The Effect of Agricultural and Financial Sectors on Environmental Quality: Testing the Validity of the LCC Hypothesis in Türkiye

Ender Baykut

doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1708492

EN TR

The Effect of Agricultural and Financial Sectors on Environmental Quality: Testing the Validity of the LCC Hypothesis in Türkiye

Abstract

The increasing destruction of nature after the Industrial Revolution has revealed that we need to be more sensitive to the environment. These adverse effects, mainly observed in the agriculture, forestry, and fishing sectors, have been the subject of limited studies in the literature. This study attempts to determine the impact of the agricultural and financial sectors on environmental quality in Türkiye. The first objective of this study is to test the hypothesis of load capacity curve (LCC) validity regarding the in Türkiye, focusing on the agricultural and financial sectors. The second is to calculate the level of GDP per capita, which is the turning point from environmental degradation to environmental quality. To this end, the study uses annual data from 1990 to 2021, indicating that the series has different levels of stationarity as a result of stationarity tests. It is evident that the Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag (A-ARDL) model is the best fitted as the dependent variable, the load capacity factor is I(0). The findings reveal that there is a cointegration relationship among the variables. Model results demonstrate that development in agricultural sectors increases environmental quality (EQ), whereas development in the financial sector causes environmental degradation (ED). Furthermore, the result proves that the hypothesis of LCC is valid for Türkiye, and it is detected that 20.720 USD is the amount of GDP per capita at which environmental degradation stops and environmental quality begins to increase. The findings show that policymakers should give more support and importance to the agricultural sectors to ensure increased environmental quality.

Keywords

Tarım ve Finans Sektörlerinin Çevresel Kalite Üzerine Etkileri: Türkiye'de LCC Hipotezinin Geçerliliğinin Test Edilmesi

Öz

Sanayi devrimi sonrasında artan doğa tahribatı, çevreye karşı daha duyarlı davranmamız gerektiğini ortaya koymuştur. Özellikle tarım-ormancılık-balıkçılık sektörlerinde gözlemlenen bu olumsuz etkiler, sınırlı sayıda akademik çalışmaya konu olmuştur. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de tarımsal sektörler ile finans sektörünün, çevre kalitesi üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye çalışmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, çalışmanın temel iki amacı bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan ilki; tarım ve finans sektörleri odağında, Türkiye’de yük kapasite eğrisine (LCC) ilişkin hipotezin geçerliliğini sınamaktır. İkinci amaç ise çevresel bozulmadan, çevresel kaliteye geçiş (dönüş) noktası olan kişi başı milli gelir düzeyini hesaplamaktır. Bu amaçla, 1990-2021 arası döneme ait yıllık verilerin kullanıldığı çalışmada, durağanlık testleri neticesinde serilerin farklı mertebelerden durağanlığa sahip oldukları görülmüştür. Bağımlı değişken olan yük kapasite faktörünün I(0) olması nedeniyle A-ARDL yöntemi tercih edilmiştir. Bulgular, değişkenler arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkinin varlığını göstermektedir. Model sonuçları, tarımsal sektörlerdeki gelişimin çevresel kaliteyi arttırdığını buna karşın finans sektöründeki gelişimin ise çevresel bozulmaya neden olduğunu yönündedir. Ayrıca Türkiye için LCC hipotezi geçerli olduğu tespit edilmiş olup çevresel bozulmanın durup, çevresel kalitedeki artışın başlayacağı kişi başı milli gelir düzeyi 20.720 ABD doları olarak hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, politika yapıcıların çevresel kalitedeki artışı sağlamak için tarımsal sektörlere daha fazla destek ve önem vermesi gerektiğini göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Adekoya, O. B., Ajayi, G. E., Suhrab, M., & Oliyide, J. A. (2022). How critical are resource rents, agriculture, growth, and renewable energy to ED in the resource-rich African countries? The role of institutional quality. Energy Policy, 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112888
Afshan, S., and Yaqoob, T. (2023). Unravelling the efficacy of green innovation and taxation in promoting Environmental Quality: A dual-model assessment of testing the LCC theory in emerging economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 416, 137850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137850
Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Yang, X., Hussain, N., & Sinha, A. (2022). Financial development and ED: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? Gondwana Research, 105, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.09.012
Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., & Cary, M. (2021). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecological Indicators, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060
Ali, S., Shah, A. A., Ghimire, A., & Tariq, M. A. U. R. (2022). Investigation the nexus between CO2 emissions, agricultural land, crop, and livestock production in Pakistan. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1014660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1014660
Ali, Z., Yang, J., Ali, A., & Khan, A. (2024). Balancing agriculture, environment and natural resources: insights from Pakistan’s load capacity factor analysis. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26(4), 1227–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02673-2
Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., & Mohammed, A. H. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48, 315–323.
Alola, A. A., Özkan, O., & Usman, O. (2023). Role of Non-Renewable Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Driving Environmental Sustainability in India: Evidence from the Load Capacity Factor Hypothesis. 16, 2847. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062847

