Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye

Ayberk Şeker

doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182

TR EN

İklim Değişikliğinin Azaltılmasında Sürdürülebilir Arazi Kullanımı: Tarım Arazisi Kapasitesinin Türkiye'deki Emisyonlar Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, Tarım Arazisi Yük Kapasite Faktörünün (CROPLCF) sera gazı (GHG) ve CO₂ emisyonları üzerindeki etkilerini analiz ederek, Türkiye’nin karbonsuzlaşma sürecinde tarımsal arazi sürdürülebilirliğinin rolünü incelemektedir. Bunun yanı sıra, Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi (EKC) hipotezi test edilmekte ve ekonomik büyüme, tarımsal katma değer ile tarımsal ticaret arasındaki dinamik etkileşimler araştırılmaktadır. Analizlerde, 1970–2024 dönemine ait yıllık veriler kullanılmaktadır. Uzun ve kısa dönemli ilişkiler Otoregresif Dağıtılmış Gecikme (ARDL) sınır testi yaklaşımıyla incelenirken, olası yapısal kırılmalar Zivot–Andrews birim kök testi aracılığıyla ele alınmaktadır. Ayrıca, farklı zaman ufuklarında değişkenler arasındaki nedensel ilişkileri belirlemek amacıyla frekans alanı nedensellik analizi uygulanmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, emisyonlar, ekonomik büyüme, CROPLCF, tarımsal katma değer ve tarımsal ticaret arasında istikrarlı bir uzun dönemli eşbütünleşme ilişkisinin varlığını doğrulamaktadır. Sonuçlar, CROPLCF ve tarımsal katma değerin GHG ve CO₂ emisyonlarını anlamlı ölçüde azalttığını, buna karşılık ekonomik büyüme ve tarımsal ticaretin emisyonlar üzerinde pozitif bir etki yarattığını göstermektedir. CROPLCF'teki %1'lik bir iyileşmenin, uzun dönemde toplam sera gazı emisyonlarını yaklaşık %0.83, CO₂ emisyonlarını ise %0.55 oranında azalttığı tespit edilmiştir. EKC hipotezi Türkiye örneği için doğrulanmıştır. Nedensellik analizleri, özellikle orta ve uzun vadede değişkenler arasında çift yönlü etkileşimlerin bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bulgular, sürdürülebilir tarımsal arazi kullanımının ekolojik taşıma kapasitesini artırarak emisyon azaltımını desteklediğini, buna karşın ticaret odaklı tarımsal genişlemenin çevresel baskıları artırabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar, tarımsal arazi yönetiminin iklim politikasının merkezine yerleştirilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir. Türkiye'nin 2053 net-sıfır hedefine ulaşması için, CROPLCF'nin resmi izleme sistemlerine entegre edilmesi, toprak organik karbonunu artıran uygulamaların (azaltılmış toprak işleme, örtü bitkileri) teşvik edilmesi ve tarımsal ticaretin çevresel ayak izinin azaltılması kritik öneme sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye

