Fertilizer Use Efficiencies of Some Greenhouse Plants Grown under Farmer PracticesNutrient Uptakes and N, P, K and Ca Utilization Rates of Some Plants Grown Under Greenhouse Conditions According to Farmer Practices

Ferhat Bulut; İbrahim Erdal

doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1106115

TR EN

Sera Koşullarında Çifttçi Uygulamalarıyla Yetiştirilen Bazı Bitkilerin Besin Elementi Alımlarıyla N, P, K ve Ca Yararlanma Oranları

Öz

Bu çalışmada, çiftçi uygulamaları altında serada yetiştirilen karnabahar, marul, pırasa, soğan ve turp bitkilerinin N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn ve Cu alımlarıyla N, P, K ve Ca kullanım oranlarını belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Bu nedenle, çiftiçilerin yetiştiricilik pratikleri ve gübreleme uygulamaları temel alınmıştır. Araştırma, her bitkinin hasat dönemine kadar sürdürülmüştür. Analiz sonuçlarına göre gübreli ve gübresiz uygulamalar arasında incelenen özellikler açısından istatistiksel olarak önemli farklar olduğu belirlenmiştir (P<0.01). Bitkilerin besin elementi alımlarına göre genel bir değerlendirme yapılırsa, her iki durumda da en fazla besin elementi alımının turp, en az besin maddesi alımının ise soğan tarafından gerçekleştiği görülmüştür. Gübrelerle uygulanan besin elementlerinden yararlanma oranları değerlendirildiğinde, bitkilerin N, P, K ve Ca’dan yararlanma oranlarının yüzde olarak karnabahar için sırasıyla 5.61, 4.31, 14.30 ve 75.30, marul için; 11.39, 13.50, 38.70 ve 22.30, pırasa için; 8.32, 8.06, 17.90 ve 43.0, soğan için; 2.79, 2.50, 7.10 ve 41.80, turp için; 23.10, 33.83, 81.50 ve 335.0 olduğu belirlenmiştir. Uygulanan gübreler, bitkilerin verim ve besin elementi içeriklerini olumlu etkilemiş olsa da, özellikle N, P ve K için yararlanma oranlarının oldukça düşük olduğu görülmüştür. Bu sonuçlar, sera koşullarında çiftiçi uygulamalarına göre yetiştirilen bu bitkilerin uygun gübrelenmediğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fertilizer Use Efficiencies of Some Greenhouse Plants Grown under Farmer PracticesNutrient Uptakes and N, P, K and Ca Utilization Rates of Some Plants Grown Under Greenhouse Conditions According to Farmer Practices

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to determine the uptakes of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu and utilization rates of N, P, K and Ca by cauliflower, lettuce, leek, onion and radish plants grown under greenhouse conditions depending on the farmer practices. For this reason, the breeding practices and fertilization program of the farmers were taken as the basis. The research was continued until the harvest period of each plant. According to the results of the analysis, significant differences (P<0.01) were found in examined parameters between the fertilized and non-fertilized treatments. Based on the nutrient uptake of the plants, it was seen that the radish plant removed the highest nutrient and the onion removed the least nutrient in both conditions. Considering the fertilizer nutrient utilization rates of plants as percentage for N, P, K, and Ca were 5.61, 4.31, 14.30, 75.30 for cauliflower; 11.39, 13.50, 38.70 and 22.31 for lettuce; 8.32, 8.06, 17.90, 43.0 for leek; 2.79, 2.50, 7.10, 41.80 for onion and 23.10, 33.83, 81.50 and 335 for radish plant. Although the applied fertilizers had a positive effect on the yield and nutrient concentrations of the plants, utilization rates were found to be quite low especially for N, P, and K. These results showed that these plants grown under greenhouse conditions according to farmer treatments were not fertilized properly.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

ISUBÜ

Thanks

We tank to ISUBU BAP for the finantial support for this work.

References

Allison, L.E., & Moodie C.D (1965). Carbonate. Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, 379–1400, p. 1572.
Alpaslan, M., Güneş, A., & İnal A (1998). Deneme tekniği. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, p. 437.
Anaç, D., & Eryüce N (2003). Nutrient management in protected cropping in Turkey. The International Fertilizer Society, Proceedings 522, 19-34.
Atılgan, A., Coşkan, A., Saltuk, B., & Erkan, M. (2007). Antalya Yöresindeki Seralarda Kimyasal ve Organik Gübre Kullanım Düzeyleri ve Olası Çevre Etkileri. Ekoloji 15(62), 37-47.
Ayoub, A.T. (1999). Fertilizers and the environment. nutrient cycling in agro ecosystems 55(2), 117-121.
Baligar, V.C., & Bennett, O.L. (1986a). Outlook on fertilizer use efficiency in the tropics. Fertil Res 10, 83–96.
Baligar, V.C., & Bennett. O.L. (1986b). NPK-fertilizer efficiency. A Situation Analysis for The Tropics. Fertil Res 10, 147–164.
Baligar, V.C., Fageria, N.K., & He, Z.L. (2001). Nutrient Use Efficiency in Plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Anal 32(7-8), 921-950.