Altıntaş, N., Açıkgöz, F., Okur, M., Öztürk, M., & Aydın, A. (2024). Renewable Energy and Banking Sector Development Impact on Load Capacity Factor in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140143
Alvarado, R., Ortiz, C., Jiménez, N., Ochoa-Jiménez, D., and Tillaguango, B. (2021). Ecological footprint, air quality and research & development: The role of agriculture and international trade. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125589
Arshad, Z., Robaina, M., & Botelho, A. (2020). The role of ICT in energy consumption and environment: an empirical investigation of Asian economies with cluster analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32913–32932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09229-7
Ayad, H. (2023). Investigating the fishing grounds load capacity curve in G7 nations: Evaluating the influence of human capital and renewable energy use. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 194, 115413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115413
Ayad, H., & Lefilef, A. (2024). Unveiling new insights into China’s marine ecosystem: Exploring the fishing grounds load capacity curve. Journal of Cleaner Production, 450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141507
Ayad, H., Hassoun, S. S., Abdelkader, S. B., & Sallam, O. A. A. J. (2024). Assessing deforestation in the Brazilian forests: An econometric inquiry into the load capacity curve for deforestation. Forest Policy and Economics, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103135
Baigorri, B., Montañés, A., & Simón-Fernández, M.-B. (2025). The influence of the Great Recession on the relationship between ecological footprint, renewable energy and economic growth. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 25, 100556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100556
Bandara, J. S., & Cai, Y. (2014). The impact of climate change on food crop productivity, food prices and food security in South Asia. Economic Analysis and Policy, 44(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2014.09.005
Bergougui, B. (2024). Investigating the relationships among green technologies, financial development and ecological footprint levels in Algeria: Evidence from a novel Fourier ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105621
Brander, K. (2008). Tackling the old familiar problems of pollution, habitat alteration and overfishing will help with adapting to climate change. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56(12), 1957–1958. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.08.024
Bui, D. T. (2020). Transmission channels between financial development and CO2 emissions: A global perspective. Heliyon, 6(11), e05509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05509
Bülbül, H., & Akgül, I. (2018). Türkiye finansal stres endeksi ve markov rejim değişim modeli ile yüksek stres dönemlerinin belirlenmesi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13(3), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.427265
Caglar, A. E., Destek, M. A., & Manga, M. (2024). Analyzing the load capacity curve hypothesis for the Turkiye: A perspective for the sustainable environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 444, 141232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141232
Çamkaya, S. (2024). LCC Hipotezi Çerçevesinde Çevresel Kalite ve Kentleşme Arasındaki İlişki: Türkiye’den Ampirik Kanıtlar. Fiscaoeconomia, 8(2), 739–760. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1435550
Cardil, A., de-Miguel, S., Silva, C. A., Reich, P. B., Calkin, D., Brancalion, P. H. S., Vibrans, A. C., Gamarra, J. G. P., Zhou, M., Pijanowski, B. C., Hui, C., Crowther, T. W., Hérault, B., Piotto, D., Salas-Eljatib, C., Broadbent, E. N., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Picard, N., Aragão, L. E. O. C., … Liang, J. (2020). Recent deforestation drove the spike in Amazonian fires. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), 121003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abcac7
Chandio, A. A., Akram, W., Ahmad, F., & Ahmad, M. (2020). Dynamic relationship among agriculture-energy-forestry and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: empirical evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(27), 34078–34089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09560-z
Chandio, A. A., Akram, W., Ozturk, I., Ahmad, M., & Ahmad, F. (2021). Towards long-term sustainable environment: does agriculture and renewable energy consumption matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 53141–53160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14540-y