Öz

This study examines the role of agricultural land sustainability in Türkiye’s decarbonization pathway by analyzing the impact of the Cropland Load Capacity Factor (CROPLCF) on greenhouse gas (GHG) and CO₂ emissions. It also tests the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis and explores the dynamic interactions between economic growth, agricultural value added, and agricultural trade. The analysis employs annual data for the period 1970–2024. Long- and short-run relationships are investigated using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach, while structural breaks are addressed through the Zivot–Andrews unit root test. Additionally, frequency domain causality analysis is applied to identify time-varying causal linkages across different horizons. The findings confirm a stable long-run cointegration relationship among emissions, economic growth, CROPLCF, agricultural value added, and agricultural trade. CROPLCF and agricultural value added significantly reduce GHG and CO₂ emissions, whereas economic growth and agricultural trade exert a positive effect on emissions. A one-percent increase in CROPLCF is associated with a long-run decline in environmental pressures, leading to an estimated 0.83% reduction in overall greenhouse gas emissions and a 0.55% decrease in CO₂ emissions. The EKC hypothesis is validated for Türkiye. Causality results reveal bidirectional interactions, particularly in the medium and long run. The results suggest that sustainable agricultural land use enhances ecological carrying capacity and supports emission mitigation, while trade-oriented agricultural expansion may intensify environmental pressures. The findings suggest that strategies for managing agricultural land need to play a central role in climate policy design. In the case of Türkiye, progress toward the 2053 net-zero objective will likely depend on formally incorporating CROPLCF indicators into national monitoring frameworks, encouraging farming practices that enhance soil organic carbon—such as reduced tillage and the use of cover crops—and lowering the environmental impacts associated with agricultural trade.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Apergis, N. & Öztürk, İ. (2015). Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026
Akadiri, S.S., Adebayo, T.S., Riti, J.S., Awosusi, A.A., (2022). The Effect of Financial Globalization and Natural Resource Rent on Load Capacity Factor in India: An Analysis Using the Dual Adjustment Approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(59), 89045–89062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22012-0
Akay, S. S. (2025). Investigating Land Suitability for PV Farm and Existing Sites using a Multi-Criteria Decision Approach in Gaziantep, Türkiye. Applied Sciences, 15(5), 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052441
Awan, A.M., & Azam, M. (2022), Evaluating the Impact of GDP per capita on Environmental Degradation for G-20 Economies: Does N-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve Exist?. Environ Dev Sustain, 24, 11103–11126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01899-8
Batmaz, A., & Sisman-Aydin, G. (2025). Türkiye’s Alignment with the Paris Agreement: A Comparative Policy Analysis with Germany and Spain. Sustainability, 17(9), 3899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093899
Breitung, J. & Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for Short and Long Run Causality: A Frequency-Domain Approach. Journal of Econometrics, 132, 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.004
Cammerino, A. R. B., Ingaramo, M., Piacquadio, L., & Monteleone, M. (2025). How Much Longer can We Tolerate Further Loss of Farmland without Proper Planning? The Agrivoltaic Case in the Apulia Region (Italy). Agronomy, 15(5), 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051177
Chu, L.K. (2021), Economic Structure and Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: New Evidence from Economic Complexity. Appl Econ Lett, 28(7), 612–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1767280

