Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Batı Anadolu Fasulye Genetik Kaynaklarının Biyolojik Çeşitliliğinin Araştırılması ve Karakterizasyonu

Yıl 2019, , 251 - 263, 31.12.2019

Hüseyin Çancı , Faik Kantar , Murat Bozkurt Mehmet Zahit Yeken Vahdettin Çiftçi Göksel Özer

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.579482
Cited By: 4

Öz

Bu
çalışmada, Batı Anadolu Bölgesi'nde 10 ilde üretilen 156 önemli yerel fasulye
ekotipi 2015 yılında toplanmış ve ekotipler arasındaki biyolojik çeşitliliği
araştırmak ve karakterize etmek için 2016 yılında Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat
Fakültesi'nde tarla denemesi yürütülmüştür. İncelenen karakterler açısından en
belirgin değişim kuru sap ve tane veriminde kaydedilirken bunu bitkide bakla
sayısı,  baklada tane sayısı, bitki boyu
ve yüz tane ağırlığı takip etmiştir.  En
yüksek bitki başına tane verimi MGL-30 (145.6 g), MGL-38 (101.7 g), ANT-43
(87.8 g) ve MGL-26 (81.9 g) 
genotiplerinden elde edilmiştir. 
Temel bileşen analizinde, 17 bileşen yerel fasulye genetik
kaynaklarındaki varyasyonun %74.9’unu izah etmiştir.  Bakla rengi, bitki tipi ve sarılma özelliği
en fazla katkı sağlayan özellikler olmuştur. 
Bitki boyu ve olgunlaşma gün sayısı, biplot analizinde tane verimi ile
aynı yönde ve en dar açıya sahip vektörler olmuştur. Morfolojik özellikler
kullanılarak üretilen benzerlik dendogramı genotipleri iki ana gruba (A ve B)
ve dört alt gruba (A1, A2, B1 ve B2 ) ayrılmıştır.   Morfolojik özellikler açısından en uzak
gruplarda yer alan MGL-01, KTH-01, MNS-01 ve ANT-13 ile UŞK-01, ANT-01, MGL-05
ve AYD-02 ekotipleri kullanılarak melezleme ıslahı ile yeni çeşitler geliştirilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Phaseolus sp. Morpholojik özellikler Yerel ekotipler Genetik kaynak

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

115R042

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TUBITAK) tarafından desteklenmiştir (Proje no. 115R042).

