Abstract
Bu araştırmada, serada yetiştirilen hıyar bitkisinin yarı ıslatmalı sulama (YIS) ve geleneksel kısıntılı sulamaya (KS) tepkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma, Türkiye’nin güneyinde Antalya koşullarında plastik örtülü ve cam olmak üzere iki farklı serada yürütülmüştür. Kontrol konu (K100) ile birlikte iki geleneksel kısıntılı sulama (KS75 ve KS50), ardışık-yarı ıslatmalı sulama (A-YIS75 ve A-YIS50) ve sabit-yarı ıslatmalı sulama (S-YIS75 ve S-YIS50) olmak üzere yedi sulama konusu ele alınmıştır. Sulama suyu (mm), verim (t ha-1), bitki boyu (cm), kuru madde vb gözlem ve ölçümler yapılmıştır. Sulama suyu kullanım randımanı (SSKR) değerleri (kg (ha×mm)-1) hesaplanmıştır. Beklenildiği gibi, K100 kontrol konusu toprak su içeriği en yüksek değerlerde ve tarla kapasitesi yakın bir seyir izlemiştir. Diğer konularda ise bitki kök bölgesi toprak su içeriği K100 konusundan daha düşük düzeyde kalmıştır. Toplam verim değerlerinin istatistiksel analizi sonucu Tukey’s %5 düzeyinde sulama konuları arasındaki fark önemli bulunmuştur. İlk yıl K100, KS75, S-YIS75, A-YIS75 ve A-YIS50 konuları istatistiki olarak en yüksek verim değerlerinde yer almış ve aralarında istatistiki olarak bir fark bulunmamıştır. Yine ilk yıl, S-YIS50 ve KS50 konuları ise istatistiki olarak en düşük verim değerlerine sahip olmuştur. İkinci yıl, birinci yıla benzer bir şekilde ancak, sadece K100 ve S-YIS75 konuları istatistiki olarak en yüksek verim değerlerine sahip olmuş ve aralarında istatistiki olarak bir fark bulunmamıştır. Yine ikinci yıl, KS50 konusu istatistiki olarak en düşük verim değerine sahip olmuştur. SSKR değeri her iki yıl en yüksek A-YIS50 konusunda hesaplanmıştır. En düşük SSKR değeri ise birinci yıl KS50, ikinci yıl ise A-YIS75 konularında belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada, genel olarak, sulama suyunun kısıntı düzeyi artıkça verimde azalma saptanmıştır. Sulama suyundan tasarruf sağlamaya yönelik araştırmalar özellikle suyun kıt ve pahalı olduğu kurak ve yarı kurak bölgelerde önemini gittikçe artırmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, verimdeki düşüşün sulama suyundaki azalma oranından daha küçük kalması, YIS konularının bir avantajı olarak görülebilir.
Supporting Institution
Akdeniz Üniversitesi
References
- Anonim 1998. 1997 yılı çalışma raporu. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Tarım İl Müdürlüğü, Antalya, 71ss.
- Anonim 2000. Antalya ili uzun yıllık iklim verileri. Antalya Meteoroloji Bölge Müdürlüğü, Antalya.
- Chaffey N 2001. Restricting water supply enhances crop growth. Trends Plant Sci. 6(8): 346.
- Davies WJ, Zhang J 1991. Root signals and the regulation of growth and develeopment of plants in drying soil. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 55-76.
- Davies JW, Tardieu F, Trejo CL 1994. How do chemical signals work in plants that grow in drying soil? Plant Physiol. 104: 309-314.
- Kaman H, Kirda C, Cetin M, Topcu S 2006. Salt accumulation in the root zones of tomato and cotton irrigated with partial root-drying technique. Irrigation and Drainage 55: 533-544.
- Kang S, Liang Z, Hu W, Zhang J 1998. Water use efficiency of controlled alternate irrigation on root-divided maize plants. Agricultural Water Management 38: 69-76.
- Kang S, Liang Z, Pan Y, Shi P, Zhang J 2000. Alternate Furrow Irrigation for Maize Production in an Arid Area. Agricultural Water Management 45: 267-274.