Ciner, C. (2011). Eurocurrency Interest Rate Linkages: A Frequency Domain Analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 20(4), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2010.09.006
Cong, X., Wu, H., & Xie, Q. (2024), Assessing the Effects of Trade Openness and Economic Growth on Environmental Pollution in China and Policy Implications for Sustainability: A Nonlinear Analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 28, 18643–18662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05698-9
Çukur, F., Işın, F., & Çukur, T. (2021). Determination of the relationship between organic farming area and agricultural added value in some European Union countries with panel ARDL analysis. Applied Ecology And Envıronmental Research, 19(6), 5007-5016. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1906_50075016
Destek, M. A. & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Investigation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for Ecological Footprint: The Role of Energy and Financial Development. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 2483-2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017
Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R., & Doğan, E. (2018). Analyzing the Environmental Kuznets Curve for the EU Countries: The Role of Ecological Footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(29), 29387-29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4
Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348
Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517
Dinçer, S., & Akın, F. (2025). Tarımsal Toplam Faktör Verimliliği ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Çevre Kalitesi Üzerindeki Etkisi:Tarımda Başarılı Olan Ülkeler Örneği. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 28(6), 1531-1544. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1661043
Dogan, N. (2016). Agriculture and environmental Kuznets curves in the case of Turkey: evidence from the ARDL and bounds test. Agricultural Economics, 62(12), 566-574. https://doi.org/10.17221/112/2015-AGRICECON
Dogan, E., & Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2020), The Impact of Economic Structure to the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis: Evidence from European Ccountries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(11), 12717–12724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07878-2
Đokić, D., Matkovski, B., Jeremić, M., & Đurić, I. (2022). Land Productivity and Agri-Environmental Indicators: A Case study of Western Balkans. Land, 11(12), 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122216
Geß, A., & Hazar Kalonya, D. (2023). Sustainable Husbandry?—A Comparative LCA of Three Lamb Breeding Systems in Turkey. Circ. Econ. Sust. 3, 1769–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00249-2
Geweke, J. (1982). Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77(378), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2287238
Ghimire, A., Lin, F., & Zhuang, P. (2021). The Impacts of agricultural trade on economic growth and environmental pollution: evidence from Bangladesh using ardl in the presence of structural breaks. Sustainability, 13(15), 8336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158336
Ghosh, M., Luo, D., Siddiqui, M.S., Rutherford, T., & Zhu, Y. (2020), The Drivers of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity Improvements in Major Economies: Analysis of Trends 1995–2009. Foreign Trade Rev, 55(3), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732520920769
Granger, C. W. J (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Crossspectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
Granger, C. W. J. (1980). Testing for Causality: A Personal Viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2(1), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(80)90069-X
Güler, İ., Naimoğlu, M., Şimşek, O., Adalı, Z., & Özbek, S. (2025) Analyzing the Impact of Economic Growth and FDI on Sustainable Development Goals in China: Insights from Ecological Footprints and Load Capacity Factors. Front. Environ. Sci., 13, 1513158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1513158
Guloglu, B., Caglar, A. E., & Pata, U. (2023). Analyzing the Determinants of the Load Capacity Factor in OECD Countries: Evidence from Advanced Quantile Panel Data Methods. Gondwana Research, 118, 92-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.013
Hosoya, Y. (1991). The Decomposition and Measurement of the Interdependency between Second-Order Stationary Processes. Probability Theory Relat Fields, 88(4), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192551
Huang, G., Huang, P.-H., Khattak, S.I., & Khan, A. (2025). Load Capacity Factor as Metrics for Land and Forests Sustainability Assessment in G20 Economies: Fresh Insight from Policy, Technology, and Economy Perspectives. Forests, 16, 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16111654
Ken, E. & Çobanoğlu, F. (2024). The effect of alternative product prices on production balance: Empirical findings on the production of oilseed crops in Türkiye. Ege Univ. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 61(2), 175-187. https://doi.org/ 10.20289/zfdergi.1440254.
Kılıç, E., Puig, R., Zengin, G., Zengin, C. A., & Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2018). Corporate Carbon Footprint for Country Climate Change Mitigation: A Case Study of a Tannery in Turkey. Science of The Total Environment, 635, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.111
Kirca, M., Yeniyurt, M., Canbay, Ş., & Altıntaş, N. (2025). Restoring Balance: The Intersection of Management and Fishing Sustainability in Indonesia. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 33, 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.70007
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality, The American Economic Review, 45 (1), 1–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811579
Leal, P.H., & Marques, A.C. (2022). The evolution of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis assessment: A literature review under a critical analysis perspective. Heliyon, 8, e11521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11521
Mehmood, U., Tariq, S., Ul Haq, Z., Aslam, M.U., & Imran, A. (2023), How Economic Growth Contributes to CO2 emissions in the Presence of Globalization and Eco-Innovations in South Asian Countries? World, 4(1), 202-213. https://doi.org/10.3390/world4010014
Ojaghlou, M., Uğurlu, E., Kadłubek, M., & Thalassinos, E. (2023). Economic Activities and Management Issues for the Environment: An Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and STIRPAT Analysis in Turkey. Resources, 12(5), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12050057
Onur, M. (2025). The Impact of the Transformation of Agricultural Lands into Urbanized Areas on Micro-ScaleAir Pollutants: The Case of Yalıncak, Trabzon. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 28(6), 1445-1457. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1623025
Pata, U.K. (2021a). Do Renewable Energy and Health Expenditures Improve Load Capacity Factor in the USA and Japan? A New Approach to Environmental Issues. Eur J Health Econ., 22(9), 1427–1439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01321-0
Pata, U.K. (2021b), Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Complexity, CO2 Emissions, and Ecological Footprint in the USA: Testing the EKC Hypothesis with a Structural Break. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 28(1), 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3
Pata, U. K. & Kartal, M. T. (2023). Impact of Nuclear and Renewable Energy Sources on Environment Quality: Testing the EKC and LCC Hypotheses for South Korea. Nucl Eng Technol., 55(2), 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.10.027
Pata, U. K. & Pata, S. K. (2025). Do Structural Change and Forest Load Capacity Factor Provide Areduction in Carbon Emissions in the BRICS Countries?. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 18, 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01646-8
Pata, U. K. & Pata, S. K. (2024). Determining the Effectiveness of the Forest Load Capacity Factor in Assisting Decarbonization in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 166, 103281. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.forpol.2024.103281
