Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=fN4JwbjoqRJeY2s0wrCYCWFQ2Xe6-zRFLSetXv4dvWo&_path=id%3D916295%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Den%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Sudan otunun potansiyel besleme değerine çeşidin etkisi

Year 2022, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 400 - 405, 30.04.2022

Sergey Kapustin , Alexander Volodin , Andrey Kapustin , Nikolay Samokısh

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.916295
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Ortalama olarak en yüksek bitki boyu 2019-2020 yıllarında Sudan otu çeşidi Nika'da (274 cm) bulunmuştur. Sputnitsa ve Aleksandrina'daki bu oranlar 23 ve 30 cm daha düşüktü. Yeni Nika çeşidinde iki kesimden sonra yeşil madde verimi 41.0 t ha-1 ve 9.59 t ha-1 samandı. Tanınan çeşitlerdeki bu oranlar, 35.0-36.0 t ha-1 ve 7.98-8.28 t ha-1 aralığında değişmektedir. Maksimum protein içeriği Nika çeşidinde (% 13.72), Sputnitsa standardında (% 11.33) ve Aleksandrina çeşidinde (% 11.72) bulunmuştur. Hava-kuru maddedeki lif içeriği Nika'da% 25.20, Sputnitsa'da% 26.01 ve Aleksandrina'da% 26.03 idi. Koyun yeminde metabolize edilebilir enerjinin varlığını belirlerken, Nika çeşidinin 1 kg yeşil madde içinde 2.03 MJ, Aleksandrina - 1.96 MJ, Sputnitsa - 1.90 MJ içerdiği bulunmuştur. Yeni Nika çeşidi de 1 kg samanda benzer maksimum orana sahipti ve 8.79 MJ idi. İncelenen Sudan otu çeşitleri arasında en önemli amino asit içeriği Nika çeşidinde de elde edilmiştir. Bu çeşidin hava-kuru maddesindeki maksimum asparagin ve glutamik asit oranı sırasıyla% 1.84 ve% 1.38'dir. Nika çeşidinin kuru maddesi yüksek seviyede (% 0.5-1.0) amino asit prolin, glisin, alanin, valin, lösin, fenilalanin ve lizin içerir. Sudan otunun havada kuru maddesinde önemli miktarda treonin, serin, izolösin, tirozin ve arginin amino asitleri (% 0,3-0,5) elde edilmiştir. Saman içindeki metiyonin ve histidin amino asit içeriği düşüktü (% 0.27'den az)

Keywords

Sudan otu Yeşil ve kuru madde Azot içermeyen özüt Metabolize edilebilir enerji Amino asitler