- Kang S, Zhang L, Hu X, Li Z, Jerie P 2001. An improved water use efficiency for hot pepper grown under controlled alternate drip irrigation on partial roots. Sci. Hortic. 89: 257-267.
- Kirda C, Baytorun N 1999. Fertigation under saline conditions: Irrigation management minimizing soil salinity risk. Ryan, J. (ed.), 2000. Plant Nutrient Management under Pressurized Irrigation Systems in the Mediterranean Region. Proceedings of the IMPHOS International Fertigation Workshop Organized by the World Phosphate Institute (IMPHOS), 25-27 April 1999, Amman, Jordan. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, pp. 288-296.
- Kirda C, Cetin M, Dasgan Y, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ekici B, Derici MR, Ozguven AI 2004. Yield response of greenhouse grown tomato to partial root drying and conventional deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 69: 191-201.
- Kirda C, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ulger AC, Yazici A, Cetin M, Derici MR 2005. Grain yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of maize under deficit irrigation. Field Crops Research 93: 132–141.
- Sarı M, Aksoy T, Köseoğlu T, Kaplan M, Kılıç Ş, Pilanalı N 1993. Akdeniz Üniversitesi yerleşim alanının detaylı toprak etüdü ve ideal arazi kullanım planlaması. Akdeniz Üniv. Yayınları, Antalya, 145 ss.
- Stoll M, Loveys B, Dry P 2000. Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 51(350): 1627-1634.
- Tardieu F, Davies WJ 1992. Stomatal response to absicisic acid is a function of current plant water status. Plant Physiol. 92: 540-545.
- Topcu S, Kirda C, Dasgan Y, Kaman H, Cetin M, Yazici A, Bacon MA 2007. Yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of tomato grown under deficit irrigation. Europ. J. Agronomy 26: 64–70.
- Wilkinson S, Davies WJ, 1997. Xylem Sap pH Increase: A Drought Signal Received at the Apoplastic Face of the Guard Cell that Involves the Suppression of Saturable Abscisic Acid Uptake by the Epidermal Symplast. Plant Physiol. 113: 559-573.
- Zhang J, Schurr U, Davies WJ 1987. Control of stomatal behaviour by abscisic acid which apparently originates in roots. J. Exp. Bot. 38: 1174-1181.
Response of Greenhouse Grown Cucumber to Partial Root Zone Drying and Conventional Deficit Irrigation
Abstract
In this study, it was aimed to determine the response of greenhouse grown cucumber to the partial root zone drying (YIS) and conventional deficit irrigation (KS). The study was conducted in plastic and glass covered two greenhouses in Antalya condition. With control (K100) and total of seven irrigation treatments including two conventional deficit irrigation (KS75 and KS50), two alternate-partial root zone drying (A-YIS75 and A-YIS50) and two fixed-partial root zone drying (S-YIS75 and S-YIS50) were discussed. Irrigation water (mm), yield (t ha-1), plant height (cm), dry matter etc. observations and measurements were recorded. Irrigation water use efficiency (SSKR) values (kg (ha×mm)-1) were calculated. As expected, the soil water content of control (K100) treatment was at the highest values and field capacity followed a close course. In other treatments, the soil water content in the plant root zone remained lower than the K100. As a result of the statistical analysis of the total yield values, Tukey's 5% level difference between irrigation treatments was found to be significant. In the first year, K100, KS75, S-YIS75, A-YIS75 and A-YIS50 treatments were statistically at the highest efficiency values and there was no statistically difference between them. Again, in the first year, S-YIS50 and KS50 treatments had statistically the lowest efficiency values. In the second year, similar to the first year, but only the K100 and S-YIS75 treatments had the highest efficiency values statistically, and there was no statistically difference between them. Again, in the second year, KS50 treatment had the lowest efficiency value statistically. The SSKR value was calculated for the highest A-YIS50 for both years. The lowest SSKR value was determined in the first year KS50 and the second year in A-YIS75. In the study, generally, as the level of irrigation water reduced, the yield was decreased. Studies on saving irrigation water, in particular, it is increasingly important in arid and semi-arid regions where water is scarce and expensive. In this context, an advantage of YIS treatment is that the reduction in yield remains smaller than the rate of reduction in irrigation water.
