Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars

İbrahim Kutalmış Kutsal; Hüseyin Karlıdağ

doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1785217

TR EN

Bazı Kayısı Çeşitlerinde Kuraklık Koşullarına Morfolojik Tepkilerin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Abstract

Kuraklık, yarı kurak bölgelerde kayısı yetiştiriciliğini sınırlayan en önemli stres faktörlerden biridir. Ticari değeri yüksek Hacıhaliloğlu gibi çeşitlerin kuraklığa duyarlılığı, Malatya gibi yarı kurak bölgelerde sürdürülebilir kayısı üretimi açısından risk oluşturmaktadır. İklim değişikliğine bağlı olarak tarımda kullanılabilir suyun giderek daha kısıtlı hale gelmesi bu sorunu derinleştirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, on bir geleneksel ve yaygın olarak yetiştirilen kayısı çeşidi ile bu çeşitlerin aşılandığı, aşısız şahit olarak kullanılan çöğür materyalinin tam sulama ve sulamasız koşullardaki morfolojik tepkileri incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla, sürgün uzunluğu, yaprak alanı, spesifik yaprak ağırlığı, yaş ve kuru ağırlık olmak üzere beş morfolojik parametre entegre edilerek toplam zarar indeksi hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmada sürgün uzunluğu, yaprak alanı, spesifik yaprak ağırlığı, bitki yaş ve kuru ağırlıkları ölçülmüş; kuraklığa duyarlılığı değerlendirmek amacıyla bireysel stres tolerans indeksleri ve toplam zarar indeksi hesaplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, çeşitler arasında kuraklığa duyarlılık bakımından önemli farklılıklar olduğunu göstermiştir. Hacıhaliloğlu en yüksek toplam zarar indeksine (169.34) sahip olurken, bunu Şalak (145.26) ve Çöloğlu (137.58) izlemiştir. Kabaaşı (104.29), Hasanbey (108.33) ve Soğancı (112.64) ise daha yüksek kuraklık dayanıklılığı göstermiştir. Hacıhaliloğlu’nda yaprak alanı (%35.68) ve sürgün uzunluğunda (%35.80) ciddi azalmalar belirlenirken, Kabaaşı çeşidinde yaş (%18.99) ve kuru ağırlıktaki (%27.56) kayıplar sınırlı kalmıştır. Spesifik yaprak ağırlığında tüm çeşitlerde azalma gözlenmiş, en düşük azalma Tokaloğlu’nda (%6.53) kaydedilmiştir. Hacıhaliloğlu’nun toplam zarar indeksi, Kabaaşı’ya kıyasla yaklaşık %60 daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Bulgular, geleneksel kayısı çeşitleri arasında kuraklık toleransının değişkenlik gösterdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Kabaaşı ve Hasanbey çeşitleri kurak bölgelerde yetiştiricilik için umut vadeden genotipler olarak öne çıkarken, ticari değeri yüksek Hacıhaliloğlu çeşidinin sulama kısıtı altında uzun vadeli adaptasyon kapasitesinin sınırlı olabileceğini ve kuraklık koşullarında sürdürülebilir üretim açısından risk oluşturabileceğini ortaya koymuştur. Çalışma, kayısı ıslah programları için çeşit seçimi, bölgesel adaptasyon ve kuraklığa tolerans konularında önemli bilgiler sunmaktadır. Ayrıca, kuraklığa toleranslı olarak bulunan çeşitlerin anaç olarak kullanımı gelecekte ticari bahçelerde stresin azaltılmasına katkı sağlayabilir. Ancak bu çalışma sera/saksı koşullarında yürütüldüğünden, elde edilen bulgular bu bağlamda değerlendirilmeli ve daha geniş bir geçerlilik için bahçe koşullarında doğrulanmalıdır.

