Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Aspir Samanı Çeşitlerinin Yem Değeri Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 2, 424 - 429, 30.04.2023

Bilal Selçuk Tuğba Bakır Tahsin Beycioğlu Adem Kamalak Fatih Kıllı

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1136792

Abstract

Bu araştırma, Kahramanmaraş ilinde Ağustos ayında yağlı tohum bitkisi olarak hasat edilen Yekta, Linas, Dinçer, Göktürk, Zirkon, Olas, Balcı aspir çeşitlerinin samanlarının kimyasal kompozisyonları, nispi yem değerleri (NYD), in vitro gaz üretimi (İVGÜ), metabolik enerji (ME) ve organik madde sindirim (OMS) saptamak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırma bulguları aspir samanı çeşitleri arasında kimyasal kompozisyon bakımında önemli farklılıklar olduğunu ortaya koymuştur (P<0.001). Aspir samanı çeşitlerinin ham proteini (HP) %6.49-10.51, nötr deterjan lifi (NDF) %40.28-46.50, asit deterjan lifi (ADF) %34.79-39.73, ham külü (HK) %10.04-10.65, nispi yem değerleri (NYD) 116.79-142.67, metabolik enerjisi 7.58-8.53 MJ kg-1 KM, organik madde sindirimi (OMS) %55.11-61.88, metan üretim oranı ise %10.68-11.94 aralığında bulunmuştur. Dinçer çeşidi HP oranı %10.51 ve NDF oranı %40.28, ADF oranı %34.79 ve NYD 142.67 değerleri ile öne çıkmıştır. Metabolik enerji (ME) ve organik madde sindirimi (OMS) sırasıyla; 8.53 MJ kg-1 KM ve %61.88 olarak Linas çeşidi öne çıkmıştır. Gaz üretimleri açısından Göktürk 33.91 ml, metan üretim oranı bakımından Linas %10.68 ile öne çıkmıştır. Sonuç olarak çeşitlerin potansiyel bir kaba yem kaynağı olabileceği, yem tüketim miktarları üzerine etkilerini görmek için in vivo çalışmalara gereksinim olduğu söylenebilir.

