Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Biyoloik Gübrelerin Heritage Ahududu Çeşidinde Bazı Fizyolojik Tepkiler Üzerine Etkileri

Year 2020, Volume: 23 Issue: 6, 1422 - 1427, 31.12.2020

Gülden Balcı , Hakan Keles , Ramazan Cakmakcı

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.652416
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Rosacea familyasının Rubus cinsine ait olan ahududu, hem insan sağlığı açısından faydaları hem de sanayi ve sofralık olarak geniş kullanım alanına sahip olması sebebiyle ekonomik potansiyeli yüksek üzümsü meyvelerden birisidir. Bu çalışmada bitki gelişimini olumlu etkileyen biyolojik gübrelerinin (PGPR ve mikoriza) Heritage ahududu çeşidinin bazı kimyasal özellikleri üzerine etkileri incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla bitki yapraklarının klorofil, antosiyanin, toplam fenolik madde, prolin, toplam karbonhidrat miktarları değerlendirilmiştir. En yüksek klorofil ve antosiyanin içerikleri BF5 ve BF4 bakteri formülleri aşılamalarından (sırasıyla 37.24 ve 37.85 ve 5.58 ve 5.14) elde edilmiştir. Toplam karbonhidrat miktarları üzerine uygulamaların etkisi önemsiz bulunmuştur. Toplam fenolik ve prolin içerikleri bakımından en yüksek değerler (2.94 GAE mg g-1 ve 0.091 prolin g-1) BF5 aşılamasından elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucuna göre bakteri uygulamalarının bölgemizde Heritage ahududu yetiştiriciliği için incelenen parametreler açısından önce çıkan uygulama olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Ahududu Fizyolojik tepkiler Mikoriza PGPR

