Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kırsal Alanda Sosyal Sermayenin Yaşam Memnuniyeti Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 21 , 123 - 132, 31.12.2018

Şerafettin Keleş Atilla Keskin , Nur Ertek

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.504999
Cited By: 1

Öz

Başta ekonomi bilimi olmak üzere birçok bilim bireylerin ve toplumum
mutlu yaşam sürmelerini hedeflemektedir. Birçok çalışmada yaşam memnuniyeti,
demografik, genetik, psikolojik ve ekonomik değişkenlerle ölçülmeye çalışılmış
ama sosyal sermaye pek dikkate alınmamıştır. Bu çalışmada, sosyal sermaye ile
yaşam memnuniyeti arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Tesadüfî Örnekleme Yöntemine göre yapılan hesaplamalar sonucunda anket
sayısı 324 olarak belirlenmiştir. Erzurum kent merkezi dışındaki ilçe ve
köylerde yapılan anketlerden elde edilen veriler kullanılmıştır. Yapısal
Eşitlik Modelinin kullanıldığı çalışmada elde edilen bulgular yaşam memnuniyeti
ile sosyal sermaye arasında pozitif yönlü bir etkileşimin olduğunu
göstermektedir. İlişkisel Sosyal Sermaye (0,65), Bilişsel Sosyal Sermaye (0,62)
ve Yapısal Sosyal Sermaye (0,31)  orta
derecede pozitif yönde yaşam memnuniyetini etkilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yaşam memnuniyeti Sosyal Sermaye Kırsal Alan Türkiye.

Kaynakça

  • Anonymous (2016). İllerde yaşam endeksi gösterge değerleri, 2015, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Ankara.
  • Bayram, N. (2010). Introduction to Structural Equation Model and Amos Applications, Ezgi Print house, Bursa.
  • Bjørnskov, C. (2003). The happy few: Cross–country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos, 56 (1), 3-16.
  • Bagozzi, P.R., Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Academy of Marketing Science Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Spring, Vol. 16(1).
  • Chan, J., To, H., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research . Social Indicators Research , 75.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
  • Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cam- bridge: Harvard University
  • Çelik, H. E. ve Yılmaz, V., 2014. Lisrel 9.1 ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi. Arı Yayınları İstanbul.
  • Çiçek, A., Erkan, O. (1996). Research and Sampling Methods in Agricultural Economy Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture Print house, No: 12, Lecture Note Series No: 6, Tokat.
  • De Carolis, D. M., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30 (1), 41-56.
  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, 55 (1), 34.
  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49 (1), 71-75.
  • Duman, B ve Alacahan, O. (2011). Sosyal Sermaye/Güven Boyutunda Etniklik. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences. Jan 2011, Vol. 10 Issue 1, pp.181-208.
  • Emiroğlu, M., 1972. A study regarding the area, number of parcels and parcel size of the rural settlements by geographical regions. Journal of Geographical Studies Issue 3-4, pp.109 – 138, Ankara.
  • Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. (2002). The economics of happiness. World economics, 3 (1), 1-17.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social Capital and the Global Economy Source. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 5 pp. 89-103
  • Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well‐Being, social capital and public policy: What's new?. The Economic Journal, 116 (510).
  • Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001). Happiness, introversion–extraversion and happy introverts. Personality and individual Differences, 30 (4), 595-608.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2 user's reference guide: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization: A preprocessor for LISREL. Scientific Software International.
  • Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Kalaycı, Ş., 2006. SPSS Applied multi variable statistic methods. Asil Press Distribution, Ankara.
  • Kline, B. R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, the Guilford Press, 2nd ed., New York.
  • Krishna, A., and Shrader, E. (2000). Cross Cultural Measures of Social Capital: A Tool and Results from India and Panama. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No 21. Washington DC: World Bank.
  • Leung, A., Kier, C., Fung, T., Fung, L., & Sproule, R. (2011). Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (3), 443-462.
  • Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of general psychology, 9 (2), 111.
  • Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy?. Psychological science, 6 (1), 10-19.
  • Oishi, S., Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2007). The optimum level of well-being: Can people be too happy?. Perspectives on psychological science, 2 (4), 346-360.
  • Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of sociology, 105 (1), 88-127.
  • Perkins, D. D., & Long, D. A. (2002). Neighborhood sense of community and social capital. In Psychological sense of community (pp. 291-318). Springer US.
  • Rasmussen, C., Armstrong, J., & Chazdon, S. (2011). Bridging Brown County: Captivating social capital as a means to community change.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52 (1), 141-166.
  • Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2004). Emotions across cultures and methods. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 35 (3), 304-326.
  • Sümer, N. and Bek, Y. (2012). Structural Equation Models and LISREL Applications, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Agriculture, Faculty of Sciences and Literature Samsun.
  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37 (1), 1-46.
  • Yılmaz, V. (2004). Application of the Structural Equation Models to Consumer Complaints via LISREL Journal of Social Sciences 2004/1.
  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64 (4), 678.

