Research Article

Determination of the Potential of Some Legume Forage Crops as Bee Pasture

Volume: 29 Number: 2 January 21, 2026
EN TR

Determination of the Potential of Some Legume Forage Crops as Bee Pasture

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the potential of some cultivated legume forage crops to be used as bee pasture. Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz), sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), and white clover (Trifolium repens L.) were used as plant materials. The study was conducted during the 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 growing seasons under the ecological conditions of Bingöl. In the first year, Hungarian vetch was the first plant visited by bees, while sainfoin and white clover were visited around the same time. In the second year, sainfoin was the first, followed closely by Hungarian vetch and white clover. Based on two-year averages, white clover was open to bee visitation for 54 days, sainfoin for 34 days, and Hungarian vetch for 16 days. The average number of honeybee visits over the two years was 19.9 in Hungarian vetch, 36.35 in sainfoin, and 39.65 in white clover. Differences in the number of bee visits, time spent on the flower, and the number of flowers per m2 in 2021 and 2022 were statistically significant for all three forage crops. In 2021, plant height was found statistically insignificant. According to two-year average correlation data, the time bees spent on the flowers and the number of flowers per square meter in all plants. As a result, it was concluded that the forage plants used in the study have the potential to be used as a bee pasture, serving both as a roughage and as forage for bees. This approach may offer an alternative to reduce or eliminate itinerant beekeeping. Additionally, the use of these plants as a honeybee pasture in Bingöl and similar ecological conditions would be beneficial for both productivity and producers. However, as this is one of the first studies on bee pasture, further research is recommended.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Bingöl University

Project Number

PİKOM-Bitki.2019.001

Ethical Statement

This study does not require any ethical declaration.

Thanks

This study was supported by Bingöl University Pilot University Coordination Center Unit (Project No: PİKOM-Bitki.2019.001).

References

  1. Açıkgöz, E. (2001). Yem bitkileri (Yenilenmiş 3. Baskı). Uludağ Üniversitesi Vakfı Yayın No: 182. Bursa. Aygün, C., Kara, İ., Erdoğdu, İ., & Atalay, A. K. (2018). Onobrychis hypargyrea Boiss tüylü korunga karakterizasyonu çalışmaları. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 11(2), 47–55. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/biodicon/issue/55721/761904
  2. Aygün, C., & Olgun, M. (2014). Determination of genotypic performances of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) collected from natural pastures. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 73–84. https://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/en/pub/issue/2268/29940
  3. Balabanlı, C., Avcıoğlu, R., Hatipoğlu, R., & Karadağ, Y. (2009). Macar fiği (Vicia pannonica Crantz.), Baklagil yem bitkileri. Cilt II. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Üretim ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü, s. 26-27. İzmir.
  4. Couvillon, M. J., Schürch, R., & Ratnieks, F. L. (2014). Dancing bees communicate a foraging preference for rural lands in high-level agri-environment schemes. Current Biology, 24(2014), 1212–1215.
  5. Çaçan, E., Kutlu, M. A., Uçar, R., Özdemir, S., Ekmekçi, M., Mokhtarzadeh, S., & Kökten, K. (2022a). Yemlik kolzanın farklı ekim normlarının bazı verim özelliklerine etkisi ve arı merası olarak değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 22(1), 5–15. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uluaricilik/issue/69901/1013621
  6. Çaçan, E., Kökten, K., Mokhtarzadeh, S., Uçar, R., Özdemir, S., Ekmekçi, M., & Kutlu, M. A. (2022b July 26-28). Arı merası olarak değerlendirilen yemlik kolzadan elde edilen kesin verim ve kalite açısından değerlendirilmesi. II-International Conference on Global Practice of Multidisciplinary Scientific Studies, Batumi, Georgia.
  7. Çaçan, E., Kutlu, M. A., Uçar, R., Özdemir, S., Kökten, K., Mokhtarzadeh, S., & Ekmekçi, M. (2023). Comparison of honey, pollen and propolis amounts and honey quality obtained from bee pasture and highland. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 23(2), 190–201. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uluaricilik/issue/80885/1344339
  8. Çeçen, S., Öten, M., & Erdurmuş, C. (2015). Antalya doğal florasında bulunan korunga (Onobrychis sativa L.) popülasyonlarının toplanması ve morfolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Derim, 32(1), 63–70. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/derim/issue/4578/62687

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Pasture-Meadow Forage Plants

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

January 21, 2026

Publication Date

January 21, 2026

Submission Date

October 15, 2024

Acceptance Date

August 15, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 29 Number: 2

APA
Uçar, R., Kökten, K., Çaçan, E., Ozdemir, S., Ekmekçi, M., Kutlu, M. A., & Mokhtarzadeh, S. (2026). Determination of the Potential of Some Legume Forage Crops as Bee Pasture. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 29(2), 382-395. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1567784


International Peer Reviewed Journal
Free submission and publication
Published 6 times a year



88x31.png


KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

e-ISSN: 2619-9149