Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Sözleşmeli Üretimin Besi Sığırı Üreticilerinin Geliri Üzerine Etkisi: Eğilim Skoru Eşleştirme Yöntemi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 392 - 399, 30.04.2022

Hasan Burak Ağır , Cuma Akbay

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.896094
Cited By: 3

Öz

Bu çalışma, sözleşmeli üretime katılımın besi sığırı üreticileri gelirleri üzerine etkisini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, veriler 2016 yılında Adana ilinde 155 üreticiden yüz yüze yapılan anketlerden elde edilmiştir. Sözleşmeli üretimin üretici geliri üzerine etkisi Propensity Score Matching (Eğilim Puanı Eşleştirme) kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlara göre, sözleşme yapan üreticilerin sözleşme yapmayanlara göre daha fazla varlığa ve çoğunlukla daha büyük bir sürüye sahip olduğunu saptanmıştır. Ayrıca, sözleşmeye katılım, üretici gelirinde %10.04'lük bir artış sağlamaktadır (p<0.01). Sözleşme yapan işletmelerin çoğunluğunun büyük ölçekli işletmeler olduğu göz önüne alındığında, gelirdeki bu artışın küçük işletme sahiplerini sözleşmeli üretime katılmaya teşvik etmek için yeterli olmadığı söylenebilir. Bu bağlamda, politika yapıcıların işletme ölçeğine uygun teknik yardım sağlamaya odaklanmaları, küçük üreticilerin sözleşmeye katılım oranını artırmak için işletme büyüklüğü ile ters orantılı bir sözleşme fiyatı belirlemeleri ve yayım hizmetlerini artırmaları gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sözleşmeli üretim Besi sığırı Muamele etkisi Eğilim Skoru Eşleştirme

