Determining the Attitudes of Agricultural Engineer Candidates Towards Digitalization in Agriculture with Factor Analysis: The Case of Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Asena Ertürk; Didem Doğar; Adnan Çiçek

doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1740494

TR EN

Ziraat Mühendisi Adaylarının Tarımda Dijitalleşmeye Yönelik Tutumlarının Faktör Analizi ile Belirlenmesi: Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Örneği

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi öğrencilerinin tarımda dijitalleşmeye yönelik tutumlarını belirlemek ve bu tutumları etkileyen faktörleri analiz etmektir. Çalışmanın verileri, 2024-2025 akademik yılında 208 adet üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinden anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak 23 maddeden oluşan Likert tipi bir ölçek kullanılmış ve elde edilen veriler üzerinde keşfedici faktör analizi uygulanmıştır. Analiz sonucunda ölçek üç ana boyuta ayrılmıştır. Bunlar; "Dijital Tarımın Faydaları ve Eğitimine Yönelik Algı", "Dijital Tarımın Ekonomik ve Çevresel Faydaları" ve "Dijital Tarıma Yönelik Endişeler ve Destek İhtiyacı" şeklindedir. Öğrenciler, dijital tarımın verimlilik artışı, maliyetlerin azaltılması ve çevresel sürdürülebilirliğe katkısı gibi konularda büyük ölçüde olumlu görüş bildirirken; teknolojiye bağımlılık, yüksek yatırım maliyetleri ve tarımsal istihdamın azalması gibi risklere yönelik kaygılarını da ifade etmişlerdir. KMO değeri 0.950 ve Cronbach’s Alpha katsayısı 0.971 olarak hesaplanmış, bu sonuçlar veri setinin faktör analizine son derece uygun ve ölçeğin yüksek derecede güvenilir olduğunu göstermiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, ziraat fakültelerinde dijital tarım teknolojilerine yönelik hem teorik hem de uygulamalı eğitimlerin artırılması gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca dijitalleşmenin yaygınlaştırılması sürecinde yalnızca teknolojik avantajların değil eğitim, destek ve adaptasyon boyutlarının da dikkate alınması gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, teknoloji temelli değil, sosyo-kültürel ve eğitimsel bileşenleri içeren bütüncül yaklaşımlar benimsenmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Determining the Attitudes of Agricultural Engineer Candidates Towards Digitalization in Agriculture with Factor Analysis: The Case of Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the attitudes of Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture students towards digitalization in agriculture and to analyze the factors affecting these attitudes. The data of the study were collected from 208 third and fourth-grade students in the 2024-2025 academic year by survey. A Likert-type scale consisting of 23 items was used as a data collection tool, and exploratory factor analysis was applied to the obtained data. As a result of the analysis, the scale was divided into three main dimensions. These are: "Perception of the Benefits and Education of Digital Agriculture", "Economic and Environmental Benefits of Digital Agriculture" and "Concerns and Support Needs for Digital Agriculture". While students largely expressed positive opinions on issues such as increasing productivity, reducing costs, and contributing to environmental sustainability in digital agriculture, they also expressed their concerns about risks such as dependence on technology, high investment costs, and the decrease in agricultural employment. The KMO value was calculated as 0.950, and Cronbach's Alpha coefficient as 0.971, and these results showed that the data set was extremely suitable for factor analysis and the scale was highly reliable. The findings reveal that theoretical and applied training on digital agricultural technologies should be increased in agricultural faculties. It is also emphasized that not only technological advantages but also education, support, and adaptation dimensions should be taken into consideration in the digitalization dissemination process. In this context, it is recommended to adopt holistic approaches that include socio-cultural and educational components, not technology-based ones.

Keywords

Kaynakça

Abdulai, A.R., KC, K.B. & Fraser, E. (2022). What factors influence the likelihood of rural farmer participation in digital agricultural services? Experience from smallholder digitalization in Northern Ghana. Outlook on Agriculture, 52(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270221144641.
Anitei, M., Veres, C. & Pisla, A. (2020). Research on challenges and prospects of digital agriculture. Proceedings, 63(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020063067.
Aydın, N. (2022). The place of informatıon technologıes in the agrıcultural sector. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences. 8, 129-135.
Baran, F.O., Kara, E. & Sürmen, M. (2023). Türkiye’de tarımda dijitalleşme sürecinde yaşanan gelişmeler. Tarım, orman ve su bilimlerinde yenilikçi çalışmalar. Duvar Yayınevi. 8, 151–177.
Bartlett, M.S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various χ 2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296–298. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2984057.
Bonett, D.G. & Wright, T.A. (2015). Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960.
Boz Yılmazer, E. & Tunalıoğlu, R. (2024). Akıllı Tarım Uygulamalarının Sektörel Bakış Açısıyla Değerlendirilmesi. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.33202/comuagri.1469974.
Bronson, K. (2018). Smart farming: Including rights holders for responsible agricultural innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(2), 7–14.

