Araştırma Makalesi
PDF EndNote BibTex Kaynak Göster

Relationships Between Fish Sizes and Otolith Sizes for Three Different Gray Mullet Species from Köyceğiz Lagoon (Muğla)

Yıl 2022, Cilt 25, Sayı 4, 909 - 915, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.885559

Öz

In this study, the relationships between fish sizes and otolith sizes were investigated in three mullet species from the Köyceğiz Lagoon. Total length of 263 mullets, 119 Mugil cephalus Linnaeus, 1758, 91 Chelon labrosus (Risso, 1827) and 53 Chelon saliens (Risso, 1810), and the length, width and weight of right and left otoliths were measured. The difference between right and left otolith measurements was not statistically significant, thus the average of right and left otolith measurements was used in this study. The average total lengths of mullets were determined as 29.0 cm, 26.0 cm, 22.5 cm for M. cephalus, C. labrosus and C. saliens, respectively. In this study, the largest otolith length was measured in M. cephalus individuals with 11.66 mm, and the smallest otolith length was measured in C. saliens individuals with 2.93 mm. Biometric relationships between otolith measurements and total length have shown that all studied species are quite suitable for reliable size estimates.

Kaynakça

  • Agüera A, Brophy D 2011. Use of saggital otolith shape analysis to discriminate Northeast Atlantic and Western Mediterranean stocks of Atlantic saury, Scomberesox saurus saurus (Walbaum). Fisheries Research, 110(3): 465-471.
  • Akyol O, Kinacigil HT 2001. Comparative body and otolith morphometrics of Mugilidae in Homa Lagoon (Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea). Acta Adriatica, 42(2): 3-14.
  • Aydin R, Calta M, Sen D, Coban MZ 2004. Relationships between fish lengths and otolith length in the population of Chondrostoma regium (Heckel, 1843) inhabiting Keban Dam Lake. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(9): 1550-1553.
  • Battaglia P, Malara D, Romeo T, Andaloro F 2010. Relationships between otolith size and fish size in some mesopelagic and bathypelagic species from the Mediterranean Sea (Strait of Messina, Italy). Scientia Marina, 74: 605–612.
  • Bilge G 2018. Relationship between sagittal otolith size and fish size in Engraulis encrasicolus and Sardina pilchardus (Osteichthyes: Clupeiformes) in the southern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 33(3): 72-76.
  • Bostancı D, Polat N 2008. Benekli Pisi, Lepidorhombus boscii (Risso, 1810)’nın Otolit Yapısı, Otolit Boyutları-Balık Boyu İlişkileri ve Yaş Tayini. Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 2(3): 375-381.
  • Campana SE 2004. Photographic Atlas of Fish Otoliths of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 133, NRC Research Press, 978-0-660-19108-9.
  • Cengiz Ö, Özekinci U, İşmen A, Öztekin A 2012. Saroz Körfezi’ndeki (Kuzey Ege Denizi, Türkiye) benekli pisi balığı’nın, Lepidorhombus boscii (Risso, 1810) total boy-otolit boyu arasındaki ilişki. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(5): 429-434.
  • De La Cruz-Agüero J, Chollet-Villalpando J G, Valle-López FL 2016. Relationships between sagittal otolith length and fish size for 14 mojarra species (Gerreidae: Perciformes) in Mexico. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 16(3): 629-636.
  • Dortbudak M.Y, Ozcan G 2019. Otolith Body Length Relationship of Abu Mullet ((Heckel, 1843)) in Tigris River, Sırnak, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(10): 7088-7091.
  • Felix VR, Martinez-Perez JA, Molina JR, Zuniga REQ, Lopez JF 2013. Morphology and morphometric relationships of the sagitta of Diapterus auratus (Perciformes: Gerreidae) from Veracruz, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical, 61: 139–147.
  • Fortunato RC, Durà VB, Volpedo A 2014. The morphology of saccular otoliths as a tool to identify different mugilid species from the Northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 146: 95-101.
  • Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN, van der Laan R 2020. Eschmeyer's catalog of fishes: genera, species, references, online version. Updated 3 August 2020. https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. Accessed 25 December 2020.