Kaynakça

  • Abdulai Y, Al-Hassan S 2016. Effects of Contract Farming on Small-Holder Soybean Farmers Income In The Eastern Corridor Of The Northern Region, Ghana. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 7(2): 103-113.
  • Alıcı S, Yılmaz G, Kınay A 2011. Investigation of Contracted Tobacco Farming and Grower Behavior in Tokat-Erbaa. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 28(1): 53-59.
  • Austin PC 2011. An İntroduction To Propensity Score Methods for Reducing The Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Beh. Res., 46: 399-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171. 2011.568786
  • Becker SO, Caliendo M 2007. Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment Effects. The Stata Journal 7(1): 71-83.https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700104
  • Bellemare MF 2012. As You Sow, So Shall You Reap: The Welfare Impacts of Contract Farming. World Development, 40(7): 1418–1434. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.008
  • Benmehaia MA, Brabez F 2018. Vertical Relationships and Food Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of Processing Tomato Sector in Algeria. New Medit, A Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agricultural and Environment, 2: 3-14.
  • Begum IA, Alam MJ, Buysse J, Frija A, Huylenbroeck GV 2012. Contract Farmer and Poultry Farm Efficiency in Bangladesh: A Data Envelopment Analysis. Applied Economics, 44(28): 3737-3747. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.581216
  • Bergsta SA, Sepriano A, Ramiro S, Landewe R 2019. Three Handy Tips and A Practical Guide To Improve Propensity Score Models. RMD Open, 5: 1-4.
  • Bijman J 2018. Contract Farming in Developing Countries: An Overview. Development Cooperation, Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2008, pp. 27.
  • Birthal PS, Jha AK, Tiongco MM, Narrod C 2008. Improving Farm-To-Market Linkages Through Contract Farming: A Case Study of Smallholder Dairying In India. Discussion Paper 00814. Int. Food Policy Research Ins. Washington D.C., 2008, pp. 40.
  • Brookhart A, Schneeweis S, Rothman K, Glynn R, Avorn J, Stürmer T 2006. Variable Selection For Propensity Score Models. Am. J. Epidemiol, 163(12): 1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/ kwj149
  • Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some Practical Guidance For The Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1): 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
  • Costales A, Son NT, Lapar ML, Tioncgo M 2006. Smallholder Contract Farming of Swine in Northern Vietnam: Type and Scale of Production. Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative Research Report.
  • Diprete T, Gangl M 2004. Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects: Rosenbaum Bounds on Matching Estimators and Instrumental Variables Estimation with Imperfect Instruments. Sociological Methodology, 34: 271–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00154.x
  • Eaton C, Shepherd A 2001. Contract Farming: Partnerships for Growth. Agricultural Services Bulletin 145, FAO, Rome, 2001, pp.153.
  • Engindeniz S 2008. Comparative economic analysis of contracted-based and non-contract tomato production in Izmir. Alatarım, 7(1): 44-51.
  • GDMMB 2019. General Directory of Meat and Milk Board. Avaliable at: www.esk.gov.tr (Accessed: 15.05. 2019).
  • Guo H, Jolly RW, Zhu J 2005. Contract Farming in China: Supply Chain pr Ball and Chain? In Proceedings of the Minnesota International Economic Development Conference, University of Minnesota, 2005, April 29-30.
  • Guo S, Fraser M W 2015. Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods And Applications. SAGE Publications, London, UK, 409p.
  • Gümüş AH 2019. A Study on The Marketing Situation of Turkey’s Tobacco Production, its Problems And Recommendations for Alternative Marketing Types. PhD thesis, Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Hu WY 2013. Effect of Contract Farming on the U.S. Crop Farmers’ Average Return. Agricultural Economics, CZECH, 59(5): 195–201. https://doi.org/10.17221/100/2012-AGRICECON
  • Khandker SR, Koolwal GB, Samad HA 2010. Handbook on impact evaluation: Quantitative Methods. Washington, DC, World Bank, 2010.
  • Katchova AL 2010. Agricultural Contracts and Alternative Marketing Options: A Matching Analysis. Journal of Agr. and Applied Economics, 42(2): 261–276. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/ S107407 0800003448
  • Key N, Runsten D 1999. Contract Farming, Smallholders, and Rural Development in Latin America: The Organization of Agro Processing Firms and the Scale of Out Grower Production. World Development, 27(2): 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00107
  • Key N, Mcbride W 2003. Production Contracts and Productivity in The U.S. Hog Sector. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 85(1): 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00107
  • Leuven E, Sianesi B 2003. Psmatch2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Iİmbalance Testing. Statistical Software Components.
  • Little P D, Watts M 1994. Living under contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation In Sub-Saharan Africa. Univ of Wisconsin Press.
  • Maertens M, Velde KV 2017. Contract Farming in Staple Food Chains: The Case of Rice in Benin. World Development, 95: 73-87. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.worlddev.2017.02.011
  • Mendola M 2007. Agricultural Technology Adoption and Poverty Reduction: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis for Rural Bangladesh. Food Policy, 32: 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.foodpol.2006.07.003
  • Minot N 2007. Contract Farming in Developing Countries: Patterns, Impact and Policy Implications, Case Study 6-3 Of The Program, Food Policy For Developing Countries: The Role Of Government In The Global Food System, 2007. 14p.
  • Miyata S, Minot N, Hu D 2009. Impact of Contract Farming on Income: Linking Small Farmers, Packers, and Supermarkets in China. World Development, 37(11): 1781-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.025
  • Mwambi MM, Oduol J, Mshenga P, Saidi M 2016. Does contract Farming Improve Smallholder Income? The Case Of Avocado Farmers in Kenya. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 6(1): 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/ JADEE-05-2013-0019
  • Newbold P 1995. Statistics for Business and Economics. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1995.
  • Porter G, Phillips-Howard K 1997. Comparing Contracts: An Evaluation of Contract Farming Schemes in Africa. World Development, 25(2): 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00101-5
  • Rehber E 2007. Contract farming: Theory and practice. ICFAI University Press, Hyderabad, India, 2007.
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB 1983. The Central Role of The Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
  • Rosenbaum PR 2003. Observational Studies. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2002.
  • Rubin DB 2001. Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3): 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020363010465
  • Sarma PK, Ahmed U, AKMA Al-Amin, Fatema K 2014. Determinants of Market Participation in Small Scale Beef Cattle Entrepreneurs: Evidence From Pabna and Sirajganj Districts of Bangladesh. J. Sylhet Agril. Univ., 1(2): 289-297.
  • Setboonsarng S, Leung P, Stefan A 2008. Rice Contract Farming in Lao PDR: Moving From Subsistence to Commercial Agriculture. ADB Institute Discussion Paper, 2008. N. 90. pp. 20.
  • Sianesi B 2004. An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86: 133-155.
  • Turkstat, 2019. Turkish Statistical Institute. Livestock statistics. Avaliable at: www.tuik.gov.tr. (Accessed: March 15, 2019).
  • Wang H, Mouster P, Thi Tan Log N 2014. Economic Impact of Direct Marketing and Contracts: The Case of Safe Vegetable Chains in Northern Vietnam. Food Policy, 47: 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.04.001

Impact of Contract Farming on Beef Cattle Farmers' Income: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 392 - 399, 30.04.2022