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith. R. J. (2001). Bound Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Long Run Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.
Phillips, P. & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 335-346. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336182
Rafiq, S., Salim, R., & Apergis, N. (2015). Agriculture, Trade Openness and Emissions: An Empirical Analysis and Policy Options. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 60(3), 348-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12131
Rjoub, H., Odugbesan, J. A., Adebayo, T. S., & Wong, W. (2021). Sustainability of the Moderating Role of Financial Development in the Determinants of Environmental Degradation: Evidence from Turkey. Sustainability, 13(4), 1844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041844
Saka, K. (2024). Evaluation of a Grid-Connected PV Power Plant: Performance and Agrivoltaic Aspects. Environ Dev Sustain, 26, 32319–32336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05098-z
Santhosh, R., Baskaran, R. M., Harisudan, C., Prabhaharan, J., & Kumar, K. (2025). Agrivoltaic Farming: A Sustainable Approach for Climate-Smart Agriculture. Plant Science Today, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/ 10.14719/pst.7558
Sarıca, D., Dalgıç, A., Demircan, V. 2023. Dynamics of apple exports in Türkiye: an autoregressive distributed lag approach. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 65, 2189–2196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-00942-4
Sarica, K., Dellal, İ., Kollugil, E. T., & Ersoy, E. (2023). GHG Emission Mitigation of Turkish Agriculture Sector: Potential and Cost Assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 28(7), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10073-6
Sarkodie, S. A., Ntiamoah, E. B., & Li, D. (2019). Panel Heterogeneous Distribution Analysis of Trade and Modernized Agriculture on CO2 Emissions: The Role of Renewable and Fossil Fuel Energy Consumption. Natural Resources Forum, 43(3), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12183
Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross-country evidence. Policy Res. Work. Pap. Ser. 18, 55.
Sheng, S., Li, F., Yang, B., & Luo, T. (2025). The Impact of Cropland Displacement on Crop Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 393, 127111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127111
Siche, R., Pereira, L., Agostinho, F., & Ortega, E. (2010). Convergence of Ecological Footprint and Emergy Analysis as a Sustainability Indicator of Countries: Peru as Case Study. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 15(10), 3182–3192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027
Sinha, A. & Schneider, N. (2024). Stationarity and Convergence of LCF Series. Gondwana Research, 129, 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.08.009
Somoye, O.A., Akinwande, T.S., Mar’I, M., & Ozdeser, H. (2025). The Determinants of Load Capacity Factor: Evidence from GCC Countries. Sustainable Economies, 3(1), 1424. https://doi.org/10.62617/se1424
Șargu, L., Ignat, G., Timuș, A., Prigoreanu, I., & Șargu, N. (2025). Economic and Energy Assessment of Emissions from European Agriculture: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Sustainability and Resilience. Sustainability, 17(6), 2582. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062582
Şeyranlıoğlu, O., Han, A., & Aydinbaş, G. (2025). The Impact of Climate Change and Environmental Degradation on Agricultural Credit Usage:Evidence from Türkiye with Fourier Approximations. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 28(6), 1516-1530. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1652184
Şimşek, O., Güler, İ., Özbek, S., Naimoğlu, M., & Adalı, Z. (2025). Assessing the Convergence of Cropland Ecological Balance: A Panel Data Analysis of 13 Major Agricultural Countries. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(7), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i7.7676
Tillaguango, B., Alvarado, R., Ahmad, M., Murshed, M., & Işık, C. (2025). Applying the Forest Load Capacity Factor to Assess Environmental Sustainability in the Global South. Forest Policy and Economics, 180, 103631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103631
Tüzün, F., Derin-Güre, P. & Zırh, B.C. (2024). Drivers and Challenges of Solar Photovoltaics (PV) Adoption by Turkish Manufacturers. Environ Dev Sustain, 27, 30867–30902 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04943-5
Ullah, S. & Lin, B. (2025). An Environmental Assessment through Load Capacity Factor: The Dynamic Effects of Technological Cooperation Grants and Energy Depletion in Pakistan. Front. Sustain. Energy Policy, 3, 1438573. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2024.1438573
Ullah, M. K., & Shabir, S. (2023). The Significant Effects of Agricultural Systems on the Environment. Journal of World Science, 2(6), 798-805. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i6.291
Usman, M., Anwar, S., Yaseen, M. R., Makhdum, M. S. A., Kousar, R., & Jahanger, A. (2021). Unveiling the Dynamic Relationship between Agriculture Value Addition, Energy Utilization, Tourism and Environmental Degradation in South Asia. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4), e2712. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2712
Üçtuğ, F.G., Ediger, V.Ş., Küçüker, M.A., Berk, İ., İnan, A., & Fereidani, B. M. (2025). Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Heavy Machinery Manufacturing: A Case Study in Türkiye. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 30, 939–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02462-7
Villanthenkodath, M. A. & Pal, S. (2025). Assessing the Relative Impact of Inland and Marine Fish Production on Fishing Load Capacity Factor: Insights for Sustainable Fisheries Management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 215, 117855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117855
Vicente-Vicente, J. L., García-Ruiz, R., Francaviglia, R., Aguilera, E., & Smith, P. (2016). Soil Carbon Sequestration Rates under Mediterranean Woody Crops Using Recommended Management Practices: A Meta-Analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 235, 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.024
Wagner, M., Lask, J., Kiesel, A., Lewandowski, I., Weselek, A., Högy, P., Trommsdorff, M., Schnaiker, M.-A., & Bauerle, A. (2023). Agrivoltaics: The Environmental Impacts of Combining Food Crop Cultivation and Solar Energy Generation. Agronomy, 13(2), 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020299
Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Li, R. (2024), Rethinking the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis across 214 Countries: The Impacts of 12 Economic, Institutional, Technological, Resource, and Social Factors. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, 11, 292. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02736-9
Yang, H., Wang, X., & Bin, P. (2022). Agriculture Carbon-Emission Reduction and Changing Factors behind Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Growth in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 334, 130193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130193
Yang, X., Liu, Y., Bezama, A., & Thran, D. (2024). Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency and Agricultural Practices: Implications for Balancing Carbon Emissions Reduction and Agricultural Productivity Increment. Environmental Development, 50, 101004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101004
Yeligeti, M., Hu, W., Scholz, Y., Stegen, R., & von Krbek, K. (2023). Cropland and rooftops: the global undertapped potential for solar photovoltaics. Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 054027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/accc47
Zidane, T. E. K., Zainali, S., Bellone, Y., Guezgouz, M., Khosravi, A., Lu, S. M., Tekie S., Amaducci, S., & Campana, P. E. (2025). Economic Evaluation of One-Axis, Vertical, and Elevated Agrivoltaic Systems across Europe: A Monte Carlo Analysis. Applied Energy, 391, 125826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125826
Zivot, E. & Andrews, D.W.K. (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/1391541