References

  • Baranovsky AV, Kapustin SI, Kapustin AS 2019. The study of modern hybrids of grain sorghum in the conditions of the steppe zone. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science-IJEES, 9(4): 717-722. DOI: 10.31407/ijees9417.
  • Baranovsky AV, Sadovoy AS, Kapustin SI, Kapustin AS 2020. Optimization of sowing time for grain sorghum and millet. Bioscience research, 17(2): 1121-1128.
  • Cole MR, Eggleston G, Petrie E, Uchimiya SM, Dalley C 2017. Cultivar and maturity effects on the quality attributes and ethanol potential of sweet sorghum. Biomass and Bioenergy, 96: 183-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.12.001
  • Dospekhov BA 1985. Methods of field experience. Moscow: Agropromizdat.
  • Fedin MA 1985. Methodology of state crop variety testing of cultivated plants. Moscow: Publishing House of the Ministry of Agriculture of the USSR.
  • Goulart-Machado R, Saccol-De Sá EL, Hahn L, Pilatti-Santana WL 2018. Inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobia in Sudan grass (Sorghum × sudanense (Piper) Stapf cv. Sudanense) and millet (Pennisetumglaucum (L.)R.Br. cv. BRS1501). ActaAgronomica, 67(1). DOI: 10.15446/ acag. v67n1.55849
  • Kapustin SI, Volodin AB, Kapustin AS 2018. Inheritance of morphological and fertile characters in heterozygous sorghum hybrids. Ukrainian journal of ecology, 8(3): ‏273-281.
  • Kapustin S, Volodin A, Kapustin A 2019. Comprehensive Assessment of New Varieties Hybrids Sugar Sorghum in the Conditions of South Russia. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6(6): 11512-11517.
  • Kapustin SI, Volodin AB, Kapustin AS 2020. Process of the selection of Sorghum-Sudank hybrids in arid conditions Steppe zone. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science-IJEES, 10(2): 331-336. DOI: 10.31407/ijees10.212
  • Kosogova TM, Baranovsky AV, Kapustin SI, Kapustin AS 2020. The effect of nitrogen fertilizers on the productivity of grain sorghum. Bioscience research, 17(1): 228-234.
  • Kuznetsov IY, Akhiyarov BG, Asylbaev IG, Davletov FA, Sergeev VS, Abdulvaleyev RR, Valitov AV, Mukhametshin AM, Ayupov DS, Yagafarov RG 2018. The effect of Sudan grass on the mixed sowing chemical composition of annual forage crops. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13: 6558-6564. DOI: 10.3923/jeasci.2018.6558.6564.
  • Mut H, Gulumser E, Dogrusoz ME, Basaran U 2017. Effect of different nitrogen levels on hay yield and some quality traits of sudan grass and sorghum ..sudan grass hybrids. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 17(2): 269-278. DOI: 10.5958/0974-181x.2017.00026.9
  • Stojanovic B, Dordevic N, Simic A, Bozickovic A, Davidovic V, Ivetic A 2020. The in vitro protein degradability of legume and sudan grass forage types and ensiled mixtures. Ankara Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 67(4): 419-425. DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.702257
  • Sonmez O, Pierzynski G, Kaya C, Aydemir S 2016. The evaluation of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) and CaCl2 extraction on phosphorus-zinc interaction in sudan grass. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 48(1): 393-397.
  • Tang CC, Luo F, Li XY, Pei ZY, Gao JM, Sun SJ 2015. Responsiveness of sweet sorghum in yield and quality related traits to environmental factors. Acta Agronomica Sinica (China), 41(10): 1612-1618. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01612
  • Vasin VG, Tcybulskii AV, Kiseleva LV, Kozhevnikova OP, Saniev RN, Adamov AA 2018. Productivity, Quality, And Amino Acid Composition Of Sudan Grass And Sunflower Mixtures Grown With Soybean And/Or Spring Vetch For Haylage-Silage Use. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Biological and Chemical Sciences, 9(5): 1230-1241.
  • Volgin VI, Romanenko LV, Prokhorenko PN 2008. The method of calculating the metabolizable energy in feed based on the content of raw nutrients. Dubrovitsy: Publishing House of the Research Institute of Animal Husbandry of the Russian Agricultural Academy.
  • Wynd FL, Noggle GR 1947. Effects of selected chemical properties of soils on protein content of sudan grass. Lloydia, 10(2): 136-144.

Feed Quality of New Sudan Grass Varieties

Year 2022, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 400 - 405, 30.04.2022

Sergey Kapustin , Alexander Volodin , Andrey Kapustin , Nikolay Samokısh

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.916295
Cited By: 1

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted to determine the feed quality of New Sudan grass varieties. On average, the highest plant height was found in Sudan grass variety Nika (274 cm) in 2019-2020. These rates in Sputnitsa and Aleksandrina were loer by 23 and 30 cm, respectevely. The yield of green matter after two cuts in the new variety Nika was 41.0 t ha-1 and 9.59 t ha-1 of hay. These rates in the recognized varieties varied in the range of 35.0-36.0 t ha-1 and 7.98-8.28 t ha-1. The maximum protein content for varieties Nika, Sputnitsa standard and Aleksandrina were 13.72%, 11.33%, and 11.72%, respectevely. The fiber content in the air-dry matter was 25.20% in Nika, 26.01% in Sputnitsa and 26.03% in Aleksandrina. When determining the presence of metabolizable energy in sheep feed, it was found that the variety Nika contained 2.03 MJ, Aleksandrina – 1.96 MJ, Sputnitsa – 1.90 MJ in 1 kg of green matter. The new variety Nika also had similar maximum rate in 1 kg of hay and amounted to 8.79 MJ. Among the studied varieties of Sudan grass, the most significant amino acid content was also obtained in the variety Nika. The maximum rate of asparagine and glutamic acids in the air-dry matter of this variety was 1.84% and 1.38%, respectively. The dry matter of the variety Nika contains high level (0.5-1.0%) of the amino acids proline, glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, phenylalanine, and lysine. A significant amount of threonine, serine, isoleucine, tyrosine, and arginine amino acids (0.3-0.5%) was obtained in the air-dry matter of Sudan grass. The content of methionine and histidine amino acids in hay was low (less than 0.27%).

