Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kasık bitlerinin Morfolojik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi (Pthirus pubis, Linnaeus, 1758)

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 305 - 311, 30.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.905025

Öz

Kasık bitleri (Pthirus pubis) hayatta kalmak için omurgalı konakçılara bağımlı, obligat ve daimi insan ektoparazitleridir. Kasık bitleri, kanatsız, dorsoventral olarak düz şekilli ve parazitik özelliklerinden dolayı çok basit yapıdırlar. Çalışmada, erkek bir hastadan alınan kasık bitlerinin ayrıntılı olarak morfolojik ve taksonomik özellikleri incelenerek sunulmuştur. Bit örnekleri morfolojik ve taksonomik özellikler açısından ışık mikroskobu ile incelendi. Pthirus pubis türünün tanımlanması, yetişkin erkek ve dişi iki kasık bitinin boyu, anatomik vücut bölümleri, dorsal ve ventral morfolojik detayları belirlenerek yapıldı. İncelenen erişkin kasık bitleri; açık krem renkli, boyları 1-2 mm aralığında, anatomik yapıları ise üç çift bacakları, iki belirgin anten taşıyan baş kısımları ile birleşik yapıdaki thorax ve abdomen bölümleri mevcut idi. Pthirus pubis, insanlarda pediculosis pubis hastalığına neden olur. Hastalık cinsel yolla insanlara bulaşmaktadır. Bu hastalık öncelikle kişiden kişiye cinsel ilişki yoluyla yayılmaktadır. Kasık bitleri insanlar arasında bulaşıcı olabilen önemli bir halk sağlığı sorunu olup, bu ektoparazitin tanısı ve diğer böceklerden ayırt edilmesi için morfolojik karakterlerinin bilinmesi büyük önem taşımaktadır

Destekleyen Kurum

destekleyen kurum bulunmamaktadır

Proje Numarası

yok

Kaynakça

  • Altınsoy F, Alver O, Doğanay S 2018. A Rare Case of Blebharitis: Phthiriasis Palpebrarum. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 42(1):90–92.
  • Anderson AL, Chaney E 2009. Pubic lice (Pthirus pubis): history, biology and treatment vs. knowledge and beliefs of US college students. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:592-600.
  • Burgess NRH, Cowan GO 1993. Lice. Pp. 81-88. In: A Colour Atlas of Medical Entomology (ed. N.R H Burges, GO Cowan). Springer, Dordrecht, London, UK, 1-140 sy.
  • Bonilla DL, Durden LA, Eremeeva, ME, Dasch GA 2013. The biology and taxonomy of head and body lice-- implications for louse-borne disease prevention. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003724.
  • Burkhart CN 2003. Fomite transmission with head lice: a continuing controversy. Lancet 361:99–100.
  • Burkhart CN, Burkhart CG 1999. Odds and ends of head lice: characteristics, risk of fomite transmission, and treatment. J Clin Dermatol 2: 15–18.
  • Dehghani R, Limoee M, Ahaki AR 2013. First report of family infestation with pubic louse (Pthirus pubis; Insecta: Anoplura: Pthiridae) in Iran a case report. Trop Biomed 30:152–154.
  • Durden LA, John E 2009. Lice (Phthiraptera), Chapter 4, pp. 45-65. In: Medical and Veterinary Entomology (ed. GR Mullen and LA Durden). Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, Holland, 1-597 sy.
  • Durden LA, Kessler SE, Boundenga L, Ngoubangoye B, Tsoumbou TA, Moussadji-Kinga CI, Halbwax M, Setchell JM, Nichols J, Greiman SE 2020. A New Species of Sucking Louse from the Mandrill from Gabon with a Review of Host Associations and Geographical Distributions, and Identification Keys to Members of the Genus pedicinus (Phthiraptera: Anoplura: Pedicinidae). J Parasitol 106(2):221–232.
  • KhanT 2018. Phthiriasis palpebrarum presenting as anterior blepharitis. Indian J Public Health 62:239–241.
  • Kraus SJ, Glassman LH 1976. The crab louse-review of physiology and study of anatomy as seen by the scanning electron microscope. J Am Vener Dis Assoc 2(4):12-18.
  • Lee JS, Lee WK, Cho BK 1990. Morpholgical Study of Korean Pubic Louse, Phthirus pubis (Linnaeus, 1758) by Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Korean J Dermatol 28(1):26-33.
  • Light JE, Smith VS, Allen JM, Durden LA, Reed DL 2010. Evolutionary history of mammalian sucking lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura). BMC Evol Biol 22:292.
  • Light JE, Toups MA, Reed DL 2008. What's in a name: the taxonomic status of human head and body lice. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47:1203-16.
  • Mathison BA, Pritt BS 2014. Laboratory identification of arthropod ectoparasites. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:48-67. Nuttall GHF 1918. The Biology of Phthirus pubis. Parasitol 10: 383–405.
  • Opaneye AA, Jayaweera DT, Walzman M, Wade AA 1993. Pediculosis pubis: a surrogate marker for sexually transmitted diseases. J R Soc Health 113(1):6-7.
  • Ortega Insaurralde I, Minoli S, Toloza AC, Picollo MI, Barrozo RB 2019. The Sensory Machinery of the Head Louse Pediculus humanus capitis: From the Antennae to the Brain. Front Physiol 10:434.
  • Pakeer O, Jeffery J, Mohamed AM, Ahmad, F, Baharudin O 2007. Four cases of pediculosis caused by Pthirus pubis Linnaeus, 1758 (Diptera: Anoplura) from peninsular Malaysia. Trop Biomed 24(2):101–103.
  • Palanisamy AP, Kanakaram KK, Vadivel S, Kothandapany S 2015. Indian Dermatol Online J 6 (5):375.
  • Roberts LS, Janovy J 2009. Parasitic Insects: Chewing and Sucking Lice, Chapter 36, sy. 570-573. In: Foundations of Parasitology (ed. G.D. Schmidt and L.S. Roberts). McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, USA, 1-660 sy.
  • Saddozai S, Kakarsulemankhel J 2008. Infestation of head lice, Pediculus humanus capitis, in school children at Quetta City and its suburban areas, Pakistan. Pakistan J Zool 40(1): 45-52.
  • Salavastru CM, Chosidow O, Janier M, Tiplica GS 2017. European guideline for the management of pediculosis pubis. JEADV 31:1425–1428.
  • Scanni G 2012. Human phthiriasis. Can dermoscopy really help dermatologists? Entodermoscopy: a new dermatological discipline on the edge of entomology. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 147(1):111-117.
  • Shakya M, Jayraw AK, Singh, M 2018. Pubic lice infestation in man from Mhow, Madhya Pradesh. J Parasit Dis 42(3):402-404.
  • Veraldi S, Pontini P, Nazzaro G 2018. Phthirus pubis Infestation of the Scalp: A Case Report and Review of The Literature. Korean J Parasitol 56(5): 487-489.
  • Weiss RA 2009. Apes, lice and prehistory. J Biol 8(2):20.
  • Wu N, Zhang H, Sun FY 2017. Phthiriasis palpebrarum: A case of eyelash infestation with Pthirus pubis. Exp Ther Med 13(5):2000-2002