Kaynakça

  • Anlarsal AE, Yücel C, Özveren D 2000. The Determination of Seed Yield and Yield Components in Some Bean (Ph. vulgaris) Cultivars and Correlations Between These Characters Under the Çukurova Conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 24: 19-29 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Anonim 2018a. Food and Agricultural Organization. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. (Erişim tarihi: 17 Ocak 2018).
  • Anonim 2018b. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey. http://www.turksat.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001. (Access date: 18 Ocak 2018).
  • Aquino-Bolaños EN, García-Díaz YD, Chavez-Servia JL, Carrillo-Rodríguez JC, Vera-Guzmán AM, Heredia-García E 2016. Anthocyanin, polyphenol, and flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity in Mexican common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 28: 581-588.
  • Balkaya A, Yanmaz R 2002. Morphological properties of cultivar nominates selected Black Sea Region bean populations and identification by protein markers. Ankara University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9: 182-188.
  • Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Giardini A, Rau D, Rodriguez M, Biagetti E, Santilocchi R, Spagnoletti Zeuli P, Gioia T, Logozzo G, Attene G, Nanni L, Papa R 2013. Molecular analysis of the parallel domestication of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Mesoamerica and the Andes. New Phytologist, 197: 300-313.
  • Blair MW, Galeano CH, Tovar E, Muñoz Torres MC, Castrillón AV, Beebe SE, Rao IM 2012. Development of a Mesoamerican intra-genepool genetic map for quantitative trait loci detection in a drought tolerant × susceptible common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cross. Molecular Breeding, 29(1): 71-88.
  • Çancı H, Toker C 2006. Evaluation of selection criteria in large-seeded Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Genotypes Using Phenotyping Correlations, Path and Factor Analyses. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 11:19-27.
  • Çancı H 2016. Determination to Phenologic, Morphologic and Agronomic Characters of Bean (Phaseolus spp.) Mini- Core Collection in Antalya Conditions. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9: 26-32 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Çiftçi V, Şensoy S, Türkmen Ö 2009. Van-Gevaş’ta Yaygın Olarak Yetiştirilen Yalancı Dermason Fasulye Populasyonunun Seleksiyon Yöntemiyle Islahı, TOVAG- 106O346 Nolu Proje Sonuç Raporu.
  • De La Fuente María, López-Pedrouso M, Alonso J, Santalla M, De Ron A.M, Gonzalo A, Zapata C 2012. In-depth characterization of the phaseolin protein diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 50(3): 315-325.
  • Duzdemir O 2009. Using Path Coefficient Analysis to Determine the Relationship between Yield and Yield Components of Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Applied Biological Sciences, 3: 45-49.
  • Ekincialp A, Şensoy S 2018. Determination of Genetic Diversity Using Phenotypic and Molecular Methods among Bean Genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Lake Van Basin. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 6(7): 893-902.
  • Elkoca E, Çınar T 2015. The adaptation, agronomical and quality characteristics of some dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars and lines under Erzurum ecological conditions. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Science, 30: 141- 153 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Elkoca E, Haliloglu K, Kantar F, Eken C, Donmez F, Aydin M 2010. Genetic diversity of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in the northeast region of Turkey based on morphological traits. 5th International Food Legumes Research Conference (IFLRC V) & 7th European Conference on Grain Legumes (AEP VII), Legumes for Global Health,
  • Legume Crops and Products for Food, Feed and Environmental Benefits, scientific books, (pp. 36), 26-30 April, 2010, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Erdinc C, Turkmen O, Dasgan HY, Sensoy S 2017. Phenotypıc and molecular genetıc diversıty among some Turkish bean genotypes. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 27(6):1963-1973.
  • Khaidizar MI, Haliloglu K, Elkoca E, Aydin M, Kantar F 2012. Genetic diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces grown in northeast Anatolia of Turkey assessed with simple sequence repeat markers. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 17(2): 145-150.
  • Kulaz H, Çiftçi V 2012. Relationships among yield components and selection criteria for seed yield improvement in bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 18: 257-262.
  • Kwak M, Gepts P 2009. Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 118(5): 979–992
  • Nadeem MA, Habyarimana E, Çiftçi V, Nawaz MA, Karaköy T, Comertpay G, Ercişli S 2018. Characterization of genetic diversity in Turkish common bean gene pool using phenotypic and whole-genome DArTseq-generated silicoDArT marker information. PloS one, 13(10), e0205363.
  • Parveen SI, Sekhar MR, Reddy DM, Sudhakar P 2011. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). International Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology, 2: 619-625.
  • Prakash J, Ram RB, Meena ML 2015. Genetic variation and characters interrelationship studies for quantitative and qualitative traits in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Lucknow conditions. Legume Research, 38: 425-433.
  • Pekşen E, Gülümser A 2005. Relationships between seed yield and yield components and path analysis in some common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes. The Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Ondokuz Mayıs University, 20: 82-87 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Petrova SD, Desheva GN 2016. Path coefficient and correlation analyses of quantitative characters in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Phytologia Balcanica, 22: 243-246.
  • Sarıkamış G, Yaşar F, Bakır M, Kazan K, Ergül A 2009. Genetic characterization of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes from eastern Turkey. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8(3): 880-887.
  • Scarano D, Rubio F, Ruiz JJ, Rao R, Corrado G 2014. Morphological and genetic diversity among and within common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the Campania region (Southern Italy). Scientia Horticulturae, 180: 72-78.
  • Scarano D, Rao R, Masi P, Corrado G 2015. SSR fingerprint reveals mislabeling in commercial processed tomato products. Food Control, 51: 397-401.
  • Singh RJ, Chung GH, Nelson RL 2007. Landmark research in legumes. Genome, 50: 525-537.
  • Sözen Ö, Özçelik H, Bozoğlu H 2012. Determination of Biodiversity of Collected Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Populations in Western Black Sea Region, Turkey. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5: 59-63 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Toker C, Cagirgan MI 2004. The use of phenotypic correlations and factor analysis in determining characters for grain yield selection in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Hereditas, 140: 226-228.
  • White JW, Izquierdo J 1991. Physiology of yield potential and stress tolerance. In: A. van Schoonhoven & O. Voysest (Eds.), Common Beans. Research for Cop Improvement, pp. 287–382. CAB Int CIAT, Colombia.