Charfeddine, L., & Ben Khediri, K. (2016). Financial development and EQ in UAE: Cointegration with structural breaks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 1322–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.059
Chen, Y., Zhao, J., Lai, Z., Wang, Z., & Xia, H. (2019). Exploring the effects of economic growth, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on China’s CO₂ emissions: Evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renewable Energy, 140, 341–353.
Clark, T. P., & Longo, S. B. (2019). Examining the effect of economic development, region, and time period on the fisheries footprints of nations (1961–2010). International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 60(4), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715219869976
Dai, J., Ahmed, Z., Alvarado, R., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Assessing the nexus between human capital, green energy, and load capacity factor: Policymaking for achieving sustainable development goals. Gondwana Research, 129, 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.009
De, U. K., & Tamang, R. K. (2023). Pattern of agricultural progress in India’s north-east and the contributing factors: An econometric analysis. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(3), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.33462/ jotaf.1114386
Deng, S., Tiwari, S., Khan, S., Razib Hossain, M., & Chen, R. (2024). Investigating the load capacity curve (LCC) hypothesis in leading emitter economies: Role of clean energy and energy security for sustainable development. Gondwana Research, 128, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.10.020
Dogan, A., & Pata, U. K. (2022). The role of ICT, R&D spending and renewable energy consumption on Environmental Quality: Testing the LCC hypothesis for G7 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 135038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135038
Du, J., Yang, X., Long, D., & Xin, Y. (2024). Modelling the influence of natural resources and social globalization on load capacity factor: New insights from the ASEAN countries. Resources Policy, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104816
Fang, Z., Wang, T., & Yang, C. (2024). Nexus among natural resources, environmental sustainability, and political risk: Testing the load capacity factor curve hypothesis. Resources Policy, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.resourpol.2024.104791
Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2024). Effects of FDI, GDP and energy use on ecological footprint in Finland: An ARDL approach. World Development Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2024.100157 Global Footprint Network (2024). https://www.footprintnetwork.org/
Göçoğlu, V., & Göksu, S. (2024). How do industrialization and agricultural land use affect urban population in Turkey? Policy implications in the context of SDGs. Journal of Policy Modeling, 46(1), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.08.004
Gokmenoglu, K. K., Olasehinde-Williams, G. O., & Taspinar, N. (2019). Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: The Role of Deforestation. Energ. Environ. Strateg. Era Globalizat, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06001-5_3
Göksu, S., & Balkı, A. (2023). ARDL ve NARDL Eşbütünleşme Analizleri: Adım Adım Eviews Uygulaması. Serüven Yayınevi, Ankara. https://hdl.handle.net/11630/11330
Guloglu, B., Emre Caglar, A., & Korkut Pata, U. (2023). Analyzing the determinants of the load capacity factor in OECD countries: Evidence from advanced quantile panel data methods. Gondwana Research, 118, 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.013
Gyamfi, B. A., Onifade, S. T., Erdoğan, S., & Ali, E. B. (2023). Colligating ecological footprint and economic globalization after COP21: Insights from agricultural value-added and natural resources rents in the E7 economies. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 30(5), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2166141
Habibullah, M. S., Din, B. H., Tan, S.-H., & Zahid, H. (2022). Impact of climate change on biodiversity loss: global evidence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(1), 1073–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15702-8
Hakkak, M., Altintaş, N., & Hakkak, S. (2023). Exploring the relationship between nuclear and renewable energy usage, ecological footprint, and load capacity factor: A study of the Russian Federation testing the EKC and LCC hypothesis. Renewable Energy Focus, 46, 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2023.07.005
Huang, Y., Villanthenkodath, M. A., & Haseeb, M. (2023). The nexus between eco‐friendly technology and ED in India: Does the N or inverted N‐shape load capacity curve(LCC) hypothesis hold?. Natural Resources Forum, 47(2), 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12281
