Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Lectotypification of Some Names in Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae)

Yıl 2020, , 402 - 415, 30.04.2020

Ergin Hamzaoğlu

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.636135
Cited By: 1

Öz

In this study,
lectotypifications of 21 valid or synonym names of the genus Dianthus L.
(Caryophyllaceae) were determined. Among these; the types of D. acrochlorus
Stapf, D. haussknechtii Boiss., D.
hypochlorus Boiss. & Heldr., D.
kastembeluensis Freyn & Sint., D. kotschyanus Boiss. & Heldr., D. lydus Boiss., D. micranthus Boiss. & Heldr., D.
multipunctatus Ser. var. gracilior
Boiss., D.
pallens Sibth. & Sm. var. oxylepis Boiss. and D. striatellus Fenzl were based upon the specimens collected from two or more
localities. The types of D. bitlisianus Kotschy ex Boiss., D. brevicaulis Fenzl, D. carmelitarum
Reut. ex Boiss., D. cibrarius Clem., D. hymenolepis Boiss., D. muschianus Kotschy ex Boiss., D.
polycladus Boiss. and D. setisquameus
Hausskn. ex Bornm. were based upon the specimens collected from a single
locality without mentioning any “type”. And D. arpadianus Ade &
Bornm. var. trojanus Bornm. &
Sint., D. engleri Hausskn. &
Bornm. and D. siphonocalyx Blakelock were based upon the specimens for which
multiple “types” were stated. Most of the specimens of the lectotypes
determined in this study were collected from Turkey and the rest came from
Syria and Iraq.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dianthus Typification Turkey Syria Iraq

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

KBAG-111T873

Teşekkür

I am indebted to the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) for financial support (Project No. KBAG-111T873). I also thank the curators of the herbaria in the K, E, P, JE, WU, BM, PH and BR for the virtual images of the type specimens.

Kaynakça

  • Ade A 1934. Dianthus arpadianus Ade et Bornmüller spec. nov. Repertorium Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis, 36: 385-388.
  • Blakelock RA 1948. The Rustam Herbaria, Iraq: Part 1. Systematic List. Kew Bulletin, 3(3): 375-444.
  • Boissier E 1843. Diagnoses Plantarum Orientalium Novarum, vol 1(1). Typographia Ferd. Ramboz, Genevae, 20.
  • Boissier E 1849. Diagnoses Plantarum Orientalium Novarum, vol 1(8). Typographia Ferd. Ramboz, Genevae, 64-69.
  • Boissier E 1867. Flora Orientalis, vol 1. H. Georg, Geneva & Basel, 483-512.
  • Clementi J 1857. Sertulum Orientale seu recensio plantarum in Olympo Bithynico, in agro Byzantino et Hellenico, nonnullisque aliis Orientis Regionibus annis 1849-1850. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, 16: 239-337.
  • Davis PH 1965. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 1. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 10-11.
  • Fenzl E 1842. Pugillus Plantarum Novarum Syria et Tauri Occidentalis Primus. F. Beck, Vindobonae, 10-11.
  • Freyn von J 1893. Plantae Novae Orientales, III. Oesterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 43: 372-377.
  • Haussknecht C 1890. Referat über die auf der Frühjahrshauptversammlung zu Rudolstadt 1890 vorgelegten und besprochenen Pflanzen. Mitteilungen der Geographischen Gesellschaft für Thüringen zu Jena, 9: 10-23.
  • IPNI 2019. The International Plant Names Index, Dianthus acrochlonis. http://www.ipni.org/ipni/plantnamesearchpage.do (Access date: 12.07.2019].
  • Nersesyan AA 2011. Genus Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae) in southern Transcaucasia. Takhtajania, 1: 44-51.
  • Rechinger KH 1988. Dianthus L. (Flora Iranica, vol 163. Akademische Druck-u Verlagsanstalt, Graz) 128-188.
  • Reeve H 1967. Dianthus L. (Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 2. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh: Ed. Davis PH) 99-131.
  • Stapf O 1886. Beitrage zur flora von Lycien, Carien und Mesopotamien. Aun. 1881, 1882, 1883. Plantae collectae a Dre Felix Luschan, II. Theil. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften/Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 51: 347-384.
  • Staples G, Prado J 2018. Clarification is needed in the Code for the nomenclatural status of type specimen photographs. Taxon, 67(5): 833-835.
  • Strid A 1986. Dianthus L. (Mountain Flora of Greece, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 176-200.
  • The Plant List 2019. Dianthus acrochlonis. http://www.theplantlist.org (Access date: 12.07.2019).
  • Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Kusber W-H, Li D-Z, Marhold K, May TW, McNeill J, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Veg 159. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten, 1-254.