Investigation and Characterization of Phaseolus bean bio-diversity in Western Anatolia

Yıl 2019, , 251 - 263, 31.12.2019

Hüseyin Çancı , Faik Kantar , Murat Bozkurt Mehmet Zahit Yeken Vahdettin Çiftçi Göksel Özer

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.579482
Cited By: 4

Öz

In
this study, 156 important local bean ecotypes produced in 10 provinces in the
Western Anatolia Region were collected in 2015, and field trial was conducted
in 2016 at Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture in order to investigate
and characterize biodiversity. The highest variation was recorded for straw
yield and seed yield per plant followed by pod number per plant, seed number
per pod, plant height and 100 seed yield. MGL-30 (145.6 g), MGL-38 (101.7 g),
ANT-43 (87.8 g) and MGL-26 (81.9 g) gave the highest seed yields per plant. In
principle component analysis, 17 components explained   74.9% of genetic variation in local bean genetic
resources.  Pod color, plant growth and
speed of climbing were the most important traits contributing to diversity. In biplot vector analysis,
plant height and days to maturity were of the closest and parallel vector angle
to seed yield.  Hierarchal constellation
cluster analysis on the bases of morphological traits produced two main groups
(A and B) and 4 sub-groups (A1, A2, B1, and B2). Most distant landraces of
MGL-01, KTH-01, MNS-01, and ANT-13 to the genotypes of UŞK-01, ANT-01, MGL-05
and AYD-02 may be used in a hybridization program.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Phaseolus sp. Morphologic traits Landraces Germplasm

Proje Numarası

115R042

Kaynakça

  • Anlarsal AE, Yücel C, Özveren D 2000. The Determination of Seed Yield and Yield Components in Some Bean (Ph. vulgaris) Cultivars and Correlations Between These Characters Under the Çukurova Conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 24: 19-29 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Anonim 2018a. Food and Agricultural Organization. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. (Erişim tarihi: 17 Ocak 2018).
  • Anonim 2018b. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey. http://www.turksat.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001. (Access date: 18 Ocak 2018).
  • Aquino-Bolaños EN, García-Díaz YD, Chavez-Servia JL, Carrillo-Rodríguez JC, Vera-Guzmán AM, Heredia-García E 2016. Anthocyanin, polyphenol, and flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity in Mexican common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 28: 581-588.
  • Balkaya A, Yanmaz R 2002. Morphological properties of cultivar nominates selected Black Sea Region bean populations and identification by protein markers. Ankara University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9: 182-188.
  • Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Giardini A, Rau D, Rodriguez M, Biagetti E, Santilocchi R, Spagnoletti Zeuli P, Gioia T, Logozzo G, Attene G, Nanni L, Papa R 2013. Molecular analysis of the parallel domestication of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Mesoamerica and the Andes. New Phytologist, 197: 300-313.
  • Blair MW, Galeano CH, Tovar E, Muñoz Torres MC, Castrillón AV, Beebe SE, Rao IM 2012. Development of a Mesoamerican intra-genepool genetic map for quantitative trait loci detection in a drought tolerant × susceptible common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cross. Molecular Breeding, 29(1): 71-88.
  • Çancı H, Toker C 2006. Evaluation of selection criteria in large-seeded Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Genotypes Using Phenotyping Correlations, Path and Factor Analyses. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 11:19-27.
  • Çancı H 2016. Determination to Phenologic, Morphologic and Agronomic Characters of Bean (Phaseolus spp.) Mini- Core Collection in Antalya Conditions. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9: 26-32 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Çiftçi V, Şensoy S, Türkmen Ö 2009. Van-Gevaş’ta Yaygın Olarak Yetiştirilen Yalancı Dermason Fasulye Populasyonunun Seleksiyon Yöntemiyle Islahı, TOVAG- 106O346 Nolu Proje Sonuç Raporu.
  • De La Fuente María, López-Pedrouso M, Alonso J, Santalla M, De Ron A.M, Gonzalo A, Zapata C 2012. In-depth characterization of the phaseolin protein diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 50(3): 315-325.
  • Duzdemir O 2009. Using Path Coefficient Analysis to Determine the Relationship between Yield and Yield Components of Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Applied Biological Sciences, 3: 45-49.
  • Ekincialp A, Şensoy S 2018. Determination of Genetic Diversity Using Phenotypic and Molecular Methods among Bean Genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Lake Van Basin. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 6(7): 893-902.
  • Elkoca E, Çınar T 2015. The adaptation, agronomical and quality characteristics of some dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars and lines under Erzurum ecological conditions. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Science, 30: 141- 153 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Elkoca E, Haliloglu K, Kantar F, Eken C, Donmez F, Aydin M 2010. Genetic diversity of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in the northeast region of Turkey based on morphological traits. 5th International Food Legumes Research Conference (IFLRC V) & 7th European Conference on Grain Legumes (AEP VII), Legumes for Global Health,
  • Legume Crops and Products for Food, Feed and Environmental Benefits, scientific books, (pp. 36), 26-30 April, 2010, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Erdinc C, Turkmen O, Dasgan HY, Sensoy S 2017. Phenotypıc and molecular genetıc diversıty among some Turkish bean genotypes. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 27(6):1963-1973.
  • Khaidizar MI, Haliloglu K, Elkoca E, Aydin M, Kantar F 2012. Genetic diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces grown in northeast Anatolia of Turkey assessed with simple sequence repeat markers. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 17(2): 145-150.
  • Kulaz H, Çiftçi V 2012. Relationships among yield components and selection criteria for seed yield improvement in bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 18: 257-262.
  • Kwak M, Gepts P 2009. Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 118(5): 979–992
  • Nadeem MA, Habyarimana E, Çiftçi V, Nawaz MA, Karaköy T, Comertpay G, Ercişli S 2018. Characterization of genetic diversity in Turkish common bean gene pool using phenotypic and whole-genome DArTseq-generated silicoDArT marker information. PloS one, 13(10), e0205363.
  • Parveen SI, Sekhar MR, Reddy DM, Sudhakar P 2011. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). International Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology, 2: 619-625.
  • Prakash J, Ram RB, Meena ML 2015. Genetic variation and characters interrelationship studies for quantitative and qualitative traits in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Lucknow conditions. Legume Research, 38: 425-433.
  • Pekşen E, Gülümser A 2005. Relationships between seed yield and yield components and path analysis in some common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes. The Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Ondokuz Mayıs University, 20: 82-87 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Petrova SD, Desheva GN 2016. Path coefficient and correlation analyses of quantitative characters in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Phytologia Balcanica, 22: 243-246.
  • Sarıkamış G, Yaşar F, Bakır M, Kazan K, Ergül A 2009. Genetic characterization of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes from eastern Turkey. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8(3): 880-887.
  • Scarano D, Rubio F, Ruiz JJ, Rao R, Corrado G 2014. Morphological and genetic diversity among and within common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the Campania region (Southern Italy). Scientia Horticulturae, 180: 72-78.
  • Scarano D, Rao R, Masi P, Corrado G 2015. SSR fingerprint reveals mislabeling in commercial processed tomato products. Food Control, 51: 397-401.
  • Singh RJ, Chung GH, Nelson RL 2007. Landmark research in legumes. Genome, 50: 525-537.
  • Sözen Ö, Özçelik H, Bozoğlu H 2012. Determination of Biodiversity of Collected Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Populations in Western Black Sea Region, Turkey. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5: 59-63 (in Turkish with English summary).
  • Toker C, Cagirgan MI 2004. The use of phenotypic correlations and factor analysis in determining characters for grain yield selection in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Hereditas, 140: 226-228.
  • White JW, Izquierdo J 1991. Physiology of yield potential and stress tolerance. In: A. van Schoonhoven & O. Voysest (Eds.), Common Beans. Research for Cop Improvement, pp. 287–382. CAB Int CIAT, Colombia.
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Ziraat, Veterinerlik ve Gıda Bilimleri
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ (Research Article)
Yazarlar

