Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bingöl İli İçin Yüksek Verim ve Kaliteye Sahip Korunga Genotiplerinin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) Belirlenmesi

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 3, 619 - 628, 30.06.2023

Erdal Çaçan Kağan Kökten Ali Koç

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1084441

Abstract

Bu araştırma, Bingöl ili için verim ve kalitesi yüksek korunga genotiplerini belirlemek amacıyla 2017-2018 yılları arasında iki yıl süreyle yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada iki adet tescilli çeşit (Lütfibey, Peschanyj 1251), altı adet çeşit adayı (Emre, Hilal, Faith, Mehmetalibey, Koç 1461) ve beş adet populasyon (Genç, Adaklı, Yedisu, Ankara ve Tarım) olmak üzere toplam 13 adet genotip bitkisel materyal olarak kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada genotiplerin yeşil ot verimleri, kuru ot verimleri, ham protein oranları, ham protein verimleri, ADF (asit deterjanda çözünmeyen lif) oranları, NDF (nötral deterjanda çözünmeyen lif) oranları, sindirilebilir kuru madde oranları ve nispi yem değerleri incelenmiştir. Genotiplerin iki yıllık ortalaması olarak yeşil ot verimi 1832±60 kg/da, kuru ot verimi 576±20 kg/da, ham protein oranı %16.4±0.3, ham protein verimi 95.3±3.9 kg/da, ADF oranı %31.2±0.5, NDF oranı %43.8±0.6, sindirilebilir kuru madde oranı %64.6±0.4 ve nispi yem değeri 139±2.3 olarak elde edilmiştir. Iki yıllık verilere göre araştırmada yeşil ot verimi, kuru ot verimi ve ham protein verimi açısından genotipler arasında tespit edilen farklılıkların istatistiksel olarak önemli (p<0.01), ham protein, ADF, NDF ve sindirilebilir kuru madde oranları ile nispi yem değeri açısından ise genotipler arasında tespit edilen farklılıkların istatistiksel olarak önemsiz olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak incelenen özellikler açısından Tarım, Hilal, Peschanyj ve Lütfibey genotiplerinin Bingöl ili koşullarında ön plana çıktığı belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Ham protein Yem verimi Yem kalitesi Sindirilebilirlik Biplot

References

  • Acikgoz, E. (2001). Forage Crops. Uludag University Empowerment Foundation Publication No: 182, Bursa. (In Turkish)
  • Acikgoz, E. (2013). Forage Crops Growing. Dairy Farming Training Center Publications No: 8, Bursa. (In Turkish)
  • Akdeniz, H. (2019). The influence of different sowing methods of sainfoin, smooth bromegrass and wheatgrass mixtures on yield traits and quality characteristics. Journal of Agriculture 2(1), 1-15.
  • Anonymous, (2019). Climate data of Bingol province. Bingol Meteorology Station Directorate, Bingol, Turkey.
  • Anonymous, (2020). Technical instruction for measuring agricultural values. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Seed Registration and Certification Center, Ankara. (In Turkish)
  • Basaran, U., Mut, H., Onal, O., Acar, Z. & Ayan, I. (2011). Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) landraces. Turkish Journal Field Crops 16(1), 9-14.
  • Basbag, M., Sayar, M.S., Aydin, A., Hosgoren, H. & Demirel, R. (2015). Some agronomical and quality traits in nine (Vicia ssp.) species cultivated in Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 2(1), 69-77.
  • Basbag, M., Cacan, E. & Sayar, M.S. (2018). Determining feed quality of some grass species and assessments on relations among the traits with biplot analysis method. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops 27(2), 92-101.
  • Cinar, S. & Hatipoglu, R. (2015). Quality characteristics of the mixtures of some warm season perennial grasses with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) under irrigated conditions of Cukurova. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 20(1), 31-37.
  • Cecen, S., Oten, M. & Erdurmus, C. (2015). Collection and determination of morphological traits of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) populations from Antalya natural flora. Derim 32(1), 63-70.
  • Ekiz, H., Altinok, S., Sancak, C., Sevimay, C.S. & Kendir, H. (2011). Forage Crops. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Publications No: 1588, Ankara. (In Turkish)
  • Elmali Aksu, D. & Kaya, I. (2012). The effects of different harvesting time on nutrient content of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) and vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Journal of Lalahan Livestock Research Institute 52(2), 39-45.
  • Erkovan, H.I. & Tan, M. (2009). The determination of seed and hay yield and some characteristics of sainfoin under dry and irrigation condition. Erzincan University Journal of Science and Techonology 2(1), 61-70.
  • Ertus, M.M., Sabanci, C.O. & Zorer Celebi, S. (2012). Determination of some characteristics of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) landraces grown in Van province. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22(3), 165-172.
  • JMP, (2018). A Business Unit of SAS. SAS Institute, USA.
  • Koc, A. & Akdeniz, H. (2017). Preliminary investigations on the yield and some agricultural properties of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) species of breed in Gozlu and Altınova agricultural establishments. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature 20(1), 6-12.
  • Morrison, J.A. (2003). Hay and Pasture Management. Extension Educator, Crop Systems Rockford Extension Center. http://iah.aces.uiuc.edu/pdf/ Agronomy_HB/08chapter.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2019).
  • Parlak Ozaslan, A., Gokkus, A., Samikiran, E. & Senol, M.Y. (2014). Investigation of morphological and agronomic characteristics of some wild sainfoin species. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty 2(2), 111-117.
  • Sezen, Y. (1995). Fertilizers and Fertilization. Ataturk University Publication No: 679, Agriculture Faculty Publications No:303, Erzurum. (In Turkish)
  • Soya, H., Avcioglu, R. & Geren, H. (2004). Forage Crops. Hasad Publications, Istanbul. (In Turkish)
  • Tan, M. & Sancak, C. (2009). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.). In: Legume Forage Crops Volume II, ed. Avcioglu R., Hatipoglu R, Karadag Y, General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development, Izmir. (In Turkish)
  • Temel, O. & Ozalp, M. (2016). Effects of elevation and some soil properties on the yield and quality of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa Scop.) forage crop grown in Savsat district, Artvin. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31(1), 106-116.
  • TUIK, (2022). Turkish Statistical Institute, Crop Production Statistic, http://www.tuik.gov.tr, (Accessed July 20, 2022).
  • Turk, M. (2005). The effects of different seeding densities on the hay and crude protein yields of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.). Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural Sciences 11(3), 292-298.
  • Turk, M. & Celik, N. (2005). Studies on effects of different row spacings and seeding rates on the seed yield of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.). ANADOLU, J. of AARI 15(2), 43-57.
  • Ulger, I. & Kaplan, M. (2016). Variations in potential nutritive value, gas and methane production of local sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) populations. Alınteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences 31(B9), 42-47.
  • Unal, S. & Firincioglu, H.K. (2007). Investigation of the phenological, morphological and agronomic traits of some sainfoin populations and line. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops 16(1-2), 31-38.
  • Van Dyke, N.J. & Anderson, P.M. (2000). Interpreting a Forage Analysis. Alabama Cooperative Extension. Circular ANR-890.
  • Yavuz, T. & Karadag, Y. (2016). Yield and quality performances of artificial pasture mixtures under dryland conditions. Igdir University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 6(4), 155-163.
  • Zengin, M. (2012). Basic Principles in Interpretation of Soil and Plant Analysis Results (Chapter 12). In: Plant Nutrition, ed. Karaman, M.R., 874, Gubretas Guide Books Series :2. (In Turkish).

