Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Ahlat ve Böcekte Kitosan ile Kaplamanın Etkisinin Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2020, , 1449 - 1455, 31.12.2020

Eda Güneş

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.707642
Cited By: 1

Öz

Ahlat (Pyrus elaeagnifolia)’ın yüksek şeker oranına sahip olması, depo zararlıları ve böceklerin bu besine ilgisini arttırmaktadır. Kitosan gibi yenilebilir film ve kaplamalar, gıdaların bozulmasını önlemek ve raf ömrünü uzatmak için tercih edilmektedir. Bu amaçla Ahlat dilimleri kitosan ile kaplanmış (%0.2-2; KA) ve 30 gün boyunca Drosophila melanogaster erginlerinin bu armutlar ile beslenmeleri sağlanmıştır. Ergin bireyler ve Ahlat’larda tekstür analizi yapılmıştır. Artan oranlarda KA ile beslenme ergin bireylerin deri sertliğinin fazlalaşmasına neden olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sadece yenilebilir kaplama uygulanan Ahlat’larda kaplama oranının artmasıyla sertliğin azaldığı, üzerinde böcek beslenen Ahlat’larda ise sertliğin arttığı görülmektedir. %2’lik KA ile beslemenin böcekte sertlik oluşturup, yumurta oluşumunu engelleyen bir yöntem olarak belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kitosan Drosophila Yenilebilir kaplama Ahlat Tekstür

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

Çalışmanın gerçekleştirilmesinde tekstür cihazının kullanımı için izin veren Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Gıda Mühendisliği bölümü Dr. Öğretim üyesi Durmuş Sert ve ekibine teşekkür ederiz.

