chamaecytisus palmensis), a Leguminous Tree. Animal Feed Science and Technology 28 (3-4): 275-292.
  • Bouazza L, Bodas R, Boufennara S, Bousseboua H, Lopez S 2012. Nutritive Evaluation of Foliage from Fodder Trees and Shrubs Characteristic of Algerian Arid and Semi Arid Areas. Journal Animal Feeding Sci 21(3): 521-536.
  • Brewbaker JL 1986. Leguminous Trees and Shrubs for Southeast Asia and The South Pacific. (Forages in Southeast Asian and South Pacific Agriculture, Proceedings Series. ACIAR Proceedings, Ed. In Blair GJ, Ivory DA, Evans TR) 43-50.
  • Budağ C 2009. Baklagil Tane Yemleri ve Ruminant Beslenmede Kullanımı. YYÜ Fen Bilim Enstitüsü Derg 14(2): 88-107.
  • Canbolat Ö 2012. Determination of Potential Nutritive Value of Exotic Tree Leaves in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veterinerlik Fakültesi Dergisi 18(3): 419-423.
  • Canbolat Ö, Karaman Ş 2009. Bazı Baklagil Kaba Yemlerinin in vitro Gaz Üretimi, Organik Madde Sindirimi, Nispi Yem Değeri ve Metabolik Enerji İçeriklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 15 (02): 188-196.
  • Degen AA, Blanke A, Becker K, Kam M, Benjamin RW, Makkar HPS 1997. The Nutritive Value of Acacia saligna and Acacia salicina for Goats and Sheep. Animal Science 64(2): 253.
  • Demirkol İ 2019. Akasya Yaprağının Besleme Değeri ve Metan Üretim Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi. Harran Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Zootekni Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 30 sy.
  • El-Shatnawi MK, Mohawesh YM 2000. Seasonal Chemical Composition of Saltbush in Semiarid Grassland of Jordan. Journal of Range Management 53: 211-214.
  • Foroughbakhch R, Carrillo-Parra A, Cardenas-Avila ML, Moreno-Limon S 2012. Seasonal Changes in Alimentary Value and Digestibility of Gleditsia triacanthos L. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 11(22): 4279-4282.
  • Frost RA, Wilson LM, Launchbaugh KL, Hovde EM 2008. Seasonal Change in Forage Value of Rangeland Weeds in Northern Idaho. Invasive Plant Science and Management 1(4): 343-351.
  • Hagerman AE 1988. Extraction of Tannin from Fresh and Preserved Leaves. Journal of chemical Ecology 14(2): 453-61.
  • Kaçar B, Katkat AV, Öztürk Ş 2006. Bitki Fizyolojisi. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 563 sy.
  • Kamalak A 2007. Kondense Tanenin Olumsuz Etkilerini Azaltmak İçin Kullanılan Katkı Maddeleri ve Yemlere Uygulanan İşlemler. KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 10(2).
  • Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Atalay AI, Kaplan M 2010. Determination of Potential Nutritive Value of Young, Old and Senescent Leaves of Arbutus andrachne Tree. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 37(2): 257-260.
  • Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Gurbuz Y, Ozay O, Ozkose E 2005. Chemical Composition and Its Relationship to in vitro Gas Production of Several Tannin Containing Trees and Shrub Leaves. Asian- Aust. Journal Animal Sciences 18(2): 203-208.
  • Kamalak A, Guven I, Kaplan M, Boga, M, Atalay AI, Ozkan CO 2012. Potential Nutritive Value of Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Pods from Different Growing Sites for Ruminants. Journal Agricultural Science Technology 14(1): 115-126.
  • Kaya E, Canbolat O, Atalay AI, Kurt O, Kamalak A 2016. Potential Nutritive Value and Methane Production of Pods, Seed and Senescent Leaves of Gleditsia triacanthos Trees. Livestock Research for Rural Development 28(7):123.
  • Khazaal K, Boza J, Ørskov ER 1994. Assesment of Phenolics-Related Anti-Nutritive Effects in Mediterranean Browse: A Comparison Between The Use of The In Vitro Gas Production Technique with or without Polyvinylpolypyrrolidone or Nylon Bag. Animal Feed Science Technology 49(1-2): 133–149.
  • Kökten K, Kaplan M, Hatipoğlu R, Saruhan V, Çınar S 2012. Nutritive Values of The Leaves of Mediterranean Shrubs. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 22(1): 188-194.
  • Luginbuhl JM, Mueller JP 2000. Evaluation of Fodder Trees for Goats. 7th International Conference on Goats 15-18 May 2000, France
  • Makkar HPS, Blümmel M, Becker K 1995. Formation of Complexes Between Polyvinyl Pyrrolidones or Polyethylene Glycols and Tannins, and Their Implication in Gas Production and True Digestibility in in vitro Techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 73(6): 897-913.
  • Medjekal S, Bodas R, Bousseboua H, López S 2018. Evaluation of Carob (Ceratonia siliqua) and Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Pods as a Feed for Sheep. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 8(2): 247-256.
  • Menke KH, Steingass H 1988. Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value Obtained from Chemical Analysis and in vitro Gas Production Using Rumen Fluid. Animal Research development 28: 7-55.
  • Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W 1979. The Estimation of the Digestibility and Metabolizable Energy Content of Ruminant Feedingstuffs from The Gas Production When They Are Incubated with Rumen Liquor in vitro. The Journal of Agricultural Science 93(1): 217-222.