Dianthus L.’ta (Caryophyllaceae) Bazı İsimlerin Lektotipifikasyonu

Yıl 2020, , 402 - 415, 30.04.2020

Ergin Hamzaoğlu

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.636135
Cited By: 1

Öz

LBu çalışmada, Dianthus
L. cinsinde (Caryophyllaceae) geçerli veya sinonim durumda olan 21 ismin
lektotipifikasyonu yapıldı. Bunlar arasında; D. acrochlorus Stapf, D.
haussknechtii Boiss., D.
hypochlorus Boiss. & Heldr., D.
kastembeluensis Freyn & Sint., D. kotschyanus Boiss. & Heldr., D. lydus Boiss., D. micranthus Boiss. & Heldr., D. multipunctatus Ser. var. gracilior Boiss., D. pallens Sibth. & Sm. var. oxylepis Boiss. ve D. striatellus Fenzl’de tipler iki veya daha fazla adresten
toplanmış örneklere dayandırılmıştır. D. bitlisianus Kotschy ex Boiss., D. brevicaulis Fenzl, D. carmelitarum
Reut. ex Boiss., D. cibrarius Clem., D. hymenolepis Boiss., D. muschianus Kotschy ex Boiss., D.
polycladus Boiss. ve D. setisquameus
Hausskn. ex Bornm.’da tipler, “tip” belirtmeksizin tek adresten toplanmış
örneklere dayandırılmıştır. Ve D.
arpadianus Ade & Bornm. var. trojanus
Bornm. & Sint., D. engleri
Hausskn. & Bornm. ve D. siphonocalyx
Blakelock’ta ise, birden fazla “tip” olarak belirtilmiş örneklere dayandırılmıştır. Bu çalışmada lektotip
olarak belirlenen örneklerin çoğunluğu Türkiye’den, bir kısmı ise Suriye ve
Irak’tan toplanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dianthus Tipifikasyon Türkiye Suriye Irak

Proje Numarası

KBAG-111T873

Kaynakça

  • Ade A 1934. Dianthus arpadianus Ade et Bornmüller spec. nov. Repertorium Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis, 36: 385-388.
  • Blakelock RA 1948. The Rustam Herbaria, Iraq: Part 1. Systematic List. Kew Bulletin, 3(3): 375-444.
  • Boissier E 1843. Diagnoses Plantarum Orientalium Novarum, vol 1(1). Typographia Ferd. Ramboz, Genevae, 20.
  • Boissier E 1849. Diagnoses Plantarum Orientalium Novarum, vol 1(8). Typographia Ferd. Ramboz, Genevae, 64-69.
  • Boissier E 1867. Flora Orientalis, vol 1. H. Georg, Geneva & Basel, 483-512.
  • Clementi J 1857. Sertulum Orientale seu recensio plantarum in Olympo Bithynico, in agro Byzantino et Hellenico, nonnullisque aliis Orientis Regionibus annis 1849-1850. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, 16: 239-337.
  • Davis PH 1965. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 1. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 10-11.
  • Fenzl E 1842. Pugillus Plantarum Novarum Syria et Tauri Occidentalis Primus. F. Beck, Vindobonae, 10-11.
  • Freyn von J 1893. Plantae Novae Orientales, III. Oesterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 43: 372-377.
  • Haussknecht C 1890. Referat über die auf der Frühjahrshauptversammlung zu Rudolstadt 1890 vorgelegten und besprochenen Pflanzen. Mitteilungen der Geographischen Gesellschaft für Thüringen zu Jena, 9: 10-23.
  • IPNI 2019. The International Plant Names Index, Dianthus acrochlonis. http://www.ipni.org/ipni/plantnamesearchpage.do (Access date: 12.07.2019].
  • Nersesyan AA 2011. Genus Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae) in southern Transcaucasia. Takhtajania, 1: 44-51.
  • Rechinger KH 1988. Dianthus L. (Flora Iranica, vol 163. Akademische Druck-u Verlagsanstalt, Graz) 128-188.
  • Reeve H 1967. Dianthus L. (Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 2. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh: Ed. Davis PH) 99-131.
  • Stapf O 1886. Beitrage zur flora von Lycien, Carien und Mesopotamien. Aun. 1881, 1882, 1883. Plantae collectae a Dre Felix Luschan, II. Theil. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften/Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 51: 347-384.
  • Staples G, Prado J 2018. Clarification is needed in the Code for the nomenclatural status of type specimen photographs. Taxon, 67(5): 833-835.
  • Strid A 1986. Dianthus L. (Mountain Flora of Greece, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 176-200.
  • The Plant List 2019. Dianthus acrochlonis. http://www.theplantlist.org (Access date: 12.07.2019).
  • Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Kusber W-H, Li D-Z, Marhold K, May TW, McNeill J, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Veg 159. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten, 1-254.
Toplam 19 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Yapısal Biyoloji
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ (Research Article)
Yazarlar

Ergin Hamzaoğlu 0000-0001-6053-6796

Proje Numarası KBAG-111T873
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 22 Ekim 2019
Kabul Tarihi 5 Aralık 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020

Kaynak Göster

APA Hamzaoğlu, E. (2020). Lectotypification of Some Names in Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 23(2), 402-415. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.636135

Cited By

Bingöl’den Yeni Bir Çalımsı Dianthus (Caryophyllaceae) Taksonu, Türkiye
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
Ergin HAMZAOĞLU
https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.714530

21082



2022-JIF = 0.500

2022-JCI = 0.170

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi (International Peer Reviewed Journal)

       Dergimiz, herhangi bir başvuru veya yayımlama ücreti almamaktadır. (Free submission and publication)

      Yılda 6 sayı yayınlanır. (Published 6 times a year)


88x31.png 

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

                 


Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
e-ISSN: 2619-9149