Bouyoucos, G.J. (1951). A Recalibration of The Hydrometer Method for Making Mechanical Analysis of Soils 1. Agronomy J 43(9), 434-438.
Bremner, J.M. (1965). Total nitrogen. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties 9, 1149-1178, p.1572.
Dhillon, J.S., Eickhoff, E.M., Mullen, R.W., & Raun, W.R. (2019). World Potassium Use Efficiency in Cereal Crops. Agronomy Journal 111(2), 889-896.
Engindeniz, S., Yılmaz, İ., Durmuşoğlu, E., Yağmur, B., Eltez, R.Z., Demirtaş, B., Engindeniz, D., & Tatarhan. A.H., (2010). Sera Sebzelerinin Karşılaştırmalı Girdi Analizi. Ekoloji 19(74), 122-130.
Erdal, İ., Ertek, A., Şenyiğit, U., & Yılmaz, H. İ (2006). Effects of Different Irrigation Programs and Nitrogen Levels on Nitrogen Concentration, Uptake and Utilisation in Processing Tomatoes (Lycopersicum Esculentum). Aust J Exp Agric 46(12), 1653-1660.
Havlin, J.L., Tisdale, S.L., Nelson, W.L., & Beaton, J.D. (2016). Soil fertility and fertilizers. Pearson Education India, p. 487.
Hawkesford, M.J., Kopriva, S., & De Kok, L.J. (2016). Nutrient use efficiency in plants . New York, NY, USA: Springer International Pu, p. 279.
Hesterman, O.B., Russelle, M.P., Sheaffer, C.C., & Heichel, G.H. (1987). Nitrogen Utilization from Fertilizer and Legume Residues in Legume‐Corn Rotations1. Agron Jour 79(4), 726-731.
Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, p. 498.
Johnston, A.E., Poulton, P.R., Fixen, P.E., & Curtin, D. (2014). Phosphorus: Its Efficient Use in Agriculture. Adv Agron 123, 177-228.
Jones, J.B. (1991). Plant analysis handbook. A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide, p.581.
Kacar, B. (1994). Bitki ve toprağın kimyasal analizleri: III Toprak analizleri. Ankara Ü., Ziraat Fakültesi, Eğitim Araştırma ve Geliştirme Vakfı Yayınları, p.705.
Kucukyumuk, Z., & Erdal, I. (2011). Rootstock and Cultivar Effect on Mineral Nutrition, Seasonal Nutrient Variation and Correlations among Leaf, Flower and Fruit Nutrient Concentrations in Apple Trees. Bulgarian J of Agr Sci 17(5), 633-641.
Ladha, J.K., Pathak, H., Krupnik, T.J., Six, J., & Van Kessel, C. (2005). Efficiency of Fertilizer Nitrogen in Cereal Production: Retrospects and Prospects. Advances in Agron 87, 85-156.
Lindsay, W.L., & Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA Micronutrient Soil Test. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 35,600-602.
Nazlı, İ., & Erdal, İ. (2019). Influence of Rootstock and Variety on Leaf Nutrient Concentration of Pear Grown on a Nutrient-Sufficient Soil. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature 22, 141-148.
Olsen, S.R. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Dep. of Agri. Circ, Washington, p. 939.
Peech, M. (1965). Hydrogen-ion activity. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, American Society of Agronomy, Madison 914-916, p. 1572.
Pradika, V., Masykuri, M.,& Supriyadi, S. (2019). Farmer Awareness to the Dangers of Heavy Metal Cadmium (Cd) Pollution Due to Over-Fertilization in Sragen Regency Central Java. Caraka Tani: J of Sust Agric 34(1), 76-85.
Rakshit, A., Singh, H.B., Sen, A. (Eds.) (2015). Nutrient use efficiency: From basics to advances, New Delhi, Springer India, p. 417.
Raun, W.R., Johnson, G.V. (1999). Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Cereal Production. Agron. J. 91, 357-363.
Roberts, T.L., & Johnston, A.E. (2015). Phosphorus Use Efficiency and Management in Agriculture. Resources, Conservation and Recy 105, 275-281.
Şahin, G. (2016). The Fertilizer Use State in Turkiye and Problems Experienced About Fertilizing. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics 22(1), 19-32.
Sönmez, İ., & Kaplan, M. (2004). Demre Yöresi Seralarında Toprak ve Sulama Sularının Tuz Içeriğinin Belirlenmesi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 17(2), 155-160.
Sun, T., Yang, X., Tangi, S., Han, K., He, P., & Wu, L. (2020). Genotypic Variation in Nutrient Uptake Requirements of Rice Using The QUEFTS Model. Agronomy 11(1),1-26.
Tang, S., Pan, W., Tang, R., Ma, Q., Zhou, J., Zheng, N.,& Wu, L, (2022). Effects of Balanced and Unbalanced Fertilization on Tea Quality, Yield, and Soil Bacterial Community. App Soil Ecol 175: 104442.
Tüzel, Y., Gül, A., Daşgan, H.Y., Özgür, M., Çelik, N., Boyacı, H.F., & Ersoy, A. (2005). Örtü altı yetiştiriciliğinde gelişmeler. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VI. Teknik Kongresi, 3-7 Ocak 2005, Ankara, 551-563.
Walkley, A., & Black, I.A. (1934). An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Sci 37(1), 29–38.
Zhang, J., He, P., Ding, W., Xu, X., Ullah, S., Abbas, T., Chao, A., Rongzong, C.,& Zhou, W. (2019). Estimating Nutrient Uptake Requirements for Radish in China Based on QUEFTS Model. Scientific Reports 9(1), 1-10.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ferhat Bulut
0000-0003-1645-8131
Türkiye

İbrahim Erdal ^*
0000-0001-8177-948X
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 30, 2023

Submission Date

April 19, 2022

Acceptance Date

August 14, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 26 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1106115

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA33CL53AD

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Bulut, F., & Erdal, İ. (2023). Fertilizer Use Efficiencies of Some Greenhouse Plants Grown under Farmer PracticesNutrient Uptakes and N, P, K and Ca Utilization Rates of Some Plants Grown Under Greenhouse Conditions According to Farmer Practices. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 26(3), 639-649. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1106115