Kaynakça

  • Andersen LH, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V, Toft S, Mayntz D 2010. Protein and Carbohydrate Composition of Larval Food Affects Tolerance to Thermal Stress and Desiccation in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster. Journal of insect physiology 56(4): 336-340.
  • Bahadorani S, Bahadorani P, Phillips JP, Hilliker AJ 2008. The Effects of Vitamin Supplementation on Drosophila Life Span Under Normoxia and Under Oxidative Stress. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 63 (1): 35-42.
  • Baltas N 2017. Investigation of a Wild Pear Species (Pyrus elaeagnifolia subsp. elaeagnifolia pallas) from Antalya, Turkey: Polyphenol Oxidase Properties and Anti-xanthine Oxidase, Anti-urease, and Antioxidant Activity. International Journal of Food Properties 20(3): 585-595.
  • Batta YA 2006. Quantitative Postharvest Contamination and Transmission of Penicillium Expansum (Link) Conidia to Nectarine and Pear Fruit by Drosophila melanogaster (Meig.) Adults. Postharvest Biology and Technology 40(2): 190-196.
  • Bellamy DE, Sisterson MS, Walse SS 2013. Quantifying Host Potentials: Indexing Postharvest Fresh Fruits for Spotted Wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. PLOS One 8(4).
  • Bilişli A 2015. Gıda Kimyası (Sidas Yayınları, No: 005, İzmir-Türkiye) 188.
  • Boxall RA 2001. Post-harvest Losses To Insects - A World Overview. International Biodeterioration and Biodegadation 48: 137-152.
  • Candan T, Bağdatlı A 2018. Gıda Ürünlerinde Yenilebilir Film ve Kaplama Uygulamaları. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering 5(2): 645-655.
  • Carbonell-Capella JM. Buniowska M, Esteve MJ, Frigola A 2015. Effect of Stevia rebaudiana Addition on Bioaccessibility of Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Beverages Based on Exotic Fruits Mixed With Oat Following Simulated Human Digestion. Food Chemistry 184: 122-130.
  • Castro SPM, Paulín EGL 2012. Is Chitosan A New Panacea? Areas of Application (In The Complex World of Polysaccharides, IntechOpen) 1-46.
  • Çolak EŞ, Canhilal R, Yüksel E 2018. Depolanmış Ürün Zararlılarıyla Mücadelede Rezidüyel Pestisit Uygulamaları. Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Derg 8-18.
  • Ertaş N, Doğruer Y 2010. Besinlerde Tekstür. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Derg 7 (1): 35-42.
  • Ferizli AG, Emekci M 2010. Depolanmış Ürün Zararlılarıyla Savaşım, Sorunlar ve Çözüm Yolları. TMMOB Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası Ziraat Mühendisliği VII. Teknik Kongesi, 11-15 Ocak 2010 Ankara, Bildiriler Kitabı 2: 579-587.
  • Ghasemnezhad M, Zareh S, Rassa M, Sajedi RH 2013. Effect Of Chitosan Coating On Maintenance of Aril Quality, Microbial Population and PPO Activity of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L. cv. Tarom) at Cold Storage Temperature. Journal of Science and Food Agric 93: 368–374.
  • Güneş E, Nizamlıoglu HF, Aydın H 2018. Antioxidant Activity Of Chitin Obtained From The Insect. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science 13(4): 213-216.
  • Güneş E, Sert D 2018. Borik Asit’in Farklı Gelişim Evrelerindeki Drosophila melonagaster’in Dış İskeleti Üzerine Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Derg 21(2): 126-130.
  • Han C, Zuoa J, Wanga Q, Xua L, Zhaia B, Wang Z, Dong H, Gao L 2014. Effects Of Chitosan Coating on Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life of Sponge Gourd (Luffa cylindrica) During Storage. Scientia Horticulturae 166: 1–8.