Keywords

Aspir samanı çeşitleri in vitro gaz üretimi Metan Organik madde sindirimi

References

  • Akpinar, A. (1999). Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) tohumu yağının çözücü ekstraksiyonu ve karakterizasyonu (Tez No: 90598). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Kimya Ana Bilim Dalı]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  • Anonymous, (2016). FAO Statistical Database. http:/www.fao.org.
  • AOAC, (1990). Official method of analysis. 15th ed., pp.66-88. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Babaoğlu, M. (2006). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de aspir bitkisinin tarihi, kullanım alanları ve önemi. Broşür. Trakya Tarımsal Araştırmalar Enstitüsü, Edirne.
  • Bilal, Y., & Kamalak, A. (2022). Meşe Palamudunun Kuzu Rasyonlarına İlavesinin Sindirim Derecesine, Metabolik Enerjisine ve Metan Üretimine Etkisinin İn Vitro Gaz Üretim Tekniği ile Belirlenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 25(Ek Sayı 2), 583-590.
  • Cagri, A., & Kara, K. (2018). The Effect of Safflower on the In Vitro Digestion Parameters and Methane Production in Horse and Ruminant. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 44(2), 73-85.
  • Cappellozza, B.I., Bohnert, D.W., Schauer, C.S., Falck, S.J., Vanzant, E.S., Harmon, D.L., & Cooke, R. F. (2013). Daily and alternate day supplementation of urea or soybean meal to ruminants consuming low-quality cool-season forage: II. Effects on ruminal fermentation. Livestock Science, 155(2-3), 214-222.
  • Doane, P.H., Schofield, P., & Pell, A.N. (1997). Neutral detergent fiber disappearance and gas and volatile fatty acid production during the in vitro fermentation of six forages. Journal of Animal Science, 75(12), 3342-3352.
  • Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1), 1-42.
  • Filya, I., Karabulut, A., Canbolat, O., Değirmencioğlu, T., & Kalkan, H. (2002). Bursa bölgesinde yetiştirilen yem hammaddelerinin besleme değeri ve hayvansal organizmada optimum değerlendirme koşullarının in vivo ve in vitro yöntemlerle saptanması üzerinde araştırmalar. UÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve İncelemeler Serisi, 25, 1-16.
  • French, A.V., O’Rourke P.K., & Cameron, D.G. (1988). Beef production from forage crops in the Brigalow region of Central Queensland 1. Forage sorghums. Tropical Grasslands, 22, 79-84.
  • IPCC (Intergoverment Panel on Climate Change) (2001). Climate change 2001. The scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Kılıç, Ü., & Abdıwalı, M.A. (2016). Alternatif kaba yem kaynağı olarak şarapçılık endüstrisi üzüm atıklarının in vitro gerçek sindirilebilirlikleri ve nispi yem değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 22(6), 895-901, 2016.
  • Landa, S., Molle, G., Fois, N., Friedman, S., Barkai, D., Decandia, M., ... & Sitzia, M. (2005). Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) as a novel pasture species for dairy sheep in the Mediterranean conditions of Sardinia and Israel. Small Ruminant Research, 59(2-3), 239-249.
  • Landau, S., Friedman, S., Brenner, S., Bruckental, I., Weinberg, Z.G., Ashbell, G., ... & Leshem, Y. (2004). The value of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) hay and silage grown under Mediterranean conditions as forage for dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science, 88(3), 263-271.
  • López, S., Makkar, H.P., & Soliva, C.R. (2010). Screening plants and plant products for methane inhibitors. In In vitro screening of plant resources for extra-nutritional attributes in ruminants: nuclear and related methodologies (pp. 191-231). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Menke, H.H, & Steingass, H, (1988). Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value Obtained from Chemical Analysis and in vitro Gas Production Using Rumen Fluid. Animal Research Development, 28, 7-55.
  • Menke, K.H, Raab L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D., & Schneider, W. (1979). The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 93(1), 217-222.
  • Mir, Z., Rushfeldt, M.L., Mir, P.S., Paterson, L.J., &Weselake, R.J. (2000). Effect of dietary supplementation with either conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) or linoleic acid rich oil on the CLA content of lamb tissues. Small Ruminant Research, 36(1), 25-31.
  • Mündel, H.H., & Lethbridge Research Centre (Canada). (2004). Safflower production on the Canadian prairies: revisited in 2004. Lethbridge, Alta. Lethbridge Research Station, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
  • Ørskov, E.R., & McDonald, I. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 92(2), 499-503.
  • Öztürk, H. (2008). Ruminant beslemesinde probiyotik mayalar. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi. 79(3), 37-42
  • Peiretti, P.G. (2017). Nutritional aspects and potential uses of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in livestock. Agricultural Research Updates, 19, 3-22.
  • Redfearn, D.D., Zhang H., & Caddel, J.L. (2004). Forage quality interpretations. division of agricultural sciences and natural resources, Oklahoma State University.
  • Sanderson, R., Lister, S.J., Sargeant, A., & Dhanoa, M.S. (1997). Effect of particle size on in vitro fermentation of silages differing in dry matter content. In Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science (Vol. 1997, pp. 197-197). Cambridge University Press.
  • SPSS, (2011). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows,version20.0. New York: IBM Corp 440.
  • Stanford, K., Wallins, G.L., Lees, B.M., & Mündel, H.H. (2001). Feeding value of immature safflower forage for dry ewes. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 81(2), 289-292.
  • Stanford, K., Wallins, G.L., Lees, B.M, & Mündel, H.H. (2001). Immature safflower forage as a feed for ewes. In Proceedings of the 5th International Safflower Conference, Williston, North Dakota and Sidney, Montana, USA, 23-27 July, 2001. Safflower: a multipurpose species with unexploited potential and world adaptability (pp. 29-32). Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University.
  • Van Dyke, N.J., & Anderson, P.M, (2000). Interpreting aFforage Analysis. Alabama cooperative extension. Circular ANR-890.
  • Van Soest, P.J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell University Press
  • Vermorel, M. (1978). Feed evaluation for ruminants. II. The new energy systems proposed in France. Livestock Production Science, 5(4), 347-365.
  • Vonghia, G., Pinto, F., Ciruzzi, B., & Montemurro, O. (1992). In vivo digestibility and nutritive value of safflower utilized as fodder crop cultivated in Southern Italy. In Livestock in the mediterranean cereal production systems (pp. 127-129). PUDOC, Wageningen.
  • Yavuz, M. (2005). Bazı ruminant yemlerinin nispi yem değeri ve in vitro sindirim değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 97-101