Determination of High Yield and Quality Sainfoin Genotypes (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) for the Bingöl Province of Turkey

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 3, 619 - 628, 30.06.2023

Erdal Çaçan Kağan Kökten Ali Koç

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1084441

Abstract

This research was carried out for two years between 2017-2018 to determine the high yield and quality sainfoin genotypes for Bingöl Province. A total of 13 genotypes were used as plant materials, two of which were registered cultivars (Lutfibey, Peschanyj 1251), six candidate cultivars (Emre, Hilal, Fatih, Mehmetalibey, Koc 1461, Yunus) and five were populations (Genc, Adakli, Yedisu, Ankara, Tarim). In the study forage yields, dry matter yields, crude protein ratios, crude protein yields, ADF (acid detergent fiber) ratios, NDF (neutral detergent fiber) ratios, digestible dry matter ratios and relative feed values of genotypes were investigated. As the average of two years of the genotypes; the forage yield was 1832±60 kg da-1, the dry matter yield was 576±20 kg da-1, the crude protein rate was 16.4±0.3%, the crude protein yield was 95.3±3.9 kg da-1, the ADF rate was 31.2±0.5%, the NDF rate was 43.8±0.6%, the digestible dry matter rate was 64.6±0.4% and the relative feed value was obtained as 139±2.3. According to two years data in the study, the differences between genotypes were found statistically significant (p<0.01) in terms of forage yield, dry matter yield and crude protein yield, but the differences between genotypes were found to be statistically insignificant in terms of crude protein, ADF, NDF and digestible dry matter ratios and relative feed value. As a result, it was determined that Tarim, Hilal, Peschanyj and Lutfibey genotypes came to the fore in the conditions of Bingöl Province in terms of the examined characteristics.