References

  • Akay A, Kararslan E 2012. Mikoriza Aşılanmış Kudret Narı (Momordica charantia) Bitkisine Farklı Dozlarda Fosforlu ve Demirli Gübre Uygulamasının Yaprak Klorofil İçeriğine Etkisi. Iğdır Üni. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(3): 103-108.
  • Altuntaş Ö, Abak K, Daşgan HY 2016. Serada Biber Yetiştiriciliğinde Mikoriza Kullanımının Bitki Gelişmesi ve Verime Etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2): 146-151.
  • Anonymous 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division Website. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
  • Aras S, Arıkan Ş, İpek M, Eşitken A, Pırlak L, Dönmez MF, Turan M 2018. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Enhanced Leaf Organic Acids, FC-R Activity and Fe Nutrition of Apple Under Lime Soil Conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 40(6): 120.
  • Aras S, Eşitken A 2019a. Physiological Effects of Photoselective Nets in Strawberry Plant. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 22: 342-346.
  • Aras S, Eşitken A 2019b. Responses of Apple Plants to Salinity Stress. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(2): 253-257.
  • Aras S, Keles H 2019. Evaluation of Leaf Properties of Eight Cherry Cultivars Grafted onto Maxma 14 Rootstock. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 7(3): 144-152.
  • Arıkan Ş, Eşitken A, İpek M, Aras S, Şahin M, Pırlak L, Dönmez FM, Turan M 2018. Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Fe Acquisition in Peach (Prunus Persica L.) Under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41(17): 2141-2150.
  • Arshad M, Frankenberger WT 1998. Plant Growth Regulating Substances in The Rhizosphere: Microbial Production and Functions. Advances in Agronomy, 62: 46-151.
  • Aydın A, Yıldırım E, Karaman MR, Turan M, Demirtaş A, Şahin F, Güneş A, Esringü A, Dizman M, Tutar A 2012. Humik Asit, PGPR ve Kimyasal Gübre Uygulamalarının Brokoli (Brassica Oleracea) Bitkisinin Bazı Verim Parametreleri Üzerine Etkisi. SAÜ Fen Edebiyat Dergisi, 1: 309-316.
  • Balcı G, Keles H 2019. Bazı Ahududu Çeşitlerinin Yozgat Ekolojisinde Adaptasyon Yeteneklerinin Belirlenmesi. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 22(6): 823-829.
  • Baligar VC, Fageria NK, He ZL 2001. Nutrient Use Efficiency in Plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32 (7-8): 921–950.
  • Baslam M, Goicoechea N 2012. Water Deficit Improved the Capacity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) for Inducing the Accumulation of Antioxidant Compounds in Lettuce Leaves. Mycorrhiza, 22:347–359.
  • Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID 1973. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water Stress Studies. Plant and Soil, 39:205-208..
  • Çakmakci R, Erat M, Oral B, Erdoğan Ü, Sahin F 2009. Enzyme Activities and Growth Promotion of Spinach by İndole-3-Acetic Acid-Producing Rhizobacteria. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 84: 375-380.
  • Çiylez S, Eşitken A 2018. Mikoriza ve BBAR Uygulamalarının Çilekte Büyüme Üzerine Etkileri. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 32(3): 361-365.
  • Demirsoy L, Demirsoy H, Bilgener Ş, Ersoy B, Öztürk A, Balcı G, Çelikel G 2006. Samsun’da Yapılan Ahududu Çeşit Adaptasyon Çalışmaları. II. Ulusal Üzümsü Meyveler Sempozyumu, 14-16 Eylül 2006, Tokat.
  • Dursun A, Yildirim E, Turan M, Ekinci M, Kul R, Parlakova Karagoz F 2019. Determination of the Effects of Bacterial Fertilizer on Yield and Growth Parameters of Tomato. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 21(5): 1227-1234.
  • Ebell LF 1969. Variation in total soluble sugars of conifer tissues with method of analysis. Phytochemistry, 8(1): 227-233.
  • Edreva A 1998. Stres physiology, definition and concepts of stres. Classification of stress factors, approaches applied in stress research. Bitkilerde Stres Fizyolojisinin Moleküler Temelleri Sempozyumu, 22-26 Haziran 1998, EBİLTEM-Bornova, İzmir.
  • Eroğlu Z, Gerçekçioğlu R 2006. İki Ürün Veren Bazı Ahududu (R. ideaus L.) Çeşitlerinin Tokat Koşullarındaki Performansları. II. Ulusal Üzümsü Meyveler Sempozyumu, 14-16 Eylül, 244-249, Tokat.