  • Hiroi M, Meunier N, Marion‐Poll F, Tanimura T 2004. Two Antagonistic Gustatory Receptor Neurons Responding to Sweet‐Salty and Bitter Taste in Drosophila. Journal of Neurobiology 61(3): 333-342.
  • Hollowood TA, Linforth RST, Taylor AJ 2002. The Effect of Viscosity on The Perception of Flavour. Chemical Senses 27(7): 583-591.
  • Ilhan M, Akkol EK, Taştan H, Dereli FTG, Tümen I 2019. Efficacy of Pyrus elaeagnifolia subsp. elaeagnifolia in Acetic Acid–Induced Colitis Model. Open Chemistry 17(1): 13-22.
  • Itai A 2007. Pear Genome Mapping and Moleculer Breeding in Plants. Fruit and Nuts, 4: 157-170.
  • Jeong YT, Oh SM, Shim J, Seo JT, Kwon JY, Moon SJ 2016. Mechanosensory Neurons Control Sweet Sensing in Drosophila. Nature Communications 7(1): 1-9.
  • Kahve Hİ 2016. Kitosanın Kaplama Materyali Olarak Et Endüstrisinde Kullanımı. Aksaray Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü gıda mühendisliği Anabilim dalı, Yüksek Lisans tezi, 82 sy.
  • Kalkisim O, Okcu Z, Karabulut B, Ozdes D, Duran C 2018. Evaluation of Pomological and Morphological Characteristics and Chemical Compositions of Local Pear Varieties (Pyrus communis L.) Grown in Gumushane, Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau 60(2): 173-181.
  • Kaushik S, Kain P 2019. Understanding Taste Using Drosophila melanogaster (In Drosophila-Little, but Powerful Tool for Discovery IntechOpen) https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/understanding-taste-using-drosophila-melanogaster
  • Kavak DD, Kececi S 2019. Extraction of Phenolic Antioxidants From Pyrus elaeagrifolia Pallas: Process Optimization, Investigation of The Bioactivity and β-glucuronidase Inhibitory Potential. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 13(4): 2894-2902.
  • Kim SE, Coste B, Chadha A, Cook B, Patapoutian A 2012. The Role of Drosophila Piezo in Mechanical Nociception. Nature 483(7388): 209-212.
  • Koç H, Vinyard CJ, Essick GK, Foegeding EA 2013. Food oral processing: conversion of food structure to textural perception. Annual Review of Food Science And Technology 4: 237-266.
  • Kou XH, Guo W, Guo R, Li X, Xue Z 2014. Effects of Chitosan, Calcium Chloride, And Pullulan Coating Treatments on Antioxidant Activity in Pear cv. Huang Guan During Storage. Food Bioprocess Technol 7: 671–681.
  • Kudow N, Kamikouchi A, Tanimura T 2019. Softness Sensing and Learning in Drosophila larvae. Journal of Experimental Biology 222(7): jeb196329.
  • Kumral NA, Kovancı B 2007. The Diversity And Abundance of Mites In Agrochemical-Free and Conventional Deciduous Fruit Orchards of Bursa, Turkey. Türkiye Entomoloji Derg 31(2): 83-95.
  • Kundaković T, Ćirić A, Stanojković T, Soković M, Kovačević N 2014. Cytotoxicity and Antimicrobial Activity of Pyrus pyraster Burgsd. and Pyrus spinosa Forssk.(Rosaceae). African Journal Of Microbiology Research 8(6): 511-518.
  • Lee JC, Dalton DT, Swoboda-Bhattarai KA, Bruck DJ, Burrack HJ, Strik BC, Walton VM 2016. Characterization and Manipulation of Fruit Susceptibility to Drosophila suzukii. Journal of Pest Science 89(3): 771-780.
  • Liman ER, Zhang YV, Montell C 2014. Peripheral Coding Of Taste. Neuron 81(5): 984-1000.
  • Masek P, Keene AC 2013. Drosophila Fatty Acid Taste Signals Through The PLC PATHWAy in Sugar-Sensing Neurons. PLoS Genet 9(9): e1003710.
  • Moussian B, Schwarz H, Bartoszewski S, Nüsslein Volhard C 2005. Involvement of Chitin in Exoskeleton Morphogenesisin Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Morphology 264 (1): 117- 130.