Comparison of Feed Value Characteristics of Safflower Straw Varieties

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 2, 424 - 429, 30.04.2023

Bilal Selçuk Tuğba Bakır Tahsin Beycioğlu Adem Kamalak Fatih Kıllı

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1136792

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine the chemical composition, relative feed values (RFV), in vitro gas production (IVGP), metabolic energy (ME), and organic matter digestion (OMD). of the straw of Yekta, Linas, Dinçer, Göktürk, Zirkon, Olas, and Balcı safflower cultivars harvested as oilseed plants in Kahramanmaraş in August. (Research findings revealed that there are significant differences in chemical composition between safflower straw cultivars (P<0.001). Crude protein (HP) of safflower straw varieties 6.49-10.51%, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) 40.28-46.50%, acid detergent fiber (ADF) 34.79-39.73%, raw ash (HK) 10.04%-10.65%, relative feed values (RFV) 116.79-142.67, metabolic energy 7.58-8.53 MJ kg-1 KM, organic matter digestion (OMD) 55.11-61.88%, methane production rate 10.68-11.94%. The Dinçer cultivar stood out with its HP ratio of 10.51%, NDF ratio of 40.28%, ADF ratio of 34.79%, and NYD of 142.67. Metabolic energy (ME) and organic matter digestion (OMD), respectively; Linas variety stood out with 8.53 MJ kg-1 KM and 61.88%. In terms of gas production, Göktürk stood out with 33.91 ml and Linas with 10.68% in terms of methane production. As a result, it can be said that cultivars can be a potential source of forage and in vivo studies are needed to see their effects on feed consumption amounts.

Keywords

Safflower Straw Varieties in vitro gas production Methane Organic matter digestion

