Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Determination of Turkish Common Bean Germplasm for Morpho-agronomic and Mineral Variations for Breeding Perspectives in Turkey

Year 2019, Vol 22 (Suppl 1), 38 - 50, 31.10.2019

Mehmet Zahit Yeken , Muhammad Azhar Nadeem , Tolga Karaköy , Faheem Shehzad Baloch , Vahdettin Çiftçi

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.549996
Cited By: 12

Abstract

Turkey is lavished with
hundreds of common bean landraces. The present study was aimed to investigate
the agronomic and mineral variations in 80 common bean landraces collected from
11 different provinces of Turkey. Genotypic variation expressed as a range for
some traits like days to maturity (90-141 days), plant height (25.25-361.50
cm), 1000 seeds weight (140-633 g), Iron (66.48-128.05 mg kg-1), and
Zinc (20.56-42.01 mg kg-1).  Positive
and highly significant correlation of Magnesium with Iron and Zinc was observed
and analytic results derived from the first 3 eigenvectors suggested that days
to pod setting, Zinc, and 1000 seeds weight were main variation
contributing traits. Among the provinces, landraces from Tunceli performed well
for agronomic traits and Malatya provinces landraces were found enrich for
mineral traits. Landraces E-26 and S-19 reflected higher Fe and Zn contents,
and higher yield, respectively. Cluster analysis divided the studied germplasm
on the basis of plant height and geographic. Information provided herein can be
helpful for the development of candidate varieties having higher yield with
greater mineral contents.  

Keywords

Biofortification Common bean common bean Zing and Iron

Supporting Institution

Research and Development Unit (BAP) of Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Project Number

Project Number: 2015.10.07.868

Thanks

This study was financially supported by the Research and Development Unit (BAP) of Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University (Project Number: 2015.10.07.868). We would like to thank to the Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute, Eskişehir/Turkey and Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana/Turkey for supplying commercial cultivars.