  • Mountousis J, Papanikolaou K, Stanogias G, Chatzitheodoridis F, Roukos C 2008. Seasonal Variation of Chemical Composition and Dry Matter Digestibility of Rangelands in NW Greece. Journal of Central European Agriculture 9(3): 547- 556.
  • Oktay G, Temel S 2015. Ebu Cehil (Calligonum polygonoides L. ssp. commosum (L’Her.) Çalısının Yıllık Yem Değerinin Belirlenmesi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1): 30-36.
  • Özelçam H, Dereboylu AE, Canbolat Ö, Ipçak HH 2019. Kurutulmuş ve Silolanmış Pavlonya (Paulownia sp.) Ağacı Yapraklarının Yem Değerinin Ileri Düzeyde Tanımlanması ve in vitro Sindirilebilirliğinin Belirlenmesi. 118O461 nolu Tübitak Tovag Proje Sonuç Raporu.
  • Özyazici MA, Açıkbaş S 2020. Ihlamur Ağacı (Tilia rubra subsp. caucasica (Rupr.) V. Engl.) Yapraklarının Yem Değeri Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(3):581-596.
  • Papachristou TG, Nastis AS 1996. Influence of Deciduous Broad Leaved Woody Species in Goat Nutrition During The Dry Season in Northern Greece. Journal of Small Ruminant Research 20(1): 15-22.
  • Parlak AO, Gokkus A, Hakyemez BH, Baytekin H 2011. Forage Quality of Deciduos Woody and Herbaceous Species Throughout a Year in Mediterranean Shrublands of Western Turkey. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 21(3): 513-518.
  • Paterson RT, Karanja GM, Nyaata OZ, Kariuki, IW, Roothaert RL 1998. A Review of Tree Fodder Production and Utilization within Smallholder Agroforestry Systems in Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 41 (2): 181-199.
  • Pecetti L, Tava A, Pagnotta MA, Russi L 2007. Variations in Forage Quality and Chemical Composition Among Italian Accessions of Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) Strit. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 87(6): 985-991.
  • Salem BH, Atti N, Priolo A, Nefzaoui A 2002. Polyethylene Glycol in Concentrate or Feed Blocks to Deactivate Condensed Tannins in Acacia Cyanophylla Lindl. Foliage. 1. Effects on Intake, Digestion and Growth by Barbarine Lambs. Animal Science 75 (1):127-135.
  • Singh B, Todaria NP 2012. Nutrients Composition Changes in Leaves of Quercus semecarpifolia at Different Seasons and Altitudes. Annals of Forest Research 55(2): 189–196.
  • Şimşek N, Kamalak A 2019. Bazı Ağaç Yapraklarının Anti Metanojenik Özelliklerinin in vitro Gaz Üretim Tekniği ile Belirlenmesi. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture 2(1): 1-5.
  • Tatlıyer A, Kamalak A, Öztürk D 2019. Sandal Ağacı (Arbutus andrachne) Yapraklarının Potansiyel Besleme Değerinin Belirlenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 22(2): 315-321.
  • Temel S, Kır AE 2015. Bazı Çalı ve Ağaç Türlerinin Mevsimsel Dönem ve Hayvan Gruplarınagöre Otlanmada Tercih Durumlarının Belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi 1(1): 31 – 39.
  • Tolera A, Said AN 1997. in sacco, in vitro andin vivo digestibility and Supplementary Value of Some Tropical Forage Legume Hays to Sheep Feeding on a Basal Diet of Maize Stover. Journal of Physiology Animal Nutrition 77(1): 35-43.
  • Tolunay A, Adıyaman E, Akyol A, Ince D 2009. Herbage Growth and Fodder Yield Characteristics of Kermes Oak (Quecus coccifera L.) in a Vegetation Period. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8(2): 290-294.
  • Van Soest PJ 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. (Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell University Press) 44 sy.
  • Van Soest PV, Robertson JB Lewis BA 1991. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74(10): 3583-3597.
  • Ventura MR, Castanon JIR, Pieltain MC, Flores MP 2004. Nutritive Value of Forage Shrubs: Bituminaria bituminosa, Rumex lunaria, Acacia salicina, Cassia sturtii and Adenocorpus foliosus. Small Ruminant Research. 52: 13-18.
Toplam 51 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Ziraat, Veterinerlik ve Gıda Bilimleri
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ (Research Article)
Yazarlar

Özer Kurt 0000-0002-6325-6201

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 30 Ocak 2022
Kabul Tarihi 24 Mart 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

APA Kurt, Ö. (2022). Gladiçya (Gleditsia triacanthos) Ağaç Yapraklarının Potansiyel Yem Değerinin Saptanması. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 25(Ek Sayı 2), 576-582. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1065337

Cited By

Nutrient Composition and Metabolic Energy of Different Fruit Tree Leaves as Feeding Sources for Ruminants
Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1405298

21082



2022-JIF = 0.500

2022-JCI = 0.170

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi (International Peer Reviewed Journal)

       Dergimiz, herhangi bir başvuru veya yayımlama ücreti almamaktadır. (Free submission and publication)

      Yılda 6 sayı yayınlanır. (Published 6 times a year)


88x31.png 

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

                 


Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
e-ISSN: 2619-9149