Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=vkGlTfX_U1C-sE62DObGxJr_xpv6GZ_8hDwgrZxECuI&_path=id%3D692943%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Den%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Effect of Top Shoot Pruning on the Biomas Yield in Soybean Plant

Year 2020, Volume: 23 Issue: 5, 1192 - 1199, 31.10.2020

Metin Dağtekin , Mehmet Emin Bilgili

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.692943
Cited By: 2

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the potential biomass yield increase by the change created in plant architecture by cutting the top shoot of soybean. In the research, Arısoy and Lider soybean varieties, which are widely cultivated in Çukurova Region, were used as materials. In the research, plants top shoots were pruned during three-leaf (3B) and five-leaf (5B) stages. In the study, the seed yield per decare in the Arısoy variety was 461 kg in the control group, 440 kg in 3B application and 553 kg in 5B application. These values were realized as 540, 478 and 519 kg in the Leader variety, respectively. As a result of the research, while the seed yield was highest in the 5B application of the Arısoy variety, the Leader variety responded negatively to two different applications (3B and 5B). This situation revealed that pruning mechanization, which will develop suitable plant architecture for high seed and biomass yield in 5B period in Arısoy variety in our region, is applicable.

Keywords

Pruning Biomass yield Soybean Top shoot

Project Number

FBA-2019-11388

References

  • Ali A, Fletcher R A 1970. Hormonal Regulation of Apical Dominance in Soybeans. Canadian Journal of Botany 48(11): 1989-1994.
  • Altınyüzük H 2017. Soya Çeşitlerinin Çukurova Koşullarında II. Ürün Olarak Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 75sy.
  • Arıoğlu H, Özyurtseven S, Onat B, Güllüoğlu L 2013. İkinci Ürün Koşullarında Bazı Soya [Glycine max (L.) Merr] Çeşitlerinin Önemli Bitkisel Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. I. Türkiye 10. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi Bildiri Kitapçığı, Cilt II:409-414, Konya.
  • Aserse A A, Markos D, Getachew G, Yli-Halla M, Lindström K 2019. Rhizobial Inoculation Improves Drought Tolerance, Biomass and Grain Yields of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and Soybean (Glycine max L.) at Halaba and Boricha in Southern Ethiopia. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1624724.
  • Bakal H, Güllüoglu L, Onat B, Arıoğlu H 2017. The Effect of Growing Seasons on Some Agronomic and Quality Characteristics of Soybean Varieties in Mediterranean Region in Turkey. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 22(2): 187-196.
  • Board J E 1985. Yield Components Associated with Soybean Yield Reductions at Nonoptimal Planting Dates. Agronomy journal 77(1): 135-140.
  • Brun W A, Betts K J 1984. Source/Sink Relations of Abscising and Nonabscising Soybean Flowers. Plant Physiol 75: 187-191.
  • Cober E R, Morrison M J 2010. Regulation of Seed Yield and Agronomic Characters by Photoperiod Sensitivity and Growth Habit Genes in Soybean. Theoretical and applied genetics 120(5):1005-1012.
  • Dybing C D, Reese Z N 2008. Nitrogen and Carbohydrate Nutrient Concentrations and Flower Set in Soybean Glycine Max (L.) merr. Journal Biol Sci 8(1): 24-33.
  • Doğan Y, Koyutürk Ö, Aktaş H 2015. Mardin-Kızıltepe Ekolojik Koşullarında Ekim Zamanı Uygulamalarının Bazı Soya Fasulyesi (Glycine max L.) Çeşitlerinde Verim ve Verim Öğeleri Üzerine Etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi: 293-303.
  • Egli D B 1993. Cultivar Maturity and Potential Yield of Soybean. Field Crops Research 32(1-2): 147-158.
  • Green-Tracewicz E, Page E R, Swanton C J 2011. Shade Avoidance in Soybean Reduces Branching and İncreases Plant-to-Plant Variability in Biomass and Yield per Plant. Weed Science 59(1): 43-49.
  • Faostat 2018. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
  • Frederick J R, Camp C R, Bauer P J 2001. Drought-Stress Effects on Branch and Mainstem Seed Yield and Yield Components of Determinate Soybean. Crop Science 41(3): 759-763.
  • Islam M O, Rahim M A, Prodhan A K M A 2010. Flowering Pattern, Floral Abscission and Yield Attributes in Soybean Influenced by GABA. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University 8(1), 29-33.
  • Kınacı M 2011. Çanakkale Koşullarında Soya Fasulyesi Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Bazı Kalite Unsurlarının Belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 69sy. Kokubun M 2011. Physiological Mechanisms Regulating Flower Abortion in Soybean. INTECH Open Access Publisher.
  • Kokubun M, Honda I 2000. Intra-Raceme Variation in Pod-Set Probability is Associated with Cytokinin Content in Soybeans. Plant Production Science 3(4): 354-359.
  • Krisnawati A, Adie M M 2015. Variability of Biomass and Harvest Index from Several Soybean Genotypes as Renewable Energy Source. Energy Procedia 65: 14-21.
  • Linkemer G, Board J E, Musgrave M E 1998. Waterlogging Effects on Growth and Yield Components in Late-Planted Soybean. Crop Science 38(6): 1576-1584.
  • Nonokawa K, Kokubun M, Nakajima T, Nakamura T, Yoshida R 2007. Roles of Auxin and Cytokinin in Soybean Pod Setting, Plant Production Science 10(2): 199-206.
  • Norsworthy J K, Shipe E R 2005. Effect of Row Spacing and Soybean Genotype on Mainstem and Branch Yield. Agronomy Journal 97(3): 919-923.
  • Pereira-Flores M E, Justino F B 2019. Yield Components and Biomass Partition in Soybean: Climate Change Vision. In Soybean-Biomass, Yield and Productivity. IntechOpen.
  • Robinson A P, Simpson D M, Johnson W G 2013. Response of Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean Yield Components to Dicamba Exposure. Weed Science 61(4): 526-536.
  • Ruan Y L, Patrick J W, Bouzayen M, Osorio S, Fernie A R 2012. Molecular Regulation of Seed and Fruit Set. Trends in Plant Science 17(11): 656-665.
  • TÜİK 2018. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul
  • Yetgin S 2008. Çukurova Bölgesinde Ana Ürün Koşullarında Bazı Soya Çeşit ve Hatlarının Verim ve Tarımsal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 40sy.