Hughes, T. P., Bellwood, D. R., Folke, C., Steneck, R. S., & Wilson, J. (2005). New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol, 20(7), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.022
Hussain, M., Wang, W., & Wang, Y. (2022). Natural resources, consumer prices and financial development in China: Measures to control carbon emissions and ecological footprints. Resources Policy, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102880
İçen, N. M. E. (2024). Türkiye’de yük kapasite faktörünün belirleyicileri nelerdir? Genişletilmiş ARDL yaklaşımı. Ekonomik Ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 20(2), 299–312.
Jiang, K., Teuling, A. J., Chen, X., Huang, N., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Gao, R., Men, J., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Cai, L., Huang, Z., Ma, Z., & Pan, Z. (2024). Global land degradation hotspots based on multiple methods and indicators. Ecological Indicators, 158, 111462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111462
Jiang, Q., Rahman, Z. U., Zhang, X., Guo, Z., & Xie, Q. (2022). An assessment of the impact of natural resources, energy, institutional quality, and financial development on CO2 emissions: Evidence from the BandR nations. Resources Policy, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102716
Kazemzadeh, E., Fuinhas, J. A., Salehnia, N., Koengkan, M., & Silva, N. (2023). Assessing influential factors for ecological footprints: A complex solution approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137574
Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J. R., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Basu, N. (Nil) ., Baldé, A. B., Bertollini, R., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Boufford, J. I., Breysse, P. N., Chiles, T., Mahidol, C., Coll-Seck, A. M., Cropper, M. L., Fobil, J., Fuster, V., Greenstone, M., Haines, A., … Zhong, M. (2018). The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. The Lancet, 391(10119), 462–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32345-0
Latif, N., & Faridi, M. Z. (2023). Examining the impact of financial development on load capacity factor (LCF): System GMM analysis for Asian economies. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.1063212
Li, J., Dong, K., Wang, K., & Dong, X. (2023). How does natural resource dependence influence carbon emissions? The role of environmental regulation. Resources Policy, 80, 103268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103268
Lin, Y., Anser, M. K., Peng, M. Y. P., & Irfan, M. (2023). Assessment of renewable energy, financial growth and in accomplishing targets of China’s cities carbon neutrality. Renewable Energy, 205, 1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.026
Lindberg, K., Martvall, A., Bastos Lima, M. G., & Franca, C. S. S. (2023). Herbal medicine promotion for a restorative bioeconomy in tropical forests: A reality check on the Brazilian Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics, 155, 103058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103058
Mahmood, H., Alkhateeb, T. T. Y., Al-Qahtani, M. M. Z., Allam, Z., Ahmad, N., & Furqan, M. (2019). Agriculture development and CO2 emissions nexus in Saudi Arabia. Plos One, 14(12), e0225865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225865
Mohamed, E. F., Abdullah, A., Jaaffar, A. H., & Osabohien, R. (2024). Reinvestigating the EKC hypothesis: Does renewable energy in power generation reduce carbon emissions and ecological footprint?. Energy Strategy Reviews, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101387
Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2006). What determines migration flows from low‐income to high‐income countries? An empirical investigation of Fiji–Us migration 1972–2001. Contemporary economic policy, 24(2), 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byj019
Narayan, P.K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied economics, 37(17), 1979-1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500278103
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2023). The Ongoing Marine Heat Waves in U.S. Waters, Explained. Available at. https://www.noaa.gov/news /ongoing-marine-heat-waves-in-us-waters-explained.
Nwokoro, C. V., & Chima, F. O. (2017). Impact of ED on agricultural production and poverty in rural Nigeria. Am. Int. J. Contemp. Res, 7, 6–14.
Okezie, B. N., Nwani, C., Nnam, H. I., & Onuoha, P. I. (2023). Testing the income-finance-trade-environment nexus based on the ecological load capacity factor: Frequency-domain causality evidence from Nigeria. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19584