Investigation of Morphological Characteristics of Pubic lice (Pthirus pubis, Linnaeus, 1758)

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 305 - 311, 30.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.905025

Öz

Pubic lice (Pthirus pubis) are obligate, permanent ectoparasites of humans, entirely dependent upon their vertebrate hosts for survival. Pubic lice have a very simplified body form as a result of their parasitic characteristics, being wingless and dorsoventrally flattened. In the study, the pubic lice taken from a male patient were examined morphologically in detail and their taxonomic characteristics were presented. The lice specimens were examined for morphological and taxonomic characteristics under a light microscope. The identification of the Pthirus pubis species was made by determining the height, anatomical body parts, dorsal and ventral morphological details of the adult male and female two pubic lice. Examined adult pubic lice were light cream-colored, 1-2 mm in length, and their anatomical structures included three pairs of legs, two prominent antennae, and parts of the thorax and abdomen in a combined structure. Pthirus pubis causes pediculosis pubis disease in humans. The disease can be sexually transmitted to humans. Pthirus pubis is spread primarily through person-to-person sexual contact. Pubic louse is a major public health problem that can be contagious among humans, and it has great importance to know their morphological characters to diagnose this ectoparasite and distinguish it from other insects.

Proje Numarası

yok

Kaynakça

  • Altınsoy F, Alver O, Doğanay S 2018. A Rare Case of Blebharitis: Phthiriasis Palpebrarum. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 42(1):90–92.
  • Anderson AL, Chaney E 2009. Pubic lice (Pthirus pubis): history, biology and treatment vs. knowledge and beliefs of US college students. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:592-600.
  • Burgess NRH, Cowan GO 1993. Lice. Pp. 81-88. In: A Colour Atlas of Medical Entomology (ed. N.R H Burges, GO Cowan). Springer, Dordrecht, London, UK, 1-140 sy.
  • Bonilla DL, Durden LA, Eremeeva, ME, Dasch GA 2013. The biology and taxonomy of head and body lice-- implications for louse-borne disease prevention. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003724.
  • Burkhart CN 2003. Fomite transmission with head lice: a continuing controversy. Lancet 361:99–100.
  • Burkhart CN, Burkhart CG 1999. Odds and ends of head lice: characteristics, risk of fomite transmission, and treatment. J Clin Dermatol 2: 15–18.
  • Dehghani R, Limoee M, Ahaki AR 2013. First report of family infestation with pubic louse (Pthirus pubis; Insecta: Anoplura: Pthiridae) in Iran a case report. Trop Biomed 30:152–154.
  • Durden LA, John E 2009. Lice (Phthiraptera), Chapter 4, pp. 45-65. In: Medical and Veterinary Entomology (ed. GR Mullen and LA Durden). Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, Holland, 1-597 sy.
  • Durden LA, Kessler SE, Boundenga L, Ngoubangoye B, Tsoumbou TA, Moussadji-Kinga CI, Halbwax M, Setchell JM, Nichols J, Greiman SE 2020. A New Species of Sucking Louse from the Mandrill from Gabon with a Review of Host Associations and Geographical Distributions, and Identification Keys to Members of the Genus pedicinus (Phthiraptera: Anoplura: Pedicinidae). J Parasitol 106(2):221–232.
  • KhanT 2018. Phthiriasis palpebrarum presenting as anterior blepharitis. Indian J Public Health 62:239–241.
  • Kraus SJ, Glassman LH 1976. The crab louse-review of physiology and study of anatomy as seen by the scanning electron microscope. J Am Vener Dis Assoc 2(4):12-18.
