Araştırma Makalesi

Determining the Meat Consumption Preferences of Tourists in the Kars Province

Cilt: 27 Sayı: Ek Sayı 1 (Suppl 1) 25 Aralık 2024
PDF İndir
EN TR

Determining the Meat Consumption Preferences of Tourists in the Kars Province

Abstract

This study aimed to understand the meat consumption preferences of local people and tourists in Kars, which is known for its high-goose production and cultural and historical tourism. The AHP method was used to analyze the data, with 250 consumers interviewed through proportional sampling. Fish was the top preferred meat type for 29.18% of visitors, followed by chicken meat (26.41%), red meat (24.64%), and goose meat (19.77%). The most important criteria for meat consumption in Kars were taste (27.08%), price (23.97%), ease of transportation (19.47%), nutritional content (18.18%), and smell (12.20%). In terms of taste, consumers prefer fish as their first choice, followed by goose meat as their second choice. In terms of affordability, chicken and fish are the first choices, followed by fish. They prefer fish and goose meat for their nutritional and safety value. In terms of smell, fish and goose meat are among the most important choices. The demand for organic fish with higher nutritional value from Çıldır Lake is higher than other types of meat. The affordability of chicken and fish also influences consumers' preferences for these meat types. However, loyalty to red meat and chicken remains low in terms of nutrition and safety. To enhance the economic conditions for producers, consumers, and restaurants, it is crucial to streamline the availability of fish, enhance trust and perception of the nutritional value of red and white meat, and make goose meat more cost-effective. This will lead to increased consumption of meat products and improved service opportunities.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Adamski M., Wencek E. (2012). Młoda polska gęś owsiana. Tuszki i elementy młodej polskiej gęsi owsianej. Zeszyt Branżowy Systemu Gwarantowanej Żywności QAFP. Materiały szkoleniowe dla producentów drobiu rzeźnego i zakładów drobiarskich. Wyd. KRD-IG, Warszawa
  2. Adamski, M., Kuzniacka, J., & Milczewska, N. (2017). Preferences of consumers for choosing poultry meat. Pol. J. Natur. Sci, 32(2), 261-271.
  3. Agcakale, F. (2018). Kırmızı Et Talep Tahmini: Erzurum Ili Üzerine Bir Uygulama. (Tez No 531576). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Erzurum Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat ABD]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  4. Akçay, A., Sarıözkan, S., & Serhat, A.L. (2018). Akademik personelin et tüketim tercihlerinin analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ile değerlendirilmesi. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 89(1), 11-24.
  5. Akçay, Y., & Vatansever, Ö. (2013). Kırmızı et tüketimi üzerine bir araştırma: kocaeli ili kentsel alan örneği. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1), 43-60.
  6. Akın, Y., & Çelen, M. F. (2020). Using of bee pollen powder to breeder japanese quails diets and effects on hatching egg quality characteristics and hatching results. Medical Sciences and Biotechnology Book, 169.
  7. Ashitey, E. (2019). Fish and seafood report. global agricultural information network. http://agriexchange.apeda.gov.in/MarketReport/Reports/Fish_and_Seafood_Report_Accra_Ghana_3- 8-2019.pdf (accessed on 11 October 2020).
  8. Becker, T. (2000). Consumer perception of fresh meat quality: a framework for analysis, British Food Journal, 102(2), 158-176.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Tarımsal Yönetimde Pazarlama , Tarım Ekonomisi (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

15 Eylül 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

25 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Ocak 2024

Kabul Tarihi

29 Mayıs 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 27 Sayı: Ek Sayı 1 (Suppl 1)

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aksoy, A., & Uzundumlu, A. S. (2024). Determining the Meat Consumption Preferences of Tourists in the Kars Province. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 27(Ek Sayı 1 (Suppl 1), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1420817

Cited By

21082



2024-JIF = 0.500

2024-JCI = 0.14

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi (International Peer Reviewed Journal)

       Dergimiz, herhangi bir başvuru veya yayımlama ücreti almamaktadır. (Free submission and publication)

      Yılda 6 sayı yayınlanır. (Published 6 times a year)


88x31.png 

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

                 


Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
e-ISSN: 2619-9149