  • Froese R, Pauly D 2019. FishBase. [Version 12/2019] http://www.fishbase.org
  • González-Castro M, Ghasemzadeh J 2016. Morphology and morphometry based taxonomy of Mugilidae. Biology, ecology and culture of grey mullet (Mugilidae). CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 1-21.
  • Harvey JT, Loughlin TR, Perez MA, Oxman DS 2000. Relationship between fish size and otolith length for 63 species of fishes from the eastern North Pacific Ocean. NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle (NOAA Technical Report NMFS, 150).
  • Hüssy K, Hinrichsen HH, Fey DP, Walther Y, Velasco A 2010. The use of otolith microstructure to estimate age in adult Atlantic cod Gadus morhua. Journal of Fish Biology, 76(7): 1640-1654.
  • Jawad LA, Al-Mamry JM 2012. Relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions in the carangid fish (Carangoides coeruleopinnatus (Ruppell, 1830)) collected from the Sea of Oman. Journal of FisheriesSciences. com, 6(3): 203–208.
  • Jawad LA, Ambuali A, Al-Mamry JM, Al-Busaidi HK 2011. Relationships between fish length and otolith length, width and weight of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier, 1817) collected from the Sea of Oman. Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 69(2): 51-61.
  • Longenecker K 2008. Relationships between Otolith Size and Body Size for Hawaiian Reef Fishes1. Pacific science, 62(4): 533-539.
  • Polito MJ, Trivelpiece WZ, Karnovsky NJ, Ng E, Patterson WP, Emslie SD 2011. Integrating stomach content and stable isotope analyses to quantify the diets of pygoscelid penguins. PloS one, 6(10): e26642.
  • Radhakrishnan KV, Liu M, He W, Murphy BR, Xie S 2010. Otolith retrieval from faeces and reconstruction of prey-fish size for Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) wintering at the East Dongting lake National Nature Reserve, China. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 89: 505–512.
  • Salehi V, Hesni MA, Teimori A, Lashkari MR 2016. The sagittal otolith morphology of four selected mugilid species from Iranian waters of the Persian Gulf (Teleostei: Mugilidae). International Journal of Aquatic Biology, 4(5): 318-324.
  • Steward CA, DeMaria KD, Shenker JM 2009. Using otolith morphometrics to quickly and inexpensively predict age in the gray angelfish (Pomacanthus arcuatus). Fisheries Research, 99: 123–129.
  • Şahin T, Güneş E 1998. Relationship between otolith and total lengths of flounder (Pleuronectes flesus luscus Pallas, 1811) collected in eastern Black Sea coasts of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Marine Sciences, 4: 117-123.
  • Turan C 2016. Biogeography and distribution of Mugilidae in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, and North-East Atlantic. In: D Crosetti & SJM Blaber (eds.) Biology, ecology and culture of grey mullets (Mugilidae). CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York. pp. 116–127.
  • Tuset VM, Lombarte A, Assis CA 2008. Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic. Scientia Marina, 72: 7-198.
  • Waessle JA, Lasta CA, Favero M 2003. Otolith morphology and body size relationships for juvenile Sciaenidae in the Rio de la Plata estuary (35-36 °S). Scienta Marina, 67: 233–240.
  • Whitfield AK, Panfili J, Durand JD 2012. A global review of the cosmopolitan flathead mullet Mugil cephalus Linnaeus 1758 (Teleostei: Mugilidae), with emphasis on the biology, genetics, ecology and fisheries aspects of this apparent species complex. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 22(3): 641-681.
  • Wood AD 2005. Using bone measurements to estimate the original sizes of bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) from digested remains. Fishery Bulletin, 103(2): 461–466.
  • Yıldız T 2020. Relationships between fish sizes and otolith sizes of whiting (Merlangius merlangus linnaeus, 1758) from the Western Black Sea. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 35(3): 69-74.

Köyceğiz Lagünü'ndeki (Muğla) Üç Farklı Kefal Türü İçin Balık Boyutları - Otolit Boyutları Arasındaki İlişkiler

Yıl 2022, Cilt 25, Sayı 4, 909 - 915, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.885559

