Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=lg4-X89eoE_HrI2AMqj-PEkosFLHU4Xueq75-8IV99U&_path=id%3D763481%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Den%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Effects of Different Irrigation Levels and Nitrogen Rates on Peanut Yield and Quality in Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey

Year 2021, Volume: 24 Issue: 2, 306 - 312, 30.04.2021

Erkan Boydak , Mehmet Şimşek , Ali Rıza Demirkıran

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.763481
Cited By: 6

Abstract

The aim of research about irrigation and nutrition of peanut is to determine most suitable irrigation level and nitrogen fertilizer dose for peanut in the Harran conditions (Şanlıurfa, Turkey).In this study, different amounts of the nitrogen (N1:0, N2:40, N3:80, and N4:120 kg N ha-1) were applied as ammonium nitrate in two times as planting and flowering times to peanut plants. The irrigation levels were determined as 100, 75, 50, and 25% of the irrigation required and labeled as I1 (first irrigation), I2 (second irrigation), I3 (third irrigation), and I4 (fourth irrigation), respectively. In this study, positive and significant effect were found that the need protein and the increasing of peanut yield with its components were increased with 120 kg ha-1 nitrogen fertilization (N4) and no-deficit water (100%:I1) while the variable 100 fruit weight were increased with 80 kg ha-1 nitrogen fertilization (N3) and no-deficit water (100%:I1) application on plant. The plant height and 100 seed weight except 2nd year were also increased with 80 kg ha-1 nitrogen (N3) and no-deficit water (100%:I1).

Keywords

Nitrogen fertilizer Irrigation Peanut Arachis hypogaea L Harran

Project Number

HÜBAP-404

References

  • Ali A, Ebrahim A 2011. The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Irrigation Management on Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Yield in the North of Iran, 21st International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, p. 15–23.
  • Ali AG, Seyyed ANN 2010. Effects of Iron and Nitrogen Fertilizers on Yield and Yield Components of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Astaneh Ashrafiyeh, Iran. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 9(3): 256–262.
  • Arıoğlu H, Bakal H, Güllüoğlu L, Kurt C, Onat B 2016. Ana Ürün Koşullarında Yetiştirilen Bazı Yerfıstığı Çeşitlerinin Önemli Agronomic ve Kalite Özelliklerininin Belirlenmesi, Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(2): 24-29.
  • Barbieri JD, Dallacort R, Faria Junior CA, De Freitas PS, De Carvalho MA 2017. Peanut Cultivars Submitted to Irrigation Levels and Nitrogen Adubation in Tropical Climate. Engenharia Agrícola, 37(6): 1126-1136.
  • Chen R, Cheng W, Cui J, Liao J, Fan H, Zheng Z, Ma F 2015. Lateral Spacing in Drip-irrigated Wheat: The effects on Soil Moisture, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency. Field Crops Research, 179(10): 52–62.
  • Chung SY, Vercellotti JR, Sanders TH 1997. Increase of Glycolytic Enzymes in Peanuts during Peanut Maturation and Curing: Evidence of Anaerobic Metabolism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45(12): 4516–4521.
  • Conkerton EJ, Ross LF, Daigle DJ, Kvien CS, McCombs C 1989. The Effect of Drought Stress on Peanut Seed Composition. II. Oil, Protein and Minerals. Oleagineux, 44(12): 593–602.
  • Duarte EAA, Melo Filho P deA, Santos RC 2013. Características Agronômicas e Indice de Colheita de Diferentes Genótipos de Amendoim Submetidos a Estresse Hídrico. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 17(8): 843-847.
  • Erisman JW, van Grinsven H, Leip A, Mosier A, Bleeker A 2010. Nitrogen and Biofuels: An Overview of The Current State of Knowledge. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 86(2): 211-223.
  • Hu J, Xia G, Zhang Y, Zhang B, Chi D 2018. Effect of Nitrogen Application on Soil Nitrogen Absorption and Transformation under Supplementary Irrigation of Peanut. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 1: 1-11.
  • Kandil AA, El-Haleem AKA, Khalafallah MA, El-Habbasha SF, Abu-Hagaza NS, Behairy TG 2007. Effect of Nitrogen Levels and Some Bio-fertilizers on Dry Matter, Yield and Yield Attributes of Peanut. Bulletin of the National Research Centre (Cairo), 32: 341–359.
  • Kasap Y, Demirkıran AR, Şerbetçi A 1999. The Effect of Different Level of Phosphorus Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Agricultural Characteristics of Some Peanut Varieties under The Ecological Conditions of Kahramanmaraş. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23(4): 777-784.
  • Lanier JE, Jordan DL, Spears JF, Wells R, Johnson PD 2005. Peanut Response to Inoculation and Nitrogen Fertilizer. Agronomy Journal, 97(1): 79-84.
  • Reddy CR, Reddy SR 1993. Scheduling Irrigation for Peanuts with Variable Amounts of Available Water. Agricultural Water Management, 23(1): 1–9.
  • Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V 2003. Physiological Responses of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Drought Stress and Its Amelioration: a Critical Review. Plant Growth Regulators, 41(1): 75-88.
  • Rowland DL, Fairclotha W, Payton P, Tissue DT, Ferrell JA, Sorensen RB, Butts CL 2012. Primed Acclimation of Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Through The Use of Deficit Irrigation Timed to Crop Developmental Periods. Agricultural Water Management, 113(5): 85-95.
  • Sun H, Wang Y, Wang M, Zhao C 2010. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate on Senescence Characteristics and Yield of Different Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30: 2671–2677.
  • Trostle C 2004. Peanut Production 'Keys & Concerns' Texas South Plains. Lubbock, TX: Texas A&M University, Texas AgriLife Extension.
  • Trostle C 2005. Rhizobium Nodulation and Peanuts. In Focus on Entomology, vol. XLIV, no. 2. Lubbock, TX: Texas A&M University, Texas AgriLife Extension.
  • Wen G, Mori T, Yamamoto T, Chikushi J, Inoue M 2001. Nitrogen Recovery of Coated Fertilizers and Influence on Peanut Seed Quality for Peanut Plants Grown in Sandy Soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32(19-20): 3121-3140

Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Şartlarında Farklı Sulama Düzeyleri ve Azot Oranlarının Yerfıstığı Verimi ve Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi

Year 2021, Volume: 24 Issue: 2, 306 - 312, 30.04.2021

Erkan Boydak , Mehmet Şimşek , Ali Rıza Demirkıran

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.763481
Cited By: 6

Abstract

Bu çalışma ile Harran koşullarında (Şanlıurfa, Türkiye) yerfıstığı için en uygun sulama seviyesini ve azotlu gübre dozunu belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Azotlu gübre uygulamaları (N1: 0, N2: 40, N3: 80 ve N4: 120 kg N ha-1) amonyum nitrat olarak, ekimden sonra % 50’si, diğeri çiçeklenmede) uygulanmıştır. Sulama seviyeleri; sırasıyla gerekli sulama seviyesinin % 100’ü (I1), % 75’i (I2), % 50’si (I3) ve % 25'i (I4) olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, uygulamalara bağlı olarak protein ve yerfıstığı veriminin 120 kg N ha-1 azot gübrelemesi (N4) ve % 100 (I1) sulama uygulaması ile arttığı bulunmuştur. En fazla bitki meyve ağırlığı 80 kg N ha-1 azot gübreleme (N3) ve % 100 sulama uygulaması ile elde edilmiştir. Yine en yüksek bitki boyu (2. yıl hariç) ve en fazla 100 tohum ağırlığı da yine 80 kg N ha-1 azot (N3) ve % 100 sulama uygulaması ile tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Azotlu gübreleme, yerfıstığı sulama harran Arachis hypogaea L.,

Supporting Institution

HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Project Number

HÜBAP-404

Thanks

Harran Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar Koordinatörlüğüne teşşekkür ederiz.