Hasan Burak Ağır , Cuma Akbay

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.896094
Cited By: 3

Öz

This study aims to investigate the impact of contract farming participation on the income of beef cattle farmers. For this purpose, the data was collected from 155 farmers by face-to-face questionnaires in Adana province in 2016. The impact of contract farming on farmers’ income was identified using Propensity Score Matching. The results show that farmers who participate in the contract have more assets and mostly have a larger herd in comparison with non-contract. Further, contract participation entails a 10.04% increase in income (p<0.01). Given that most of the contract farms are large-scale, it can be said that this gain in income is not enough for encouraging smallholders to participate in contract farming. The evidence from this study suggests that policymakers should focus on providing appropriate technical assistance, giving price premiums and bonuses inversely proportional to farm-scale and improve extension services to enhance the rate of smallholder contract participation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Contract farming Beef cattle Treatment effect Propensity score matching

Kaynakça

  • Abdulai Y, Al-Hassan S 2016. Effects of Contract Farming on Small-Holder Soybean Farmers Income In The Eastern Corridor Of The Northern Region, Ghana. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 7(2): 103-113.
  • Alıcı S, Yılmaz G, Kınay A 2011. Investigation of Contracted Tobacco Farming and Grower Behavior in Tokat-Erbaa. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 28(1): 53-59.
  • Austin PC 2011. An İntroduction To Propensity Score Methods for Reducing The Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Beh. Res., 46: 399-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171. 2011.568786
  • Becker SO, Caliendo M 2007. Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment Effects. The Stata Journal 7(1): 71-83.https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700104
  • Bellemare MF 2012. As You Sow, So Shall You Reap: The Welfare Impacts of Contract Farming. World Development, 40(7): 1418–1434. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.008
  • Benmehaia MA, Brabez F 2018. Vertical Relationships and Food Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of Processing Tomato Sector in Algeria. New Medit, A Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agricultural and Environment, 2: 3-14.
  • Begum IA, Alam MJ, Buysse J, Frija A, Huylenbroeck GV 2012. Contract Farmer and Poultry Farm Efficiency in Bangladesh: A Data Envelopment Analysis. Applied Economics, 44(28): 3737-3747. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.581216
  • Bergsta SA, Sepriano A, Ramiro S, Landewe R 2019. Three Handy Tips and A Practical Guide To Improve Propensity Score Models. RMD Open, 5: 1-4.
  • Bijman J 2018. Contract Farming in Developing Countries: An Overview. Development Cooperation, Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2008, pp. 27.
  • Birthal PS, Jha AK, Tiongco MM, Narrod C 2008. Improving Farm-To-Market Linkages Through Contract Farming: A Case Study of Smallholder Dairying In India. Discussion Paper 00814. Int. Food Policy Research Ins. Washington D.C., 2008, pp. 40.
  • Brookhart A, Schneeweis S, Rothman K, Glynn R, Avorn J, Stürmer T 2006. Variable Selection For Propensity Score Models. Am. J. Epidemiol, 163(12): 1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/ kwj149
  • Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some Practical Guidance For The Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1): 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
  • Costales A, Son NT, Lapar ML, Tioncgo M 2006. Smallholder Contract Farming of Swine in Northern Vietnam: Type and Scale of Production. Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative Research Report.
  • Diprete T, Gangl M 2004. Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects: Rosenbaum Bounds on Matching Estimators and Instrumental Variables Estimation with Imperfect Instruments. Sociological Methodology, 34: 271–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00154.x
  • Eaton C, Shepherd A 2001. Contract Farming: Partnerships for Growth. Agricultural Services Bulletin 145, FAO, Rome, 2001, pp.153.
  • Engindeniz S 2008. Comparative economic analysis of contracted-based and non-contract tomato production in Izmir. Alatarım, 7(1): 44-51.
  • GDMMB 2019. General Directory of Meat and Milk Board. Avaliable at: www.esk.gov.tr (Accessed: 15.05. 2019).
  • Guo H, Jolly RW, Zhu J 2005. Contract Farming in China: Supply Chain pr Ball and Chain? In Proceedings of the Minnesota International Economic Development Conference, University of Minnesota, 2005, April 29-30.
  • Guo S, Fraser M W 2015. Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods And Applications. SAGE Publications, London, UK, 409p.
  • Gümüş AH 2019. A Study on The Marketing Situation of Turkey’s Tobacco Production, its Problems And Recommendations for Alternative Marketing Types. PhD thesis, Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Hu WY 2013. Effect of Contract Farming on the U.S. Crop Farmers’ Average Return. Agricultural Economics, CZECH, 59(5): 195–201. https://doi.org/10.17221/100/2012-AGRICECON
  • Khandker SR, Koolwal GB, Samad HA 2010. Handbook on impact evaluation: Quantitative Methods. Washington, DC, World Bank, 2010.