Hüseyin Çancı 0000-0001-8963-850X

Faik Kantar 0000-0003-3102-1181

Murat Bozkurt 0000-0001-8609-8288

Mehmet Zahit Yeken 0000-0003-0490-371X

Vahdettin Çiftçi 0000-0003-0547-9527

Göksel Özer 0000-0002-3385-2520

Proje Numarası 115R042
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Haziran 2019
Kabul Tarihi 22 Ağustos 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Çancı, H., Kantar, F., Bozkurt, M., Yeken, M. Z., vd. (2019). Batı Anadolu Fasulye Genetik Kaynaklarının Biyolojik Çeşitliliğinin Araştırılması ve Karakterizasyonu. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi, 22, 251-263. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.579482

Cited By

Fasulye genotiplerinde çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler ile tohum fiziksel özelliklerinin karakterizasyonu
Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1258084
Agro-morphological characterization of local bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1093427
Characterization of mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes in Turkey in terms of emergence and seedling traits
Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1086965
Assessment of Agro-Morphological Traits of Common Bean Genotypes Grown Under Organic Farming Conditions with Multi-Variate Analyses and Applications
Gesunde Pflanzen
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00713-3

21082



2022-JIF = 0.500

2022-JCI = 0.170

Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi (International Peer Reviewed Journal)

       Dergimiz, herhangi bir başvuru veya yayımlama ücreti almamaktadır. (Free submission and publication)

      Yılda 6 sayı yayınlanır. (Published 6 times a year)


88x31.png 

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

                 


Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi
e-ISSN: 2619-9149