Keywords

Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the major limiting factors for apricot cultivation in semi-arid regions, where water availability is increasingly unreliable due to climate change. The drought sensitivity of commercially important cultivars such as ‘Hacıhaliloğlu’ poses a risk for sustainable apricot production in regions like Malatya. This study aimed to evaluate the morphological responses of 11 traditional, widely cultivated apricot cultivars and 1 wild seedling genotype (Çöğür) under full irrigation and no-irrigation treatments. An integrated damage index was calculated from five morphological traits (shoot length, leaf area, specific leaf weight, and fresh and dry weights) to quantify drought sensitivity. Morphological traits, including shoot length, leaf area, specific leaf weight, plant fresh and dry weight, were measured. Individual stress tolerance indices and an overall damage index were calculated to assess drought sensitivity among cultivars. Significant genotypic variation in morphological sensitivity to drought was observed. Hacıhaliloğlu exhibited the highest cumulative damage index (169.34), followed by Şalak (145.26) and Çöloğlu (137.58), indicating pronounced susceptibility. In contrast, Kabaaşı (104.29), Hasanbey (108.33), and Soğancı (112.64) demonstrated superior drought resilience. Trait-specific responses showed severe reductions in leaf area (35.68%) and shoot length (35.80%) in Hacıhaliloğlu, while Kabaaşı maintained relatively stable biomass, with limited declines in fresh (18.99%) and dry weight (27.56%). Tokaloğlu recorded the smallest reduction in specific leaf weight (6.53%). The total damage index of Hacıhaliloğlu was approximately 60% higher than Kabaaşı. These findings emphasize the variability in drought tolerance among traditional apricot cultivars, highlighting Kabaaşı and Hasanbey as promising candidates for cultivation in drought-prone regions. In contrast, the high commercial value cultivar Hacıhaliloğlu may exhibit limited long-term adaptive capacity under reduced irrigation, posing a potential risk to the sustainability of apricot production in water-limited environments. This study provides valuable insights for cultivar selection, regional adaptation, and breeding programs targeting drought tolerance. Further research on the use of drought-tolerant cultivars as rootstocks could improve stress mitigation strategies in apricot orchards. However, as this study was conducted under greenhouse pot conditions, the findings should be interpreted within this context and validated under orchard conditions to ensure broader applicability.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

TÜBİTAK

Project Number

120O669

Ethical Statement

We declare that the study does not require the approval of an ethics committee

Thanks

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK) under the research project No. 120O669

References

Abbaspour, H., Saeidi-Sar, S., & Afshari, H. (2011). Improving drought tolerance of Pistacia vera L. seedlings by arbuscular mycorrhiza under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 5(32), 7010–7018. https://doi.org/10.5897/jmpr11.1448
Abdolahipour, M., Kamgar-Haghighi, A. A., Sepaskhah, A. R., Zand-Parsa, S., Honar, T., & Razzaghi, F. (2019). Time and amount of supplemental irrigation at different distances from tree trunks influence on morphological characteristics and physiological responses of rainfed fig trees under drought conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 253, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.023
Ahmed, Ch. B., Rouina, B. B., Sensoy, S., Boukhris, M., & Abdallah, F. B. (2009). Changes in gas exchange, proline accumulation and antioxidative enzyme activities in three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 67(2), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envexpbot.2009.07.006
Aljemaa, B. A. (2020). Determination of Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Responses of Some Pistacia Genotypes to Drought Stress[PhD Thesis, Selcuk University, Institute of Science, Department of Horticulture. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center (Türkiye)]
Asma, B. M., Yiğit, E., & Akça, Y. (1994). A study on the determination of tolerance of important apricot cultivars to low temperatures. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(1), 87–94
Aydın, Y. (2022). Quantification of water requirement of some major crops under semi-arid climate in Turkey. PeerJ, 10, e13696. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13696
Bakhoum, G. Sh., Sadak, M. Sh., & Thabet, M. S. (2023). Induction of Tolerance in Groundnut Plants Against Drought Stress and Cercospora Leaf Spot Disease with Exogenous Application of Arginine and Sodium Nitroprusside Under Field Conditions. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 23(4), 6612–6631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01514-x
Bashir, S. S., Hussain, A., Hussain, S. J., Wani, O. A., Zahid Nabi, S., Dar, N. A., Baloch, F. S., & Mansoor, S. (2021). Plant drought stress tolerance: Understanding its physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 35(1), 1912–1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2021.2020161