  • Oms-Oliu G, Soliva-Fortuny R, Martín-Belloso O 2008. Using Polysaccharide-Based Edible Coatings to Enhance Quality and Antioxidant Properties Of Fresh-Cut Melon. LWT-Food Science and Technology 41: 1862–1870.
  • Pektaş M 2009. Hasat Öncesi Bazı Bitki Büyümeyi Düzenleyici Madde (BBDM) uygulamaları-nın ‘Akça’ ve ‘B. P. Morettını’ Armutlarında (Pyrus communis L.) Meyve Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta, 58 sy.
  • Rajan A, Perrimon N 2011. Drosophila as a Model For Interorgan Communication: Lessons From Studies on Energy Homeostasis. Developmental Cell 21(1): 29-31.
  • Rezazadeh A, Sampson BJ, Stafne ET, Marshall-Shaw D, Stringer SJ, Hummer K 2018. Susceptibility of Bunch Grape and Muscadine Cultivars to Berry Splitting and Spotted-Wing Drosophila Oviposition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 69(3): 258-265.
  • Rogina B, Reenan RA, Nilsen SP, Helfand SL 2000. Extended Life-Span Conferred by Cotransporter Gene Mutationsin Drosophila. Biogerontology Science 290: 2137-2140.
  • Sánchez-Alcaniz JA, Zappia G, Marion-Poll F, Benton R 2017. A Mechanosensory Receptor Required for Food Texture Detection in Drosophila. Nature Communications 8(1): 1-9.
  • Serçe S, Gündüz K, Özdemir E, Kıyga Y, Orhan E, Ercişli S 2008. Farklı Sistemlerde Yetiştirilen Çileklerin (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) Meyve Eti Sertlik Ölçümleri Arasındaki İlişkiler. Bahçe 37(1): 9-16.
  • Soylu A 2003. Ilıman İklim Meyveleri – II, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Ders Notları, Bursa.
  • Şimşek T, Keyf S 2018. Alginat-Kitosan Bazlı Biofilm Sentezi İçin Deneysel Tasarım Uygulaması. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Derg 8(2): 482-490.
  • Tellam RL 1996. The Peritrophic Matrix, Biology of the Insect Midgut (Springer, Dordrecht) 86-114.
  • Tokatlı K, Demirdöven A 2018. Optimization of Chitin and Chitosan Production From Shrimp Wastes and Characterization. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 42(2): e13494.
  • Toshima N, Tanimura T 2012. Taste Preference For Amino Acids Is Dependent on Internal Nutritional State in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology 215(16): 2827-2832.
  • Tural S, Sarıcaoğlu FT, Turhan S 2017. Yenilebilir Film ve Kaplamalar: Üretimleri Uygulama Yöntemleri Fonksiyonları ve Kaslı Gıdalarda Kullanımları. Akademik Gıda 15(1): 84-94.
  • Vargas M, Albors A, Chiralt A, Gonzalezmartinez C 2006. Quality of Cold-Stored Strawberries as Affected By Chitosan–Oleic Acid Edible Coatings. Postharvest Biology and Technology 41: 164–171.
  • Walsh DB, Bolda MP, Goodhue RE, Dreves AJ, Lee J, Bruck DJ, Zalom FG 2011. Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Invasive Pest of Ripening Soft Fruit ExpandingI Geographic Range and Damage Potential. Journal of Integrated Pest Management 2(1): G1-G7.
  • Yilmaz KU, Ercisli S, Cam M, Uzun A, Yilmaztekin M, Kafkas E, Pinar H 2015b. Fruit Weight, Total Phenolics, Acidity and Sugar Content of Edible Wild Pear (Pyrus elaeagnifolia Pall.) Fruits. Erwerbs-Obstbau 57(4): 179-184.
  • Yilmaz KU, Uzun A, Cam M, Ercisli S 2015a. Some Morphological and Fruit Characteristics of Naturally Grown Pyrus elaeagrifolia Pall. of Kayseri Province (Central Anatolia, Turkey). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 62(5): 711-720.
  • Zhang YV, Aikin TJ, Li Z, Montell C 2016. The Basis of Food Texture Sensation in Drosophila. Neuron 91(4): 863-877.