  • Eyduran SP, Ağaoğlu YS, Çelik M 2006. Bazı Ahududu Çeşitlerinin Ayaş (Ankara) Koşullarına Adaptasyonu Üzerine Araştırmalar. II. Ulusal Üzümsü Meyveler Sempozyumu, 14-16 Eylül 2006, Tokat.
  • Farrant JM 2000. A Comparison of Mechanisms of Desiccation Tolerance Among Three Angiosperm Resurrection Plant Species. Plant Ecology, 151: 29-39.
  • García-Fraile P, Menéndez E, Celador- Lera L, Díez-Méndez A, Jiménez- Gómez A, Marcos-García M, Cruz- González XA, Cruz-González P, Rivas R 2017. Bacterial Probiotics: A Truly Gren Revolution. In: “Probiotics and Plant Health”. Springer, 131-162.
  • Güllüce M, Agar G, Şahin F, Turan M, Güneş A, Demirtaş A, Esringü A, Karaman MR, Tutar A, Dizman M 2012. Pb Ve Cd ile Kirletilmiş Alanlarda Yetiştirilen Turp Bitkisinin Verim Parametreleri Üzerine Humik Asit ve PGPR Uygulamalarının Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. SAÜ Fen Edebiyat Dergisi, 1: 509-517.
  • Harborne JB 1980. Plant Phenolics. In: Secondary Plant Products. E. A. Bell, B. V. Charlwood (ed.), Springer –Verlag, 329-402.
  • Heidari M, Mousavinik SM, Golpayegani A 2011. Plant Growth Promotıng Rhizobacterıa (PGPR) Effect on Physiological Parameters and Mineral Uptake in Basil (Ociumum Basilicm L.) Under Water Stress. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, (6)5: 6-11.
  • İpek M, Aras S, Arıkan Ş, Eşitken A, Pırlak L, Dönmez MF, Turan M 2017. Root Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculations Increase Ferric Chelate Reductase (FC-R) Activity and Fe Nutrition in Pear Under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 219: 144-151.
  • Johnston JW, Harding K, Benson EE 2007. Antioxidant Status and Genotypic Tolerance of Ribes in Vitro Cultures to Cryopreservation. Plant Science, 172: 524- 534.
  • Kameli A, Lösel DM 1993. Carbohydrates and Water Status in Wheat Plants Under Water Stress. New Phytologist, 125(3): 609-614.
  • Khan W, Prıthıvıraj B, Smıth DL 2003. Photosynthetic responses of corn and soybean to foliar application of salicylates. J. Plant Physiol. 160: 485-492.
  • Koc A, Balci G, Erturk Y, Keles H, Bakoglu N, Ercisli S 2016. Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Proline, Membrane Permeability and Growth of Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) Under Salt Stress. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 89: 89-97
  • Kutlu M, Cakmakci R, Hosseinpour A, Karagöz H 2019. The Use of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Effect on Essentıal Oil Rate, Essential Oil Content, Some Morphological Parameters and Nutrient Uptake of Turkish Oregano. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(2): 1641-1653.
  • Loescher WH, McCamant T, Keller JD 1990. Carbohydrate Reserves, Translocation and Storage in Woody Plant Roots. HortScience, 25(3): 274-281.
  • Miller G, Suzuki N, Cıftcı-Yılmaz S, Mıttler R 2010. Reactive Oxygen Species Homeostasis and Signaling During Drought and Salinity Stresses. Plant Cell Environment, 33: 453-457.
  • Naghashzadeh M 2014. Response of relative water content and cell membrane stability to mycorrhizal biofertilizer in maize. Electronic Journal of Biology, 10(3): 68-72.
  • Parida AK, Das AB, Sanada Y, Mohanty P 2004. Effects of Salinity on Biochemical Components of The Mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum. Aquatic Botany, 80: 77–87.
  • Robyt JF, White BJ 1987. Biochemical Technique: Theory and Practices, 40-72.
  • Rodriguez RZ, Matson MVC, Montiel LGH, Amador BM, Puente ER, Lara L 2014. Effect of Pseudomonas putida on growth and Anthocyanin Pigment in Two Poinsettia (Euphorbia Pulcherrima) Cultivars. The Scientific World Journal, 1-6.
  • Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Di Mattia E 2010. Enhancement of alkalinity tolerance in two cucumber genotypes inoculated with an arbuscular mycorrhizal biofertilizer containing Glomus intraradices. Biol Fertil Soils, 46: 499–509.
  • Singleton VL, Rossi JR 1962. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Water Astress Studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207.

