Yağışa Bağlı Kuru Şartlarda Dallı Darı (Panicum virgatum L.) Çeşitlerinin 4 ve 5.Yıllardaki Biyokütle Verimi ve Diğer Tarımsal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Erdal Gönülal; Süleyman Soylu

doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.775043

EN TR

Determination of Biomass Yield and Other Agricultural Characteristics of Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) Varieties in Rainfed Conditions in 4th and 5th Years

Abstract

A two-year, 2018 (4th) and 2019 5th), study was conducted to determine the biomass yield and other characteristics of six switchgrass varieties in Konya - Karapınar location under rainfed conditions. Six usedv varieties (Alamo, Shawnee, Kanlow, Shelter, Cave in rock and Trailblazer) were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Study results indicated that fresh biomass yield was 734 kg da-1 for Cave in rock and 1499 kg da-1 for Alamo cutivars. Dry biomass yield was 343 kg/da for Cave in rock and 774 kg/da for Trailblazer. Plant height were determined as 47.8 cm for Cave in rock and 70 cm for Alamo. Tiller number per meter were found as 229.8 in Cave in rock and 448.5 in Trailblazer. Aditionally, tiller weight was 0.78 g for Trailblazer and 1.24 g for Kanlow cultivars. Also, chlorophyll content of Shawnee and Kanlow cultivars were 29.6% and 44.3%, respectively. Stoma conductivity was measured as 22.4 mmol H2O m-2 s-1 for Shawnee and 34.3 mmol H2O m-2 s-1 for Alamo and canopy temperature were determined between 37.7 oC for Kanlow and 43.9 °C for Shawnee. In the study, it was determined that the biomass yield decreased in the fifth year and the highest yield was optained from four varieties including Kanlow, Alamo, Trailblazer and Shelter.

Keywords

Kaynakça

Aimar D, Calafat M, Andrade AM, Carassay L, Bouteau F, Abdala G, Molas ML 2014. Drought Effects on The Early Development Stages of Panicum virgatum L.: Cultivar Differences. Biomass and Bioenergy, 66: 49-59.
Bahar B, Barutçular C, Yağbasanlar T 2003. Yazlık Makarnalık Buğdayda Stoma İletkenliğinin Verim ve Verim Unsurlarıyla İlişkileri. 5. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi 13-17 Ekim 2013, Diyarbakır
Barney JN, Mann JJ, Kayser GB, Blumwald E, Deynze AV, Ditomaso JM 2009. Tolerance of Switchgrass to Extreme Soil Moisture Stress: Ecological Implications. Plant Science, 177: 24–732.
Blum A, Ebercon A 1981. Cell Membrane Stability As a Measure of Drought and Heat Tolerance in Wheat. Crop Science, 21: 43-47.
Casler MD 2012. Switchgrass Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics, in Switchgrass, a Valuable Biomass, Crop for Energy (ed. A. Monti). Springer, London, 29–53.
Çiçek F 2017. Dallı Darı Çeşitlerinin Farklı Gelişme Dönemleri için G.D.D İsteklerinin Tespiti ve Farklı Biçim Sıklıklarına Tepkisinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarla Bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 24-49.
David K, Ragauskas AJ 2010. Switchgrass As An Energy Crop for Biofuel Production: A Review of Its Ligno-cellulosic Chemical Properties. Energy & Environmental Science, 3: 1182-1190.
Evett SR, Howel TA, Schneider AD, Upchurch DR, Wanjura DF 1996. Canopy Temperature Based Automated Irrigation Control, Evaporation and Irrigation Scheduling, al, C. R. C. E. San Antonio: 207-213.