References

  • Akpinar, A. (1999). Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) tohumu yağının çözücü ekstraksiyonu ve karakterizasyonu (Tez No: 90598). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Kimya Ana Bilim Dalı]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  • Anonymous, (2016). FAO Statistical Database. http:/www.fao.org.
  • AOAC, (1990). Official method of analysis. 15th ed., pp.66-88. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Babaoğlu, M. (2006). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de aspir bitkisinin tarihi, kullanım alanları ve önemi. Broşür. Trakya Tarımsal Araştırmalar Enstitüsü, Edirne.
  • Bilal, Y., & Kamalak, A. (2022). Meşe Palamudunun Kuzu Rasyonlarına İlavesinin Sindirim Derecesine, Metabolik Enerjisine ve Metan Üretimine Etkisinin İn Vitro Gaz Üretim Tekniği ile Belirlenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 25(Ek Sayı 2), 583-590.
  • Cagri, A., & Kara, K. (2018). The Effect of Safflower on the In Vitro Digestion Parameters and Methane Production in Horse and Ruminant. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 44(2), 73-85.
  • Cappellozza, B.I., Bohnert, D.W., Schauer, C.S., Falck, S.J., Vanzant, E.S., Harmon, D.L., & Cooke, R. F. (2013). Daily and alternate day supplementation of urea or soybean meal to ruminants consuming low-quality cool-season forage: II. Effects on ruminal fermentation. Livestock Science, 155(2-3), 214-222.
  • Doane, P.H., Schofield, P., & Pell, A.N. (1997). Neutral detergent fiber disappearance and gas and volatile fatty acid production during the in vitro fermentation of six forages. Journal of Animal Science, 75(12), 3342-3352.
  • Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1), 1-42.
  • Filya, I., Karabulut, A., Canbolat, O., Değirmencioğlu, T., & Kalkan, H. (2002). Bursa bölgesinde yetiştirilen yem hammaddelerinin besleme değeri ve hayvansal organizmada optimum değerlendirme koşullarının in vivo ve in vitro yöntemlerle saptanması üzerinde araştırmalar. UÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve İncelemeler Serisi, 25, 1-16.
  • French, A.V., O’Rourke P.K., & Cameron, D.G. (1988). Beef production from forage crops in the Brigalow region of Central Queensland 1. Forage sorghums. Tropical Grasslands, 22, 79-84.
  • IPCC (Intergoverment Panel on Climate Change) (2001). Climate change 2001. The scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Kılıç, Ü., & Abdıwalı, M.A. (2016). Alternatif kaba yem kaynağı olarak şarapçılık endüstrisi üzüm atıklarının in vitro gerçek sindirilebilirlikleri ve nispi yem değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 22(6), 895-901, 2016.
  • Landa, S., Molle, G., Fois, N., Friedman, S., Barkai, D., Decandia, M., ... & Sitzia, M. (2005). Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) as a novel pasture species for dairy sheep in the Mediterranean conditions of Sardinia and Israel. Small Ruminant Research, 59(2-3), 239-249.
  • Landau, S., Friedman, S., Brenner, S., Bruckental, I., Weinberg, Z.G., Ashbell, G., ... & Leshem, Y. (2004). The value of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) hay and silage grown under Mediterranean conditions as forage for dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science, 88(3), 263-271.
  • López, S., Makkar, H.P., & Soliva, C.R. (2010). Screening plants and plant products for methane inhibitors. In In vitro screening of plant resources for extra-nutritional attributes in ruminants: nuclear and related methodologies (pp. 191-231). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Menke, H.H, & Steingass, H, (1988). Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value Obtained from Chemical Analysis and in vitro Gas Production Using Rumen Fluid. Animal Research Development, 28, 7-55.
  • Menke, K.H, Raab L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D., & Schneider, W. (1979). The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 93(1), 217-222.
  • Mir, Z., Rushfeldt, M.L., Mir, P.S., Paterson, L.J., &Weselake, R.J. (2000). Effect of dietary supplementation with either conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) or linoleic acid rich oil on the CLA content of lamb tissues. Small Ruminant Research, 36(1), 25-31.
  • Mündel, H.H., & Lethbridge Research Centre (Canada). (2004). Safflower production on the Canadian prairies: revisited in 2004. Lethbridge, Alta. Lethbridge Research Station, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
  • Ørskov, E.R., & McDonald, I. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 92(2), 499-503.
  • Öztürk, H. (2008). Ruminant beslemesinde probiyotik mayalar. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi. 79(3), 37-42
  • Peiretti, P.G. (2017). Nutritional aspects and potential uses of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in livestock. Agricultural Research Updates, 19, 3-22.
  • Redfearn, D.D., Zhang H., & Caddel, J.L. (2004). Forage quality interpretations. division of agricultural sciences and natural resources, Oklahoma State University.
  • Sanderson, R., Lister, S.J., Sargeant, A., & Dhanoa, M.S. (1997). Effect of particle size on in vitro fermentation of silages differing in dry matter content. In Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science (Vol. 1997, pp. 197-197). Cambridge University Press.
  • SPSS, (2011). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows,version20.0. New York: IBM Corp 440.
  • Stanford, K., Wallins, G.L., Lees, B.M., & Mündel, H.H. (2001). Feeding value of immature safflower forage for dry ewes. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 81(2), 289-292.
  • Stanford, K., Wallins, G.L., Lees, B.M, & Mündel, H.H. (2001). Immature safflower forage as a feed for ewes. In Proceedings of the 5th International Safflower Conference, Williston, North Dakota and Sidney, Montana, USA, 23-27 July, 2001. Safflower: a multipurpose species with unexploited potential and world adaptability (pp. 29-32). Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University.
  • Van Dyke, N.J., & Anderson, P.M, (2000). Interpreting aFforage Analysis. Alabama cooperative extension. Circular ANR-890.
  • Van Soest, P.J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell University Press
  • Vermorel, M. (1978). Feed evaluation for ruminants. II. The new energy systems proposed in France. Livestock Production Science, 5(4), 347-365.
  • Vonghia, G., Pinto, F., Ciruzzi, B., & Montemurro, O. (1992). In vivo digestibility and nutritive value of safflower utilized as fodder crop cultivated in Southern Italy. In Livestock in the mediterranean cereal production systems (pp. 127-129). PUDOC, Wageningen.
  • Yavuz, M. (2005). Bazı ruminant yemlerinin nispi yem değeri ve in vitro sindirim değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 97-101
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLE
Authors

Bilal Selçuk 0000-0001-9136-5707

Tuğba Bakır 0000-0003-2185-7137

Tahsin Beycioğlu 0000-0001-5338-8836

Adem Kamalak 0000-0003-0967-4821

Fatih Kıllı 0000-0001-8480-0416

Publication Date April 30, 2023
Submission Date June 27, 2022
Acceptance Date September 11, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023Volume: 26 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Selçuk, B., Bakır, T., Beycioğlu, T., Kamalak, A., et al. (2023). Aspir Samanı Çeşitlerinin Yem Değeri Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 26(2), 424-429. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1136792
 Download Cover Image


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149