Blaya-Ros, P. J., Blanco, V., Torres-Sánchez, R., & Domingo, R. (2021). Drought-Adaptive Mechanisms of Young Sweet Cherry Trees in Response to Withholding and Resuming Irrigation Cycles. Agronomy, 11(9), 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091812
Bolat, I., Dikilitas, M., Ercisli, S., Ikinci, A., & Tonkaz, T. (2014). The Effect of Water Stress on Some Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Characteristics and Bud Success on Apple and Quince Rootstocks. The Scientific World Journal,2014:769732, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/769732
Bouremani, N., Cherif-Silini, H., Silini, A., Bouket, A. C., Luptakova, L., Alenezi, F. N., Baranov, O., & Belbahri, L. (2023). Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): A Rampart against the Adverse Effects of Drought Stress. Water, 15(3), 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030418
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany, 103(4), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn125
Chen, Y., Yao, Z., Sun, Y., Wang, E., Tian, C., Sun, Y., Liu, J., Sun, C., & Tian, L. (2022). Current Studies of the Effects of Drought Stress on Root Exudates and Rhizosphere Microbiomes of Crop Plant Species. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(4), 2374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042374
Chieb, M., & Gachomo, E. W. (2023). The role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant drought stress responses. BMC Plant Biology, 23(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04403-8
Cornelissen, J. H. C., Lavorel, S., Garnier, E., Diaz, S., Buchmann, N., Gurvich, D. E., Reich, P. B., ter Steege, H., Morgan, H. D., van der Heijden, M. G. A., Pausas, J. G., & Poorter, H. (2003). A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 51(4), 335-380. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT02124
Cui, Y., Wang, J., Wang, X., & Jiang, Y. (2015). Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity for Drought Tolerance among and within Perennial Ryegrass Accessions. HortScience, 50(8), 1148–1154. https://doi.org/10.21273/ hortsci.50.8.1148
Çağlayan, K., & Yurdakul, S. (2017). Sharka disease (Plum pox virus) in Turkey: The past, present and future. Acta Horticulturae, 1163, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2017.1163.11
Dichio, B., Xiloyannis, C., Sofo, A., & Montanaro, G. (2007). Effects of post-harvest regulated deficit irrigation on carbohydrate and nitrogen partitioning, yield quality and vegetative growth of peach trees. Plant and Soil, 290(1–2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9144-x
FAO. (2024). FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat (Acess date: 22.06.2025)
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., & Basra, S. M. A. (2009). Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. In E. Lichtfouse, M. Navarrete, P. Debaeke, V. Souchère, & C. Alberola (Eds.), Sustainable agriculture (pp. 153–188). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Galmés, J., Medrano, H., & Ribas‐Carbó, M. (2006). Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: Responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 127(3), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00621.x
Fouad, M. O., Essahibi, A., Benhiba, L., & Qaddoury, A. (2014). Effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the protection of olive plants against oxidative stress induced by drought. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(3), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014123-4815
Galmés, J., Medrano, H., & Flexas, J. (2007). Photosynthesis and photoinhibition in response to drought in a pubescent (var. Minor) and a glabrous (var. Palaui) variety of Digitalis minor. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 60(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.08.001
Glerum, C. (1985). Frost hardiness of coniferous seedlings: principles and applications, pp. 107--123. Proceedings, Evaluation Seedling Quality: Principles.
Gohari, S., Imani, A., Talaei, A. R., Abdossi, V., & Asghari, M. R. (2023). Physiological Responses of Almond Genotypes to Drought Stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 70(6), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1021443723601751
Guerfel, M., Baccouri, O., Boujnah, D., & Zarrouk, M. (2008). Changes in lipid composition, water relations and gas exchange in leaves of two young ‘Chemlali’ and ‘Chetoui’ olive trees in response to water stress. Plant and Soil, 311(1–2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9663-8
Hojjati, M., Ghanbari Jahromi, M., Abdossi, V., & Torkashvand, A. M. (2024). Enhancing Sweet Cherry Yield and Quality Under Drought Stress Through Melatonin Foliar Spraying. Applied Fruit Science, 66(6), 2239–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-024-01200-x
Karlıdağ, H., & Ercişli, S. (2010). The influence of rootstocks on frost damage in apricot cvs. Kabaaşı and Hacıhaliloğlu. Acta Horticulturae, 86(2), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2010.862.48
Hu, F., Zhang, Y., & Guo, J. (2023). Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic physiological characteristics, leaf microstructure, and related gene expression of yellow horn. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 18(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2023.2215025