Determination of the Effect of Coating with Chitosan on Ahlat and Insect

Yıl 2020, , 1449 - 1455, 31.12.2020

Eda Güneş

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.707642
Cited By: 1

Öz

Ahlat (Pyrus elaeagnifolia), a crop with high sugar content, increases the interest of warehouse pests and insects. Edible films and coatings such as chitosan are preferred to preserve food spoilage and shelf life. For this purpose, Ahlat (wild pear) slices were covered with chitosan (0.2-2%; KA) and Drosophila melanogaster adults were fed with these wild pears for 30 days. Texture analysis was made in adults and wild pears. Nutrition with increasing rates of KA were determined to cause an increase in skin stiffness of adults. It is observed that the hardness decreases with the increase of the coating rate in Ahlat, where only edible coating is applied, and the hardness increases in wild pears that feed insects. Feeding with 2% KA is determined as a method that creates stiffness in the insect and prevents the formation of eggs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Chitosan Wild pear Texture Edible coating Drosophila

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

  • Andersen LH, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V, Toft S, Mayntz D 2010. Protein and Carbohydrate Composition of Larval Food Affects Tolerance to Thermal Stress and Desiccation in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster. Journal of insect physiology 56(4): 336-340.
  • Bahadorani S, Bahadorani P, Phillips JP, Hilliker AJ 2008. The Effects of Vitamin Supplementation on Drosophila Life Span Under Normoxia and Under Oxidative Stress. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 63 (1): 35-42.
  • Baltas N 2017. Investigation of a Wild Pear Species (Pyrus elaeagnifolia subsp. elaeagnifolia pallas) from Antalya, Turkey: Polyphenol Oxidase Properties and Anti-xanthine Oxidase, Anti-urease, and Antioxidant Activity. International Journal of Food Properties 20(3): 585-595.
  • Batta YA 2006. Quantitative Postharvest Contamination and Transmission of Penicillium Expansum (Link) Conidia to Nectarine and Pear Fruit by Drosophila melanogaster (Meig.) Adults. Postharvest Biology and Technology 40(2): 190-196.
  • Bellamy DE, Sisterson MS, Walse SS 2013. Quantifying Host Potentials: Indexing Postharvest Fresh Fruits for Spotted Wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. PLOS One 8(4).
  • Bilişli A 2015. Gıda Kimyası (Sidas Yayınları, No: 005, İzmir-Türkiye) 188.
  • Boxall RA 2001. Post-harvest Losses To Insects - A World Overview. International Biodeterioration and Biodegadation 48: 137-152.
  • Candan T, Bağdatlı A 2018. Gıda Ürünlerinde Yenilebilir Film ve Kaplama Uygulamaları. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering 5(2): 645-655.
  • Carbonell-Capella JM. Buniowska M, Esteve MJ, Frigola A 2015. Effect of Stevia rebaudiana Addition on Bioaccessibility of Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Beverages Based on Exotic Fruits Mixed With Oat Following Simulated Human Digestion. Food Chemistry 184: 122-130.
  • Castro SPM, Paulín EGL 2012. Is Chitosan A New Panacea? Areas of Application (In The Complex World of Polysaccharides, IntechOpen) 1-46.
  • Çolak EŞ, Canhilal R, Yüksel E 2018. Depolanmış Ürün Zararlılarıyla Mücadelede Rezidüyel Pestisit Uygulamaları. Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Derg 8-18.
  • Ertaş N, Doğruer Y 2010. Besinlerde Tekstür. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Derg 7 (1): 35-42.
  • Ferizli AG, Emekci M 2010. Depolanmış Ürün Zararlılarıyla Savaşım, Sorunlar ve Çözüm Yolları. TMMOB Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası Ziraat Mühendisliği VII. Teknik Kongesi, 11-15 Ocak 2010 Ankara, Bildiriler Kitabı 2: 579-587.
  • Ghasemnezhad M, Zareh S, Rassa M, Sajedi RH 2013. Effect Of Chitosan Coating On Maintenance of Aril Quality, Microbial Population and PPO Activity of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L. cv. Tarom) at Cold Storage Temperature. Journal of Science and Food Agric 93: 368–374.
  • Güneş E, Nizamlıoglu HF, Aydın H 2018. Antioxidant Activity Of Chitin Obtained From The Insect. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science 13(4): 213-216.