The Effects of Biofertilizers on Some Physological Responses in Heritage Raspberries

Year 2020, Volume: 23 Issue: 6, 1422 - 1427, 31.12.2020

Gülden Balcı , Hakan Keles , Ramazan Cakmakcı

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.652416
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Raspberry, which belongs to the genus Rubus of the Rosacea family, is an important berry fruit with economical potential due to its benefits in terms of human health and wide usage area in industry. In this study, the effects of biological fertilizers (PGPR and mycorrhiza) on some chemical properties of Heritage raspberries were investigated. For this purpose, chlorophyll, anthocyanin, total phenolic content, proline, total carbohydrate levels of plant leaves were evaluated. The highest chlorophyll and anthocyanin contents were obtained from BF5 and BF4 bacterial inoculations (37.24 and 37.85 and 5.58 and 5.14, respectively). The effect of applications on total carbohydrate content was not significant. The highest phenolic and proline contents (2.94 GAE mg g-1 and 0.091 proline g-1) were obtained from BF5 treatment. The results indicated that bacterial applications were the first application in terms of the parameters examined for Heritage raspberry cultivation in the region.

Keywords

Raspberry Physological responses Mycorrhiza PGPR

References

  • Akay A, Kararslan E 2012. Mikoriza Aşılanmış Kudret Narı (Momordica charantia) Bitkisine Farklı Dozlarda Fosforlu ve Demirli Gübre Uygulamasının Yaprak Klorofil İçeriğine Etkisi. Iğdır Üni. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(3): 103-108.
  • Altuntaş Ö, Abak K, Daşgan HY 2016. Serada Biber Yetiştiriciliğinde Mikoriza Kullanımının Bitki Gelişmesi ve Verime Etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2): 146-151.
  • Anonymous 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division Website. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
  • Aras S, Arıkan Ş, İpek M, Eşitken A, Pırlak L, Dönmez MF, Turan M 2018. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Enhanced Leaf Organic Acids, FC-R Activity and Fe Nutrition of Apple Under Lime Soil Conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 40(6): 120.
  • Aras S, Eşitken A 2019a. Physiological Effects of Photoselective Nets in Strawberry Plant. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 22: 342-346.
  • Aras S, Eşitken A 2019b. Responses of Apple Plants to Salinity Stress. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(2): 253-257.
  • Aras S, Keles H 2019. Evaluation of Leaf Properties of Eight Cherry Cultivars Grafted onto Maxma 14 Rootstock. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 7(3): 144-152.
  • Arıkan Ş, Eşitken A, İpek M, Aras S, Şahin M, Pırlak L, Dönmez FM, Turan M 2018. Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Fe Acquisition in Peach (Prunus Persica L.) Under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41(17): 2141-2150.
  • Arshad M, Frankenberger WT 1998. Plant Growth Regulating Substances in The Rhizosphere: Microbial Production and Functions. Advances in Agronomy, 62: 46-151.
  • Aydın A, Yıldırım E, Karaman MR, Turan M, Demirtaş A, Şahin F, Güneş A, Esringü A, Dizman M, Tutar A 2012. Humik Asit, PGPR ve Kimyasal Gübre Uygulamalarının Brokoli (Brassica Oleracea) Bitkisinin Bazı Verim Parametreleri Üzerine Etkisi. SAÜ Fen Edebiyat Dergisi, 1: 309-316.
  • Balcı G, Keles H 2019. Bazı Ahududu Çeşitlerinin Yozgat Ekolojisinde Adaptasyon Yeteneklerinin Belirlenmesi. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 22(6): 823-829.
  • Baligar VC, Fageria NK, He ZL 2001. Nutrient Use Efficiency in Plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32 (7-8): 921–950.
  • Baslam M, Goicoechea N 2012. Water Deficit Improved the Capacity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) for Inducing the Accumulation of Antioxidant Compounds in Lettuce Leaves. Mycorrhiza, 22:347–359.
  • Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID 1973. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water Stress Studies. Plant and Soil, 39:205-208..
  • Çakmakci R, Erat M, Oral B, Erdoğan Ü, Sahin F 2009. Enzyme Activities and Growth Promotion of Spinach by İndole-3-Acetic Acid-Producing Rhizobacteria. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 84: 375-380.
  • Çiylez S, Eşitken A 2018. Mikoriza ve BBAR Uygulamalarının Çilekte Büyüme Üzerine Etkileri. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 32(3): 361-365.
  • Demirsoy L, Demirsoy H, Bilgener Ş, Ersoy B, Öztürk A, Balcı G, Çelikel G 2006. Samsun’da Yapılan Ahududu Çeşit Adaptasyon Çalışmaları. II. Ulusal Üzümsü Meyveler Sempozyumu, 14-16 Eylül 2006, Tokat.
  • Dursun A, Yildirim E, Turan M, Ekinci M, Kul R, Parlakova Karagoz F 2019. Determination of the Effects of Bacterial Fertilizer on Yield and Growth Parameters of Tomato. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 21(5): 1227-1234.
  • Ebell LF 1969. Variation in total soluble sugars of conifer tissues with method of analysis. Phytochemistry, 8(1): 227-233.
  • Edreva A 1998. Stres physiology, definition and concepts of stres. Classification of stress factors, approaches applied in stress research. Bitkilerde Stres Fizyolojisinin Moleküler Temelleri Sempozyumu, 22-26 Haziran 1998, EBİLTEM-Bornova, İzmir.
