Lectotypification of Some Names in Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae)

Ergin Hamzaoğlu

doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.636135

TR EN

Lectotypification of Some Names in Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae)

Abstract

In this study, lectotypifications of 21 valid or synonym names of the genus Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae) were determined. Among these; the types of D. acrochlorus Stapf, D. haussknechtii Boiss., D. hypochlorus Boiss. & Heldr., D. kastembeluensis Freyn & Sint., D. kotschyanus Boiss. & Heldr., D. lydus Boiss., D. micranthus Boiss. & Heldr., D. multipunctatus Ser. var. gracilior Boiss., D. pallens Sibth. & Sm. var. oxylepis Boiss. and D. striatellus Fenzl were based upon the specimens collected from two or more localities. The types of D. bitlisianus Kotschy ex Boiss., D. brevicaulis Fenzl, D. carmelitarum Reut. ex Boiss., D. cibrarius Clem., D. hymenolepis Boiss., D. muschianus Kotschy ex Boiss., D. polycladus Boiss. and D. setisquameus Hausskn. ex Bornm. were based upon the specimens collected from a single locality without mentioning any “type”. And D. arpadianus Ade & Bornm. var. trojanus Bornm. & Sint., D. engleri Hausskn. & Bornm. and D. siphonocalyx Blakelock were based upon the specimens for which multiple “types” were stated. Most of the specimens of the lectotypes determined in this study were collected from Turkey and the rest came from Syria and Iraq.

Keywords

Dianthus,Typification,Turkey,Syria,Iraq

Supporting Institution

TÜBİTAK

Project Number

KBAG-111T873

Thanks

I am indebted to the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) for financial support (Project No. KBAG-111T873). I also thank the curators of the herbaria in the K, E, P, JE, WU, BM, PH and BR for the virtual images of the type specimens.

References

Ade A 1934. Dianthus arpadianus Ade et Bornmüller spec. nov. Repertorium Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis, 36: 385-388.
Blakelock RA 1948. The Rustam Herbaria, Iraq: Part 1. Systematic List. Kew Bulletin, 3(3): 375-444.
Boissier E 1843. Diagnoses Plantarum Orientalium Novarum, vol 1(1). Typographia Ferd. Ramboz, Genevae, 20.
Boissier E 1849. Diagnoses Plantarum Orientalium Novarum, vol 1(8). Typographia Ferd. Ramboz, Genevae, 64-69.
Boissier E 1867. Flora Orientalis, vol 1. H. Georg, Geneva & Basel, 483-512.
Clementi J 1857. Sertulum Orientale seu recensio plantarum in Olympo Bithynico, in agro Byzantino et Hellenico, nonnullisque aliis Orientis Regionibus annis 1849-1850. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, 16: 239-337.
Davis PH 1965. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 1. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 10-11.
Fenzl E 1842. Pugillus Plantarum Novarum Syria et Tauri Occidentalis Primus. F. Beck, Vindobonae, 10-11.

Freyn von J 1893. Plantae Novae Orientales, III. Oesterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 43: 372-377.
Haussknecht C 1890. Referat über die auf der Frühjahrshauptversammlung zu Rudolstadt 1890 vorgelegten und besprochenen Pflanzen. Mitteilungen der Geographischen Gesellschaft für Thüringen zu Jena, 9: 10-23.
IPNI 2019. The International Plant Names Index, Dianthus acrochlonis. http://www.ipni.org/ipni/plantnamesearchpage.do (Access date: 12.07.2019].
Nersesyan AA 2011. Genus Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae) in southern Transcaucasia. Takhtajania, 1: 44-51.
Rechinger KH 1988. Dianthus L. (Flora Iranica, vol 163. Akademische Druck-u Verlagsanstalt, Graz) 128-188.
Reeve H 1967. Dianthus L. (Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 2. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh: Ed. Davis PH) 99-131.
Stapf O 1886. Beitrage zur flora von Lycien, Carien und Mesopotamien. Aun. 1881, 1882, 1883. Plantae collectae a Dre Felix Luschan, II. Theil. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften/Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 51: 347-384.
Staples G, Prado J 2018. Clarification is needed in the Code for the nomenclatural status of type specimen photographs. Taxon, 67(5): 833-835.
Strid A 1986. Dianthus L. (Mountain Flora of Greece, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 176-200.
The Plant List 2019. Dianthus acrochlonis. http://www.theplantlist.org (Access date: 12.07.2019).
Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Kusber W-H, Li D-Z, Marhold K, May TW, McNeill J, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Veg 159. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten, 1-254.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Structural Biology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ergin Hamzaoğlu ^*
0000-0001-6053-6796
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 30, 2020

Submission Date

October 22, 2019

Acceptance Date

December 5, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 23 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.636135

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA89YP96BM

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Hamzaoğlu, E. (2020). Lectotypification of Some Names in Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 23(2), 402-415. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.636135

Cited By

Bingöl’den Yeni Bir Çalımsı Dianthus (Caryophyllaceae) Taksonu, Türkiye

Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.714530

Lectotypification of Some Names in Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae)

Dianthus L.’ta (Caryophyllaceae) Bazı İsimlerin Lektotipifikasyonu

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lectotypification of Some Names in Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae)

Abstract

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Project Number

Thanks

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Bingöl’den Yeni Bir Çalımsı Dianthus (Caryophyllaceae) Taksonu, Türkiye