Impact of Different Methods of Wheat Cultivation on the Occurrence of Carabidae Family Representatives (Carabidae, Coleoptera)

Ivan Ilko; Viera Peterkova

doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1216981

TR EN

Impact of Different Methods of Wheat Cultivation on the Occurrence of Carabidae Family Representatives (Carabidae, Coleoptera)

Öz

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different methods of wheat cultivation on the occurrence of Carabidae (Coleoptera, Carabidae). The collection was carried out during a three-year period from 2016 to 2018, on research areas in Borovce, which belong to the Research Institute of Plant Production (VÚRV) in Piešťany. The collection of epigeic material was done in five variants: V1: mulching technique; V2: conventional technique; V3: minimization technique; V4: no-till technique; and ECO: ecological technique. During the three-year period, we obtained 11,362 specimens from eight epigeic groups. Out of all the epigeic groups, the dominant order was Coleoptera with the number of individuals 7593. We addressed the Coleoptera order in more detail. It was represented by six families, of which the Carabidae family was dominant. We recorded 6656 specimens from the mentioned family, of which we determined 20 species. The eudominant species were Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger, 1798) and Pseudoophonus rufipes (DeGeer, 1774) throughout the whole period on all types of variants. Based on the specimens obtained, we calculated the values of dominance, frequency, species similarity of communities, diversity of communities and statistically evaluated the correlation of the impact of meteorological factors and the occurrence of Carabidae.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Impact of Different Methods of Wheat Cultivation on the Occurrence of Carabidae Family Representatives (Carabidae, Coleoptera)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different methods of wheat cultivation on the occurrence of Carabidae (Coleoptera, Carabidae). The collection was carried out during a three-year period from 2016 to 2018, on research areas in Borovce, which belong to the Research Institute of Plant Production (VÚRV) in Piešťany. The collection of epigeic material was done in five variants: V1: mulching technique; V2: conventional technique; V3: minimization technique; V4: no-till technique; and ECO: ecological technique. During the three-year period, we obtained 11,362 specimens from eight epigeic groups. Out of all the epigeic groups, the dominant order was Coleoptera with the number of individuals 7593. We addressed the Coleoptera order in more detail. It was represented by six families, of which the Carabidae family was dominant. We recorded 6656 specimens from the mentioned family, of which we determined 20 species. The eudominant species were Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger, 1798) and Pseudoophonus rufipes (DeGeer, 1774) throughout the whole period on all types of variants. Based on the specimens obtained, we calculated the values of dominance, frequency, species similarity of communities, diversity of communities and statistically evaluated the correlation of the impact of meteorological factors and the occurrence of Carabidae.

Keywords

Destekleyen Kurum

Trnava university

Proje Numarası

6/TU/2022

Kaynakça

Bohac, J., Moudry, J., & Desetova, L. (2007). Biodiverzita a zemedelstvi. Zivotne prostredi. Vol. 41 (1), 24-29.
Edwards, C.A., Sunderland, K.D., & George, K.S. (1979). Studies of polyphagous predators of cereal aphids. Journal of Applied Ecology 16(3), 811-823.
Ekschmitt, K., Weber, M., & Wolters, V. (1997). Spiders, carabids, and staphylinids: the ecological potential of predatory macroarthropods. In: Benckiser, G. (Ed.). Fauna in Soil Ecosystems. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997. p.307-362.
Ermakov, A.I. (2004). Structural changes in thecarabid fauna of forest ecosystems under a toxicimpact. In. Russian Journal of Ecology, 35, 403-408.
Gallardo, B., Gascón, S., Quintana, X. a Comín, F. A. (2011). How to choose a biodiversity indicator–Redundancy and complementarity of biodiversity metrics in a freshwater ecosystem. Ecological indicators, 11(5), 1177-1184.
Horakova, J., Hula, V., Pikula, J. (2005). Contribution to fauna of invertebrates of sink holes within the agricultural landscape of the Moravian Karst Protected Area. Part one: Carabidae (Coleoptera). Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., 2005, LIII, No. 5, pp. 53–62.
Hurka, K. (1996). Carabidae Ceské a Slovenske republiky. Zlin: Kabourek. 9-35 s. (a) ISBN 80-901466-2-7.
Kosewska, A., Skalski, T., Nietupski, M. (2014). Effect of conventional and non-inversion tillage systems on the abundance and some life history traits of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in winter triticale fields. European Journal of Entomology, 111(5).