Keywords

Sudan grass Green and dry matter Nitrogen-free extract Metabolizable energy Amino acids

References

  • Baranovsky AV, Kapustin SI, Kapustin AS 2019. The study of modern hybrids of grain sorghum in the conditions of the steppe zone. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science-IJEES, 9(4): 717-722. DOI: 10.31407/ijees9417.
  • Baranovsky AV, Sadovoy AS, Kapustin SI, Kapustin AS 2020. Optimization of sowing time for grain sorghum and millet. Bioscience research, 17(2): 1121-1128.
  • Cole MR, Eggleston G, Petrie E, Uchimiya SM, Dalley C 2017. Cultivar and maturity effects on the quality attributes and ethanol potential of sweet sorghum. Biomass and Bioenergy, 96: 183-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.12.001
  • Dospekhov BA 1985. Methods of field experience. Moscow: Agropromizdat.
  • Fedin MA 1985. Methodology of state crop variety testing of cultivated plants. Moscow: Publishing House of the Ministry of Agriculture of the USSR.
  • Goulart-Machado R, Saccol-De Sá EL, Hahn L, Pilatti-Santana WL 2018. Inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobia in Sudan grass (Sorghum × sudanense (Piper) Stapf cv. Sudanense) and millet (Pennisetumglaucum (L.)R.Br. cv. BRS1501). ActaAgronomica, 67(1). DOI: 10.15446/ acag. v67n1.55849
  • Kapustin SI, Volodin AB, Kapustin AS 2018. Inheritance of morphological and fertile characters in heterozygous sorghum hybrids. Ukrainian journal of ecology, 8(3): ‏273-281.
  • Kapustin S, Volodin A, Kapustin A 2019. Comprehensive Assessment of New Varieties Hybrids Sugar Sorghum in the Conditions of South Russia. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6(6): 11512-11517.
  • Kapustin SI, Volodin AB, Kapustin AS 2020. Process of the selection of Sorghum-Sudank hybrids in arid conditions Steppe zone. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science-IJEES, 10(2): 331-336. DOI: 10.31407/ijees10.212
  • Kosogova TM, Baranovsky AV, Kapustin SI, Kapustin AS 2020. The effect of nitrogen fertilizers on the productivity of grain sorghum. Bioscience research, 17(1): 228-234.
  • Kuznetsov IY, Akhiyarov BG, Asylbaev IG, Davletov FA, Sergeev VS, Abdulvaleyev RR, Valitov AV, Mukhametshin AM, Ayupov DS, Yagafarov RG 2018. The effect of Sudan grass on the mixed sowing chemical composition of annual forage crops. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13: 6558-6564. DOI: 10.3923/jeasci.2018.6558.6564.
  • Mut H, Gulumser E, Dogrusoz ME, Basaran U 2017. Effect of different nitrogen levels on hay yield and some quality traits of sudan grass and sorghum ..sudan grass hybrids. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 17(2): 269-278. DOI: 10.5958/0974-181x.2017.00026.9
  • Stojanovic B, Dordevic N, Simic A, Bozickovic A, Davidovic V, Ivetic A 2020. The in vitro protein degradability of legume and sudan grass forage types and ensiled mixtures. Ankara Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 67(4): 419-425. DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.702257
  • Sonmez O, Pierzynski G, Kaya C, Aydemir S 2016. The evaluation of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) and CaCl2 extraction on phosphorus-zinc interaction in sudan grass. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 48(1): 393-397.
  • Tang CC, Luo F, Li XY, Pei ZY, Gao JM, Sun SJ 2015. Responsiveness of sweet sorghum in yield and quality related traits to environmental factors. Acta Agronomica Sinica (China), 41(10): 1612-1618. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01612
  • Vasin VG, Tcybulskii AV, Kiseleva LV, Kozhevnikova OP, Saniev RN, Adamov AA 2018. Productivity, Quality, And Amino Acid Composition Of Sudan Grass And Sunflower Mixtures Grown With Soybean And/Or Spring Vetch For Haylage-Silage Use. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Biological and Chemical Sciences, 9(5): 1230-1241.
  • Volgin VI, Romanenko LV, Prokhorenko PN 2008. The method of calculating the metabolizable energy in feed based on the content of raw nutrients. Dubrovitsy: Publishing House of the Research Institute of Animal Husbandry of the Russian Agricultural Academy.
  • Wynd FL, Noggle GR 1947. Effects of selected chemical properties of soils on protein content of sudan grass. Lloydia, 10(2): 136-144.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLE
Authors

Sergey Kapustin 0000-0002-3389-0340

Alexander Volodin 0000-0002-2944-4241

Andrey Kapustin 0000-0001-7857-5988

Nikolay Samokısh 0000-0003-0304-5995

Publication Date April 30, 2022
Submission Date April 15, 2021
Acceptance Date June 15, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 25 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kapustin, S., Volodin, A., Kapustin, A., Samokısh, N. (2022). Feed Quality of New Sudan Grass Varieties. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 25(2), 400-405. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.916295

Cited By

Study of the promising sweet sorghum varieties
Agrarian Bulletin of the
https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2023-236-07-22-31
 Download Cover Image


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149