Soya Bitkisinde Tepe Sürgün Budamasının Biyomas Verimine Etkisi

Year 2020, Volume: 23 Issue: 5, 1192 - 1199, 31.10.2020

Metin Dağtekin , Mehmet Emin Bilgili

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.692943
Cited By: 2

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, soya bitkisinde tepe sürgününün kesilerek bitki mimarisinde oluşturulacak değişimin biyomas verimini artırma potansiyelini belirlemektir. Araştırmada Çukurova Bölgesinde ana ürün olarak yaygın üretimi yapılan Arısoy ve Lider soya çeşitleri materyal olarak kullanılmıştır. Tepe sürgün budama uygulamaları bitkiler üç yapraklı (3B) ve beş yapraklı (5B) aşamada iken gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada Arısoy çeşidinde dekara tohum verimi kontrol grubunda 461 kg, 3B uygulamasında 440 kg, 5B uygulamasında 553 kg olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Bu değer Lider çeşidinde ise sırası ile 540, 478 ve 519 kg olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, tohum verimi en yüksek Arısoy çeşidinin 5B uygulamasında görünürken, Lider çeşidi ise iki farklı uygulamaya (3B ve 5B) negatif tepki vermiştir. Bu durum, bölgemizde Arısoy çeşidinde 5B döneminde yüksek tohum ve biyomas verimi için uygun bitki mimarisini geliştirecek budama mekanizasyonun uygulanabilir olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır.

Keywords

Budama Biyomas verimi Soya Tepe sürgünü

Supporting Institution

Çukurova Üniversitesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Yönetim Birimi

Project Number

FBA-2019-11388

Thanks

Bu çalışmada materyallerin analizi ve deneysel sonuçları Çukurova Üniversitesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Yönetim Birimi (Proje No: FBA-2019-11388) tarafından desteklenen projeden alınmıştır. Destekleri için teşekkür ediyoruz.