Keywords

Crude protein Forage yield Forage quality Biplot Digestibility

References

  • Acikgoz, E. (2001). Forage Crops. Uludag University Empowerment Foundation Publication No: 182, Bursa. (In Turkish)
  • Acikgoz, E. (2013). Forage Crops Growing. Dairy Farming Training Center Publications No: 8, Bursa. (In Turkish)
  • Akdeniz, H. (2019). The influence of different sowing methods of sainfoin, smooth bromegrass and wheatgrass mixtures on yield traits and quality characteristics. Journal of Agriculture 2(1), 1-15.
  • Anonymous, (2019). Climate data of Bingol province. Bingol Meteorology Station Directorate, Bingol, Turkey.
  • Anonymous, (2020). Technical instruction for measuring agricultural values. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Seed Registration and Certification Center, Ankara. (In Turkish)
  • Basaran, U., Mut, H., Onal, O., Acar, Z. & Ayan, I. (2011). Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) landraces. Turkish Journal Field Crops 16(1), 9-14.
  • Basbag, M., Sayar, M.S., Aydin, A., Hosgoren, H. & Demirel, R. (2015). Some agronomical and quality traits in nine (Vicia ssp.) species cultivated in Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 2(1), 69-77.
  • Basbag, M., Cacan, E. & Sayar, M.S. (2018). Determining feed quality of some grass species and assessments on relations among the traits with biplot analysis method. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops 27(2), 92-101.
  • Cinar, S. & Hatipoglu, R. (2015). Quality characteristics of the mixtures of some warm season perennial grasses with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) under irrigated conditions of Cukurova. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 20(1), 31-37.
  • Cecen, S., Oten, M. & Erdurmus, C. (2015). Collection and determination of morphological traits of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) populations from Antalya natural flora. Derim 32(1), 63-70.
  • Ekiz, H., Altinok, S., Sancak, C., Sevimay, C.S. & Kendir, H. (2011). Forage Crops. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Publications No: 1588, Ankara. (In Turkish)
  • Elmali Aksu, D. & Kaya, I. (2012). The effects of different harvesting time on nutrient content of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) and vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Journal of Lalahan Livestock Research Institute 52(2), 39-45.
  • Erkovan, H.I. & Tan, M. (2009). The determination of seed and hay yield and some characteristics of sainfoin under dry and irrigation condition. Erzincan University Journal of Science and Techonology 2(1), 61-70.
  • Ertus, M.M., Sabanci, C.O. & Zorer Celebi, S. (2012). Determination of some characteristics of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) landraces grown in Van province. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22(3), 165-172.
  • JMP, (2018). A Business Unit of SAS. SAS Institute, USA.
  • Koc, A. & Akdeniz, H. (2017). Preliminary investigations on the yield and some agricultural properties of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) species of breed in Gozlu and Altınova agricultural establishments. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature 20(1), 6-12.
  • Morrison, J.A. (2003). Hay and Pasture Management. Extension Educator, Crop Systems Rockford Extension Center. http://iah.aces.uiuc.edu/pdf/ Agronomy_HB/08chapter.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2019).
  • Parlak Ozaslan, A., Gokkus, A., Samikiran, E. & Senol, M.Y. (2014). Investigation of morphological and agronomic characteristics of some wild sainfoin species. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty 2(2), 111-117.
  • Sezen, Y. (1995). Fertilizers and Fertilization. Ataturk University Publication No: 679, Agriculture Faculty Publications No:303, Erzurum. (In Turkish)
  • Soya, H., Avcioglu, R. & Geren, H. (2004). Forage Crops. Hasad Publications, Istanbul. (In Turkish)
  • Tan, M. & Sancak, C. (2009). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.). In: Legume Forage Crops Volume II, ed. Avcioglu R., Hatipoglu R, Karadag Y, General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development, Izmir. (In Turkish)
  • Temel, O. & Ozalp, M. (2016). Effects of elevation and some soil properties on the yield and quality of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa Scop.) forage crop grown in Savsat district, Artvin. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31(1), 106-116.
  • TUIK, (2022). Turkish Statistical Institute, Crop Production Statistic, http://www.tuik.gov.tr, (Accessed July 20, 2022).
  • Turk, M. (2005). The effects of different seeding densities on the hay and crude protein yields of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.). Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural Sciences 11(3), 292-298.
  • Turk, M. & Celik, N. (2005). Studies on effects of different row spacings and seeding rates on the seed yield of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.). ANADOLU, J. of AARI 15(2), 43-57.
  • Ulger, I. & Kaplan, M. (2016). Variations in potential nutritive value, gas and methane production of local sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) populations. Alınteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences 31(B9), 42-47.
  • Unal, S. & Firincioglu, H.K. (2007). Investigation of the phenological, morphological and agronomic traits of some sainfoin populations and line. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops 16(1-2), 31-38.
  • Van Dyke, N.J. & Anderson, P.M. (2000). Interpreting a Forage Analysis. Alabama Cooperative Extension. Circular ANR-890.
  • Yavuz, T. & Karadag, Y. (2016). Yield and quality performances of artificial pasture mixtures under dryland conditions. Igdir University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 6(4), 155-163.
  • Zengin, M. (2012). Basic Principles in Interpretation of Soil and Plant Analysis Results (Chapter 12). In: Plant Nutrition, ed. Karaman, M.R., 874, Gubretas Guide Books Series :2. (In Turkish).
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLE
Authors

Erdal Çaçan 0000-0002-9469-2495

Kağan Kökten 0000-0001-5403-5629

Ali Koç 0000-0002-8744-5939

Early Pub Date April 10, 2023
Publication Date June 30, 2023
Submission Date March 8, 2022
Acceptance Date September 13, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023Volume: 26 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Çaçan, E., Kökten, K., & Koç, A. (2023). Determination of High Yield and Quality Sainfoin Genotypes (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) for the Bingöl Province of Turkey. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 26(3), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1084441
 Download Cover Image


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149