References
- Anonim 1998. 1997 yılı çalışma raporu. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Tarım İl Müdürlüğü, Antalya, 71ss.
- Anonim 2000. Antalya ili uzun yıllık iklim verileri. Antalya Meteoroloji Bölge Müdürlüğü, Antalya.
- Chaffey N 2001. Restricting water supply enhances crop growth. Trends Plant Sci. 6(8): 346.
- Davies WJ, Zhang J 1991. Root signals and the regulation of growth and develeopment of plants in drying soil. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 55-76.
- Davies JW, Tardieu F, Trejo CL 1994. How do chemical signals work in plants that grow in drying soil? Plant Physiol. 104: 309-314.
- Kaman H, Kirda C, Cetin M, Topcu S 2006. Salt accumulation in the root zones of tomato and cotton irrigated with partial root-drying technique. Irrigation and Drainage 55: 533-544.
- Kang S, Liang Z, Hu W, Zhang J 1998. Water use efficiency of controlled alternate irrigation on root-divided maize plants. Agricultural Water Management 38: 69-76.
- Kang S, Liang Z, Pan Y, Shi P, Zhang J 2000. Alternate Furrow Irrigation for Maize Production in an Arid Area. Agricultural Water Management 45: 267-274.
- Kang S, Zhang L, Hu X, Li Z, Jerie P 2001. An improved water use efficiency for hot pepper grown under controlled alternate drip irrigation on partial roots. Sci. Hortic. 89: 257-267.
- Kirda C, Baytorun N 1999. Fertigation under saline conditions: Irrigation management minimizing soil salinity risk. Ryan, J. (ed.), 2000. Plant Nutrient Management under Pressurized Irrigation Systems in the Mediterranean Region. Proceedings of the IMPHOS International Fertigation Workshop Organized by the World Phosphate Institute (IMPHOS), 25-27 April 1999, Amman, Jordan. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, pp. 288-296.
- Kirda C, Cetin M, Dasgan Y, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ekici B, Derici MR, Ozguven AI 2004. Yield response of greenhouse grown tomato to partial root drying and conventional deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 69: 191-201.
- Kirda C, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ulger AC, Yazici A, Cetin M, Derici MR 2005. Grain yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of maize under deficit irrigation. Field Crops Research 93: 132–141.
- Sarı M, Aksoy T, Köseoğlu T, Kaplan M, Kılıç Ş, Pilanalı N 1993. Akdeniz Üniversitesi yerleşim alanının detaylı toprak etüdü ve ideal arazi kullanım planlaması. Akdeniz Üniv. Yayınları, Antalya, 145 ss.
- Stoll M, Loveys B, Dry P 2000. Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 51(350): 1627-1634.
- Tardieu F, Davies WJ 1992. Stomatal response to absicisic acid is a function of current plant water status. Plant Physiol. 92: 540-545.
- Topcu S, Kirda C, Dasgan Y, Kaman H, Cetin M, Yazici A, Bacon MA 2007. Yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of tomato grown under deficit irrigation. Europ. J. Agronomy 26: 64–70.
- Wilkinson S, Davies WJ, 1997. Xylem Sap pH Increase: A Drought Signal Received at the Apoplastic Face of the Guard Cell that Involves the Suppression of Saturable Abscisic Acid Uptake by the Epidermal Symplast. Plant Physiol. 113: 559-573.
- Zhang J, Schurr U, Davies WJ 1987. Control of stomatal behaviour by abscisic acid which apparently originates in roots. J. Exp. Bot. 38: 1174-1181.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences |
| Journal Section | RESEARCH ARTICLE |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | April 30, 2022 |
| Submission Date | February 19, 2021 |
| Acceptance Date | April 9, 2021 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022Volume: 25 Issue: 2 |
Cited By
Determination of the Effect of Different Irrigation Regimes on Some Quality Properties of Cucumber
Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1093951
International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year
KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature
e-ISSN: 2619-9149