References

  • Ali A, Fletcher R A 1970. Hormonal Regulation of Apical Dominance in Soybeans. Canadian Journal of Botany 48(11): 1989-1994.
  • Altınyüzük H 2017. Soya Çeşitlerinin Çukurova Koşullarında II. Ürün Olarak Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 75sy.
  • Arıoğlu H, Özyurtseven S, Onat B, Güllüoğlu L 2013. İkinci Ürün Koşullarında Bazı Soya [Glycine max (L.) Merr] Çeşitlerinin Önemli Bitkisel Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. I. Türkiye 10. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi Bildiri Kitapçığı, Cilt II:409-414, Konya.
  • Aserse A A, Markos D, Getachew G, Yli-Halla M, Lindström K 2019. Rhizobial Inoculation Improves Drought Tolerance, Biomass and Grain Yields of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and Soybean (Glycine max L.) at Halaba and Boricha in Southern Ethiopia. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1624724.
  • Bakal H, Güllüoglu L, Onat B, Arıoğlu H 2017. The Effect of Growing Seasons on Some Agronomic and Quality Characteristics of Soybean Varieties in Mediterranean Region in Turkey. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 22(2): 187-196.
  • Board J E 1985. Yield Components Associated with Soybean Yield Reductions at Nonoptimal Planting Dates. Agronomy journal 77(1): 135-140.
  • Brun W A, Betts K J 1984. Source/Sink Relations of Abscising and Nonabscising Soybean Flowers. Plant Physiol 75: 187-191.
  • Cober E R, Morrison M J 2010. Regulation of Seed Yield and Agronomic Characters by Photoperiod Sensitivity and Growth Habit Genes in Soybean. Theoretical and applied genetics 120(5):1005-1012.
  • Dybing C D, Reese Z N 2008. Nitrogen and Carbohydrate Nutrient Concentrations and Flower Set in Soybean Glycine Max (L.) merr. Journal Biol Sci 8(1): 24-33.
  • Doğan Y, Koyutürk Ö, Aktaş H 2015. Mardin-Kızıltepe Ekolojik Koşullarında Ekim Zamanı Uygulamalarının Bazı Soya Fasulyesi (Glycine max L.) Çeşitlerinde Verim ve Verim Öğeleri Üzerine Etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi: 293-303.
  • Egli D B 1993. Cultivar Maturity and Potential Yield of Soybean. Field Crops Research 32(1-2): 147-158.
  • Green-Tracewicz E, Page E R, Swanton C J 2011. Shade Avoidance in Soybean Reduces Branching and İncreases Plant-to-Plant Variability in Biomass and Yield per Plant. Weed Science 59(1): 43-49.
  • Faostat 2018. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
  • Frederick J R, Camp C R, Bauer P J 2001. Drought-Stress Effects on Branch and Mainstem Seed Yield and Yield Components of Determinate Soybean. Crop Science 41(3): 759-763.
  • Islam M O, Rahim M A, Prodhan A K M A 2010. Flowering Pattern, Floral Abscission and Yield Attributes in Soybean Influenced by GABA. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University 8(1), 29-33.
  • Kınacı M 2011. Çanakkale Koşullarında Soya Fasulyesi Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Bazı Kalite Unsurlarının Belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 69sy. Kokubun M 2011. Physiological Mechanisms Regulating Flower Abortion in Soybean. INTECH Open Access Publisher.
  • Kokubun M, Honda I 2000. Intra-Raceme Variation in Pod-Set Probability is Associated with Cytokinin Content in Soybeans. Plant Production Science 3(4): 354-359.
  • Krisnawati A, Adie M M 2015. Variability of Biomass and Harvest Index from Several Soybean Genotypes as Renewable Energy Source. Energy Procedia 65: 14-21.
  • Linkemer G, Board J E, Musgrave M E 1998. Waterlogging Effects on Growth and Yield Components in Late-Planted Soybean. Crop Science 38(6): 1576-1584.
  • Nonokawa K, Kokubun M, Nakajima T, Nakamura T, Yoshida R 2007. Roles of Auxin and Cytokinin in Soybean Pod Setting, Plant Production Science 10(2): 199-206.
  • Norsworthy J K, Shipe E R 2005. Effect of Row Spacing and Soybean Genotype on Mainstem and Branch Yield. Agronomy Journal 97(3): 919-923.
  • Pereira-Flores M E, Justino F B 2019. Yield Components and Biomass Partition in Soybean: Climate Change Vision. In Soybean-Biomass, Yield and Productivity. IntechOpen.
  • Robinson A P, Simpson D M, Johnson W G 2013. Response of Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean Yield Components to Dicamba Exposure. Weed Science 61(4): 526-536.
  • Ruan Y L, Patrick J W, Bouzayen M, Osorio S, Fernie A R 2012. Molecular Regulation of Seed and Fruit Set. Trends in Plant Science 17(11): 656-665.
  • TÜİK 2018. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul
  • Yetgin S 2008. Çukurova Bölgesinde Ana Ürün Koşullarında Bazı Soya Çeşit ve Hatlarının Verim ve Tarımsal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 40sy.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLE
Authors

Metin Dağtekin 0000-0002-1397-1725

Mehmet Emin Bilgili 0000-0002-4191-0540

Project Number FBA-2019-11388
Publication Date October 31, 2020
Submission Date February 22, 2020
Acceptance Date May 1, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 23 Issue: 5

Cite

APA Dağtekin, M., & Bilgili, M. E. (2020). Soya Bitkisinde Tepe Sürgün Budamasının Biyomas Verimine Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 23(5), 1192-1199. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.692943

Cited By

Determination of Important Agricultural Traits of Some Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Genotypes and Adaptation in the Eastern Mediterranean Transition Zone
Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1250402
Epibrassinolide Uygulamasının Soyanın Verim Performansına Etkileri
Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1450224
 Download Cover Image


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149