References

  • Anonymous 2001. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Variety Registration and Seed Certification Center, https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Belgeler/Tescil/Teknik%20Talimatlar/Yemeklik%20Tane%20Baklagiller/yemeklik%20tane%20baklagiller.pdf. (access April 10, 2015)
  • Anonymous 2015a. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Bolu Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Laboratory. Anonymous 2015b. Turkish State, Meteorological Service. https://www.mgm.gov.tr, (access May 10, 2017).
  • Arystanbekkyzy M, Nadeem MA, Aktaş H, Yeken MZ, Zencirci N, Nawaz MA, Ali F, Haider MS, Tunc K, Chung G, Baloch FS 2019. Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Relationship of Turkish Wild and Cultivated Emmer (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides) Revealed by iPBS-retrotransposons Markers. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 21(1): 155-63.
  • AOAC 1984. Official Method of Analysis. 14th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  • Aydın MF, Baloch FS 2018. Exploring the genetic diversity and population structure of Turkish common bean germplasm by the iPBS-retrotransposons markers. Legume Research. LR-423:1-7.
  • Baloch FS, Alsaleh A, Shahid MQ, Çiftçi V, de Miera LE, Aasim M, Nadeem MA, Aktaş H, Özkan H, Hatipoğlu R 2017 A whole genome DArTseq and SNP analysis for genetic diversity assessment in durum wheat from central fertile crescent. Plos one. 12(1): e0167821.
  • Barclay DV, Heredia L, Gil-Ramos J, Montalvo MM, Lozano R, Mena M, Dirren H 1996. Nutritional status of institutionalized elderly in Ecuador. Archivos latinoamericanos de nutricion. 46: 122-7.
  • Bevilaqua GA, Antunes IF 2015. Chemical Composition of Whole Grains in Common Beans Landraces and Breeding Genotypes. Holos. 2: 81-91.
  • Blair MW, Astudillo C, Grusak MA, Graham R, Beebe SE 2009. Inheritance of seed iron and zinc concentrations in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Molecular Breeding. 23(2): 197-207.
  • Blair MW 2013. Mineral biofortification strategies for food staples: the example of common bean. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 61(35): 8287-94.Boros L, Wawer A, Borucka K 2014. Morphological, phenological and agronomical characterisation of variability among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) local populations from The National Centre for Plant Genetic Resources: Polish Genebank. J Hortic Res 22: 123-30.
  • Casquero PA, Lema M, Santalla M, De Ron AM 2006. Performance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from Spain in the Atlantic and Mediterranean environments. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 53(5):1021-32.
  • Celmeli T, Sari H, Canci H, Sari D, Adak A, Eker T, Toker C 2018. The Nutritional Content of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Landraces in Comparison to Modern Varieties. Agronomy. 8(9):166.
  • Çiftçi V, Şensoy S, Kulaz H 2012. Doğu Anadolu’nun Güneyinde Yetiştirilen Fasulye Gen Kaynaklarının Toplanması ve Değerlendirilmesi, Tübitak 109O163 Nolu Proje Sonuç Raporu (in Turkish).
  • FAO 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/news/archive/news-by-date/2010/en/?page=5&ipp=10 (accessed on 5 September 2018).
  • FAO 2012. FAO Statistical Yearbook 2012 [online]. Website http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i3138e/i3138e.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2018).
  • FAO 2016. FAO/UNESCO soil map of the world [online]. Website http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-survey/soil-maps-and-databases/faounesco-soil-map-of-the-world/en/ (accessed on 5 September 2018).
  • Gesto-Seco EM, Moreda-Pineiro A, Bermejo-Barrera A, Barrera-Bermejo P 2009. Multi-element determination in raft mussels by fast microwave-assisted acid leaching and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Talanta. 72: 1178-1185.
  • Godfray HC, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C 2010. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 327(5967):812-8.
  • Khaidizar MI, Haliloglu K, Elkoca E, Aydin M, Kantar F 2012. Genetic diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces grown in northeast Anatolia of Turkey assessed with simple sequence repeat markers. Turkish Journal of Field Crops.17:145-50.
  • Khush GS, Lee S, Cho JI, Jeon JS 2012. Biofortification of crops for reducing malnutrition. Plant Biotechnology Reports. 6(3):195-202.
  • Madakbas SY, Ergin M 2011. Morphological and phenological characterization of Turkish bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes and their present variation states. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6(28):6155-6166,
  • Murphy JA, Riley JP 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta. 27:31-6.
  • Nadeem MA, Habyarimana E, Çiftçi V, Nawaz MA, Karaköy T, Comertpay G, Shahid MQ, Hatipoğlu R, Yeken MZ, Ali F, Ercişli S 2018. Characterization of genetic diversity in Turkish common bean gene pool using phenotypic and whole-genome DArTseq-generated silicoDArT marker information. PloS one. 13(10): e0205363.
  • Nwadike C, Okere A, Nwosu D, Okoye C, Vange T, Apuyor B 2018. Proximate and Nutrient Composition of Some Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Accessions of Jos-Plateau, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International. 15(1): 1-9.
  • Paredes M, Becerra V, Tay J 2009. Inorganic nutritional composition of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes race Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 69(4):486-95.
  • Petry N, Boy E, Wirth J, Hurrell R 2015. The potential of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) as a vehicle for iron biofortification. Nutrients. 7(2):1144-73.Rana JC, Sharma TR, Tyagi RK, Chahota RK, Gautam NK, Singh M, Sharma PN, Ojha SN, 2015. Characterisation of 4274 accessions of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm conserved in the Indian gene bank for phenological, morphological and agricultural traits. Euphytica. 205: 441-57.
  • Ronoh AK, Were GM, Mueni MM 2017. Biofortified Crops Can Alleviate Micronutrient Deficiencies: Review of Evidence from Randomized Feeding Trials. Vitam Miner 6: 154.
  • Sanghvie T, Ross J, Heymann H 2007. Why is reducing vitamin and mineral deficiencies critical for development. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 28(1):167-173.
  • Sharma MK, Mishra S, Rana NS 2009. Genetic divergence in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) pole type cultivars. Legume Research. 32: 220-3.
  • Singh SP, Schwartz HF (2010) Breeding common bean for resistance to diseases: a review. Crop Science. 50(6):2199-223.
  • Stoilova T, Pereira G, Souso de MMT, Carnide V 2005. Diversity in common bean landraces (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Bulgaria and Portugal. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 6(4): 443-448.
  • Stoilova T, Pereira G, De Sousa M 2013. Morphological characterization of a small common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) collection under different environments. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 14, 19.
  • Yeken MZ, Kantar F, Çancı H, Özer G, Çiftçi V 2018a. Breeding of Dry Bean Cultivars Using Phaseolus vulgaris Landraces in Turkey. International Journal of Agricultural and Wildlife Sciences. 4: 45-54.
  • Yeken MZ, Akpolat H, Karaköy T, Çiftçi V 2018b. Assessment of Mineral Content Variations for Biofortification of the Bean Seed. International Journal of Agricultural and Wildlife Sciences. 4(2):261-9.