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Köyceğiz Lagünü'ndeki üç kefal balığı türünde balık boyutu ve otolit boyutları arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. 119 adet Mugil cephalus Linnaeus, 1758, 91 adet Chelon labrosus (Risso, 1827) ve 53 adet Chelon saliens (Risso, 1810) olmak üzere toplam 263 adet kefal balığının toplam boyu ile sağ ve sol otolitlerinin boyu, genişliği ölçülmüş ve ağırlıkları tartılmıştır. Sağ ve sol otolit ölçümleri arasında fark istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmadığı için bu çalışmada sağ ve sol otolit ölçümlerinin ortalaması kullanılmıştır. Kefal balıklarının ortalama total boyları M. cephalus, C. labrosus ve C. saliens için sırasıyla 29.0 cm, 26.0 cm, 22.5 cm olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışmada incelenen balıklarda en büyük otolit boyu 11.66 mm ile M. cephalus bireylerinde, en küçük otolit boyu ise 2.93 mm ile C. saliens bireylerinde ölçülmüştür. Otolit ölçümleri ve toplam uzunluk arasındaki biyometrik ilişkiler, incelenen tüm türlerin güvenilir boyut tahminleri için oldukça uygun olduğunu göstermiştir (r2=0.912).

Kaynakça

  • Agüera A, Brophy D 2011. Use of saggital otolith shape analysis to discriminate Northeast Atlantic and Western Mediterranean stocks of Atlantic saury, Scomberesox saurus saurus (Walbaum). Fisheries Research, 110(3): 465-471.
  • Akyol O, Kinacigil HT 2001. Comparative body and otolith morphometrics of Mugilidae in Homa Lagoon (Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea). Acta Adriatica, 42(2): 3-14.
  • Aydin R, Calta M, Sen D, Coban MZ 2004. Relationships between fish lengths and otolith length in the population of Chondrostoma regium (Heckel, 1843) inhabiting Keban Dam Lake. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(9): 1550-1553.
  • Battaglia P, Malara D, Romeo T, Andaloro F 2010. Relationships between otolith size and fish size in some mesopelagic and bathypelagic species from the Mediterranean Sea (Strait of Messina, Italy). Scientia Marina, 74: 605–612.
  • Bilge G 2018. Relationship between sagittal otolith size and fish size in Engraulis encrasicolus and Sardina pilchardus (Osteichthyes: Clupeiformes) in the southern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 33(3): 72-76.
  • Bostancı D, Polat N 2008. Benekli Pisi, Lepidorhombus boscii (Risso, 1810)’nın Otolit Yapısı, Otolit Boyutları-Balık Boyu İlişkileri ve Yaş Tayini. Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 2(3): 375-381.
  • Campana SE 2004. Photographic Atlas of Fish Otoliths of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 133, NRC Research Press, 978-0-660-19108-9.
  • Cengiz Ö, Özekinci U, İşmen A, Öztekin A 2012. Saroz Körfezi’ndeki (Kuzey Ege Denizi, Türkiye) benekli pisi balığı’nın, Lepidorhombus boscii (Risso, 1810) total boy-otolit boyu arasındaki ilişki. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(5): 429-434.
  • De La Cruz-Agüero J, Chollet-Villalpando J G, Valle-López FL 2016. Relationships between sagittal otolith length and fish size for 14 mojarra species (Gerreidae: Perciformes) in Mexico. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 16(3): 629-636.
  • Dortbudak M.Y, Ozcan G 2019. Otolith Body Length Relationship of Abu Mullet ((Heckel, 1843)) in Tigris River, Sırnak, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(10): 7088-7091.
  • Felix VR, Martinez-Perez JA, Molina JR, Zuniga REQ, Lopez JF 2013. Morphology and morphometric relationships of the sagitta of Diapterus auratus (Perciformes: Gerreidae) from Veracruz, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical, 61: 139–147.
  • Fortunato RC, Durà VB, Volpedo A 2014. The morphology of saccular otoliths as a tool to identify different mugilid species from the Northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 146: 95-101.
  • Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN, van der Laan R 2020. Eschmeyer's catalog of fishes: genera, species, references, online version. Updated 3 August 2020. https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. Accessed 25 December 2020.
  • Froese R, Pauly D 2019. FishBase. [Version 12/2019] http://www.fishbase.org
  • González-Castro M, Ghasemzadeh J 2016. Morphology and morphometry based taxonomy of Mugilidae. Biology, ecology and culture of grey mullet (Mugilidae). CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 1-21.
  • Harvey JT, Loughlin TR, Perez MA, Oxman DS 2000. Relationship between fish size and otolith length for 63 species of fishes from the eastern North Pacific Ocean. NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle (NOAA Technical Report NMFS, 150).
  • Hüssy K, Hinrichsen HH, Fey DP, Walther Y, Velasco A 2010. The use of otolith microstructure to estimate age in adult Atlantic cod Gadus morhua. Journal of Fish Biology, 76(7): 1640-1654.