The Effect of the Social Capital on the Life Satisfaction in Rural Areas

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 21 , 123 - 132, 31.12.2018

Şerafettin Keleş Atilla Keskin , Nur Ertek

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.504999
Cited By: 1

Öz

Many fields of science, the economy being first, aim to ensure that the individuals and the society lead a happy and satisfactory life. Many studies attempted to measure the life satisfaction by the means of demographical, genetic, psychological and economic variables; however, the social capital has been largely overlooked in this manner.  This study discusses the relationship between social capital and life satisfaction. In the study, in which the structural equation model was employed, the findings suggest that there is a positive relationship between life satisfaction and social capital. The associational social capital (0.65), Cognitive social capital (0.62) and the structural social capital (0.31) have an intermediate level effect on life satisfaction in a positive direction. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Life Satisfaction Social Capital Rural Area Turkey

Kaynakça

  • Anonymous (2016). İllerde yaşam endeksi gösterge değerleri, 2015, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Ankara.
  • Bayram, N. (2010). Introduction to Structural Equation Model and Amos Applications, Ezgi Print house, Bursa.
  • Bjørnskov, C. (2003). The happy few: Cross–country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos, 56 (1), 3-16.
  • Bagozzi, P.R., Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Academy of Marketing Science Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Spring, Vol. 16(1).
  • Chan, J., To, H., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research . Social Indicators Research , 75.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
  • Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cam- bridge: Harvard University
  • Çelik, H. E. ve Yılmaz, V., 2014. Lisrel 9.1 ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi. Arı Yayınları İstanbul.
  • Çiçek, A., Erkan, O. (1996). Research and Sampling Methods in Agricultural Economy Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture Print house, No: 12, Lecture Note Series No: 6, Tokat.
  • De Carolis, D. M., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30 (1), 41-56.
  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, 55 (1), 34.
  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49 (1), 71-75.
  • Duman, B ve Alacahan, O. (2011). Sosyal Sermaye/Güven Boyutunda Etniklik. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences. Jan 2011, Vol. 10 Issue 1, pp.181-208.
  • Emiroğlu, M., 1972. A study regarding the area, number of parcels and parcel size of the rural settlements by geographical regions. Journal of Geographical Studies Issue 3-4, pp.109 – 138, Ankara.
  • Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. (2002). The economics of happiness. World economics, 3 (1), 1-17.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social Capital and the Global Economy Source. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 5 pp. 89-103
  • Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well‐Being, social capital and public policy: What's new?. The Economic Journal, 116 (510).
  • Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001). Happiness, introversion–extraversion and happy introverts. Personality and individual Differences, 30 (4), 595-608.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2 user's reference guide: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization: A preprocessor for LISREL. Scientific Software International.
  • Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Kalaycı, Ş., 2006. SPSS Applied multi variable statistic methods. Asil Press Distribution, Ankara.
  • Kline, B. R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, the Guilford Press, 2nd ed., New York.
  • Krishna, A., and Shrader, E. (2000). Cross Cultural Measures of Social Capital: A Tool and Results from India and Panama. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No 21. Washington DC: World Bank.
  • Leung, A., Kier, C., Fung, T., Fung, L., & Sproule, R. (2011). Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (3), 443-462.
  • Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of general psychology, 9 (2), 111.
  • Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy?. Psychological science, 6 (1), 10-19.
  • Oishi, S., Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2007). The optimum level of well-being: Can people be too happy?. Perspectives on psychological science, 2 (4), 346-360.
  • Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of sociology, 105 (1), 88-127.
  • Perkins, D. D., & Long, D. A. (2002). Neighborhood sense of community and social capital. In Psychological sense of community (pp. 291-318). Springer US.
  • Rasmussen, C., Armstrong, J., & Chazdon, S. (2011). Bridging Brown County: Captivating social capital as a means to community change.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52 (1), 141-166.
  • Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2004). Emotions across cultures and methods. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 35 (3), 304-326.
  • Sümer, N. and Bek, Y. (2012). Structural Equation Models and LISREL Applications, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Agriculture, Faculty of Sciences and Literature Samsun.
  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37 (1), 1-46.
  • Yılmaz, V. (2004). Application of the Structural Equation Models to Consumer Complaints via LISREL Journal of Social Sciences 2004/1.
  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64 (4), 678.
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ (Research Article)
Yazarlar

Şerafettin Keleş 0000-0002-5147-0825

Atilla Keskin 0000-0001-5317-6032

Nur Ertek 0000-0002-3475-5888

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Ekim 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018Cilt: 21

Kaynak Göster

APA Keleş, Ş., Keskin, A., & Ertek, N. (2018). Kırsal Alanda Sosyal Sermayenin Yaşam Memnuniyeti Üzerine Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 21, 123-132. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.504999

Cited By

Eko-Psikolojiyi Etkileyen Değişkenlerin Belirlenmesi
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.962645
 Kapak Resmi İndir

21082



2022-JIF = 0.500

2022-JCI = 0.170

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi (International Peer Reviewed Journal)

       Dergimiz, herhangi bir başvuru veya yayımlama ücreti almamaktadır. (Free submission and publication)

      Yılda 6 sayı yayınlanır. (Published 6 times a year)


88x31.png 

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

                 


Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
e-ISSN: 2619-9149