Türkiye’deki Islah Çalışmaları İçin Türk Fasulye Genetik Kaynaklarının Morfo-Agronomik ve Mineral İçerik Varyasyonlarının Belirlenmesi

Year 2019, Vol 22 (Suppl 1), 38 - 50, 31.10.2019

Mehmet Zahit Yeken , Muhammad Azhar Nadeem , Tolga Karaköy , Faheem Shehzad Baloch , Vahdettin Çiftçi

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.549996
Cited By: 12

Abstract

Türkiye yüzlerce farklı fasulye popülasyonuna sahiptir.
Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin 11 farklı ilinden toplanmış 80 fasulye popülasyonunun
agronomik ve mineral varyasyonlarının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Genotipik
varyasyonun; olgunlaşma gün sayısı (90-141 gün), bitki boyu (25.25-361.50 cm),
1000 tohum ağırlığı (140-633 g), demir (66.48-128.05 mg kg-1) ve
çinko (20.56-42.01 mg kg-1) arasında değiştiği tespit edilmiştir. Magnezyum,
demir ve çinko ile pozitif ve oldukça anlamlı bir korelasyon göstermiş ve ilk 3
öz değerden elde edilen analitik sonuçlar, bakla bağlama gün sayısı, çinko ve
1000 tane ağırlığının varyasyona katkı yapan ana özellikler olduğunu ortaya
koymuştur. İller arasında, Tunceli popülasyonları agronomik özellikler, Malatya
popülasyonlarının ise mineral özellikler bakımından zengin olduğu tespit
edilmiştir. E-26 ve S-19 fasulye popülasyonları yüksek demir, çinko ve verim
özelliklerine sahip olmuşlardır. Kümeleme analizi, genetik kaynakları bitki
boyu ve coğrafik özelliklerine göre ayırmıştır. Elde edilen bulguların, yüksek
verim ve mineral içeriğe sahip aday çeşitlerin geliştirilmesinde
kullanılabileceği düşünülmektedir. 