Oladele, A.O., Maharazu, I., Alabi, O.O. & Aluwong, S.J. (2024). Estimating the Poverty Status Among Ginger Women Farmer in Kaduna State, Nigeria KSU J. Agric Nat 27(Suppl 2), 475-482. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1504498
Olanipekun, I. O., Olasehinde-Williams, G. O., & Alao, R. O. (2019). Agriculture and ED in Africa: The role of income. Science of the Total Environment, 692, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.129 Our World in Data (2024). (web page: https://ourworldindata.org/energ
Özbek, S., and Naimoğlu, M. (2025). The effectiveness of renewable energy technology under the EKC hypothesis and the impact of fossil and nuclear energy investments on the UK’s Ecological Footprint. Energy, 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135351
Özkurt, İ. C. (2024). İklim Değişikliğinin Türkiye’de Tarımsal Üretime Etkisi. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 27(Ek Sayı 1), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi 1394627
Parajuli, R., Joshi, O., & Maraseni, T. (2019). Incorporating Forests, Agriculture, and Energy Consumption in the Framework of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Sustainability, 11(9), 2688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092688
Pata, K. S., & Pata, U. K. (2025). Comparative analysis of the impacts of solar, wind, biofuels and hydropower on load capacity factor and sustainable development index. Energy, 319. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.energy.2025.134991
Pata, U. K., & Ertugrul, H. M. (2023). Do the Kyoto Protocol, geopolitical risks, human capital and natural resources affect the sustainability limit? A new environmental approach based on the LCC hypothesis. Resources Policy, 81, 103352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103352
Pata, U. K., & Karlilar Pata, S. (2024). Determining the effectiveness of the forest load capacity factor in assisting decarbonization in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103281
Pata, U. K., & Tanriover, B. (2023). Is the Load Capacity Curve Hypothesis Valid for the Top Ten Tourism Destinations?. Sustainability, 15(2), 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020960
Pata, U. K., Kartal, M. T., Adali, Z., & Karlilar, S. (2023). Proposal of fishing load capacity curve and testing validity: Evidence from top 20 countries with highest fisheries production by panel data approaches. Ocean and Coastal Management, 245, 106856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106856
Pata, U. K., Mohammed, K. S., Omeyr, C., Karlilar Pata, S., Alofaysan, H., & Kartal, M. T. (2025). Scrutinizing the load capacity curve for a global perspective: The role of Fintech, government effectiveness and renewable energy. Gondwana Research, 138, 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.10.014
Patel, N., & Mehta, D. (2023). The asymmetry effect of industrialization, financial development and globalization on CO2 emissions in India. International Journal of Thermofluids, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100397
Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R.J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, (16), no. 3: 289–326.
Pires, A. P. F., Srivastava, D. S., Marino, N. A. C., MacDonald, A. A. M., Figueiredo‐Barros, M. P., & Farjalla, V. F. (2018). Interactive effects of climate change and biodiversity loss on ecosystem functioning. Ecology, 99(5), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2202
Raihan, A. (2023). An econometric evaluation of the effects of economic growth, energy use, and agricultural value added on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Asia-pacific Journal of Regional Science, 7(3), 665–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-023-00278-7
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, (2019). https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/
Salahuddin, M., Gow, J., & Vink, N. (2020). Effects of EQ on agricultural productivity in sub Saharan African countries: A second generation panel based empirical assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140520
Shah, M. I., AbdulKareem, H. K. K., Ishola, B. D., & Abbas, S. (2023). The roles of energy, natural resources, agriculture and regional integration on CO2 emissions in selected countries of ASEAN: does political constraint matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(10), 26063–26077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23871-3
Shahbaz, M., Aydin, M., Degirmenci, T. & Bozatli, O. (2024). The role of agriculture-forestry-fisheries sectors, biodiversity expenditures, and renewable energy on EQ for The Netherlands: Evidence from novel Fourier ARDL. Nat Resour Forum. 2024;1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12517