  • Güneş E, Sert D 2018. Borik Asit’in Farklı Gelişim Evrelerindeki Drosophila melonagaster’in Dış İskeleti Üzerine Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Derg 21(2): 126-130.
  • Han C, Zuoa J, Wanga Q, Xua L, Zhaia B, Wang Z, Dong H, Gao L 2014. Effects Of Chitosan Coating on Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life of Sponge Gourd (Luffa cylindrica) During Storage. Scientia Horticulturae 166: 1–8.
  • Hiroi M, Meunier N, Marion‐Poll F, Tanimura T 2004. Two Antagonistic Gustatory Receptor Neurons Responding to Sweet‐Salty and Bitter Taste in Drosophila. Journal of Neurobiology 61(3): 333-342.
  • Hollowood TA, Linforth RST, Taylor AJ 2002. The Effect of Viscosity on The Perception of Flavour. Chemical Senses 27(7): 583-591.
  • Ilhan M, Akkol EK, Taştan H, Dereli FTG, Tümen I 2019. Efficacy of Pyrus elaeagnifolia subsp. elaeagnifolia in Acetic Acid–Induced Colitis Model. Open Chemistry 17(1): 13-22.
  • Itai A 2007. Pear Genome Mapping and Moleculer Breeding in Plants. Fruit and Nuts, 4: 157-170.
  • Jeong YT, Oh SM, Shim J, Seo JT, Kwon JY, Moon SJ 2016. Mechanosensory Neurons Control Sweet Sensing in Drosophila. Nature Communications 7(1): 1-9.
  • Kahve Hİ 2016. Kitosanın Kaplama Materyali Olarak Et Endüstrisinde Kullanımı. Aksaray Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü gıda mühendisliği Anabilim dalı, Yüksek Lisans tezi, 82 sy.
  • Kalkisim O, Okcu Z, Karabulut B, Ozdes D, Duran C 2018. Evaluation of Pomological and Morphological Characteristics and Chemical Compositions of Local Pear Varieties (Pyrus communis L.) Grown in Gumushane, Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau 60(2): 173-181.
  • Kaushik S, Kain P 2019. Understanding Taste Using Drosophila melanogaster (In Drosophila-Little, but Powerful Tool for Discovery IntechOpen) https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/understanding-taste-using-drosophila-melanogaster
  • Kavak DD, Kececi S 2019. Extraction of Phenolic Antioxidants From Pyrus elaeagrifolia Pallas: Process Optimization, Investigation of The Bioactivity and β-glucuronidase Inhibitory Potential. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 13(4): 2894-2902.
  • Kim SE, Coste B, Chadha A, Cook B, Patapoutian A 2012. The Role of Drosophila Piezo in Mechanical Nociception. Nature 483(7388): 209-212.
  • Koç H, Vinyard CJ, Essick GK, Foegeding EA 2013. Food oral processing: conversion of food structure to textural perception. Annual Review of Food Science And Technology 4: 237-266.
  • Kou XH, Guo W, Guo R, Li X, Xue Z 2014. Effects of Chitosan, Calcium Chloride, And Pullulan Coating Treatments on Antioxidant Activity in Pear cv. Huang Guan During Storage. Food Bioprocess Technol 7: 671–681.
  • Kudow N, Kamikouchi A, Tanimura T 2019. Softness Sensing and Learning in Drosophila larvae. Journal of Experimental Biology 222(7): jeb196329.
  • Kumral NA, Kovancı B 2007. The Diversity And Abundance of Mites In Agrochemical-Free and Conventional Deciduous Fruit Orchards of Bursa, Turkey. Türkiye Entomoloji Derg 31(2): 83-95.
  • Kundaković T, Ćirić A, Stanojković T, Soković M, Kovačević N 2014. Cytotoxicity and Antimicrobial Activity of Pyrus pyraster Burgsd. and Pyrus spinosa Forssk.(Rosaceae). African Journal Of Microbiology Research 8(6): 511-518.
  • Lee JC, Dalton DT, Swoboda-Bhattarai KA, Bruck DJ, Burrack HJ, Strik BC, Walton VM 2016. Characterization and Manipulation of Fruit Susceptibility to Drosophila suzukii. Journal of Pest Science 89(3): 771-780.
  • Liman ER, Zhang YV, Montell C 2014. Peripheral Coding Of Taste. Neuron 81(5): 984-1000.
  • Masek P, Keene AC 2013. Drosophila Fatty Acid Taste Signals Through The PLC PATHWAy in Sugar-Sensing Neurons. PLoS Genet 9(9): e1003710.
  • Moussian B, Schwarz H, Bartoszewski S, Nüsslein Volhard C 2005. Involvement of Chitin in Exoskeleton Morphogenesisin Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Morphology 264 (1): 117- 130.
  • Oms-Oliu G, Soliva-Fortuny R, Martín-Belloso O 2008. Using Polysaccharide-Based Edible Coatings to Enhance Quality and Antioxidant Properties Of Fresh-Cut Melon. LWT-Food Science and Technology 41: 1862–1870.
  • Pektaş M 2009. Hasat Öncesi Bazı Bitki Büyümeyi Düzenleyici Madde (BBDM) uygulamaları-nın ‘Akça’ ve ‘B. P. Morettını’ Armutlarında (Pyrus communis L.) Meyve Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta, 58 sy.