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sürdürülebilir Tarımsal Kalkınma, Tarım Politikaları, Tarım Ekonomisi (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ayberk Şeker ^*
0000-0001-7750-6286
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

23 Ekim 2026

Yayımlanma Tarihi

-

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Ocak 2026

Kabul Tarihi

17 Mart 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Sayı: Advanced Online Publication

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA26SM24XR

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şeker, A. (2026). Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182

AMA

1.Şeker A. Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi. 2026;(Advanced Online Publication). doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182

Chicago

Şeker, Ayberk. 2026. “Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, sy Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182.

EndNote

Şeker A (01 Ekim 2026) Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi Advanced Online Publication

IEEE

[1]A. Şeker, “Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, sy Advanced Online Publication, Eki. 2026, doi: 10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182.

ISNAD

Şeker, Ayberk. “Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi. Advanced Online Publication (01 Ekim 2026). https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182.

JAMA

1.Şeker A. Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi. 2026. doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182.

MLA

Şeker, Ayberk. “Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, sy Advanced Online Publication, Ekim 2026, doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182.

Vancouver

1.Ayberk Şeker. Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi. 01 Ekim 2026;(Advanced Online Publication). doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1871182

İklim Değişikliğinin Azaltılmasında Sürdürülebilir Arazi Kullanımı: Tarım Arazisi Kapasitesinin Türkiye'deki Emisyonlar Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable Land Use for Climate Change Mitigation: The Impact of Agricultural Land Capacity on Emissions in Türkiye

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

e-ISSN: 2619-9149