  • Lee JS, Lee WK, Cho BK 1990. Morpholgical Study of Korean Pubic Louse, Phthirus pubis (Linnaeus, 1758) by Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Korean J Dermatol 28(1):26-33.
  • Light JE, Smith VS, Allen JM, Durden LA, Reed DL 2010. Evolutionary history of mammalian sucking lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura). BMC Evol Biol 22:292.
  • Light JE, Toups MA, Reed DL 2008. What's in a name: the taxonomic status of human head and body lice. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47:1203-16.
  • Mathison BA, Pritt BS 2014. Laboratory identification of arthropod ectoparasites. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:48-67. Nuttall GHF 1918. The Biology of Phthirus pubis. Parasitol 10: 383–405.
  • Opaneye AA, Jayaweera DT, Walzman M, Wade AA 1993. Pediculosis pubis: a surrogate marker for sexually transmitted diseases. J R Soc Health 113(1):6-7.
  • Ortega Insaurralde I, Minoli S, Toloza AC, Picollo MI, Barrozo RB 2019. The Sensory Machinery of the Head Louse Pediculus humanus capitis: From the Antennae to the Brain. Front Physiol 10:434.
  • Pakeer O, Jeffery J, Mohamed AM, Ahmad, F, Baharudin O 2007. Four cases of pediculosis caused by Pthirus pubis Linnaeus, 1758 (Diptera: Anoplura) from peninsular Malaysia. Trop Biomed 24(2):101–103.
  • Palanisamy AP, Kanakaram KK, Vadivel S, Kothandapany S 2015. Indian Dermatol Online J 6 (5):375.
  • Roberts LS, Janovy J 2009. Parasitic Insects: Chewing and Sucking Lice, Chapter 36, sy. 570-573. In: Foundations of Parasitology (ed. G.D. Schmidt and L.S. Roberts). McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, USA, 1-660 sy.
  • Saddozai S, Kakarsulemankhel J 2008. Infestation of head lice, Pediculus humanus capitis, in school children at Quetta City and its suburban areas, Pakistan. Pakistan J Zool 40(1): 45-52.
  • Salavastru CM, Chosidow O, Janier M, Tiplica GS 2017. European guideline for the management of pediculosis pubis. JEADV 31:1425–1428.
  • Scanni G 2012. Human phthiriasis. Can dermoscopy really help dermatologists? Entodermoscopy: a new dermatological discipline on the edge of entomology. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 147(1):111-117.
  • Shakya M, Jayraw AK, Singh, M 2018. Pubic lice infestation in man from Mhow, Madhya Pradesh. J Parasit Dis 42(3):402-404.
  • Veraldi S, Pontini P, Nazzaro G 2018. Phthirus pubis Infestation of the Scalp: A Case Report and Review of The Literature. Korean J Parasitol 56(5): 487-489.
  • Weiss RA 2009. Apes, lice and prehistory. J Biol 8(2):20.
  • Wu N, Zhang H, Sun FY 2017. Phthiriasis palpebrarum: A case of eyelash infestation with Pthirus pubis. Exp Ther Med 13(5):2000-2002
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ (Research Article)
Yazarlar

Ekrem Kireçci 0000-0001-9446-8584

Proje Numarası yok
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 29 Mart 2021
Kabul Tarihi 12 Mayıs 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Kireçci, E. (2022). Investigation of Morphological Characteristics of Pubic lice (Pthirus pubis, Linnaeus, 1758). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 25(2), 305-311. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.905025

21082



2022-JIF = 0.500

2022-JCI = 0.170

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi (International Peer Reviewed Journal)

       Dergimiz, herhangi bir başvuru veya yayımlama ücreti almamaktadır. (Free submission and publication)

      Yılda 6 sayı yayınlanır. (Published 6 times a year)


88x31.png 

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

                 


Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
e-ISSN: 2619-9149