Keywords

Biyofortifikasyon Fasülye Çinko ve Demir

Project Number

Project Number: 2015.10.07.868

References

  • Anonymous 2001. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Variety Registration and Seed Certification Center, https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Belgeler/Tescil/Teknik%20Talimatlar/Yemeklik%20Tane%20Baklagiller/yemeklik%20tane%20baklagiller.pdf. (access April 10, 2015)
  • Anonymous 2015a. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Bolu Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Laboratory. Anonymous 2015b. Turkish State, Meteorological Service. https://www.mgm.gov.tr, (access May 10, 2017).
  • Arystanbekkyzy M, Nadeem MA, Aktaş H, Yeken MZ, Zencirci N, Nawaz MA, Ali F, Haider MS, Tunc K, Chung G, Baloch FS 2019. Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Relationship of Turkish Wild and Cultivated Emmer (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides) Revealed by iPBS-retrotransposons Markers. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 21(1): 155-63.
  • AOAC 1984. Official Method of Analysis. 14th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  • Aydın MF, Baloch FS 2018. Exploring the genetic diversity and population structure of Turkish common bean germplasm by the iPBS-retrotransposons markers. Legume Research. LR-423:1-7.
  • Baloch FS, Alsaleh A, Shahid MQ, Çiftçi V, de Miera LE, Aasim M, Nadeem MA, Aktaş H, Özkan H, Hatipoğlu R 2017 A whole genome DArTseq and SNP analysis for genetic diversity assessment in durum wheat from central fertile crescent. Plos one. 12(1): e0167821.
  • Barclay DV, Heredia L, Gil-Ramos J, Montalvo MM, Lozano R, Mena M, Dirren H 1996. Nutritional status of institutionalized elderly in Ecuador. Archivos latinoamericanos de nutricion. 46: 122-7.
  • Bevilaqua GA, Antunes IF 2015. Chemical Composition of Whole Grains in Common Beans Landraces and Breeding Genotypes. Holos. 2: 81-91.
  • Blair MW, Astudillo C, Grusak MA, Graham R, Beebe SE 2009. Inheritance of seed iron and zinc concentrations in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Molecular Breeding. 23(2): 197-207.
  • Blair MW 2013. Mineral biofortification strategies for food staples: the example of common bean. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 61(35): 8287-94.Boros L, Wawer A, Borucka K 2014. Morphological, phenological and agronomical characterisation of variability among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) local populations from The National Centre for Plant Genetic Resources: Polish Genebank. J Hortic Res 22: 123-30.
  • Casquero PA, Lema M, Santalla M, De Ron AM 2006. Performance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from Spain in the Atlantic and Mediterranean environments. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 53(5):1021-32.
  • Celmeli T, Sari H, Canci H, Sari D, Adak A, Eker T, Toker C 2018. The Nutritional Content of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Landraces in Comparison to Modern Varieties. Agronomy. 8(9):166.
  • Çiftçi V, Şensoy S, Kulaz H 2012. Doğu Anadolu’nun Güneyinde Yetiştirilen Fasulye Gen Kaynaklarının Toplanması ve Değerlendirilmesi, Tübitak 109O163 Nolu Proje Sonuç Raporu (in Turkish).
  • FAO 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/news/archive/news-by-date/2010/en/?page=5&ipp=10 (accessed on 5 September 2018).
  • FAO 2012. FAO Statistical Yearbook 2012 [online]. Website http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i3138e/i3138e.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2018).
  • FAO 2016. FAO/UNESCO soil map of the world [online]. Website http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-survey/soil-maps-and-databases/faounesco-soil-map-of-the-world/en/ (accessed on 5 September 2018).
  • Gesto-Seco EM, Moreda-Pineiro A, Bermejo-Barrera A, Barrera-Bermejo P 2009. Multi-element determination in raft mussels by fast microwave-assisted acid leaching and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Talanta. 72: 1178-1185.
  • Godfray HC, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C 2010. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 327(5967):812-8.
  • Khaidizar MI, Haliloglu K, Elkoca E, Aydin M, Kantar F 2012. Genetic diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces grown in northeast Anatolia of Turkey assessed with simple sequence repeat markers. Turkish Journal of Field Crops.17:145-50.
  • Khush GS, Lee S, Cho JI, Jeon JS 2012. Biofortification of crops for reducing malnutrition. Plant Biotechnology Reports. 6(3):195-202.
  • Madakbas SY, Ergin M 2011. Morphological and phenological characterization of Turkish bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes and their present variation states. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6(28):6155-6166,
  • Murphy JA, Riley JP 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta. 27:31-6.
  • Nadeem MA, Habyarimana E, Çiftçi V, Nawaz MA, Karaköy T, Comertpay G, Shahid MQ, Hatipoğlu R, Yeken MZ, Ali F, Ercişli S 2018. Characterization of genetic diversity in Turkish common bean gene pool using phenotypic and whole-genome DArTseq-generated silicoDArT marker information. PloS one. 13(10): e0205363.
  • Nwadike C, Okere A, Nwosu D, Okoye C, Vange T, Apuyor B 2018. Proximate and Nutrient Composition of Some Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Accessions of Jos-Plateau, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International. 15(1): 1-9.
  • Paredes M, Becerra V, Tay J 2009. Inorganic nutritional composition of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes race Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 69(4):486-95.
  • Petry N, Boy E, Wirth J, Hurrell R 2015. The potential of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) as a vehicle for iron biofortification. Nutrients. 7(2):1144-73.Rana JC, Sharma TR, Tyagi RK, Chahota RK, Gautam NK, Singh M, Sharma PN, Ojha SN, 2015. Characterisation of 4274 accessions of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm conserved in the Indian gene bank for phenological, morphological and agricultural traits. Euphytica. 205: 441-57.
  • Ronoh AK, Were GM, Mueni MM 2017. Biofortified Crops Can Alleviate Micronutrient Deficiencies: Review of Evidence from Randomized Feeding Trials. Vitam Miner 6: 154.
  • Sanghvie T, Ross J, Heymann H 2007. Why is reducing vitamin and mineral deficiencies critical for development. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 28(1):167-173.
  • Sharma MK, Mishra S, Rana NS 2009. Genetic divergence in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) pole type cultivars. Legume Research. 32: 220-3.
  • Singh SP, Schwartz HF (2010) Breeding common bean for resistance to diseases: a review. Crop Science. 50(6):2199-223.
  • Stoilova T, Pereira G, Souso de MMT, Carnide V 2005. Diversity in common bean landraces (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Bulgaria and Portugal. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 6(4): 443-448.
  • Stoilova T, Pereira G, De Sousa M 2013. Morphological characterization of a small common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) collection under different environments. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 14, 19.
  • Yeken MZ, Kantar F, Çancı H, Özer G, Çiftçi V 2018a. Breeding of Dry Bean Cultivars Using Phaseolus vulgaris Landraces in Turkey. International Journal of Agricultural and Wildlife Sciences. 4: 45-54.
  • Yeken MZ, Akpolat H, Karaköy T, Çiftçi V 2018b. Assessment of Mineral Content Variations for Biofortification of the Bean Seed. International Journal of Agricultural and Wildlife Sciences. 4(2):261-9.
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLE
Authors