Shahzad, U., Tiwari, S., Si Mohammed, K., & Zenchenko, S. (2023). Asymmetric nexus between renewable energy, economic progress, and ecological issues: Testing the LCC hypothesis in the context of sustainability perspective. Gondwana Research, 129, 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.07.008
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009). Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 133(3-4), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021
Sun, C., Khan, A., & Cai, W. (2024). The response of energy aid and natural resources consumption in load capacity factor of the Asia Pacific emerging countries. Energy Policy, 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114150
Topal, S. (2024). LCC Hipotezi Çerçevesinde Türkiye’de Kirlilik Sığınağı ve Kirlilik Hale Hipotezlerinin Sınanması. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 20(2), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1414228
Uzar, U., & Eyuboglu, K. (2024). Testing the asymmetric impacts of income inequality, financial development and human development on ecological footprint in Türkiye: A NARDL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142652
Wang, S., Wasif Zafar, M., Vasbieva, D. G., & Yurtkuran, S. (2024). Economic growth, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and EQ: Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve and load capacity curve hypothesis. Gondwana Research, 129, 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.06.009
Wang, Z., Pham, T. L. H., Sun, K., Wang, B., Bui, Q., & Hashemizadeh, A. (2022). The moderating role of financial development in the renewable energy consumption - CO2 emissions linkage: The case study of Next-11 countries. Energy, 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124386
Wu, Y., Anwar, A., Quynh, N. N., Abbas, A., & Cong, P. T. (2023). Impact of economic policy uncertainty and renewable energy on EQ: testing the LCC hypothesis for fast growing economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30109-3
Xu, Y., Li, C., & Wang, J. (2023). How does agricultural global value chain affect ecological footprint? The moderating role of environmental regulation. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2416–2427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2518
Yang, M., She, D., Abbas, S., Ai, F., & Adebayo, T. S. (2023). Environmental cost of financial development within the framework of the load capacity curve hypothesis in the BRICS economies: Do renewable energy consumption and natural resources mitigate some burden?. Geological Journal, 58(10), 3915–3927. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4817
Zaman, S., Zaman, Q., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., & Jehan, N. (2022). Interaction between agricultural production, female employment, renewable energy, and EQ: Policy directions in context of developing economies. Renewable Energy, 186, 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.131
Zhao, W. X., Samour, A., Yi, K., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). Do technological innovation, natural resources and stock market development promote environmental sustainability? Novel evidence based on the load capacity factor. Resources Policy, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103397
Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (2002). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of business & economic statistics, 20(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1198/ 073500102753410372.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sürdürülebilir Tarımsal Kalkınma , Tarım Ekonomisi (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ender Baykut ^*
0000-0002-3908-4008
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

21 Ocak 2026

Yayımlanma Tarihi

21 Ocak 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

28 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

28 Eylül 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1708492

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA27PP33MW

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Baykut, E. (2026). The Effect of Agricultural and Financial Sectors on Environmental Quality: Testing the Validity of the LCC Hypothesis in Türkiye. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 29(2), 429-445. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1708492

The Effect of Agricultural and Financial Sectors on Environmental Quality: Testing the Validity of the LCC Hypothesis in Türkiye

Abstract

Keywords

Tarım ve Finans Sektörlerinin Çevresel Kalite Üzerine Etkileri: Türkiye'de LCC Hipotezinin Geçerliliğinin Test Edilmesi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

e-ISSN: 2619-9149