Imran, M., Mpovo, C. L., Aaqil Khan, M., Shaffique, S., Ninson, D., Bilal, S., Khan, M., Kwon, E.-H., Kang, S.-M., Yun, B.-W., & Lee, I.-J. (2023). Synergistic Effect of Melatonin and Lysinibacillus fusiformis L. (PLT16) to Mitigate Drought Stress via Regulation of Hormonal, Antioxidants System, and Physio-Molecular Responses in Soybean Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(10), 8489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108489
Islam, M. J., Uddin, M. J., Hossain, M. A., Henry, R., Begum, Mst. K., Sohel, Md. A. T., Mou, M. A., Ahn, J., Cheong, E. J., & Lim, Y.-S. (2022). Exogenous putrescine attenuates the negative impact of drought stress by modulating physio-biochemical traits and gene expression in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). PLoS One, 17(1), e0262099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262099
Kaya, O., Kose, C., & Gecim, T. (2018). An exothermic process involved in the late spring frost injury to flower buds of some apricot cultivars (Prunus armenica L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 241, 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.07.019
Khoyerdi, F. F., Shamshiri, M. H., & Estaji, A. (2016). Changes in some physiological and osmotic parameters of several pistachio genotypes under drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 198, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.028
Kumari, A., Lakshmi, G. A., Krishna, G. K., Patni, B., Prakash, S., Bhattacharyya, M., Singh, S. K., & Verma, K. K. (2022). Climate Change and Its Impact on Crops: A Comprehensive Investigation for Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy, 12(12), 3008. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123008
Li, P., Zhang, Y., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2018). Drought stress impact on leaf proteome variations of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau of China. 3 Biotech, 8(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1088-3
Lupitu, A., Moisa, C., Bortes, F., Peteleu, D., Dochia, M., Chambre, D., Ciutină, V., Copolovici, D. M., & Copolovici, L. (2023). The Impact of Increased CO2 and Drought Stress on the Secondary Metabolites of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. Botrytis) and Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Capitata). Plants, 12(17), 3098. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173098
Ma, J., Zhang, J., Wang, J., Khromykh, V., Li, J., & Zhong, X. (2023). Global Leaf Area Index Research over the Past 75 Years: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 15(4), 3072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043072
Mahajan, S., & Tuteja, N. (2005). Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 444(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2005.10.018
Meng, X., Bai, S., Wang, S., Pan, Y., Chen, K., Xie, K., Wang, M., & Guo, S. (2023). The sensitivity of photosynthesis to magnesium deficiency differs between rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1164866, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1164866
Ödemiş, B., & Kazgöz Candemir, D., (2023). The Effects of Water Stress on Cotton Leaf Area and Leaf Morphology. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 26 (1), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.992764
Ölmez, H., Celik, B., & Misirli, A. (2024). Evaluation of Physiological Changes in Important Dried Apricot Varieties Under Drought Stress. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 12(1), 2089–2096. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12is1.2089-2096.7088
Osone, Y., Ishida, A., & Tateno, M. (2008). Correlation between relative growth rate and specific leaf area requires associations of specific leaf area with nitrogen absorption rate of roots. New Phytologist, 179(2), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02476.x
Parvaneh, T., & Afshari, H. (2013). Comparative study of the response of different almond rootstocks to water stress. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4(9), 2244–2250.
Pérez-Méndez, N., Miguel-Rojas, C., Jimenez-Berni, J. A., Gomez-Candon, D., Pérez-de-Luque, A., Fereres, E., Catala-Forner, M., Villegas, D., & Sillero, J. C. (2021). Plant Breeding and Management Strategies to Minimize the Impact of Water Scarcity and Biotic Stress in Cereal Crops under Mediterranean Conditions. Agronomy, 12(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010075
Phuong Thao, N., & Phan Tran, L.-S. (2016). Editorial (Thematic Issue: Enhancement of Plant Productivity in the Post-Genomics Era). Current Genomics, 17(4), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920291704160607182507
Rahmati, M., Davarynejad, G. H., Génard, M., Bannayan, M., Azizi, M., & Vercambre, G. (2015). Peach Water Relations, Gas Exchange, Growth and Shoot Mortality under Water Deficit in Semi-Arid Weather Conditions. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0120246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120246
Rostami, A. A., & Rahemi, M. (2013). Responses of caprifig genotypes to water stress and recovery. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences, 7(21), 131–139.
Rouached, H., Pal, S., Rachmilevitch, S., Libault, M., & Tran, L.-S. P. (2015). Plants Coping Abiotic and Biotic Stresses: A Tale of Diligent Management. BioMed Research International, 2015, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/754754
Rouhi, V., Samson, R., Lemeur, R., & Damme, P. V. (2007). Photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics in three different almond species during drought stress and subsequent recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.10.001