  • Eroğlu Z, Gerçekçioğlu R 2006. İki Ürün Veren Bazı Ahududu (R. ideaus L.) Çeşitlerinin Tokat Koşullarındaki Performansları. II. Ulusal Üzümsü Meyveler Sempozyumu, 14-16 Eylül, 244-249, Tokat.
  • Eyduran SP, Ağaoğlu YS, Çelik M 2006. Bazı Ahududu Çeşitlerinin Ayaş (Ankara) Koşullarına Adaptasyonu Üzerine Araştırmalar. II. Ulusal Üzümsü Meyveler Sempozyumu, 14-16 Eylül 2006, Tokat.
  • Farrant JM 2000. A Comparison of Mechanisms of Desiccation Tolerance Among Three Angiosperm Resurrection Plant Species. Plant Ecology, 151: 29-39.
  • García-Fraile P, Menéndez E, Celador- Lera L, Díez-Méndez A, Jiménez- Gómez A, Marcos-García M, Cruz- González XA, Cruz-González P, Rivas R 2017. Bacterial Probiotics: A Truly Gren Revolution. In: “Probiotics and Plant Health”. Springer, 131-162.
  • Güllüce M, Agar G, Şahin F, Turan M, Güneş A, Demirtaş A, Esringü A, Karaman MR, Tutar A, Dizman M 2012. Pb Ve Cd ile Kirletilmiş Alanlarda Yetiştirilen Turp Bitkisinin Verim Parametreleri Üzerine Humik Asit ve PGPR Uygulamalarının Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. SAÜ Fen Edebiyat Dergisi, 1: 509-517.
  • Harborne JB 1980. Plant Phenolics. In: Secondary Plant Products. E. A. Bell, B. V. Charlwood (ed.), Springer –Verlag, 329-402.
  • Heidari M, Mousavinik SM, Golpayegani A 2011. Plant Growth Promotıng Rhizobacterıa (PGPR) Effect on Physiological Parameters and Mineral Uptake in Basil (Ociumum Basilicm L.) Under Water Stress. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, (6)5: 6-11.
  • İpek M, Aras S, Arıkan Ş, Eşitken A, Pırlak L, Dönmez MF, Turan M 2017. Root Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculations Increase Ferric Chelate Reductase (FC-R) Activity and Fe Nutrition in Pear Under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 219: 144-151.
  • Johnston JW, Harding K, Benson EE 2007. Antioxidant Status and Genotypic Tolerance of Ribes in Vitro Cultures to Cryopreservation. Plant Science, 172: 524- 534.
  • Kameli A, Lösel DM 1993. Carbohydrates and Water Status in Wheat Plants Under Water Stress. New Phytologist, 125(3): 609-614.
  • Khan W, Prıthıvıraj B, Smıth DL 2003. Photosynthetic responses of corn and soybean to foliar application of salicylates. J. Plant Physiol. 160: 485-492.
  • Koc A, Balci G, Erturk Y, Keles H, Bakoglu N, Ercisli S 2016. Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Proline, Membrane Permeability and Growth of Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) Under Salt Stress. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 89: 89-97
  • Kutlu M, Cakmakci R, Hosseinpour A, Karagöz H 2019. The Use of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Effect on Essentıal Oil Rate, Essential Oil Content, Some Morphological Parameters and Nutrient Uptake of Turkish Oregano. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(2): 1641-1653.
  • Loescher WH, McCamant T, Keller JD 1990. Carbohydrate Reserves, Translocation and Storage in Woody Plant Roots. HortScience, 25(3): 274-281.
  • Miller G, Suzuki N, Cıftcı-Yılmaz S, Mıttler R 2010. Reactive Oxygen Species Homeostasis and Signaling During Drought and Salinity Stresses. Plant Cell Environment, 33: 453-457.
  • Naghashzadeh M 2014. Response of relative water content and cell membrane stability to mycorrhizal biofertilizer in maize. Electronic Journal of Biology, 10(3): 68-72.
  • Parida AK, Das AB, Sanada Y, Mohanty P 2004. Effects of Salinity on Biochemical Components of The Mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum. Aquatic Botany, 80: 77–87.
  • Robyt JF, White BJ 1987. Biochemical Technique: Theory and Practices, 40-72.
  • Rodriguez RZ, Matson MVC, Montiel LGH, Amador BM, Puente ER, Lara L 2014. Effect of Pseudomonas putida on growth and Anthocyanin Pigment in Two Poinsettia (Euphorbia Pulcherrima) Cultivars. The Scientific World Journal, 1-6.
  • Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Di Mattia E 2010. Enhancement of alkalinity tolerance in two cucumber genotypes inoculated with an arbuscular mycorrhizal biofertilizer containing Glomus intraradices. Biol Fertil Soils, 46: 499–509.
  • Singleton VL, Rossi JR 1962. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Water Astress Studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207.
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLE
Authors

Gülden Balcı 0000-0001-7108-4887

Hakan Keles 0000-0002-8225-931X

Ramazan Cakmakcı 0000-0002-1354-1995

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Submission Date November 29, 2019
Acceptance Date April 2, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020Volume: 23 Issue: 6

Cite

APA Balcı, G., Keles, H., & Cakmakcı, R. (2020). The Effects of Biofertilizers on Some Physological Responses in Heritage Raspberries. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 23(6), 1422-1427. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.652416

Cited By

A comprehensive review of integrating biostimulants and biopesticides for organic berry farming: exploring challenges and opportunities for Africa
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1452823
 Download Cover Image


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149