Fischer RA 2001. Selection Traits for Improving Yield Potantial. Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding, In, Eds, p. 148-159.
Geren H, Kavut YT, Topçu GD 2016. Bornova Ekolojik Koşullarında Yetiştirilen Farklı Dallı Darı Genotiplerinin Biyokütle Verimi ve Bazı Tarımsal Özellikleri Üzerine Bir Ön Araştırma. 2. Ulusal Biyoyakıtlar Sempozyumu, 27-30 Eylül Samsun
Giannakopoulos C, Bindi M, Moriondo M, Tin T 2005. Climate Change Impacts in The Mediterranean Resulting Form A 2 °C Global Temperature Rise. A Report for WWF, 14-54.
Ghimire SR, Craven KD 2011. Enhancement of Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) Biomass Production under Drought Conditions by The Ectomycorrhizal Fungus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77: 7063-7067.
Hartman JC, Jesse B, Nippert JB, Springer CJ 2012. Ecotypic Responses of Switchgrass to Altered Precipitation. Functional Plant Biology, 39: 126-136.
Jackson RD, Idso SBRJ, Pinter RJR 1981. Canopy Temperature As a Crop Water Stress Indicator. Water Resources Research, 17: 1133-1138.
JMP 2014. JMP® 11.2.1 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Lıatukas Z, Lemežıenė N, Butkutė B, Cesevıčıenė J, Dabkevıčıenė G 2015. Chlorophyll Values As a Measure of Genetic Variation of Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) Populations under Cool Temperate Climate Conditions. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 102: 159‒166.
Liu Y, Zhang X, Tran H, Shan L, Kim J, Childs K, Ervin EH, Frazier T, Zhao B 2015. Assessment of Drought Tolerance of 49 Switchgrass Genotypes Using Physiological and Morphological Parameters. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 8 : 152.
Ma Z, Wood CW, Bransby DI 2000. Soil Management Impacts on Soil Carbon Sequestration by Switchgrass. Biomass and Bioenergy, 18: 469-477.
Meyer E, Aspinwall MJ, Lowry DB, Palacio-Mejía J, Logan TL, Fay PA, Juenger TE 2014. Integrating Transcriptional, Metabolomic, and Physiological Responses to Drought Stress and Recovery in Switchgrass. BMC Genomics, 15: 527-541.
Mitchell R, Schmer M 2012. Switchgrass, Harvest and Storage. In: Green Energy and Technology, Eds,
Min D, Guragain YN, Prasad V, Vadlani PV, Lee J 2017. Effects of Different Genotypes of Switchgrass As a Bioenergy Crop on Yield Components and Bioconversion Potential. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, 7: 27-35.
Nasso NND, Lasorella MV, Roncucci N, Bonari E 2015. Soil Texture and Crop Management Affect Switchgrass Productivity in The Mediterranean. Industrial Crops and Products, 65: 21-26.
Rashid A, Stark JC, Tanveer A, Mustafa T 1999. Use of Canopy Temperature Measurements As a Screening Tool for Drought Tolerance in Spring Wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 182: 231-238.
Reynolds M, Skovmand B, Trethowan R, Pfeiffer W 1999. Evaluating A Conceptual Model for Drought Tolerance. In: In Molecular Approaches for The Genetic Improvement of Cereals for Stable Production in Water-Limited Environments, Eds: M. Ribaut, a. D. P., p. 49-53.
Soylu S, Sade B, Öğüt H, Akınerdem F, Babaoğlu M, Ada R, Eryılmaz T, Öztürk Ö, Oğuz H 2010. Investigation of Agronomic Potential of Switchgrass As an Alternative Biofuel and Biomass Crop for Turkey. 18th European Biomass Conforence, Lyon Fransa.
Şeflek A 2010. Dallı darı (Panicum virgatum L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim, Bazı Morfolojik, Fenolojik ve Fizyolojik Özelliklerinin Tespiti. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarla Bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 26-52.
Yürekli K, Anlı AS 2008. Standartlaştırılmış Yağış İndeksi ile Karaman İli Kuraklığının Analizi. Konya Kapalı Havzası Yer Altı Suyu ve Kuraklık Konferansı 11-12 Eylül 2008, Konya
Zhu Y, Fan X, Hou X, Wu J, Wang T 2014. Effect of Different Levels of Nitrogen Deficiency on Switchgrass Seedling Growth. The Crop Journal, 2: 223-234

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Ziraat, Veterinerlik ve Gıda Bilimleri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Erdal Gönülal ^*
0000-0002-1621-0892
Türkiye

Süleyman Soylu
0000-0002-0420-5033
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

28 Temmuz 2020

Kabul Tarihi

22 Eylül 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.775043

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA66XL95MY

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Gönülal, E., & Soylu, S. (2021). Yağışa Bağlı Kuru Şartlarda Dallı Darı (Panicum virgatum L.) Çeşitlerinin 4 ve 5.Yıllardaki Biyokütle Verimi ve Diğer Tarımsal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 24(3), 570-578. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.775043