Brown, J.D. (2009). Principal components analysis and exploratory factor analysis—Definitions, differences and choices. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13(1), 26–30.
Bujang, M.A., Omar, E.D. & Baharum, N.A. (2018). A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for researchers. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS, 25(6), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the interval structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.
Costello, A.B. & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868.
Çakır, A. (2014). Faktör Analizi, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (Doctoral dissertation, Doktora Tezi).
Daponte, P., De Vito, L., Glielmo, L., Iannelli, L., Liuzza, D., Picariello, F. & Silano, G. (2019). A review on the use of drones for precision agriculture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 275(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/275/1/012022.
Demirel Atasoy, Z., Velioğlu, H., İlter, S., Gez, M. & Koç, C. (2019). Türkiye’de akıllı tarımın mevcut durum raporu. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Bitkisel Üretim Genel Müdürlüğü. https://tarmakbir.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/akillitarimrapor01.pdf
Demiryürek, K., Köksal, Ö. & Kawamorita, H. (2021). Acceleration of digital transformation in agriculture sector for ensuring sustainable food security (p. 93). Ankara: COMCEC and Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
Dibbern, T., Romani, L.A.S. & Massruhá, S.M.F.S. (2024). Main drivers and barriers to the adoption of Digital Agriculture technologies. Smart Agricultural Technology, 8, 100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100459.
Eastwood, C., Klerkx, L., Ayre, M. & Dela Rue, B. (2019). Managing socio-ethical challenges in the development of smart farming: from a fragmented to a comprehensive approach for responsible research and innovation. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics, 32(5), 741-768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9704-5.
Eryılmaz, G.A., & Kılıç, O. (2018). Türkiye’de sürdürülebilir tarım ve iyi tarım uygulamaları. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 21(4), 624-631.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications Ltd., London.
Göl, B. & Tarhan, Ç. (2024). The challenges of digitalization in agriculture and digital agriculture in the EU climate policy. Journal of Information Systems and Management Research. https://doi.org/10.59940/jismar.1504821.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall. Hinkin, T.R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509.
Howard, M.C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664.
IBM Corp, (2009). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Izquierdo, I., Olea, J. & Abad, F.J. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26(3), 395-400. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.349.
Kaiser, H.F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116.
Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.
Kamilaris, A., Fonts, A. & Prenafeta-Boldύ, F. X. (2019). The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in food science & technology, 91, 640-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.034.
Karpati, L., & Szakal, Z. (2009). Marketing characteristics of Tokaj wine specialities based on factor and cluster analyses. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 3(3-4), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.19041/APSTRACT/2009/3-4/20.
Koçyiğit, A.Y., Abacı, N.İ., Demiryürek, K. & Demir, H. (2024). A research on determining the attitudes of Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Agriculture students towards digitalization in agriculture. Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi (TEAD), 10(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.61513/tead.1573312.
Kurtuluş, K. (2004). Pazarlama Araştırmaları, Genişletilmiş 7. Baskı, Literatür Yayınları, İstanbul.
Lazebnyk, L.L. & Voitenko, V.O. (2021). Digital technologies in agricultural enterprise management. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(41), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v6i41.251440.
Lloret, S., Ferreres, A., Hernandez, A. & Tomas, I. (2017). The exploratory factor analysis ofitems: Guided analysis based on empirical data and software. Anales de Psicologia, 33, 417-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.2.270211.
Mallery, P. & George, D. (2000). SPSS for windows step by step. Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
Marofi, Z., Bandari, R., Heravi-Karimooi, M., Rejeh, N. & Montazeri, A. (2020). Cultural adoption, and validation of the Persian version of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire (CADE-Q):a second-order confirmatory factor analysis. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 20, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01628-5.
Nezamova, O.A. & Olentsova, J.A. (2022). The main trends of digitalization in agriculture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 981(3), 032018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/981/3/032018.
Nikkhah, M., Heravi-Karimooi, M., Montazeri, A., Rejeh, N. & Sharif Nia, H. (2018). Psychometric properties the Iranian version of older People’s quality of life questionnaire (OPQOL). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1002-z.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Özdamar, K. (2017). Statistiksel veri analizi: SPSS ile uygulamalar. Nobel Yayıncılık.
Reinecke, M. & Prinsloo, T. (2017). The influence of drone monitoring on crop health and harvest size. In 2017 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (pp. 5–10). https://doi.org/10.1109/NEXTCOMP.2017.8016168.
Sarmento, R.P. & Costa, V. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis – a case study. (arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.05598). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.05598.
Shrestha, N. (2020). Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.05598.
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
TBRC, (2024). Digital agriculture global market report 2024. The Business Research Company. https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/digital-agriculture-global-market-report. (Accessed 03 Mar 2025)
Tekinarslan, E. (2008). Faculty of Education Students’ Attitudes Toward Internet And Implications For Online Learning. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1).
Zhang, Q. (2016). Precision agriculture technology for crop farming (p. 374). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19336.
Xiong, H., Dalhaus, T., Wang, P. & Huang, J. (2020). Blockchain technology for agriculture: Applications and rationale. Frontiers in Blockchain, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.00007.
Watkins, M.W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 201–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807.
Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C. & Bogaardt, M.J. (2017). Big data in smart farming – A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Tarım Ekonomisi (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Asena Ertürk
0000-0002-7435-6822
Türkiye

Didem Doğar ^*
0000-0003-0330-255X
Türkiye

Adnan Çiçek
0000-0002-2671-1439
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

21 Ocak 2026

Yayımlanma Tarihi

21 Ocak 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Temmuz 2025

Kabul Tarihi

18 Eylül 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1740494

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA49YY73WA

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ertürk, A., Doğar, D., & Çiçek, A. (2026). Determining the Attitudes of Agricultural Engineer Candidates Towards Digitalization in Agriculture with Factor Analysis: The Case of Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 29(2), 475-486. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1740494

Ziraat Mühendisi Adaylarının Tarımda Dijitalleşmeye Yönelik Tutumlarının Faktör Analizi ile Belirlenmesi: Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Örneği

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Determining the Attitudes of Agricultural Engineer Candidates Towards Digitalization in Agriculture with Factor Analysis: The Case of Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Abstract

Keywords

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

e-ISSN: 2619-9149