  • Jawad LA, Al-Mamry JM 2012. Relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions in the carangid fish (Carangoides coeruleopinnatus (Ruppell, 1830)) collected from the Sea of Oman. Journal of FisheriesSciences. com, 6(3): 203–208.
  • Jawad LA, Ambuali A, Al-Mamry JM, Al-Busaidi HK 2011. Relationships between fish length and otolith length, width and weight of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier, 1817) collected from the Sea of Oman. Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 69(2): 51-61.
  • Longenecker K 2008. Relationships between Otolith Size and Body Size for Hawaiian Reef Fishes1. Pacific science, 62(4): 533-539.
  • Polito MJ, Trivelpiece WZ, Karnovsky NJ, Ng E, Patterson WP, Emslie SD 2011. Integrating stomach content and stable isotope analyses to quantify the diets of pygoscelid penguins. PloS one, 6(10): e26642.
  • Radhakrishnan KV, Liu M, He W, Murphy BR, Xie S 2010. Otolith retrieval from faeces and reconstruction of prey-fish size for Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) wintering at the East Dongting lake National Nature Reserve, China. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 89: 505–512.
  • Salehi V, Hesni MA, Teimori A, Lashkari MR 2016. The sagittal otolith morphology of four selected mugilid species from Iranian waters of the Persian Gulf (Teleostei: Mugilidae). International Journal of Aquatic Biology, 4(5): 318-324.
  • Steward CA, DeMaria KD, Shenker JM 2009. Using otolith morphometrics to quickly and inexpensively predict age in the gray angelfish (Pomacanthus arcuatus). Fisheries Research, 99: 123–129.
  • Şahin T, Güneş E 1998. Relationship between otolith and total lengths of flounder (Pleuronectes flesus luscus Pallas, 1811) collected in eastern Black Sea coasts of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Marine Sciences, 4: 117-123.
  • Turan C 2016. Biogeography and distribution of Mugilidae in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, and North-East Atlantic. In: D Crosetti & SJM Blaber (eds.) Biology, ecology and culture of grey mullets (Mugilidae). CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York. pp. 116–127.
  • Tuset VM, Lombarte A, Assis CA 2008. Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic. Scientia Marina, 72: 7-198.
  • Waessle JA, Lasta CA, Favero M 2003. Otolith morphology and body size relationships for juvenile Sciaenidae in the Rio de la Plata estuary (35-36 °S). Scienta Marina, 67: 233–240.
  • Whitfield AK, Panfili J, Durand JD 2012. A global review of the cosmopolitan flathead mullet Mugil cephalus Linnaeus 1758 (Teleostei: Mugilidae), with emphasis on the biology, genetics, ecology and fisheries aspects of this apparent species complex. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 22(3): 641-681.
  • Wood AD 2005. Using bone measurements to estimate the original sizes of bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) from digested remains. Fishery Bulletin, 103(2): 461–466.
  • Yıldız T 2020. Relationships between fish sizes and otolith sizes of whiting (Merlangius merlangus linnaeus, 1758) from the Western Black Sea. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 35(3): 69-74.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Temel Bilimler
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ (Research Article)
Yazarlar

İsmail REİS> (Sorumlu Yazar)
Department of Fishing Technology, Faculty of Fisheries, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Kotekli-Mentese 48000 Mugla, Turkey
0000-0003-4599-6780
Türkiye


Celal ATEŞ>
MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0002-7336-0387
Türkiye

Destekleyen Kurum Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi
Proje Numarası 17/119
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ağustos 2022
Başvuru Tarihi 26 Şubat 2021
Kabul Tarihi 9 Eylül 2021
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022, Cilt 25, Sayı 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Reis, İ. & Ateş, C. (2022). Köyceğiz Lagünü'ndeki (Muğla) Üç Farklı Kefal Türü İçin Balık Boyutları - Otolit Boyutları Arasındaki İlişkiler . Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi , 25 (4) , 909-915 . DOI: 10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.885559
  • download

  • Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi (International Peer Reviewed Journal)
  •        Dergimiz, herhangi bir başvuru veya yayımlama ücreti almamaktadır (Free submission and publication).
  •       Yılda 6 sayı yayınlanır. (Published 6 times a year)
  •       88x31.png Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

                 


download