Research Article

Determination of the Factors Affecting Turkish Olive Producer’s Adoption of Good Agricultural Practices in Marmara Region of Turkey

Volume: 24 Number: 3 June 30, 2021
EN TR

Determination of the Factors Affecting Turkish Olive Producer’s Adoption of Good Agricultural Practices in Marmara Region of Turkey

Abstract

This study was carried out with 63 farmers using good agricultural practices (GAP) in olive production in five districts of Balıkesir, Bursa and Tekirdag provinces located in the Marmara Region of Turkey by conducting a questionnaire survey. The farmers with GAP certificate produce either Gemlik (71.4%) or (28.6%) Ayvalık varieties. Survey forms were handed out to contract-based producers in November 2017 during olive harvest period. The data were evaluated using SPSS statistical program. The results showed that average size of farms producing olive oil with GAP are generally 60-65 decares (da) in size. The average age of olive producers is 58.7, who have been producing olives for an average of 39 years with an average GAP experience of 2.4 years. A positive relationship was evident between lower level of education and late adoption of GAP. The most important problem faced by growers was Verticillium wilting, followed by olive fly in recent years. The study revealed that the absence of a significant difference in the prices of olives and olive oils grown with or without GAP reduced the attractiveness of GAP production. Moreover, because of the lack of price policy in olives grown with GAP, olives are marketed along with conventionally produced ones in an equal conditions in the domestic market.

Keywords

References

  1. Aktürk D, Savran F, Can Niyaz Ö 2014. Tarımda Konvansiyonel Üretim ile İyi Tarım Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması: Çanakkale İlinde Şeftali ve Kiraz Örneği. XI. Ulusal Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi 3-5 Eylül 2014 Samsun, 2: 748-755.
  2. Anonymous 2010. İyi Tarım Uygulamaları Hakkında Yönetmelik. 7.12.2010 Anonymous 2017. T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı İstatistikleri.
  3. Anonymous 2018. www.tuik.gov.tr. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu İnternet Sitesi ve 27778 sayılı resmi gazete.
  4. Annor BP, Mensah-Bonsu A, Jatoe JBD 2016. Compliance with GLOBALGAP standards among smallholder pineapple farmers in Akuapem-South, Ghana. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 6(1): 21-38. Doi:10.1108/JADEE-05-2013-0017
  5. Bal T, Çerçinli F 2013. The analysis of cherry production and trade in Turkey: The case of Uluborlu district. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 19(3): 398-415.
  6. Colen L, Maertens M, Swinnen J 2012. Private standards, trade and poverty: GlobalGAP and horticultural employment in Senegal. World Economy, 35(8): 1073-1088. Doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01463.x
  7. Dannenberg P 2011. Overcoming exclusion-informal dealing with the standard GlobalGAP in the Kenyan horticulture industry. Geographische Zeitschrift, 99(4): 237-255.
  8. FAO 2003. https://www.globalgap.org. (verified January 13, 2020).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2021

Submission Date

March 17, 2020

Acceptance Date

October 21, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 24 Number: 3

APA
Pilak, C., & Ülger, S. (2021). Determination of the Factors Affecting Turkish Olive Producer’s Adoption of Good Agricultural Practices in Marmara Region of Turkey. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 24(3), 515-521. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.705047

Cited By


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149