Ru, C., Hu, X., Chen, D., & Wang, W. (2023). Droughts and Thermo-Priming Enhance Acclimation to Later Drought and Heat Stress in Maize Seedlings by Improving Leaf Physiological Activity. Agronomy, 13(4), 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041124
Ruiz, J. J., García-Martínez, S., Picó, B., Gao, M., & Quiros, C. F. (2005). Genetic Variability and Relationship of Closely Related Spanish Traditional Cultivars of Tomato as Detected by SRAP and SSR Markers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 130(1), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.130.1.88
Ruiz-Sánchez, M. C., Torrecillas, A., Pérez-Pastor, A., & Domingo, R. (2000). Regulated Deficit Irrigation in Apricot Trees. Acta Horticulturae, 537, 759–766. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2000.537.90
Sen, B., Topcu, S., Türkeș, M., Sen, B., & Warner, J. (2012). Projecting climate change, drought conditions and crop productivity in Turkey. Climate Research, 52, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01074
Shen, H., Zhao, B., Xu, J., Zheng, X., & Huang, W. (2016). Effects of Salicylic Acid and Calcium Chloride on Heat Tolerance in Rhododendron ‘Fen Zhen Zhu.’ Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 141(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.141.4.363
Siddiqui, M. H., Khan, M. N., & Singh, V. P. (2022). Hot and dry: How plants can thrive in future climates. Plant Cell Reports, 41(3), 497–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-022-02843-4
Taskin, E., Boselli, R., Fiorini, A., Misci, C., Ardenti, F., Bandini, F., Guzzetti, L., Panzeri, D., Tommasi, N., Galimberti, A., Labra, M., Tabaglio, V., & Puglisi, E. (2021). Combined Impact of No-Till and Cover Crops with or without Short-Term Water Stress as Revealed by Physicochemical and Microbiological Indicators. Biology, 10(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10010023
Torrecillas, A., Alarcón, J. J., Domingo, R., Planes, J., & Sánchez-Blanco, M. J. (1996). Strategies for drought resistance in leaves of two almond cultivars. Plant Science, 118(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(96)04434-2
Torrecillas, A., Galego, R., Pérez-Pastor, A., & Ruiz-Sánchez, M. C. (1999). Gas exchange and water relations of young apricot plants under drought conditions. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 132(4), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859699006577
TÜİK. (2023). Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri: Meyve Üretim Miktarları. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/ (Access date: 25.06.2025)
Ulubaş Serçe, C., Gazel, M., Çağlayan, K., Asma, B. M., & Badenes, M. L. (2015). Screening for resistance to plum pox virus in some local Turkish apricot cultivars and their crosses by molecular markers. Acta Horticulturae, 1063, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2015.1063.17
Viljevac, M., Dugalić, K., Mihaljević, I., Šimić, D., Sudar, R., Jurković, Z., & Lepeduš, H. (2013). Chlorophyll content, photosynthetic efficiency and genetic markers in two sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) genotypes under drought stress. Acta Botanica Croatica, 72(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.2478/botcro-2013-0003
Wang, M., Wang, R., Mur, L. A. J., Ruan, J., Shen, Q., & Guo, S. (2021). Functions of silicon in plant drought stress responses. Horticulture Research, 8(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00681-1
Xu, Q., Fu, H., Zhu, B., Hussain, H. A., Zhang, K., Tian, X., Duan, M., Xie, X., & Wang, L. (2021). Potassium Improves Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants by Affecting Root Morphology, Root Exudates, and Microbial Diversity. Metabolites, 11(3), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11030131
Yadollahi, A., Arzani, K., Ebadi, A., Wirthensohn, M., & Karimi, S. (2011). The response of different almond genotypes to moderate and severe water stress in order to screen for drought tolerance. Scientia Horticulturae, 129(3), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.04.007
Yavas, I., Jamal, M. A., Ul Din, K., Ali, S., Hussain, S., & Farooq, M. (2023). Drought-Induced Changes in Leaf Morphologyand Anatomy: Overview, Implicationsand Perspectives. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33, 1517-1530 https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/174476
Yildirim, T., & Asik, S. (2018). Index-based Assessment of Agricultural Drought using Remote Sensing in the Semi-arid Region of Western Turkey. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(4), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.15832/ ankutbd.337136
Zhang, Z., Guo, L., Sun, H., Wu, J., Liu, L., Wang, J., Wang, B., Wang, Q., Sun, Z., & Li, D. (2023). Melatonin Increases Drought Resistance through Regulating the Fine Root and Root Hair Morphology of Wheat Revealed with RhizoPot. Agronomy, 13(7), 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071881
Zhao, J., Hartmann, H., Trumbore, S., Ziegler, W., & Zhang, Y. (2013). High temperature causes negative whole‐plant carbon balance under mild drought. New Phytologist, 200(2), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12400
Zokaee-Khosroshahi, M., Esna-Ashari, M., Ershadi, A., & Imani, A. (2014). Morphological Changes in Response to Drought Stress in Cultivated and Wild Almond Species. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 1(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhst.2014.50520