  • Katchova AL 2010. Agricultural Contracts and Alternative Marketing Options: A Matching Analysis. Journal of Agr. and Applied Economics, 42(2): 261–276. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/ S107407 0800003448
  • Key N, Runsten D 1999. Contract Farming, Smallholders, and Rural Development in Latin America: The Organization of Agro Processing Firms and the Scale of Out Grower Production. World Development, 27(2): 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00107
  • Key N, Mcbride W 2003. Production Contracts and Productivity in The U.S. Hog Sector. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 85(1): 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00107
  • Leuven E, Sianesi B 2003. Psmatch2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Iİmbalance Testing. Statistical Software Components.
  • Little P D, Watts M 1994. Living under contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation In Sub-Saharan Africa. Univ of Wisconsin Press.
  • Maertens M, Velde KV 2017. Contract Farming in Staple Food Chains: The Case of Rice in Benin. World Development, 95: 73-87. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.worlddev.2017.02.011
  • Mendola M 2007. Agricultural Technology Adoption and Poverty Reduction: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis for Rural Bangladesh. Food Policy, 32: 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.foodpol.2006.07.003
  • Minot N 2007. Contract Farming in Developing Countries: Patterns, Impact and Policy Implications, Case Study 6-3 Of The Program, Food Policy For Developing Countries: The Role Of Government In The Global Food System, 2007. 14p.
  • Miyata S, Minot N, Hu D 2009. Impact of Contract Farming on Income: Linking Small Farmers, Packers, and Supermarkets in China. World Development, 37(11): 1781-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.025
  • Mwambi MM, Oduol J, Mshenga P, Saidi M 2016. Does contract Farming Improve Smallholder Income? The Case Of Avocado Farmers in Kenya. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 6(1): 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/ JADEE-05-2013-0019
  • Newbold P 1995. Statistics for Business and Economics. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1995.
  • Porter G, Phillips-Howard K 1997. Comparing Contracts: An Evaluation of Contract Farming Schemes in Africa. World Development, 25(2): 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00101-5
  • Rehber E 2007. Contract farming: Theory and practice. ICFAI University Press, Hyderabad, India, 2007.
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB 1983. The Central Role of The Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
  • Rosenbaum PR 2003. Observational Studies. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2002.
  • Rubin DB 2001. Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3): 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020363010465
  • Sarma PK, Ahmed U, AKMA Al-Amin, Fatema K 2014. Determinants of Market Participation in Small Scale Beef Cattle Entrepreneurs: Evidence From Pabna and Sirajganj Districts of Bangladesh. J. Sylhet Agril. Univ., 1(2): 289-297.
  • Setboonsarng S, Leung P, Stefan A 2008. Rice Contract Farming in Lao PDR: Moving From Subsistence to Commercial Agriculture. ADB Institute Discussion Paper, 2008. N. 90. pp. 20.
  • Sianesi B 2004. An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86: 133-155.
  • Turkstat, 2019. Turkish Statistical Institute. Livestock statistics. Avaliable at: www.tuik.gov.tr. (Accessed: March 15, 2019).
  • Wang H, Mouster P, Thi Tan Log N 2014. Economic Impact of Direct Marketing and Contracts: The Case of Safe Vegetable Chains in Northern Vietnam. Food Policy, 47: 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.04.001
Toplam 43 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ziraat, Veterinerlik ve Gıda Bilimleri
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ (Research Article)
Yazarlar

Hasan Burak Ağır 0000-0003-4275-9819

Cuma Akbay 0000-0001-7673-7584

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 12 Mart 2021
Kabul Tarihi 3 Haziran 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Ağır, H. B., & Akbay, C. (2022). Impact of Contract Farming on Beef Cattle Farmers’ Income: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 25(2), 392-399. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.896094

Cited By

Participation of smallholder farmers in cattle contract farming: a systematic review
SN Business & Economics
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00736-0
Nijerya'daki Savunmasız Grubun Gıda Güvensizliği ve Diyet Çeşitliliği. Sürücüler ve Başa Çıkma Stratejileri
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1102888
Postharvest Losses in Onion: Causes and Determinants
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1091225
 Kapak Resmi İndir

21082



2022-JIF = 0.500

2022-JCI = 0.170

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi (International Peer Reviewed Journal)

       Dergimiz, herhangi bir başvuru veya yayımlama ücreti almamaktadır. (Free submission and publication)

      Yılda 6 sayı yayınlanır. (Published 6 times a year)


88x31.png 

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

                 


Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
e-ISSN: 2619-9149