References

  • Ali A, Ebrahim A 2011. The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Irrigation Management on Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Yield in the North of Iran, 21st International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, p. 15–23.
  • Ali AG, Seyyed ANN 2010. Effects of Iron and Nitrogen Fertilizers on Yield and Yield Components of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Astaneh Ashrafiyeh, Iran. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 9(3): 256–262.
  • Arıoğlu H, Bakal H, Güllüoğlu L, Kurt C, Onat B 2016. Ana Ürün Koşullarında Yetiştirilen Bazı Yerfıstığı Çeşitlerinin Önemli Agronomic ve Kalite Özelliklerininin Belirlenmesi, Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(2): 24-29.
  • Barbieri JD, Dallacort R, Faria Junior CA, De Freitas PS, De Carvalho MA 2017. Peanut Cultivars Submitted to Irrigation Levels and Nitrogen Adubation in Tropical Climate. Engenharia Agrícola, 37(6): 1126-1136.
  • Chen R, Cheng W, Cui J, Liao J, Fan H, Zheng Z, Ma F 2015. Lateral Spacing in Drip-irrigated Wheat: The effects on Soil Moisture, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency. Field Crops Research, 179(10): 52–62.
  • Chung SY, Vercellotti JR, Sanders TH 1997. Increase of Glycolytic Enzymes in Peanuts during Peanut Maturation and Curing: Evidence of Anaerobic Metabolism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45(12): 4516–4521.
  • Conkerton EJ, Ross LF, Daigle DJ, Kvien CS, McCombs C 1989. The Effect of Drought Stress on Peanut Seed Composition. II. Oil, Protein and Minerals. Oleagineux, 44(12): 593–602.
  • Duarte EAA, Melo Filho P deA, Santos RC 2013. Características Agronômicas e Indice de Colheita de Diferentes Genótipos de Amendoim Submetidos a Estresse Hídrico. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 17(8): 843-847.
  • Erisman JW, van Grinsven H, Leip A, Mosier A, Bleeker A 2010. Nitrogen and Biofuels: An Overview of The Current State of Knowledge. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 86(2): 211-223.
  • Hu J, Xia G, Zhang Y, Zhang B, Chi D 2018. Effect of Nitrogen Application on Soil Nitrogen Absorption and Transformation under Supplementary Irrigation of Peanut. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 1: 1-11.
  • Kandil AA, El-Haleem AKA, Khalafallah MA, El-Habbasha SF, Abu-Hagaza NS, Behairy TG 2007. Effect of Nitrogen Levels and Some Bio-fertilizers on Dry Matter, Yield and Yield Attributes of Peanut. Bulletin of the National Research Centre (Cairo), 32: 341–359.
  • Kasap Y, Demirkıran AR, Şerbetçi A 1999. The Effect of Different Level of Phosphorus Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Agricultural Characteristics of Some Peanut Varieties under The Ecological Conditions of Kahramanmaraş. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23(4): 777-784.
  • Lanier JE, Jordan DL, Spears JF, Wells R, Johnson PD 2005. Peanut Response to Inoculation and Nitrogen Fertilizer. Agronomy Journal, 97(1): 79-84.
  • Reddy CR, Reddy SR 1993. Scheduling Irrigation for Peanuts with Variable Amounts of Available Water. Agricultural Water Management, 23(1): 1–9.
  • Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V 2003. Physiological Responses of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Drought Stress and Its Amelioration: a Critical Review. Plant Growth Regulators, 41(1): 75-88.
  • Rowland DL, Fairclotha W, Payton P, Tissue DT, Ferrell JA, Sorensen RB, Butts CL 2012. Primed Acclimation of Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Through The Use of Deficit Irrigation Timed to Crop Developmental Periods. Agricultural Water Management, 113(5): 85-95.
  • Sun H, Wang Y, Wang M, Zhao C 2010. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate on Senescence Characteristics and Yield of Different Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30: 2671–2677.
  • Trostle C 2004. Peanut Production 'Keys & Concerns' Texas South Plains. Lubbock, TX: Texas A&M University, Texas AgriLife Extension.
  • Trostle C 2005. Rhizobium Nodulation and Peanuts. In Focus on Entomology, vol. XLIV, no. 2. Lubbock, TX: Texas A&M University, Texas AgriLife Extension.
  • Wen G, Mori T, Yamamoto T, Chikushi J, Inoue M 2001. Nitrogen Recovery of Coated Fertilizers and Influence on Peanut Seed Quality for Peanut Plants Grown in Sandy Soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32(19-20): 3121-3140
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLE
Authors

Erkan Boydak 0000-0002-3466-5356

Mehmet Şimşek 0000-0002-9552-1743

Ali Rıza Demirkıran

Project Number HÜBAP-404
Publication Date April 30, 2021
Submission Date July 3, 2020
Acceptance Date August 13, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 24 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Boydak, E., Şimşek, M., & Demirkıran, A. R. (2021). The Effects of Different Irrigation Levels and Nitrogen Rates on Peanut Yield and Quality in Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 24(2), 306-312. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.763481

Cited By

Catch performance and remaining ratio on fishing hooks for different baits used in longline fishery
Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Celalettin Aydın
https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.12
Comparison of the partial root drying and conventional drip irrigation regimes on seed, oil yield quality, and economic return for peanut crop
Irrigation Science
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00854-x
Cobalt Combined with Potassium Humate as Beneficial Applications in Alleviating Water Stress Impacts on Groundnut During Sensitive Growth Stages
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01367-4
Monitoring plant responses in field-grown peanuts exposed to exogenously applied chitosan under full and limited irrigation levels
Scientific Reports
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56573-6
Şırnak ili Silopi ilçesinde yetiştiriciliği yapılan yer fıstığının mineral beslenme durumunun toprak ve yaprak analizleri ile incelenmesi
Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1413417
Yerfıstığı (Arachis hypogaea L.) yetiştiriciliği yapılan toprakların verimlilik durumunun belirlenmesi: Osmaniye örneği
Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1512410
 Download Cover Image


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149