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Plant Physiology, Pomology and Treatment

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

İbrahim Kutalmış Kutsal ^*
0000-0002-9512-4289
Türkiye

Hüseyin Karlıdağ
0000-0002-9317-8021
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

February 27, 2026

Publication Date

February 27, 2026

Submission Date

September 16, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 30, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: Advanced Online Publication

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1785217

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA89NU99ZR

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kutsal, İ. K., & Karlıdağ, H. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, Advanced Online Publication, 996-1012. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1785217

AMA

1.Kutsal İK, Karlıdağ H. Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars. KSU J. Agric Nat. 2026;(Advanced Online Publication):996-1012. doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1785217

Chicago

Kutsal, İbrahim Kutalmış, and Hüseyin Karlıdağ. 2026. “Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, no. Advanced Online Publication: 996-1012. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1785217.

EndNote

Kutsal İK, Karlıdağ H (February 1, 2026) Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi Advanced Online Publication 996–1012.

IEEE

[1]İ. K. Kutsal and H. Karlıdağ, “Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars”, KSU J. Agric Nat., no. Advanced Online Publication, pp. 996–1012, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1785217.

ISNAD

Kutsal, İbrahim Kutalmış - Karlıdağ, Hüseyin. “Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi. Advanced Online Publication (February 1, 2026): 996-1012. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1785217.

JAMA

1.Kutsal İK, Karlıdağ H. Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars. KSU J. Agric Nat. 2026;:996–1012.

MLA

Kutsal, İbrahim Kutalmış, and Hüseyin Karlıdağ. “Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, no. Advanced Online Publication, Feb. 2026, pp. 996-1012, doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1785217.

Vancouver

1.İbrahim Kutalmış Kutsal, Hüseyin Karlıdağ. Comparative Analysis of Morphological Responses to Drought Conditions in Some Apricot Cultivars. KSU J. Agric Nat. 2026 Feb. 1;(Advanced Online Publication):996-1012. doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1785217