Kоs, T. , Bazok R., Barcic, J. (2011). Abudance and frequency of ground beetles in three maize fields in Croatia. Vol. 12, No 3, s 894–902, 2011. Lacko Bartosova, M. (2005). Udrzatelne a ekologicke polnohospodarstvo, SUA in Nitra, 575 p. ISSN 80-8069-556-3.
Lang, A.; Filser, J., Henschel, J.R. (1999). Predation by ground beetles and wolf spiders on herbivorous insects in a maize crop. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.72, p.189-199, 1999.
Mazur, E., Lukniss, M. (1980). Geomorfologicke jednotky. In Mazúr, E., ed Atlas Slovenskej socialistickej republiky. Bratislava (SAV a SÚGK), 54-55 s.
Melnychuk, N.A., Olfert, O., Yongs, B., Gillott, C. (2003), Abundance and diversity of Carabidae (Coleoptera) in different farming systems. In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. Vol. 95, s. 69–72.
Petrvalsky, V. (1993). Zoocenozy ako indikator zatazenia ekosystemov. In: Kongres slovenskej vedy 1993 – sekcia Polnohospodarstvo, 1993. S. 46 – 47.
Pfiffner, L., Luka, H. (2000). Overwintering of arthropods in soils of arable fields and adjacent semi-natural habitats. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 78, p. 215-222, 2000.
Pokorny, V., Paseka, (2002). Atlas brouku. Praha–Litomysl, 144 s. ISBN 80-7185-484-0.
Rainio J., Nemelä J. (2003). Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation. 12: 487– 506.
Remenar, M. (2017). Rekreaccna oblast Jazero Borovce, dokumentacia pre uzemne konanie (CM PROJECT). S. 60-65.
Rusch, A., Bommarco, R., Chiverton, P., Öberg, S., Wallin, H., Wiktelius, S., Ekbom, B. (2013). Response of ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities to changes in agricultural policies in Sweden over two decades. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 176, S. 63-69. 2013.
Swaminathan, R. (2014). Ground Beetles (Coleopetra: Carabidae): Their potential as bio-agents in agroecosystems. in: basic applied aspects of biopesticides. 2014. 225-233 s. DOI:10.1007/978-81-322-1877-7.
Sustek, Z., Porhajasova, J., (2011). Priestorova struktura spolocenstiev bezstavovacov s dorazom na celad Carabidae v prirodnej rezervacii Zitavsky luh. Nitra: SPU, 2011. 77 s., 2011.
Twardowski, J., Hurej, M., Jaworska, T. (2006). An effect of strip management on carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in sugar beet crop. In. Journ. Of Plant Prot. Research. No. 1. 2006. pp. 116-125. ISSN 1427-4345.
Varvara, M. (2010). Thegenus Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in some poteto crops from Romania, 1978-1999. In: Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenie. Studii si comunicari. Stiintele Naturii. Vol. 26. No. 2, 2010. 137-146 s. ISSN 1454-6914.
Vician, V., Stasiov, S., Kocík, K., Hazuchova L. (2010). Carabidae (Coleoptera) structure on variously managed agricultural land of podpoľanie area. In: Acta Facultatis Ecologiae . 2010, Vol. 22, s. 133-146.
Vician, V., Svitok, M., Michalkova, E., Lukacik, I., Stasiov, S. (2018). Influence of tree species and soil properties on ground (Coleopetra: Carabidae) communities. In: Acta Oecologica. Vol. 91. 2018. 120-126 s. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.actao.2018. 07.005.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ziraat, Veterinerlik ve Gıda Bilimleri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ivan Ilko
0000-0002-2262-5285
Slovakia

Viera Peterkova ^*
0000-0002-4817-9965
Slovakia

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

14 Haziran 2023

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

9 Aralık 2022

Kabul Tarihi

8 Mayıs 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 6

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1216981

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA75LL84RR

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ilko, I., & Peterkova, V. (2023). Impact of Different Methods of Wheat Cultivation on the Occurrence of Carabidae Family Representatives (Carabidae, Coleoptera). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 26(6), 1421-1430. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1216981

Molecular gut content analysis reveals in-field consumption of Resseliella maxima Gagné (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) by Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger) (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

Environmental Entomology

https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvag018

Impact of Different Methods of Wheat Cultivation on the Occurrence of Carabidae Family Representatives (Carabidae, Coleoptera)

Impact of Different Methods of Wheat Cultivation on the Occurrence of Carabidae Family Representatives (Carabidae, Coleoptera)

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Impact of Different Methods of Wheat Cultivation on the Occurrence of Carabidae Family Representatives (Carabidae, Coleoptera)

Abstract

Keywords

Destekleyen Kurum

Proje Numarası

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Impact of Land Use on Peat Soil Elemental Content and Carabidae and Plant Species Composition and Abundance

Predation behaviors of Pterostichus melanarius adults on larvae of the soybean gall midge, Resseliella maxima

Antibacterial activity of etanolic extracts of insects and spiders

Molecular gut content analysis reveals in-field consumption of Resseliella maxima Gagné (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) by Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger) (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

e-ISSN: 2619-9149