Mehmet Zahit Yeken 0000-0003-0490-371X

Muhammad Azhar Nadeem 0000-0002-0637-9619

Tolga Karaköy 0000-0002-5428-1907

Faheem Shehzad Baloch 0000-0002-7470-0080

Vahdettin Çiftçi 0000-0003-0547-9527

Project Number Project Number: 2015.10.07.868
Publication Date October 31, 2019
Submission Date April 5, 2019
Acceptance Date June 28, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019Vol 22 (Suppl 1)

Cite

APA Yeken, M. Z., Nadeem, M. A., Karaköy, T., Baloch, F. S., et al. (2019). Determination of Turkish Common Bean Germplasm for Morpho-agronomic and Mineral Variations for Breeding Perspectives in Turkey. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 22, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.549996

Cited By

Number of experiments necessary to more accurately differentiate common bean genotypes for grain physical traits and minerals in cluster analysis
Revista Ceres
https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x202370010013
GENETIC DIVERGENCE AND SELECTION OF COMMON BEAN CULTIVARS BASED ON PLANT ARCHITECTURE AND GRAIN YIELD
Revista Caatinga
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252022v35n409rc
Investigation of genotype × environment interactions for the seed mineral composition in Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105657
Investigation of Quality and Cooking Traits Diversity in a Global Common Bean Germplasm
Global Journal Of Botanical Science
https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-858X.2020.08.3
Phenotypic Characterization of 183 Turkish Common Bean Accessions for Agronomic, Trading, and Consumer-Preferred Plant Characteristics for Breeding Purposes
Agronomy
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020272
Genetic diversity and selection of bean landraces and cultivars based on technological and nutritional traits
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103721
Durum Wheat Breeding for Enhanced Safety and Nutritional Value: A GWAS Approach to Tackling Aluminum Uptake
Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.1284491
The use of colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for naked-eye detection of bean common mosaic virus
Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.102017
SSR and GBS based GWAS study for identification of QTLs associated with nutritional elemental in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Scientia Horticulturae
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111470
Türk Bakla Genetik Kaynaklarının Tohum Mineral İçeriği için Fenotipik Çeşitliliğin Araştırılması
Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.949496
Elazığ Koşullarına Uygun Kuru Fasulye Çeşitlerinin Araştırılması
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.725109
Molecular characterization and insights into the origin of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces of north western Himalayas
The Nucleus
Humaira Bashir
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-020-00323-2
 Download Cover Image


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149