  • Rajan A, Perrimon N 2011. Drosophila as a Model For Interorgan Communication: Lessons From Studies on Energy Homeostasis. Developmental Cell 21(1): 29-31.
  • Rezazadeh A, Sampson BJ, Stafne ET, Marshall-Shaw D, Stringer SJ, Hummer K 2018. Susceptibility of Bunch Grape and Muscadine Cultivars to Berry Splitting and Spotted-Wing Drosophila Oviposition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 69(3): 258-265.
  • Rogina B, Reenan RA, Nilsen SP, Helfand SL 2000. Extended Life-Span Conferred by Cotransporter Gene Mutationsin Drosophila. Biogerontology Science 290: 2137-2140.
  • Sánchez-Alcaniz JA, Zappia G, Marion-Poll F, Benton R 2017. A Mechanosensory Receptor Required for Food Texture Detection in Drosophila. Nature Communications 8(1): 1-9.
  • Serçe S, Gündüz K, Özdemir E, Kıyga Y, Orhan E, Ercişli S 2008. Farklı Sistemlerde Yetiştirilen Çileklerin (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) Meyve Eti Sertlik Ölçümleri Arasındaki İlişkiler. Bahçe 37(1): 9-16.
  • Soylu A 2003. Ilıman İklim Meyveleri – II, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Ders Notları, Bursa.
  • Şimşek T, Keyf S 2018. Alginat-Kitosan Bazlı Biofilm Sentezi İçin Deneysel Tasarım Uygulaması. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Derg 8(2): 482-490.
  • Tellam RL 1996. The Peritrophic Matrix, Biology of the Insect Midgut (Springer, Dordrecht) 86-114.
  • Tokatlı K, Demirdöven A 2018. Optimization of Chitin and Chitosan Production From Shrimp Wastes and Characterization. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 42(2): e13494.
  • Toshima N, Tanimura T 2012. Taste Preference For Amino Acids Is Dependent on Internal Nutritional State in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology 215(16): 2827-2832.
  • Tural S, Sarıcaoğlu FT, Turhan S 2017. Yenilebilir Film ve Kaplamalar: Üretimleri Uygulama Yöntemleri Fonksiyonları ve Kaslı Gıdalarda Kullanımları. Akademik Gıda 15(1): 84-94.
  • Vargas M, Albors A, Chiralt A, Gonzalezmartinez C 2006. Quality of Cold-Stored Strawberries as Affected By Chitosan–Oleic Acid Edible Coatings. Postharvest Biology and Technology 41: 164–171.
  • Walsh DB, Bolda MP, Goodhue RE, Dreves AJ, Lee J, Bruck DJ, Zalom FG 2011. Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Invasive Pest of Ripening Soft Fruit ExpandingI Geographic Range and Damage Potential. Journal of Integrated Pest Management 2(1): G1-G7.
  • Yilmaz KU, Ercisli S, Cam M, Uzun A, Yilmaztekin M, Kafkas E, Pinar H 2015b. Fruit Weight, Total Phenolics, Acidity and Sugar Content of Edible Wild Pear (Pyrus elaeagnifolia Pall.) Fruits. Erwerbs-Obstbau 57(4): 179-184.
  • Yilmaz KU, Uzun A, Cam M, Ercisli S 2015a. Some Morphological and Fruit Characteristics of Naturally Grown Pyrus elaeagrifolia Pall. of Kayseri Province (Central Anatolia, Turkey). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 62(5): 711-720.
  • Zhang YV, Aikin TJ, Li Z, Montell C 2016. The Basis of Food Texture Sensation in Drosophila. Neuron 91(4): 863-877.
Toplam 54 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Yapısal Biyoloji
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ (Research Article)
Yazarlar

Eda Güneş 0000-0001-7422-9375

Proje Numarası -
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Mart 2020
Kabul Tarihi 16 Mayıs 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020

Kaynak Göster

APA Güneş, E. (2020). Ahlat ve Böcekte Kitosan ile Kaplamanın Etkisinin Belirlenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 23(6), 1449-1455. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.707642

Cited By

Effect of Biofilm Application Regimes on Fruit Quality Properties of Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.)
Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.1073236

21082



2022-JIF = 0.500

2022-JCI = 0.170

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi (International Peer Reviewed Journal)

       Dergimiz, herhangi bir başvuru veya yayımlama ücreti almamaktadır. (Free submission and publication)

      Yılda 6 sayı yayınlanır. (Published 6 times a year)


88x31.png 

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

                 


Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
e-ISSN: 2619-9149